• 5 Nerdy Goodies that are Geeky Gifts I’ve Designed on Zazzle
  • About Cricket Diane
  • Archives Cricket House Studios
  • CricketDiane in the Studio Working
  • CricketDiane Surface Design Products
  • Got No Money Guides by Cricketdiane
  • International concerns – Mideast
  • Ocean Paintings
  • Private Equity Purchase of Toys R Us Required Toys R Us to Pay the Full Price of Being Bought – Is that Right?

Cricketdiane's Weblog

~ CricketDiane Blog – Cricket House Studios Blog – Paintings & Writings by Cricket Diane C Phillips

Cricketdiane's Weblog

Tag Archives: anti-science congress

Trump and GOP War on Science Roaring Like a Freight Train

23 Thursday Mar 2017

Posted by CricketDiane in Activism, Air Quality, Cricket Diane C Sparky Phillips, Global Warming

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

anti-science congress, climate change, cricketdiane, Ecology, GOP, march for science, science, selling public lands, trump, trump changes, trump science changes

Some things that have recently been changed to insanity – plus a first quick note about one thing that can be done about it – something called Salons or Paris Salons where people meet and strategize to combat these inappropriate and in some cases, insane policies from the Trump administration and GOP power drunk Congress and Senate.

 

Salons first gained fame in France during the Enlightenment, with citizens gathering to engage in political conversations and arguments; they acted as a place to plan revolution and discuss philosophy. The concept has continued ever since, with the author Gertrude Stein and the former secretary of state Madeleine Albright both known to have hosted them.

from –

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/18/political-salons-us-trump-protest?CMP=share_btn_tw

**

March for Science – on twitter

April 22, 2017

From Washington, D.C. to wherever you are and around the world

March for Science Retweeted

NYAS‏ @NYASciences Mar 10

More

The Academy is proud to support @ScienceMarchDC & @ScienceMarchNY. Find the march nearest to you. #ScienceMarch

SCIENCE, NOT SILENCE

The March for Science demonstrates our passion for science and sounds a call to support and safeguard the scientific community. Recent policy changes have caused heightened worry among scientists. The incredible and immediate outpouring of support has made clear that these concerns are also shared by the support of hundreds of thousands of people around the world.

The mischaracterization of science as a partisan issue, which has given policymakers permission to reject overwhelming evidence, is a critical and urgent matter. It is time for people who support scientific research and evidence-based policies to take a public stand and be counted.

ON APRIL 22, 2017, WE WALK OUT OF THE LAB AND INTO THE STREETS.

We are people who value science and recognize how science serves. We come from all races, all religions, all gender identities, all sexual orientations, all abilities, all socioeconomic backgrounds, all political perspectives, and all nationalities. Our diversity is our greatest strength: a wealth of opinions, perspectives, and ideas is critical for the scientific process. What unites us is a love of science, and an insatiable curiosity. We all recognize that science is everywhere and affects everyone.

The March for Science is an international movement, led by organizers distributed around the globe. This movement is taking place because of the simultaneous realization by thousands of  people who value science in their lives that staying silent is no longer an option. There are marches being planned across the United States and internationally.

from – (please visit this page link below to find March for Science events near you throughout the world and across the United States April 22, 2017.)
https://www.marchforscience.com/

**

Senate repeals Obama-era workplace safety regulation http://hill.cm/ipkvI9M 

**

Federal Agencies Told to Halt External Communications

By CORAL DAVENPORT JAN. 25, 2017

WASHINGTON — Scientists and environmentalists reacted with fear this week as the Trump administration purged nearly all mention of climate change programs from the White House and State Department websites and ordered a freeze on federal grant spending at the Environmental Protection Agency and other government agencies.

{. . . }

But the White House and State Department did delete nearly all mentions of climate change policy — which had been a top priority for Mr. Obama — and have begun replacing them with pages detailing Mr. Trump’s plans to roll back those policies — a top priority for the new president.

“People can’t tell whether data is being purged or not — it’s a confused situation,” said Michael Oppenheimer, a climate scientist at Princeton University and a member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which supplies scientific reports to world governments.

Such memos or oral communications landed this week at the E.P.A. and the Departments of the Interior, Agriculture and Health and Human Services, in a broad halt to external communications while the Trump administration struggles to put political appointees into position. (. . . )

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/25/us/politics/some-agencies-told-to-halt-communications-as-trump-administration-moves-in.html?_r=0

Definitely go read the NYTimes article above. It has a lot of good info in it and balances that some of these changes are simply the result of a new administration putting in place their own agency appointee heads and to enact their own agenda

Unfortunately, the agenda in this case is anti-science and overtly so. Many people around the world have been working to save data and research from US government sites that could very well be obliterated by the Trump administration’s obtuse perspective.

