Leveraged buyouts using junk bonds, club deals, junk commercial paper like the current Roche deal apparently cause a recognized risk to the system – and other financial tidbits from the US government in action

Private equity firms have increasingly joined together to acquire target companies (called “club deals”). In 2007, there were 28 club deals, totaling about $217 billion in value.

Club deals could reduce or increase the number of firms bidding on a target company and, thus, affect competition. In analyzing 325 public-to-private LBOs done from 1998 through 2007, GAO generally found no statistical indication that club deals, in aggregate, were associated with lower or higher prices paid for the target companies, after controlling for differences in the targets.

However, our results do not rule out the possibility of parties engaging in illegal behavior in any particular LBO. Indeed, according to securities filings and media reports, some large club deals have led to lawsuits and an inquiry into the practice by the Department of Justice.

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08885.pdf

Private Equity: Recent Growth in Leveraged Buyouts Exposed Risks That Warrant Continued Attention
GAO-08-885 September 9, 2008
Highlights Page (PDF)   Full Report (PDF, 133 pages)   Accessible Text   Recommendations (HTML)

Summary

The increase in leveraged buyouts (LBO) of U.S. companies by private equity funds prior to the slowdown in mid-2007 has raised questions about the potential impact of these deals. Some praise LBOs for creating new governance structures for companies and providing longer term investment opportunities for investors. Others criticize LBOs for causing job losses and burdening companies with too much debt. This report addresses the (1) effect of recent private equity LBOs on acquired companies and employment, (2) impact of LBOs jointly undertaken by two or more private equity funds on competition, (3) Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) oversight of private equity funds and their advisers, and (4) regulatory oversight of commercial and investment banks that have financed recent LBOs. GAO reviewed academic research, analyzed recent LBO data, conducted case studies, reviewed regulators’ policy documents and examinations, and interviewed regulatory and industry officials, and academics.

Academic research that GAO reviewed generally suggests that recent private equity LBOs have had a positive impact on the financial performance of the acquired companies, but determining whether the impact resulted from the actions taken by the private equity firms versus other factors is difficult. The research also indicates that private equity LBOs are associated with lower employment growth than comparable companies. However, uncertainty remains about the employment effect–in part because, as one study found, target companies had lower employment growth before being acquired. Further research may shed light on the causal relationship between private equity and employment growth, if any. Private equity firms have increasingly joined together to acquire target companies (called “club deals”). In 2007, there were 28 club deals, totaling about $217 billion in value. Club deals could reduce or increase the number of firms bidding on a target company and, thus, affect competition. In analyzing 325 public-to-private LBOs done from 1998 through 2007, GAO generally found no statistical indication that club deals, in aggregate, were associated with lower or higher prices paid for the target companies, after controlling for differences in the targets. However, our results do not rule out the possibility of parties engaging in illegal behavior in any particular LBO. Indeed, according to securities filings and media reports, some large club deals have led to lawsuits and an inquiry into the practice by the Department of Justice. Because private equity funds and their advisers typically claim an exemption from registration as an investment company or investment adviser, respectively, SEC exercises limited oversight of these entities. However, in examining some registered advisers to private equity funds, SEC has found some control weaknesses but generally has not found such funds to pose significant concerns for fund investors. The growth in LBOs has led to greater regulatory scrutiny. SEC, along with other regulators, has identified conflicts of interest arising in LBOs as a potential concern and is analyzing the issue. Before 2007, federal financial regulators generally found that the major institutions that financed LBOs were managing the associated risks. However, after problems with subprime mortgages spilled over to other markets in mid-2007, the institutions were being exposed to greater-than-expected risk. As a result, the regulators reassessed the institutions’ risk-management practices and identified some weaknesses. The regulators are monitoring efforts being taken to address weaknesses and considering the need to issue related guidance. While the institutions have taken steps to decrease their risk exposures, the spillover effects from the subprime mortgage problems to leveraged loans illustrate the importance of understanding and monitoring conditions in the broader markets, including connections between them. Failure to do so could limit the effectiveness and ability of regulators to address issues when they occur.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from “In process” to “Implemented” or “Not implemented” based on our follow up work.
Director:
Team:
Phone:
Orice M. Williams
Government Accountability Office: Financial Markets and Community Investment
(202) 512-5837

Recommendations for Executive Action

Recommendation: Given that the financial markets are increasingly interconnected and in light of the risks that have been highlighted by the financial market turmoil of the last year, the heads of the Federal Reserve, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and SEC should give increased attention to ensuring that their oversight of leveraged lending at their regulated institutions takes into consideration systemic risk implications raised by changes in the broader financial markets, as a whole.

Agency Affected: Department of the Treasury: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

Status: In process

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Agency Affected: Federal Reserve System

Status: In process

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Agency Affected: Securities and Exchange Commission

Status: In process

Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-885

Office of Risk Assessment

The Office of Risk Assessment (ORA) is responsible for coordinating the SEC’s risk management program. ORA was formed in 2004 to help the SEC anticipate, identify, and manage risks, focusing on early identification of new or resurgent forms of fraud and illegal or questionable activities. ORA focuses on risk issues across the corporate and financial sector, including issues relevant to corporate disclosure, market operation, sales practices, new product innovation, and many other activities of financial market participants.

ORA’s responsibilities can be grouped into three general categories:

1. Information Analysis. A key component of ORA’s activities is to analyze data on new industry trends and risks from a variety of sources, such as external experts, domestic and foreign agencies, industry and financial services, empirical data and other market data.

2. Managing the agency’s risk assessment process. ORA develops and maintains the overall process for risk assessment throughout the SEC, such as defining relevant risk frameworks and common risk language.

3. Serving as the agency’s risk management resource. ORA serves as a resource for each division and office in their risk assessment efforts, working closely with them as they work to identify, prioritize and mitigate risks.

Contact Information:

The Office of Risk Assessment welcomes dialogue with market participants. If you have particular concerns about emerging or resurging risks you would like to share with our office, you can reach us directly by telephone at (202) 551-4363, by email at ORA@SEC.GOV, or by mail at the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Attn: Office of Risk Assessment, 100 F St. NE, Washington, D.C. 20549.

http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ora.htm

***
SEC Seal         Home | Jobs | Fast Answers | Site Map | Search

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

About the SEC

Filings & Forms

Regulatory Actions

Staff Interps

Investor Info

News & Statements

Litigation

Information for…

Divisions

Corporation Finance
Enforcement
Investment Mgmt.
Trading and Markets

Division of Investment Management

The Division of Investment Management regulates investment companies (such as mutual funds, closed-end funds, UITs, ETFs, and interval funds), including variable insurance products, and federally registered investment advisers.