Haven’t checked this fact from the above article recently, but it needs checking under the circumstances of Trump budget cuts to science, scientific research NOAA, EPA, and others announced a few days ago.

The full contents of the Obama administration’s White House and State Department websites, including working links to climate change reports, have been archived and are readily available to the public.

from

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/25/us/politics/some-agencies-told-to-halt-communications-as-trump-administration-moves-in.html?_r=0

**

US science agencies face deep cuts in Trump budget

The Environmental Protection Agency and the National Institutes of Health are big losers — but planetary science at NASA stands to gain.

  • Sara Reardon,
  • Jeff Tollefson,
  • Alexandra Witze
  • & Erin Ross
16 March 2017 Updated:

  1. 16 March 2017

Corrected:

  1. 16 March 2017

 

When it comes to science, there are few winners in US President Donald Trump’s first budget proposal. The plan, released on 16 March, calls for double-digit cuts for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). It also lays the foundation for a broad shift in the United States’ research priorities, including a retreat from environmental and climate programmes.

http://www.nature.com/news/us-science-agencies-face-deep-cuts-in-trump-budget-1.21652

**

Senate votes to block Obama coal rule

BY DEVIN HENRY – 02/02/17 03:07 PM EST

Senators voted 54-45 Thursday to kill an Obama administration coal mining rule, giving President Trump his first chance to formally take off the books an environmental rule from the previous administration.

The Congressional Review Act (CRA) challenge passed by the Senate undoes the Interior Department’s Stream Protection Rule, a regulation requiring coal firms to clean up waste from mountaintop removal mining and prevent it from going into local waterways.

http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/317616-senate-votes-to-block-obama-coal-rule

**

President Trump Signs First Congressional Review Act Disapproval Resolution in 16 Years

Thursday, February 16, 2017

On February 14, 2017, President Donald Trump signed a resolution nullifying a Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulation that required energy companies to disclose foreign payments. [. . . ]

Congress’s first CRA target was an SEC regulation that would have required energy companies to disclose payments made to foreign governments. The rule, which implemented a provision in the Dodd-Frank Act, was intended to fight perceived corruption in countries with extensive oil, gas, coal, and mineral resources.

As we noted previously, House Republicans have targeted a wide array of Obama-era financial regulations for nullification under the CRA. Furthermore,  the Trump Administration issued an executive order that establishes a framework to roll back the financial regulations imposed under the Dodd-Frank Act.

http://www.natlawreview.com/article/president-trump-signs-first-congressional-review-act-disapproval-resolution-16-years

**

Senate approves CRA resolution to nullify SEC’s foreign payments rule

WASHINGTON, DC, Feb. 3
02/03/2017
By Nick Snow
OGJ Washington Editor

Sen. Benjamin J. Cardin (D-Md.), who co-wrote with then-Sen. Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.) Section 1504 of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that created the requirement, said, “It should be lost on no one that in less than 48 hours, the Republican-controlled Senate has confirmed the former head of ExxonMobil to serve as our Secretary of State, and repealed a key anti-corruption rule that ExxonMobil and the American Petroleum Institute have erroneously fought for years.”

http://www.ogj.com/articles/2017/02/senate-approves-cra-resolution-to-nullify-sec-s-foreign-payments-rule.html

**

Also found in the Oil and Gas Journal –

OZONE LIMITS IMPLEMENTATION REFORM BILL REINTRODUCED IN US SENATE

03/20/2017
ByNick Snow

Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) has reintroduced legislation aimed at giving states and communities more time to implement 2015 ground-level ozone limits under National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The measure, S. 452, also would revise the US Environmental Protection Agency’s existing timeline for reviewing NAAQS and air-quality criteria from 5-year intervals to 10-year intervals.

http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-115/issue-3b/general-interest/ozone-limits-implementation-reform-bill-reintroduced-in-us-senate.html

&&

The coming GOP assault on regulations

Behind the scenes, the war has started over the main Senate bill to roll back the administrative state.

By MICHAEL GRUNWALD

03/10/17 05:20 AM EST

[.  . . ]

There is a flurry of anti-regulatory legislation floating around Capitol Hill, but it is becoming clear that the key Republican vehicle to rein in rulemaking will be Ohio Senator Rob Portman’s Regulatory Accountability Act. A 16-page draft of the legislation obtained by POLITICO was significantly less radical than several aggressive bills recently passed by the House of Representatives, but industry groups have pinned their hopes on this one attracting support from enough moderate Democrats to overcome a Senate filibuster and make it to Trump’s desk. And even if the Portman bill won’t automatically ensure “the deconstruction of the administrative state” promised by White House adviser Steve Bannon, it could still dramatically curtail the power of government regulators in the long run.

Portman has not yet introduced the bill, but behind the scenes in Washington it is already the subject of furious lobbying by more than 150 public interest groups that oppose it as well as more than 600 business groups that support it. It is much narrower than a bill the House passed last month with the same name, but would still revamp and insert new bureaucratic hurdles into the federal regulatory process, which the Obama Administration used to enact tough new restrictions on coal plants, Wall Street banks, for-profit colleges and other corporate entities. The Portman bill would add new obstacles for agencies to overcome before enacting economically significant rules, require them to choose the most cost-effective alternative, and give judges more discretion to block regulations when the regulated interests object.

[.. .]

The opponents acknowledge that Portman’s bill would be less explosive than the better-known REINS, which would require congressional approval for all major rules, but they say it fits perfectly with the larger Republican project of handcuffing regulators. Trump has repeatedly complained that regulations are “out of control,” vowing to eliminate 75 percent of them and “maybe more.” He has already moved to delay several major Obama rules, including a crackdown on financial advisers with conflicts of interest and a broad effort to protect wetlands, and he is expected to announce efforts to stop several others in the coming days, including Obama’s strict fuel-efficiency standards for automobiles and his climate rules for power plants.

http://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2017/03/the-coming-gop-assault-on-regulations-000351

**

And House Republican leaders and rank-and-file members are beginning to strategize on employing the Congressional Review Act to attempt to block dozens more of President Obama’s regulations. The leader of the conservative House Freedom Caucus said the group hopes 300 rules can be scrapped with that parliamentary maneuver.

The “Midnight Rules Relief Act,” H.R. 21, introduced by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), would bundle final rules under one expanded Congressional Review Act joint resolution of disapproval, allowing for the en bloc disapproval of multiple regulations that would otherwise be subject to individual review under a simple CRA.

The CRA only requires a simple majority to pass, making it an ideal vehicle for roll-back supporters.

[, , , ]

Environment, energy and health

The House passage of the “Midnight Rules Relief Act,” with the “REINS Act” likely to follow, has many environmental and public health advocates nervous.

Harold Wimmer, national president and CEO of the American Lung Association, is urging members to reject the “REINS Act,” calling it “a dangerous attack on public health protections.”

In addition to delaying or stopping meaningful oversight of tobacco products, the “REINS Act” would block critical clean air protections, he said.

“The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has a track record of cost-effectively saving lives and improving public health under the Clean Air Act. The REINS Act would block or delay critical clean air protections against deadly pollutants, as well as the pollution that causes climate change,” Wimmer said in a statement.

Andrew Rosenberg, director of the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union for Concerned Scientists, called the “REINS Act” and the “Midnight Rules Relief Act” two “egregious” attacks on science-based safeguards.

“It’s very discouraging to see this Congress, in its first week, launching this attack on science-based policies. Americans didn’t vote to have public health and environmental protections gutted,” he said. “They didn’t vote to give corporations yet another tool to nullify the laws that keep our homes, neighborhoods and workplaces safe. But that’s what these two bills would do.”

Conversely, the industry-backed American Energy Alliance supported passage of the “Midnight Rules Relief Act” and is asking members to vote in favor of the “REINS Act,” saying the measures would increase accountability and transparency in the federal regulatory process and roll back “overbearing” regulations. The group said it would consider the measure a “key vote” that would be used on a scorecard of lawmakers.

http://www.eenews.net/stories/1060047867

**

DISMANTLING OF EPA BEGINS

PRESIDENT’S EXECUTIVE ORDER WILL POTENTIALLY MAKE OCEAN POLLUTION A WHOLE LOT EASIER

FEBRUARY 28, 2017 BY JUSTIN HOUSMAN

Read more at http://www.surfer.com/environmental-news/dismantling-of-epa-begins/#TmLfvrKmXDpU9yqv.99

Back in 2015, President Obama signed into law the Water of the United States Rule, a provision that restricts pollution in streams and tributaries that flow into lakes and rivers. It took years and years of studies by both the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers to compile the data the rule is based on, which essentially boils down to this: Shit flows downhill.