Laws and Rules
*       Investment Company Act of 1940

*       Investment Company Act Rules

*       Investment Advisers Act of 1940

*       Investment Advisers Act Rules

Staff Guidance and Studies
*      September 26, 2008 Responses to Frequently Asked Questions about The Reserve Fund and Money Market Funds

*      Registered Investment Company Use of Senior Securities — Select Bibliography

*       August 21, 2007 Letter to Investment Company Institute re: Funds Use of Rule 22c-2 Information for Marketing Purposes

*       June 28, 2007 Letter to Fidelity Investments, Massachusetts Financial Services Company and OppenheimerFunds, Inc. re: Implementation of FASB Interpretation No. 48

*       Staff Responses to Questions Regarding Disclosure of Fund of Funds Expenses

*       December 22, 2006 Letter to ICI re: Implementation of FASB Interpretation No. 48

*       December 14, 2006 Letter to Babson Capital Management LLC re: Interpretive Guidance on Exchange Act Rule 16b-3

*       Staff Letters Regarding Auditing Standards for Financial Statements of Insurance Company Depositors of Variable Insurance Products

*       Staff Responses to Questions About Amended Custody Rule

*       October 17, 2003 Letter to the ICI re: Disclosure by Funds Investing in Government Sponsored Enterprises

*       Implications of the Growth of Hedge Funds

*       Protecting Investors: A Half Century of Investment Company Regulation (May 1992)

*       Questions and Answers Regarding the Mutual Fund Customer Identification Program Rule

*       2001 Mutual Fund Fee Report

*       Staff Legal Bulletins

more…

Miscellaneous Investor Information
*       Variable Annuities: What You Should Know

*       Invest Wisely: An Introduction to Mutual Funds

*       Investment Advisers: What You Need to Know Before Choosing One

*       Information on Investment Clubs

*       Mutual Fund Investing: Look at More than a Mutual Funds Past Performance

*       Mutual Fund Cost Calculator

Anti-Money Laundering Rulemaking

Report Issued on Improving Financial Privacy Notices for Consumers     0     Contact Us Effectiveness Notices
Investment Company Regulation
Investment Company Registration and Regulation Package

Mutual Fund Registration Form (Form N-1a) and Instructions

Investment Adviser Regulation
Information for Newly-Registered Investment Advisers

IARD: Electronic Filing for Advisers

Compliance Information

IAPD: Investment Adviser Public Disclosure Website (Background Information)
Investment Adviser Forms

Investment Company Act Notices and Orders Investment Company Act Deregistration Notices and Orders Investment Advisers Act Notices and Orders Investment Management Staff
No-Action and Interpretive Letters Treasury’s Temporary Guarantee Program for Money Market Funds
Form 13F
*       Frequently Asked Questions About Form 13F

*       Official List of Section 13(f) Securities

GETS Cards
Roundtables
*       Rule 12b-1

*       Interactive Data

*       Hedge Funds

*       Role of Independent Investment Company Directors

*       Investment Adviser Regulatory Issues (May 2000)

Annual Industry Comment Letters
*       February 2001 Letter to Investment Company CFOs

*       December 1999 Letter to Investment Company CFOs

*       December 1998 Letter to Investment Company CFOs

Applications of Enron Corp. for Exemptions Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935

Contact | Employment | Links | FOIA | Forms | Privacy Policy
Modified: 09/30/2008

http://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment.shtml

***

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08885.pdf

Private equity firms have increasingly joined together to acquire target companies (called “club deals”). In 2007, there were 28 club deals, totaling about $217 billion in value. Club deals could reduce or increase the number of firms bidding on a target company and, thus, affect competition. In analyzing 325 public-to-private LBOs done from 1998 through 2007, GAO generally found no statistical indication that club deals, in aggregate, were associated with lower or higher prices paid for the target companies, after controlling for differences in the targets. However, our results do not rule out the possibility of parties engaging in illegal behavior in any particular LBO. Indeed, according to securities filings and media reports, some large club deals have led to lawsuits and an inquiry into the practice by the Department of Justice.

***

***
Risk-Based Capital: New Basel II Rules Reduced Certain Competitive Concerns, but Bank Regulators Should Address Remaining Uncertainties
GAO-08-953 September 12, 2008
Highlights Page (PDF)   Full Report (PDF, 74 pages)   Accessible Text   Recommendations (HTML)

Summary

Basel II, the new risk-based capital framework based on an international accord, is being adopted by individual countries. It includes standardized and advanced approaches to estimating capital requirements. In the United States, bank regulators have finalized an advanced approaches rule that will be required for some of the largest, most internationally active banks (core banks) and proposed an optional standardized approach rule for non-core banks that will also have the option to remain on existing capital rules. In light of possible competitive effects of the capital rules, GAO was asked to examine (1) the markets in which banks compete, (2) how new capital rules address U.S. banks’ competitive concerns, and (3) actions regulators are taking to address competitive and other potential negative effects during implementation. Among other things, GAO analyzed data on bank products and services and the final and proposed capital rules; interviewed U.S. and foreign bank regulators, officials from U.S. and foreign banks; and computed capital requirements under varying capital rules.

http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-953

Large and internationally active U.S.-based banks (core banks) that will adopt the Basel II advanced approaches compete among themselves and in some markets with U.S.-based non-core banks, investment firms, and foreign-based banks. Non-core banks compete with core banks in retail markets, but in wholesale markets core banks often compete with investment firms and foreign-based banks. Because holding capital is costly for banks, differences in regulatory capital requirements could influence costs, prices, and profitability for banks competing under different capital requirements. The new U.S. capital rules addressed some earlier competitive concerns of banks; however, other concerns remain. By better aligning the advanced approaches rule with the international accord and proposing an optional standardized approach rule, U.S. regulators reduced some competitive concerns for both core and non-core banks. For example, the U.S. wholesale definition of default for the advanced approaches is now similar to the accord’s. Core banks continue to be concerned about the leverage requirement (a simple capital to assets calculation), which they believe places them at a competitive disadvantage relative to firms not subject to a similar requirement. Foreign regulators have been working with U.S. regulators to coordinate Basel II implementation for U.S. banks with foreign operations. The proposed standardized approach addresses some concerns non-core banks raised by providing a more risk sensitive approach to calculating regulatory requirements. But other factors likely will reduce differences in capital for banks competing in the United States; for example, the leverage requirement establishes a floor that may exceed the capital required under the advanced and standardized approaches. Many factors have affected the pace of Basel II implementation in the United States and, while the gradual implementation is allowing regulators to consider changes in the rules and reassess banks’ risk-management systems, regulators have not yet taken action to address areas of uncertainty that could have competitive implications. For example, the final rule provides regulators with considerable flexibility and leaves open questions such as which banks may be exempted from the advanced approaches. Although the rule provides that core banks can apply for exemptions and regulators should consider these in light of some broad categories, such as asset size or portfolio mix, the rule does not further define the criteria for exemptions. Some industry participants we spoke with said that uncertainties about the implementation of the advanced approaches have been a problem for them. Moreover, regulators have not fully developed plans for a required study of the impacts of Basel II before full implementation. Lack of specificity in criteria, scope, methodology, and timing will affect the quality and extent of information that regulators will have to help assess competitive and other impacts, determine whether there are any material deficiencies requiring future changes in the rules, and determine whether to permit core banks to fully implement Basel II.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from “In process” to “Implemented” or “Not implemented” based on our follow up work.
Director:
Team:
Phone:
Orice M. Williams
Government Accountability Office: Financial Markets and Community Investment
(202) 512-5837

Recommendations for Executive Action

Recommendation: To further limit any potential negative effects, where possible, the heads of the FDIC, Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) should move to minimize the uncertainty surrounding certain aspects of Basel II. Specifically, regulators should clarify how they will use certain regulatory flexibility under the advanced approaches rule, particularly with regard to how they will exercise exemptions for core banks from the advanced approaches requirement and the extent to which core banks will be allowed to adopt the standardized approach.

Agency Affected: Department of the Treasury: Office of Thrift Supervision

Status: In process

http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-953

***

Since its creation, the CDFI Fund has awarded $864 million to community development organizations and financial institutions; it has awarded allocations of New Markets Tax Credits which will attract private-sector investments totaling $16 billion, including $1 billion of special allocation authority to be used for the recovery and redevelopment of the Gulf Opportunity Zone.