To be more specific, pollution flows from small rivers to large ones, then into the ocean or lakes.

This probably shouldn’t have been a shock, but there you have it. A rule was put in place that basically codified common sense, so, naturally, businesses that make a living involving work with oil, chemicals, mining tailings, fertilizers, and other nasty pollutants near waterways immediately hated the rule. Especially Scott Pruitt—the new head of the EPA—who sued the EPA over the rule back when he was Attorney General of Oklahoma.

Pres. Trump will sign an executive order today ordering the EPA to “review” the rule, which is wonky language for “figure out how to work around it or get rid of it altogether,” and, as far as I’m concerned, Pruitt should recuse himself from any say in this since he already tried to sue the very agency he leads over the implementation of the rule.

Read more at http://www.surfer.com/environmental-news/dismantling-of-epa-begins/#TmLfvrKmXDpU9yqv.99

**

COMMODITIES | Wed Jan 11, 2017 | 1:14pm EST

Trump taps well of protest with calls for more drilling in national parks

By Annie Knox and Kim Palmer

 

President-elect Donald Trump aims to open up federal lands to more energy development, tapping into a long-running and contentious debate over how best to manage America’s remaining wilderness.

The U.S. government holds title to about 500 million acres of land across the country, including national parks and forests, wildlife refuges and tribal territories stretching from the Arctic to the Gulf of Mexico. They overlay billions of barrels of oil and vast quantities of natural gas, coal, and uranium.

[. . . ]

In December, Trump nominated U.S. Representative Ryan Zinke of Montana, who backs coal mining on federal lands, to lead the Interior Department. Officials for Zinke and Trump declined to comment.

Trump has vowed to lift the coal moratorium – imposed in 2016 as part of Obama’s broader plan to combat climate change – within 100 days of taking office.

Separately, a coalition appointed by Trump’s team to guide his Native American policy is researching proposals to ease energy development on tribal lands – including the controversial idea of transferring them to private ownership. [nL5N1DZ0OY]

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-energy-nationalparks-idUSKBN14V1EP

(from same site — )

U.S. crude stockpiles at record high as imports surge: EIA

U.S. crude oil stocks rose to a fresh record last week, the Energy Information Administration said on Wednesday, as a surge in imports and rising domestic production more than offset a hike in refinery runs.

Oil bounces off November lows, but bloated U.S. stockpiles pressure market

SINGAPORE Oil prices recovered on Thursday from losses chalked up the session before, but the market remained under pressure as bloated U.S. crude inventories and rising output dampen OPEC-led efforts to curb global production.

 

**

Congress just made it easier to sell off federal land, including national parks

  • Heather Hansman, The Guardian
  • Jan. 20, 2017, 8:00 AM

 

In the midst of highly publicized steps to dismantle insurance coverage for 32 million people and defund women’s healthcare facilities, Republican lawmakers have quietly laid the foundation to give away Americans’ birthright: 640m acres of national land.

In a single line of changes to the rules for the House of Representatives, Republicans have overwritten the value of federal lands, easing the path to disposing of federal property even if doing so loses money for the government and provides no demonstrable compensation to American citizens.

At stake are areas managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), National Forests and Federal Wildlife Refuges, which contribute to an estimated $646bn each year in economic stimulus from recreation on public lands and 6.1m jobs. Transferring these lands to the states, critics fear, could decimate those numbers by eliminating mixed-use requirements, limiting public access and turning over large portions for energy or property development.

[ . . . ]

Republican eagerness to cede federal land to local governments for possible sale, mining or development is already moving states to act. Western states, where most federal land is concentrated, are already introducing legislation that pave the way for land transfers.

In Wyoming, for example, the 2017 senate has introduced a joint resolution that would amend the state constitution to dictate how public land given to the state by the federal government after 2019 is managed. It has little public support, but Wyoming Senate President Eli Bebout said that he thought the state should be preemptively thinking about what it would do with federal land.

The Congressional devaluation of national property is the most far-reaching legislative change in a recent push to transfer federal lands to the states. Because of the Republican majority in Congress, bills proposing land transfers could now swiftly diminish Forest Service and BLM lands across the country. [JUST GO READ IT]

http://www.businessinsider.com/congress-lays-groundwork-to-get-rid-of-federal-land-and-national-parks-2017-1

**

Republicans in Congress Set Value of All Public Lands and Buildings to $0 for Easy Sell Off at Taxpayers’ Expense

by brody levesque
January 08, 2017 1:54 PM
The Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives passed a rules change this past week by a vote of 234 to 193, that would allow Congress the ability to essentially give away federal lands and buildings for free. The new rule, authored by GOP Rep. Robert Bishop of Utah, Chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, codifies that any legislation to dispose of federal land and natural resources would have a net sum zero cost to taxpayers. As the rule applies only to the House legislative rules, it is not subject to approval by the Senate or a presidential signature and is effective immediately.
[ . . . ]
Since the House is required to account for any cost associated with any legislation it considers under Congressional Budget Office accounting rules and guidelines, legislation put forward now shall skip several steps in the normal legislative process, coming up for a vote without any discussion of the costs and benefits. This means that the House does not need to render an assessment or cost analysis of estimated financial losses resulting in legislation giving away public lands or buildings.
http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/brody_levesque/republicans_in_congress_set_value_of_all_public_lands_and_buildings_to_0_for_easy_sell_off_at_taxpayers_expense
**

GOP begins public land overhaul

BY DEVIN HENRY – 02/12/17 09:00 AM EST

In the last two weeks, the House has passed several Congressional Review Act resolutions undoing Obama-administration environmental regulations, including several opposed by industry groups and land reformers.

One of those resolutions ends a Bureau of Land Management rule restricting venting and flaring at natural gas drilling sites on public land. The rule would limit methane pollution, but industry groups say it would be duplicative, unnecessary and costly.

[… ]

Activists pushing their allies to hold the line against the GOP are working to kick up grassroots opposition to public land changes, an effort that they say has had at least some success so far.

Conservationists blistered a House rule change in January that makes it easier for the government to shed its public land holdings. And, earlier this month, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) was forced to rescind a bill to sell off millions of acres of federally owned land after a backlash from sportsmen’s groups.

http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/319017-gop-begins-public-land-overhaul

 

**

DEC. 9, 2016, 11:37 A.M.

REPORTING FROM WASHINGTON

Trump said to pick drilling advocate Cathy McMorris Rodgers for Interior

 

Donald Trump has chosen Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.), a member of the GOP congressional leadership and a strident advocate for increased oil and gas drilling on federal lands, to head the Interior Department, according to multiple news reports.

McMorris Rodgers, the highest ranking Republican woman in the House of Representatives, would take the helm of a 70,000-person agency that manages hundreds of millions of acres of federal lands, including the National Parks system. She would be charged with implementing Trump’s plan to aggressively roll back many of the environmental restrictions the Obama administration has placed on federal lands, which the president-elect wants to open up for substantially more drilling and mining.

[ . . . ]

“Selling off our public lands to the highest bidder and opening them to drilling, mining and logging is not in the best interest of our country,” said a statement from Sierra Club executive director Michael Brune, “but that is exactly what Rep. McMorris Rodgers has voted to do over and over again.”

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/trailguide/la-na-trailguide-updates-trump-said-to-pick-mcmorriss-rodgers-1481305993-htmlstory.html

**

ENVIRONMENT

4 Major Environmental Rules That the GOP Congress Is Overturning in Massive Gift to Polluters

Congress is considering eliminative more than 40 Obama administration environment and energy-related rules.
By Matt Lee-Ashley, Jenny Rowland / Center for American Progress

 

In the 24 days since President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the Republican-controlled Congress has already moved to overturn four major rules that the oil, gas, and coal industries spent millions of dollars fighting during the Obama administration. First, Congress eliminated the Stream Protection Rule, which would prevent toxic mine waste from being dumped in streams. Then Congress voted to get rid of a rule that limited bribery and corruption in oil operations around the world. And in the coming days, the U.S. Senate is scheduled to vote to overturn a rule that limits methane pollution when oil and gas companies drill on public lands and to eliminate a rule that increases public input in public lands management decisions.

Of the more than 40 Obama administration environment and energy-related rules that anti-environment advocates have identified for Congress to consider for elimination under the Congressional Review Act, or CRA, why have Republican leaders in Congress chosen these four as their first targets?