Search CDFI Fund Award Database

Last updated/reviewed: 5/2/2007

http://www.cdfifund.gov/who_we_are/about_us.asp

***

OFFICE OF FEDERAL HOUSING ENTERPRISE OVERSIGHT

SALARIES AND EXPENSES

For carrying out the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, including not to exceed $500 for official reception and representation expenses, $27,000,000, to remain available until expended, to be derived from the Federal Housing Enterprises Oversight Fund: Provided, That not to exceed such amount shall be available from the general fund of the Treasury to the extent necessary to incur obligations and make expenditures pending the receipt of collections to the Fund: Provided further, That the general fund amount shall be reduced as collections are received during the fiscal year so as to result in a final appropriation from the general fund estimated at not more than $0: Provided further, That this Office shall submit a staffing plan to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations no later than January 30, 2002.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/T?&report=hr272&dbname=107&

***

For necessary administrative and non-administrative expenses of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, not otherwise provided for, including not to exceed $25,000 for official reception and representation expenses, $1,097,292,000

[ and from the same document - ]

FEDERAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATION

MUTUAL MORTGAGE INSURANCE PROGRAM ACCOUNT

During fiscal year 2002, commitments to guarantee loans to carry out the purposes of section 203(b) of the National Housing Act, as amended, shall not exceed a loan principal of $160,000,000,000.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/T?&report=hr272&dbname=107&

***

Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs

The Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs is responsible for proactively anticipating the legislative policy goals of the Commission and working to facilitate those goals with Members of Congress and staff. The staff carefully monitors ongoing legislative activities and initiatives on Capitol Hill that affect the Commission and its mission.

The staff is responsible for developing legislative strategy, coordinating testimony of SEC officials, and responding to Congressional requests for documents, technical assistance, and other information.

In addition OLIA staff monitor any hearings that pertain to the securities markets and the protection of investors even when an SEC witness is not present. OLIA also acts as liaison for the Commission with other federal agencies and state governments.

http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/olia.htm

***

The Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) under the Department of Defense (DOD) Comptroller plays a critical role in contractor oversight by providing auditing, accounting, and financial advisory services in connection with DOD and other federal agency contracts and subcontracts.

For example, contractor officials and the DOD contracting community improperly influenced the audit scope, conclusions, and opinions of three audits–a serious independence issue.

At two DCAA locations, GAO found evidence that (1) working papers did not support reported opinions, (2) DCAA supervisors dropped findings and changed audit opinions without adequate evidence for their changes, and (3) sufficient audit work was not performed to support audit opinions and conclusions.

GAO also substantiated allegations of inadequate supervision of certain audits at a third DCAA location. Throughout GAO’s investigation, auditors at each of the three DCAA locations told us that the limited number of hours approved for their audits directly affected the sufficiency of audit testing.

Moreover, during GAO’s investigation, DCAA managers took actions against staff at two locations, attempting to intimidate auditors, prevent them from speaking with investigators, and creating a generally abusive work environment.

DCAA Audits: Allegations That Certain Audits at Three Locations Did Not Meet Professional Standards Were Substantiated
GAO-08-857 July 22, 2008

http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-857

***


State and Local Governments: Growing Fiscal Challenges Will Emerge during the Next 10 Years
GAO-08-317 January 22, 2008

Our model shows that in less than a decade the state and local government sector will begin to face growing fiscal challenges. Both fiscal balance measures (1) net lending or borrowing and (2) the operating balance–are likely to remain within their historical ranges in the next few years, but both begin to decline thereafter and fall below their historical ranges within a decade. That is, absent policy changes, state and local governments will face an increasing gap between receipts and expenditures in the coming years.

http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-317

***

Financial Regulation: A Framework for Crafting and Assessing Proposals to Modernize the Outdated U.S. Financial Regulatory System
GAO-09-216 January 8, 2009

Several key changes in financial markets and products in recent decades have highlighted significant limitations and gaps in the existing regulatory system. First, regulators have struggled, and often failed, to mitigate the systemic risks posed by large and interconnected financial conglomerates and to ensure they adequately manage their risks. The portion of firms operating as conglomerates that cross financial sectors of banking, securities, and insurance increased significantly in recent years, but none of the regulators is tasked with assessing the risks posed across the entire financial system. Second, regulators have had to address problems in financial markets resulting from the activities of large and sometimes less-regulated market participants–such as nonbank mortgage lenders, hedge funds, and credit rating agencies–some of which play significant roles in today’s financial markets. Third, the increasing prevalence of new and more complex investment products has challenged regulators and investors, and consumers have faced difficulty understanding new and increasingly complex retail mortgage and credit products. Regulators failed to adequately oversee the sale of mortgage products that posed risks to consumers and the stability of the financial system. Fourth, standard setters for accounting and financial regulators have faced growing challenges in ensuring that accounting and audit standards appropriately respond to financial market developments, and in addressing challenges arising from the global convergence of accounting and auditing standards. ? Finally, despite the increasingly global aspects of financial markets, the current fragmented U.S. regulatory structure has complicated some efforts to coordinate internationally with other regulators.

http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-216

***

http://www.sec.gov/divisions.shtml

SEC Divisions Homepages
Corporation Finance Enforcement

Investment Management Trading and Markets

SEC Offices Homepages
Office of Administrative Law Judges

Office of Administrative Services

Office of the Chief Accountant

Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations

Office of Economic Analysis

Office of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)

Office of the Executive Director

Office of Financial Management

Office of the General Counsel

Office of Human Resources

Office of Information Technology

Office of Inspector General

Office of Interactive Disclosure

Office of International Affairs

Office of Investor Education and Advocacy

Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs

Office of Public Affairs

Office of Risk Assessment

Office of the Secretary

SEC Task Force Homepages
21st Century Disclosure Initiative

SEC Organization Chart (text version also available)

For detailed descriptions of SEC offices and divisions, please read The Investor’s Advocate.

Contact | Employment | Links | FOIA | Forms | Privacy Policy
Modified: 12/17/2008

http://www.sec.gov/divisions.shtml

***

Federal grant-making agencies awarded approximately $496 billion in grants during fiscal year 2007.

http://www.gao.gov/transition_2009/opportunities/financial_management/fully-implementing-the-grants-management-line-of-business-across-government.php

*Grants.gov has selected the CCR (Central Contractor Registry) as the system in which all new recipients must register. Grants.gov is the centralized federal site where applicants can find and apply for new grant opportunities. If you would like more information, visit the CCR link on the www.grants.gov/GetStarted  site.

http://www.dpm.psc.gov/news_events/duns_entry_on_payment_request_screen.aspx?

Introduction To DPM

DPM’s mission is to provide world class grant-type payments, cash management, and grant accounting support services to HHS and other Federal departments and agencies utilizing the Payment Management System (PMS). In fiscal year 2006, DPM paid $315 billion of all Federal civilian grants. DPM is the acknowledged expert in the disbursement, accounting for, and management of Federal grant-type funds. DPM has over 30 years of experience providing convenient, cost effective, and efficient grant-type payment, cash management and grant accounting services.

http://www.dpm.psc.gov/about_us/about_us.aspx?explorer.event=true

About Us
Federal Agencies DPM Provides Services For:

DPM has 30 years experience providing convenient, cost effective, and efficient grant payment, cash management and grant accounting services.

During fiscal year 2004, DPM’s customers include a wide variety of organizations, over 26,700 in total:

* Colleges; Other Educational Entities; Hospitals;
* Other Health Organizations; & Non-Profits
* State Government Agencies
* Cross-Serviced Non-HHS Accounts
* Many Others … our customer base is continuing to grow!

The CFO Council recently selected the Division of Payment Management / Payment Management System (PMS) as one of only 2 Payment Systems for the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. As a result, more Federal agencies have chosen PMS as their payment system.

Listed below are some of the agencies currently serviced by DPM. This list will soon be growing significantly.

The HHS agencies are:

* Administration for Children and Families (ACF)
* Administration on Aging (AoA
* ) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
* Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
* Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), legacy HCFA
* Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
* Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
* Indian Health Service (IHS)
* National Institutes of Health (NIH)
* Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)

The Federal Non-HHS agencies and departments include:

Department of Agriculture (USDA)
* Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
* Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service (CSREES)
* Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS)
* Forest Service (FS)

Department of Energy (DOE)
* Schenectady Naval Reactors Office

Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
* Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP), legacy Customs
* Emergency Preparedness and Response (ER&P), legacy FEMA
* Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

Department of the Interior (DOI)
* National Park Service (NPS)
* U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)
* U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)

Department of Labor (DOL)
* Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
* Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
* Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA)
* Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
* Veterans’ Employment and Training Service (VETS)

Department of State (DOS)
* Bureau of Administration, Office of Overseas Schools (A)
* Bureau of African Affairs (AF)
* Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (DRL)
* Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS)
* Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs (EAP)
* Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs (EB)
* Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Fulbright Commission, Europe (ECA)
* Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Fulbright Commission, Western Hemisphere (ECA)
* Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Fulbright Commission, East Asia (ECA)
* Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Fulbright Commission, Near East/South Asia (ECA)
* Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA), legacy USIA
* Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs (EUR)
* Bureau of Human Resources (M/HR)
* Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR)
* Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL)
* Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs (NEA)
* Bureau of Nonproliferation (NP)
* Bureau of Nonproliferation, Office of Export Control Cooperation (NP)
* Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental Scientific Affairs (OES)
* Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Humanitarian Demining Programs (PM)
* Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration (PRM)
* Bureau of South Asian Affairs (SA)

Department of the Treasury (Treas)
* Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI) Fund
* Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
* Office of Financial Institutions (OFI)

Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
* Healthcare for the Homeless (HCHV)
* National Cemetery Administration (NCA)
* Veterans Health Administration (VHA)

Executive Office of the President (EOP)
* Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP)

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
* Ames Research Center
* Dryden Flight Research Center
* Goddard Space Flight Center
* Johnson Space Center
* Kennedy Space Center
* Langley Research Center
* Marshall Space Flight Center
* Stennis Space Center

Independent Federal Agency
* Corporation of National and Community Service (CNS)
* The United States Agency for International Development (USAID)

Division of Payment Management
Program Support Center
Financial Management Service

http://www.dpm.psc.gov/about_us/agencies.aspx?explorer.event=true

FARS/FAGA
REPORT ON OUR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS

The Financial Assistance by Geographic Area report is prepared by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Financial Assistance Reporting System (FARS) and is produced on a fiscal year basis. Data for the system is provided by each of the Department’s operating divisions (OPDIV). HHS does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the data reflected in this report.

The Financial Assistance by Geographic Area report conforms to the Government-wide requirements of the Office of Management and Budget. The report identifies the OPDIV that obligated the funds, the amount that has been obligated, the specific recipient, each recipient’s location (state, county, city, and congressional district), and the Catalog for Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number from which the funds were obligated. This feature is possible because the FARS has the capacity to interface with the HHS Central Registry System. The Central Registry System stores names, locations and other basic information about the grant recipients.

For years, HHS published a printed version of the report. Recent legislation, however, authorized HHS to determine in what form to prepare and publish the report. Consistent with the Administration’s Electronic-Government initiatives, the Government Paperwork Elimination Act, and a move to a paper free environment, HHS now disseminates the report electronically through the Division of Payment Management website, www.dpm.psc.gov.

The report format is PDF. The report can be queried by fiscal year, then by state or territory name and by recipient name and CFDA number. The total funding for each region and CFDA are provided at the end of each state and territory report. The Regional identifications and geographical coverage of each Region are shown below.

The report has been prepared for the benefit of HHS Management to provide information for timely response to inquiries from the Congress, State, and local governments. The report is also of interest to many individuals and organizations outside HHS.

If you have questions concerning the data, please contact Hal Baldwin at 301-443-9215 or at his email address, jbaldwin@psc.gov.

Links to Reference Materials

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA)
FAGA Terms
FAGA Capitals
FAGA Regions
FAGA OpDivs and Agencies
FAGA Contractions and Abbreviations

http://www.dpm.psc.gov/faga/faga.aspx?explorer.event=true

FARS/FAGA
FY02
FY03
FY04
FY05
FAGA Reference Materials
CFDA by Fiscal Year
FY06

***
Grant Recipient Info
272 Due Dates

For disbursement activity during the months of:     The 272 Report is due on:
July 01 through September 30, 2008 – 4th Qtr.     November 14, 2008
October 01 through December 31, 2008 – 1st Qtr.     February 14, 2009
January 01 through March 31, 2009 – 2nd Qtr.     May 15, 2009
April 01 through June 30, 2009 – 3rd Qtr.     August 14, 2009
July 01 through September 30, 2009 – 4th Qtr.     November 14, 2009

Department of Interior:
Fish & Wildlife Service & NASA Grantee Due Dates:     The 272 Report is due on:
July 01 through September 30, 2008 – 4th Qtr.     October 20, 2008
October 01 through December 31, 2008 – 1st Qtr.     January 23, 2009
January 01 through March 31, 2009 – 2nd Qtr.     April 21, 2009
April 01 through June 30, 2009 – 3rd Qtr.     July 21, 2009
July 01 through September 30, 2009 – 4th Qtr.     October 20, 2009

NOTE: There is no PSC 272 reporting requirement for DPM accounts ending in “B” or “B1″(this does not apply to NASA accounts) .

http://www.dpm.psc.gov/grant_recipient/reports/due_dates.aspx?

***

***
To do this, GAO analyzed grant balance data from the largest federal grant payment system; reviewed grant management problems and corrective actions from more than 150 audit reports; and reviewed guidance from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Code of Federal Regulations.

http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-432

During calendar year 2006, about $1 billion in undisbursed funding remained in expired grant accounts in the largest civilian payment system for grants–the Payment Management System (PMS). PMS is administered by the Department of Health and Human Services and makes payments for about 70 percent of grants and for 12 federal entities.

Undisbursed funding is funding the federal government has obligated through a grant agreement, but which the grantee has not entirely spent. Among all of the expired grant accounts in PMS that remained open, these undisbursed funds typically represented about 1 percent of the total funds originally made available for these grants–meaning grantees had spent most of their available funds.

http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-432

However, when expired grant accounts with no funds remaining were excluded and the focus was narrowed to just expired grant accounts with undisbursed balances, GAO found the amount of undisbursed funding represented, on average, about 26 percent of the original funding made available. The expired but still open grant accounts were associated with thousands of grantees and over 325 different federal programs.

***

FY 2006 Awards
Bank Enterprise Award (BEA) Program

Organization Name Location Award Amount

Albina Community Bank Portland, OR $500,000.00
Bangor Savings Bank Bangor, ME $145,524.00
Bank of America, N.A. Sarasota, FL $500,000.00
Bank of Dade Trenton, GA $18,000.00
Bank of Kentucky, The Crestview Hills, KY $6,000.00
Bank of Tokyo-
Mitsubishi Trust Company New York, NY $500,000.00
Bank West, Inc. Pierre, SD $22,500.00
Bedford Loan & Deposit Bank Bedford , KY $6,000.00
Branch Banking and Trust Co. Lumberton, NC $270,000.00
Bridgewater Savings Bank Raynham, MA $120,000.00
Carolina First Bank Lexington, SC $195,741.00
Carver State Bank, The Savannah, GA $385,304.00
Central Bank of Kansas City Kansas City, MO $500,000.00
Citizens Bank and Trust Chicago, IL $500,000.00
Citizens Trust Bank Atlanta, GA $6,059.00
Citizens Union Bank Shelbyville, KY $9,000.00
City National Bank of New Jersey Newark, NJ $226,805.00
Community Bank of Lawndale Chicago, IL $500,000.00