Which environmental rules is Congress scrapping—and why?We examined each of the four CRA resolutions that have received votes by at least one chamber in this new Congress to better understand special interests’ role in pushing for their repeal. Below is a summary of our findings:

(check the article for detailed explanation of each)

http://www.alternet.org/environment/4-major-environmental-rules-gop-congress-overturning-massive-gift-polluters

**

Rogue Scientists Race to Save Climate Data from Trump

AT 10 AM the Saturday before inauguration day, on the sixth floor of the Van Pelt Library at the University of Pennsylvania, roughly 60 hackers, scientists, archivists, and librarians were hunched over laptops, drawing flow charts on whiteboards, and shouting opinions on computer scripts across the room. They had hundreds of government web pages and data sets to get through before the end of the day—all strategically chosen from the pages of the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration—any of which, they felt, might be deleted, altered, or removed from the public domain by the incoming Trump administration.

Their undertaking, at the time, was purely speculative, based on travails of Canadian government scientists under the Stephen Harper administration, which muzzled them from speaking about climate change. Researchers watched as Harper officials threw thousands of books of aquatic data into dumpsters as federal environmental research libraries closed.

But three days later, speculation became reality as news broke that the incoming Trump administration’s EPA transition team does indeed intend to remove some climate data from the agency’s website. That will include references to President Barack Obama’s June 2013 Climate Action Plan and the strategies for 2014 and 2015 to cut methane, according to an unnamed source who spoke with Inside EPA. [ . . .]

https://www.wired.com/2017/01/rogue-scientists-race-save-climate-data-trump/

(Yeah, go read this one too – seriously important)

**

Scientists are frantically copying U.S. climate data, fearing it might vanish under Trump

 By Brady Dennis December 13, 2016

Alarmed that decades of crucial climate measurements could vanish under a hostile Trump administration, scientists have begun a feverish attempt to copy reams of government data onto independent servers in hopes of safeguarding it from any political interference.

The efforts include a “guerrilla archiving” event in Toronto, where experts will copy irreplaceable public data, meetings at the University of Pennsylvania focused on how to download as much federal data as possible in the coming weeks, and a collaboration of scientists and database experts who are compiling an online site to harbor scientific information.

[ . . . ]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/12/13/scientists-are-frantically-copying-u-s-climate-data-fearing-it-might-vanish-under-trump/?utm_term=.abd60cf65425
**

A REPORTER AT LARGE

MARCH 27, 2017 ISSUE

THE RECLUSIVE HEDGE-FUND TYCOON BEHIND THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY

How Robert Mercer exploited America’s populist insurgency.

By Jane Mayer

[ . . . ]

Magerman told the Wall Street Journal that Mercer’s political opinions “show contempt for the social safety net that he doesn’t need, but many Americans do.” He also said that Mercer wants the U.S. government to be “shrunk down to the size of a pinhead.” Several former colleagues of Mercer’s said that his views are akin to Objectivism, the philosophy of Ayn Rand. Magerman told me, “Bob believes that human beings have no inherent value other than how much money they make. A cat has value, he’s said, because it provides pleasure to humans. But if someone is on welfare they have negative value. If he earns a thousand times more than a schoolteacher, then he’s a thousand times more valuable.” Magerman added, “He thinks society is upside down—that government helps the weak people get strong, and makes the strong people weak by taking their money away, through taxes.” He said that this mind-set was typical of “instant billionaires” in finance, who “have no stake in society,” unlike the industrialists of the past, who “built real things.”

Another former high-level Renaissance employee said, “Bob thinks the less government the better. He’s happy if people don’t trust the government. And if the President’s a bozo? He’s fine with that. He wants it to all fall down.”

[ . . . ]

Press accounts speculated that Robert Mercer may have targeted DeFazio because DeFazio had proposed a tax on a type of high-volume stock trade that Renaissance frequently made. But several associates of Mercer’s say that the truth is stranger. DeFazio’s Republican opponent was Arthur Robinson—the biochemist, sheep rancher, and climate-change denialist. The Mercers became his devoted supporters after reading Access to Energy, an offbeat scientific newsletter that he writes. The family has given at least $1.6 million in donations to Robinson’s Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine. Some of the money was used to buy freezers in which Robinson is storing some fourteen thousand samples of human urine. Robinson has said that, by studying the urine, he will find new ways of extending the human life span.