Community Bank of the Bay Oakland, CA $500,000.00
Community Capital Bank Brooklyn, NY $500,000.00
Cor Trust Bank Mitchell, SD $15,000.00
Dacotah Banks, Inc. Aberdeen, , SD $30,000.00
F & M Bank
(Great Western Bank) Watertown, SD $75,000.00
Farmers Bank & Trust Company Georgetown, KY $5,940.00
First American International Bank Brooklyn, NY $500,000.00
First Bank Huntington Beach, CA $156,000.00
First Capital Bank of Kentucky Louisville, KY $27,000.00
First National Bank of Kansas Overland Park, KS $12,600
First National Bank of Phillips County West Helena, AR $500,000.00
First Republic Bank San Francisco, CA $120,225.00
First Western Bank Wall Wall, SD $17,250.00
FirstBank Lexington, TN $75,000.00
Franklin National Bank Minneapolis, MN $500,000.00
International Bank of Chicago Stone Park, IL $500,000.00
Louisville Community Development Bank Louisville, KY $405,577.00
Mizuho Corporate Bank (USA) New York, NY $500,000.00
NAB Bank Chicago, IL $500,000.00
National City Bank of Kentucky Louisville, KY $89,646.00
OneUnited Bank Boston, MA $500,000.00

Pacific Global Bank Chicago, IL $500,000.00
Pullman Bank and Trust
(Park National Bank) Chicago, IL $60,000.00
Republic Bank and Trust Company Louisville, KY $67,829.00
South Carolina Community Bank Columbia, SC $500,000.00
THE BANK — Oldham County, Inc. LaGrange, KY $6,000.00
The Commercial Bank of Grayson Grayson, KY $6,000.00
University National Bank St Paul, MN $500,000.00
Wainwright Bank & Trust Company Boston, MA $300,000.00

http://www.cdfifund.gov/docs/2006/bea/2006.BEA.Award%20List%20(Press%20Kit).pdf

****

Fourth Round – 2006
New Markets Tax Credit Allocations
* Indicates allocations awarded for use in the Gulf Opportunity Zone

Name of Allocatee Location Service Area Market Financing Activity Award Amount

Advantage Capital Community
Development Fund, LLC
New Orleans,
LA
Multi-state AL, LA, MS, TX Business Financing $70,000,000
* American Community Renewable
Energy Fund, LLC
New Orleans,
LA
Multi-state AL, LA, MS Business Financing $42,000,000
Banc of America CDE, LLC Washington,
D.C.
National CA, CO, DC, FL,
MA, NY, TX
Real estate financing;
Retail
$143,000,000
Boston Community Capital, Inc. Boston,
MA
National CA, CO, ME,
MA, NJ, NY, WA
Business Financing $60,000,000
* Capital Link, Inc. Boston,
MA
Multi-state AL, LA, MS Real estate financing;
Community facilities
$15,000,000
Carver Community Development
Corporation
New York,
NY
Local NY Real estate financing;
For-sale housing
$59,000,000
* CCG Community Partners, LLC Princeton,
NJ
Multi-state AL, LA, MS Real estate financing;
Mixed-use housing &
retail
$43,000,000
* Chase New Markets Corporation New York,
NY
Multi-state AL, LA, MS Real estate financing;
Retail
$50,000,000
* Chevron NMTC Fund, LLC San Francisco,
CA
Multi-state AL, LA, MS Real estate financing;
Mixed-use housing
and commercial
$50,000,000
Chicago Development Fund Chicago,
IL
Local IL Real estate financing;
Industrial
$100,000,000
Citibank NMTC Corporation Long Island City,
NY
National CA, DC, FL, IL,
MD, NJ, NY
Real estate financing;
Mixed-use housing
and commercial
$100,000,000
City First New Markets Fund II, LLC Washington,
D.C.
Multi-state DE, DC, MD, PA,
VA
Real estate financing;
Community facilities
$90,000,000
The Clearinghouse CDFI Lake Forest,
CA
Statewide CA Real estate financing
and retail
$37,000,000

Coastal Enterprises, Inc. Wiscasset,
ME
National CT, MA, ME, NH,
NY, RI, VT
Business Financing $120,000,000
Commonwealth Cornerstone Group Harrisburg,
PA
Statewide PA Real estate financing;
For sale housing
$60,000,000
Consortium America, LLC Washington,
DC
National DC, KY, MI, MO,
NY, NC, VA
Real estate financing;
Mixed-use housing and
commercial
$115,000,000
CT/KDF Community Development
Partners, LLC
Newport Beach,
CA
Local CA Real estate financing;
Mixed-use housing and
commercial
$90,000,000
Dakotas America, LLC Sioux Falls,
SD
Multi-state ND, SD Business Financing $50,000,000
Elizabeth Development Company Elizabeth,
NJ
Local NJ Real estate financing;
Retail
$10,000,000
Empowerment Reinvestment Fund,
LLC
New York,
NY
National AL, CA, LA, MS,
NY, OH, TN
Business Financing $40,000,000
Enhanced Delta Community
Development, LLC
New Orleans,
LA
Local LA Business Financing $25,000,000
* Enterprise Corporation of the Delta Jackson,
MS
Multi-state LA Business Financing $15,000,000
ESIC New Markets Partners, LP Columbia,
MD
National CA, DC, LA, MD,
MS, NY, PA
Real estate financing;
Mixed-use
$105,000,000
Genesis LA CDE, LLC Los Angeles,
CA
Local CA Real estate financing;
Mixed- use housing
and commercial
$50,000,000
Greenville New Markets Opportunity
LLC
Greenville,
SC
Local SC Real estate financing;
Community facilities
$89,000,000
* Greystone CDE LLC Warrenton,
VA
Multi-state AL, LA, MS Real estate financing;
Mixed-use
$35,000,000
HEDC New Markets, Inc New York,
NY
National CA, IL, IN, MS,
NY, PA, WA
Business Financing $121,000,000
* Hibernia Community Renewal Fund,
LLC
New Orleans,
LA
Statewide LA Business Financing $100,000,000

Hospitality Fund II, LLC Denver,
CO
Multi-state CO, IL, RI Real estate financing;
Retail
$40,000,000
Iowa Community Development, LC Johnston,
IA
Statewide IA Real estate financing;
Retail
$45,000,000
Johnson Community Development
Company
Racine,
WI
Multi-state AZ, WI Real estate financing;
Community facilities
$40,000,000
* Liberty Bank and Trust Company Baton Rouge,
LA
Local LA Business Financing $60,000,000
Local Initiatives Support Corporation New York,
NY
National CA, FL, IL, LA,
MA, NY, OH
Real estate financing;
Retail
$140,000,000
M&I New Markets Fund, LLC Wauwatosa,
WI
Multi-state AZ, IL, MN, MO,
WI
Real estate financing;
Industrial
$75,000,000
Massachusetts Housing Investment
Corporation
Boston,
MA
Statewide MA Real estate financing;
community facilities
$90,000,000
MBS Urban Initiatives CDE, LLC St. Louis,
MO
National AZ, CA, DC, LA,
MO, PA, TN
Real estate financing;
Mixed-use
$60,000,000
Merrill Lynch Community Development
Company
New York,
NY
National CA, LA, MS, NJ,
NY, PA, UT
Financing of other
CDEs
$93,000,000
Midwest Minnesota Community
Development Corporation
Detroit Lakes,
MI
Statewide MN Business Financing $80,000,000
MK La Charitable Healthcare Facilities
Fund, LLC
New Orleans,
LA
Statewide LA Loan purchase from
other CDEs
$80,000,000
* National Cities Fund, LLC New Orleans,
LA
Multi-state AL, LA, MS Real estate financing;
For-sale housing
$75,000,000
National City New Market Fund, Inc. Cleveland,
OH
National IL, IN, KY, MI,
MO, OH, PA
Real estate financing;
Mixed-use
$125,000,000
* National New Markets Fund, LLC Los Angeles,
CA
Multi-state AL, LA, MS Real estate financing;
Mixed-use
$25,000,000
* National Tribal Development
Association
Box Elder,
MT
Multi-state AL, LA, MS Business Financing $30,000,000

National Trust Community Investment
Corporation
Washington,
DC
National AL, CA, LA, MS,
MO, NC, TX
Real estate financing;
Community facilities
$53,000,000
NCB Development Corporation Washington,
DC
National CA, DC, FL, LA,
MI, MS, TX
Real estate financing;
Community facilities
$54,000,000
Nonprofit Finance Fund New York,
NY
National CA, DC, MA, MI,
NJ, NY, PA
Business Financing $20,000,000
Northside Community Development
Fund
Pittsburgh,
PA
Local PA Real estate financing;
For-sale housing
$2,000,000
The Ohio Community Development
Finance Fund
Columbus,
OH
Statewide OH Business Financing $25,000,000
PNC Community Partners, Inc. Pittsburgh,
PA
Multi-state DE, DC, IN, KY,
MD, NJ, OH, PA,
VA
Real estate financing;
Mixed-use
$75,000,000
The Reinvestment Fund, Inc. Philadelphia,
PA
Multi-state DE, MD, NJ, PA Business Financing $75,000,000
Revolution Community Ventures, LLC San Diego,
CA
Statewide CA Business Financing $35,000,000
Rockland Trust Community
Development Corporation II
Rockland,
MA
Multi-state MA, RI Business Financing $45,000,000
Rural Development Partners, LLC Hanlontown,
IA
National IA, LA, MN, MS,
MT, ND, SD
Business Financing $60,000,000
Seattle Community Investments Seattle,
WA
Local WA Real estate financing;
Mixed-use
$20,000,000
Shorebank Enterprise Pacific Ilwaco,
WA
Multi-state OR, WA Business Financing $35,000,000
Sovereign Community Development
Company
Reading,
PA
Multi-state CT, MD, MA, NH,
NJ, PA, RI
Real estate financing;
Retail
$94,000,000
Stonehenge Community Development,
LLC
Baton Rouge,
LA
National AL, GA, LA, MS,
MO, OH, TX
Business Financing $75,000,000
Structured Products Group CDE, LLC Denver,
CO
National CA, CO, DC, FL,
LA, NJ, TX
Real estate financing;
Retail
$62,000,000

* Urban Development Fund, LLC Chicago,
IL
Multi-state AL, LA, MS Real estate financing;
Retail
$60,000,000
Urban Research Park CDE, LLC Towson,
MD
National HI, IL, KY, MD,
NY, PA, VA
Real estate financing;
Office space
$50,000,000
USBCDE, LLC St. Louis,
MO
National CA, CO, MN, NY,
OH, PA, WA
Real estate financing;
Mixed-use
$135,000,000
Wachovia Community Development
Enterprises, LLC
Charlotte,
NC
National AL, FL, GA, MS,
NJ, PA, TX
Real estate financing;
Mixed-use
$143,000,000
WNC National Community
Development Advisors, LLC
Irvine,
CA
National CA, LA, MT, NJ,
NY, TX, WA
Real estate financing;
Retail
$40,000,000

http://www.cdfifund.gov/docs/nmtc/2006/List.of.Allocatess.FINAL.pdf

***

Well, if I had only known that all I had to do was to get three friends together and call ourselves loan officers or mortgage lenders or a real-estate financing company.

Then, these awards above and others through the federal, state, county and local governments, through the department of commerce, and the small business administration, among others, would’ve been given to me as free money to spend on a nice computer system and a fancier car and a pretty big new house, etc., etc., etc. (and a private plane, and vacation homes and very fancy vacations to get away from it all in luxury and eaten out at funky and fine restaurants every day, and other fun stuff.)

- cricketdiane, 02-19-09

Money has been continuously fed to companies that lend to cover business costs – as Grants and Tax Allocations and Subsidies including in 2007, before and since – And who are the socialists?

This is only the tip of a tiny chunk of ice from a really, really big iceberg. I would bet this is only one office of one fund that is doing the same thing and giving our money to cover the business costs of these businesses. They couldn’t do that for a business any of the rest of America’s people might start, including me. Just unbelievable.
- cricketdiane, 02-18-09

***
$11 MILLION AWARDED TO ORGANIZATIONS
FOR WORK IN ECONOMICALLY DISTRESSED COMMUNITIES
Today the Department of the Treasury’s Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund announced that approximately $11 million has been awarded to 51 banks and thrifts across the country that provide critically needed financial products and services to economically disadvantaged people and communities. These awards are being made through the fiscal year 2007 round of the Bank Enterprise Award (BEA) Program.
The BEA Program was created to provide an incentive to FDIC-insured banks and thrifts to annually increase either (1) their level of financing and services in economically distressed communities, such as opening new savings accounts, providing home mortgage loans or investing in local small businesses; (2) their investment in certified community development financial institutions (CDFIs); (3) or both.
The CDFI Fund awards the bank or thrift for increasing the investment they make in community
development activities. The investment made by the bank or thrift significantly leverages the CDFI Fund’s dollars and puts more capital to work in Distressed Communities throughout the nation. The $11 million awarded this round represents $226 million in investments made by the applicants to benefit low-income communities.

http://www.cdfifund.gov/docs/2007/bea/CDFIProgramBEAAwardList2007.pdf

Organization Name Location Award
1st Independence Bank Louisville, KY $6,000
Albina Community Bank Portland, OR $500,000
AMCORE Bank Rockford, IL $15,000
American Metro Bank Chicago, IL $500,000
Bank of America, N.A. Sarasota, FL $500,000
Bank of Ohio County, Inc. Beaver Dam, KY $6,000
Carver State Bank Savannah, GA $188,127
Central Bank of Kansas City Kansas City, MO $489,169
Citizens Bank New Liberty, KY $6,000
Citizens Bank and Trust Chicago, IL $290,146
City National Bank of New Jersey Newark, NJ $500,000
Columbia Savings Bank Cincinnati, OH $12,000
Commonwealth Community Bank, Inc. Hartford, KY $6,000
Community Bank of Lawndale Chicago, IL $500,000
Community Bank of the Bay Oakland, CA $286,282
Delta Southern Bank Ruleville, MS $500,000
Eclipse Bank, Inc. Louisville, KY $6,000
First American International Bank Brooklyn, NY $500,000
First State Financial, Inc. Middlesboro, KY $6,000
Franklin National Bank Minneapolis, MN $500,000
Guaranty Bank Dallas, TX $30,000
Hart County Bank and Trust Company Munfordville, KY $6,000
Hyden Citizens Bank Hyden, KY $15,000
Independence Bank Owensboro, KY $15,000
Irwin Union Bank, FSB Columbus, IN $6,235
Kentucky Bank Paris, KY $6,000
Kentucky Trust Bank Beaver Dam, KY $36,000
King Southern Bank Chaplin, KY $18,000
Lawrenceburg National Bank Lawrenceburg, KY $6,000
Legacy Bancorp, Inc. Milwaukee, WI $491,521
Louisville Community Development Bank Louisville, KY $316,545
Mission Community Bank San Luis Obispo, CA $337,500
Mission Valley Bank Sun Valley, CA $500,000
Mutual Bank Naperville, IL $60,000
Neighborhood National Bank San Diego, CA $500,000
New Washington State Bank Charlestown, IN $9,008
North Milwaukee State Bank Milwaukee, WI $500,000
OneUnited Bank Boston, MA $500,000
Pacific Global Bank Chicago, IL $500,000
Pinnacle National Bank Nashville, TN $112,500
PNC Bank, NA Philadelphia, PA $60,000
Premier Bank Wilmette, IL $179,684
Seaway National Bank of Chicago Chicago, IL $500,000
South Carolina Community Bank Columbia, SC $443,255
Stock Yards Bank and Trust Company Louisville, KY $6,373
SunTrust Bank Atlanta, GA $172,072
The Casey County Bank, Inc. Liberty, KY $6,000
The Fountain Trust Company Covington, IN $6,000
United Citizens Bank and Trust Company Campbellsburg, KY $6,000
University National Bank St Paul, MN $500,000
Your Community Bank New Albany, IN $6,294