Robinson holds a degree in chemistry from Caltech, but his work is not respected in most scientific circles. (The Oregon senator Jeff Merkley, a Democrat, has called Robinson an “extremist kook.”) Robinson appears to be the source of Robert Mercer’s sanguine view of nuclear radiation: in 1986, Robinson co-authored a book suggesting that the vast majority of Americans would survive “an all-out atomic attack on the United States.” Robinson’s institute dismisses climate change as a “false religion.” A petition that he organized in 1998 to oppose the Kyoto Protocol, claiming to represent thirty thousand scientists skeptical of global warming, has been criticized as deceptive. The National Academy of Sciences has warned that the petition never appeared in a peer-reviewed journal, though it is printed in “a format that is nearly identical to that of scientific articles.” The petition, however, still circulates online: in the past year, it was the most shared item about climate change on Facebook.

[ . . . ]

By 2011, the Mercers had joined forces with Charles and David Koch, who own Koch Industries, and who have run a powerful political machine for decades. The Mercers attended the Kochs’ semiannual seminars, which provide a structure for right-wing millionaires looking for effective ways to channel their cash. The Mercers admired the savviness of the Kochs’ plan, which called for attendees to pool their contributions in a fund run by Koch operatives. The fund would strategically deploy the money in races across the country, although, at the time, the Kochs’ chief aim was to defeat Barack Obama in 2012. The Kochs will not reveal the identities of their donors, or the size of contributions, but the Mercers reportedly began giving at least a million dollars a year to the Kochs’ fund. Eventually, they contributed more than twenty-five million.

[ . . . ]

The Mercers’ investment in Breitbart enabled Bannon to promote anti-establishment politicians whom the mainstream media dismissed, including Trump. In 2011, David Bossie, the head of the conservative group Citizens United, introduced Trump to Bannon; at the time, Trump was thinking about running against Obama. Bannon and Trump met at Trump Tower and discussed a possible campaign.

[ . . . [

David Magerman, in his essay for the Inquirer, notes that Mercer “has surrounded our President with his people, and his people have an outsized influence over the running of our country, simply because Robert Mercer paid for their seats.” He writes, “Everyone has a right to express their views.” But, he adds, “when the government becomes more like a corporation, with the richest 0.001% buying shares and demanding board seats, then we cease to be a representative democracy.” Instead, he warns, “we become an oligarchy.”

(You’ve just got to go read the whole thing – )
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/27/the-reclusive-hedge-fund-tycoon-behind-the-trump-presidency
**
GOING ROGUE

These heroic guerrilla scientists and librarians are racing to save environmental data from Trump

WRITTEN BY

Jerome WhitingtonVisiting assistant professor of anthropology, NYU

Already, some of our fears are being realized. On Monday, federal staff leaked news that the EPA had frozen its grant funding program, while USDA scientists have had their research funds frozen and were initially told to stop speaking to the media (although that order has since been rescinded.) Meanwhile, the EPA has reportedly been instructed to remove the climate change page from its website.

The Environmental Data and Governance Initiative (EDGI) has formed as an organized response to the Trump administration’s plan to undermine federal environmental science resources. Because access to and control over data is a key piece of effective regulation, we have taken action to systematically archive valuable environmental datasets, create usable nongovernmental data access, and preserve records of wide-ranging, ephemeral, web-based policy and program information. This monitoring and tracking work has also created an opportunity for providing rapid analysis of environmental regulation during the transition.

Trump has also hand-picked a wide range of extremists when it comes to environmental policy, from climate-change-denier Scott Pruitt, his nominee to head the EPA, to ex-Koch Industries lobbyist Thomas Pyle, who is the transition leader for the Energy Department transition. These are not just pro-business conservatives trying to keep environmental costs down. These are hardcore anti-environment appointees, many of whom have strong records of anti-science denial and obstructionism. This, coupled with indications that the administration will be working rapidly to roll back federal environmental policy, points toward a wholesale attack on environmental governance, with federal environmental science a key target.

This is where EDGI comes in. Formed as a decentralized team of about fifty social scientists and researchers immediately after the election, EDGI has focused on these two primary goals: documenting and analyzing the transition, and publicly archiving federally maintained data.