http://www.cdfifund.gov/docs/2007/bea/CDFIProgramBEAAwardList2007.pdf

***

Through the CDFI Program, the Fund provides monetary awards for Financial Assistance (FA) and Technical Assistance (TA). CDFIs use FA awards to further goals such as economic development, affordable housing and community development financial services.
Financial Assistance (FA)
Through FA awards, the Fund invests in certified CDFIs that demonstrate they have the financial and managerial capacity to: 1) provide affordable and appropriate financial products and services that positively impact their communities; 2) be viable financial institutions; and 3) use and leverage CDFI Fund dollars effectively.
Applicants may request a maximum $2,000,000 award under the FA Program to be used as financing capital, loan loss reserves, capital reserves, or operations.

AAFE Community Development Fund     New York, NY     $385,520
ASI Federal Credit Union     Harahan, LA     $959,308
Brooklyn Cooperative Federal Credit Union     Brooklyn, NY     $393,998
Ceda Community Development Fund     Chicago, IL     $26,230
Chattanooga Neighborhood Enterprise, Inc.     Chattanooga, TN     $960,000
Chicago Community Loan Fund     Chicago, IL     $585,060
Cincinnati Development Fund     Cincinnati, OH     $305,298
City National Bancshares Corporation     Newark, NJ     $542,705
Community Development Bank, FSB     Ogema, MN     $480,000

Community Development Capital     New Orleans, LA     $175,929
Community Development Resources     Lincoln, NE     $314,952
Community First Fund     Lancaster, PA     $482,500
Community Loan Fund of Southwestern Pennsylvania, Inc.     Pittsburgh, PA     $600,000
Cooperative Fund of New England     Amherst, MA     $207,718
Cornerstone, Inc.     Washington, DC     $860,000
Enterprise Community Loan Fund, Inc.     Columbia, MD     $860,000
First Bank of the Delta, N.A.     West Helena, AR     $366,911
Florida Community Loan Fund, Inc.     Orlando, FL     $586,800
Forward Community Investments     Madison, WI     $275,960
Gateway Community Development Credit Union     Durham, NC     $954,823
Hartford Community Loan Fund     Hartford, CT     $320,605
Hope Community Credit Union     Jackson, MS     $480,000
Hopi Credit Association     Keams Canyon, AZ     $557,500
Housing Assistance Council     Washington, DC     $649,650
Impact Seven, Inc.     Almena, WI     $902,064
Latino Community Credit Union     Durham, NC     $860,000
Legacy Redevelopment Corporation     Milwaukee, WI     $317,533
Lenders for Community Development     San Jose, CA     $960,000
Liberty Bank and Trust Company     New Orleans, LA     $825,400
Local Initiatives Support Corporation     New York, NY     $480,000
Low Income Investment Fund     San Francisco, CA     $860,000
National Federation of Community Development Credit Unions     New York, NY     $600,000
National Housing Trust Community Development Fund     Washington, DC     $478,569
Neighborhood Assets     Spokane, WA     $87,036

Neighborhood Development Center, Inc.     St. Paul, MN     $150,000
Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, Inc.     Chicago, IL     $950,704
New Hampshire Community Loan Fund, Inc.     Concord, NH     $480,000
Northern California Community Loan Fund     San Francisco, CA     $954,500
Pacific Community Ventures, Inc.     San Francisco, CA     $480,000
The Reinvestment Fund, Inc.     Philadelphia, PA     $860,000
Seedco Financial Services     New York, NY     $407,000
Self-Help Credit Union     Durham, NC     $487,800
South Dakota Rural Enterprise, Inc.     Sioux Falls, SD     $386,984
Southwest Virginia Community Development Financing, Incorporated     Abingdon, VA     $200,000
Syracuse Cooperative Federal Credit Union     Syracuse NY     $357,835
Trenton Business Assistance Corporation     Trenton, NJ     $418,359
Vermont Community Loan Fund, Inc.     Montpelier, VT     $570,999
Western Massachusetts Enterprise Fund Inc.     Greenfield, MA     $367,523
WomenVenture     St. Paul, MN     $61,293

More GRANTS –

Technical Assistance (TA)
Technical Assistance (TA) grants allow certified CDFIs and established entities seeking to become certified CDFIs to build their capacity by acquiring prescribed types of products or services including technology (usually efficiency enhancing technology such as computers and loan management software), staff training, consulting services to acquire needed skills or services (such as a market analysis or lending policies and procedures), or staff time to conduct discrete, capacity-building activities (such as website development).
Applicants may request a maximum $100,000 award under the TA Program. All TA Awards are in the form of a grant and can be used for personnel costs, training, travel, professional service costs, materials, and equipment.

Name of Allocatee     Headquarters     Service Area     Predominant Market     Allocated Amount     Predominant Financing Activity

alt.Consulting     Pine Bluff, AR     $80,222
Chicago Community Ventures     Chicago, IL     $81,589
Community Development Loan Fund     San Antonio, TX     $92,608
The Enterprise Center Capital Corporation     Philadelphia, PA     $88,000
Finance Fund Capital Corporation     Columbus, OH     $98,884
Hawaii First FCU     Kamuela, HI     $98,841
Home Headquarters, Inc.     Syracuse, NY     $59,467
Independent Employers FCU     Hilo, HI     $98,300
Leviticus 25:23 Alternative Fund, Inc.     Elmsford, NY     $66,430
MetroAction Inc.     Scranton, PA     $52,535
Minneapolis Consortium of Community Developers     Minneapolis, MN     $72,867
Montana Homeownership Network     Great Falls, MT     $64,875
Mountain Association for Community Economic Development, Inc.     Berea, KY     $98,465
New Mexico Community Development Loan Fund     Albuquerque, NM     $68,069
Northern Economic Initiatives Corporation     Marquette, MI     $79,560
PGB Holdings, Inc     Chicago, IL     $40,045
Sci-Tech Development     Milwaukee, WI     $92,110
South County Community Investment Corporation     Gilroy, CA     $80,550
Valley Economic Development Center     Van Nuys, CA     $88,090

http://www.cdfifund.gov/docs/2007/cdfi/CDFIProgramAwardList2007.pdf

Fifth Round (2007) New Markets Tax Credit Allocation Recipients1

Advantage Capital Community Development Fund, LLC **     New Orleans, LA     Multi-state     AL, LA, MS     $28,000,000     Business

American Community Renewable Energy Fund, LLC **     New Orleans, LA     Multi-state     AL, LA, MS     $30,000,000     Business
Banc of America CDE, LLC     Washington, DC     National     CA, FL, MA, NY, NC, TX, WA     $130,000,000     Real Estate
(Retail)
Brownfield Revitalization, LLC     Raleigh, NC     National     CA, CO, LA, NJ, NC, SC, TX     $92,000,000     Real Estate (Community facilities)
Capital One Community Renewal Fund, LLC **     New Orleans, LA     Statewide     LA     $60,000,000     Real Estate (Retail)
Capmark Community Development Fund, LLC     Denver, CO     National     CA, CO, DC, FL, LA, NJ, TX     $60,000,000     Real Estate (Retail)
Carolina First Community Development Corporation     Greenville, SC     Statewide     SC     $100,000,000     Business
CCG Community Partners, LLC **     Princeton, NJ     Multi-state     AL, LA, MS     $40,000,000     Real Estate
(Mixed Use)
Central Bank of Kansas City     Kansas City, MO     Local     Kansas City, MO     $50,000,000     Business
Chase New Markets Corporation     New York, NY     National     AZ, IL, LA, NJ, NY, OH, TX     $60,000,000     Real Estate
(Retail)
Cleveland New Markets Investment Fund II, LLC     Cleveland, OH     Local     Cleveland, OH     $25,000,000     Real Estate (Retail)
Coastal Enterprises, Inc.     Wiscasset, ME     National     CT, ME, MA, NH, NY, RI, VT     $120,000,000     Business
Community Development Funding, LLC **     Columbia, MD     Multi-state     AL, LA, MS     $20,000,000     Real Estate (Community Facilities)

Community Ventures Corporation, Inc.     Lexington, KY     Statewide     KY     $45,000,000     Business

Elizabeth Development Company     Elizabeth, NJ     Local     Elizabeth, NJ     $25,000,000     Real Estate
(Retail)
ESIC New Markets Partners LP     Columbia, MD     National     CO, DC, FL, GA, LA, MS, NM     $100,000,000     Real Estate
(Mixed-use)
Fifth Third New Markets Development Company, LLC     Dublin, OH     National     FL, IL, IA, KY, MI, OH, TN     $100,000,000     Real Estate
(Mixed-use)
Finance New Mexico, LLC     Santa Fe, NM     Statewide     NM     $110,000,000     Business
First-Ring Industrial Redevelopment Enterprise, Inc.     West Allis, WI     Local     Kenosha, Milwaukee, Racine     $35,000,000     Real Estate
(Mixed Use)
Gateway CDE, LLC     Newark, NJ     National     CA, DC, FL, IL, MA, NJ, NY     $50,000,000     Real Estate (Mixed Use)
Greystone CDE, LLC     New York, NY     National     AZ, CA, GA, LA, MS, NY, NC     $30,000,000     Real Estate (Mixed Use)
Hampton Roads Ventures, LLC     Norfolk, VA     Statewide     VA     $50,000,000     Real Estate
(Mixed Use)
HFHI-SA NMTC I, LLC **     St. Louis, MO     Multi-state     AL, LA, MS     $25,000,000     Real Estate
(For-sale housing)
Imagine Downtown, Inc.     Atlanta, GA     Local     Atlanta, GA     $60,000,000     Real Estate
(Office Space)
Key Community Development New Markets, LLC     Cleveland, OH     National     CO, IN, ME, NY, OH, OR, WA     $100,000,000     Real Estate
(Mixed Use)
King County Housing Authority     Seattle, WA     Local     Seattle, WA     $22,000,000     Real Estate (Community Facilities)
LA Charter School New Markets CDE     Santa Monica, CA     Local     Los Angeles, CA     $35,000,000     Real Estate (Community Facilities)
Local Initiatives Support Corporation     New York, NY     National     CA, LA, MS, NY, OH, PA, VA     $133,000,000     Real Estate (Retail)
Los Angeles Development Fund     Los Angeles, CA     Local     Los Angeles, CA     $75,000,000     Real Estate
(Retail)
Low Income Investment Fund     San Francisco, CA     Multi-state     CA, CT, DC, NJ, NY     $44,000,000     Real Estate (Community
Facilities)

Mass HEFA New Markets CDE, LLC     Boston, MA     Statewide     MA     $66,000,000     Business

MBFC CDE, Inc. **     Jackson, MS     Statewide     MS     $20,000,000     Business
MBS Urban Initiatives CDE, LLC     St. Louis, MO     National     CA, DC, LA, MD, PA, RI, TN     $60,000,000     Real Estate (Mixed Use)
Merrill Lynch Community Development Company     New York, NY     National     AL, CA, LA, MS, NJ, NY, UT     $112,000,000     Financing CDEs
Midwest Minnesota Community Development Corporation     Detroit Lakes, MN     Statewide     MN     $85,000,000     Business
MMA Financial Community Renewable Energy Initiative, LLC     San Francisco, CA     Local     San Francisco, CA metropolitan area     $20,000,000     Business
MSD New Markets, Inc.     New York, NY     National     CA, DC, IA, LA, MS, MT, NY     $95,000,000     Real Estate
(Industrial)
National City New Markets Fund, Inc.     Cleveland, OH     National     FL, IL, KY, MI, MO, OH, PA     $75,000,000     Real Estate
(Mixed Use)
National Community Fund I, LLC     Portland, OR     National     CA, ID, MT, NY, OR, PA, WA     $65,000,000     Real Estate
(Mixed Use)
National New Markets Fund, LLC     Los Angeles, CA     National     AL, CA, CT, LA, MA, MS, NY     $50,000,000     Real Estate
(Mixed Use)
National Trust Community Investment Corporation **     Washington, DC     Multi-state     AL, LA, MS     $60,000,000     Real Estate (Community Facilities)
NCB Capital Impact     Arlington, VA     National     CA, DC, MA, MI, NY, OH, TX     $100,000,000     Real Estate (Community Facilities)
Oak Hill Banks Community Development Corp.     Jackson, OH     Local     Southern Ohio     $40,000,000     Business
PIDC-Regional Development Corporation     Philadelphia, PA     Local     Philadelphia, PA     $60,000,000     Business
Port Huron CDE, LLC     Port Huron, MI     Local     Port Huron, MI     $15,000,000     Real Estate (Office Space)
Primary Care Development Corporation     New York, NY     Statewide     NY     $40,000,000     Business
Related Community Development Group, LLC     New York, NY     National     CA, FL, IL, MA, NV, NJ, NY     $75,000,000     Real Estate (Retail)

St. Bernard Parish Redevelopment, LLC **     Chalmette, LA     Local     St. Bernard Parish, LA     $50,000,000     Real Estate (Mixed Use)

SunTrust Community Development Enterprises, LLC     Atlanta, GA     National     DC, FL, GA, MD, NC, TN, VA     $100,000,000     Real Estate (Retail)
Travois New Markets, LLC     Kansas City, MO     National     AZ, MN, MT, ND, SD, WA, WI     $30,000,000     Real Estate (Industrial)
Valued Advisor Fund, The **     Chicago, IL     Multi-State     AL, LA, MS     $17,000,000     Financing CDEs
UA, LLC     New York, NY     National     CA, DC, FL, LA, MD, NJ, NY     $75,000,000     Real Estate (Mixed Use)
Urban Action Community Development, LLC     Baltimore, MD     National     MD, MA, NY, NC, PA, RI, TN     $75,000,000     Real Estate (Mixed Use)
Urban Development Fund, LLC     Chicago, IL     National     AL, CA, FL, IL, LA, MS, TX     $60,000,000     Real Estate (Retail)
Urban Research Park CDE, LLC     Hunt Valley, MD     National     HI, KY, LA, MD, MS, PA, VA     $60,000,000     Real Estate (Industrial)
USBCDE, LLC     St. Louis, MO     National     CA, CO, DC, IL, MN, NY, PA     $125,000,000     Real Estate (Mixed Use)
Wachovia Community Development Enterprises, LLC     Charlotte, NC     National     AL, CA, FL, MS, NJ, PA, TX     $105,000,000     Real Estate (Mixed Use)
Waveland Community Development, LLC     Milwaukee, WI     National     AL, CO, KS, MS, NM, TX, WI     $85,000,000     Real Estate (Industrial)
Whitney New Markets Fund, LLC **     New Orleans, LA     Multi-state     AL, LA, MS     $50,000,000     Real Estate (For Sale Housing)
Wisconsin Brownfield and Economic Development     Madison, WI     Statewide     WI     $65,000,000     Real Estate (Mixed Use)
Wisconsin