(etc.)

https://qz.com/894428/trumps-war-on-science-guerrilla-scientists-and-librarians-are-archiving-environmental-and-climate-change-data-before-trump-erases-it/

((

 

 

Share this:

  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • More
  • Print
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

Blogroll

  • CricketD's Got No Money Guide Series by CricketDiane
  • Got No Money Guides by Cricket Diane C Phillips on wordpress
  • New Visual and Adaptive Living Tools Blog
  • WordPress.org
  • www.patents.com

Cricketdiane Stuff Found Here

  • A Adaptive Living Tools Store
  • A CricketDiane Cricket House Studios Store
  • A CricketDiane's Men's Ugly Ties
  • A Custom Design Palette Store
  • A Extreme Designs
  • AA – New CricketDiane Website
  • Cricket Diane C Phillips Creating Art – CricketHouseStudios
  • Cricket Diane’s Ocean Paintings and Art Cards 2007
  • CricketD's Got No Money Guide Series by CricketDiane
  • CricketDiane at Twitter
  • CricketDiane Got No Money Guide Series
  • CricketDiane New York City Walkabout Nifty Stuff
  • CricketDiane on Facebook
  • CricketDiane on Pinterest
  • Cricketdianes deviantart gallery
  • New Visual and Adaptive Living Tools Blog
  • New York City Cricket Guide
  • New York City Outsiders Guide by CricketDiane
  • New York Walkabout
  • The America the Beautiful Show blog by CricketDiane
  • The America the Beautiful Show Channel at YouTube
  • YouTube CricketDiane, Cricket House Studios – Videos

Top Posts

  • More unbelievably stupid uses of taxpayers' money which protect the interests and profits for a few while standing on the backs of the many to do it
  • Strange Conspiracy in a Land of Freedom, Honor and Integrity 4 - Washington and what human rights and civil rights are? Have our leaders ever had integrity, decency and honor?
  • Solutions - Ways to remove heavy metals / pollutants from water and soil, a new light bulb, materials science conferences - First International Conference on Materials for Energy July 4 - 8 , 2010 looking for participants, places to find science and chemistry - aeronautics jobs / employment opportunities and other great nifty science stuff and places to find things / information / resources / opportunities -
  • Mining Oil - Mining - Gushing Oil in the Gulf of Mexico - Facts and Fantasy - The Fact is it exploded into fire - The fantasy is that doesn't mean anything and its safe -
  • Phillips Family History
  • 13,000 psi oil well pressure - Deepwater Horizon disaster and the 1990 Oil Act gave oil companies authority and rights to the entire Gulf of Mexico and Gulf Coast superceding elected officials and federal agencies
  • Muck and Mire in the Gulf of Mexico - Petroleum Offshore Exploration pay out of death and destruction - go buy a car with 40 mpg and support a turtle from being in the next oil spi
  • Oil Spill now called hydrocarbons instead of petroleum or crude oil in the Gulf of Mexico - okay - but they still should've stuck the booms around the oil and corraled the hydrocarbons out in the Gulf and sucked the "hydrocarbons" petroleum crude oil into a tanker before it spread
  • What are they doing? - this is a national emergency with the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico - not a Sunday outing

New Cricket House Studios – cricketdiane stuff

  • Corruption of President’s Actions Affects US and the International Community -Ukraine Transcript IS Proof
  • DNI Maguire Broke The Law For His Own Fealty To The President – Arrest Him Like Any Of The Rest Of Us Would Be
  • “Moscow Mitch” Soybeans and Aluminum
  • US Congress Party Control 1965 – 2019
  • Nifty New Products and an Amazing Rainbow Tie I Forgot That I Created – Cool
  • And another thing
  • Hurricane Florence in Real Time Live Streaming Cams Plus Helpful Info
  • Hurricane Update Sites – Hurricane Florence
  • Customizing Rainbow Pop Art Wall Decal Design Makes Amazing New Choices
  • Interesting Independent Designer Products You Can Buy Online
  • Elsewhere
  • Ocean Beach Posters for Beach Decor by CricketDiane and Cricket House Studios
  • Little Donnie Dare Trump limericks for the Resistance – SecondCivilWarLetters 4th of July 2018
  • Why the rights of citizens are in jeopardy in the United States right now
  • Introducing the Little Shop Out Back Preview for Studios of CricketDiane Art and New Ocean Paintings

Cricket Diane

  • 5 Nerdy Goodies that are Geeky Gifts I’ve Designed on Zazzle
  • About Cricket Diane
  • Archives Cricket House Studios
  • CricketDiane in the Studio Working
  • CricketDiane Surface Design Products
  • Got No Money Guides by Cricketdiane
  • International concerns – Mideast
  • Ocean Paintings
  • Private Equity Purchase of Toys R Us Required Toys R Us to Pay the Full Price of Being Bought – Is that Right?

Archives

  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • June 2019
  • December 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • September 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2006

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: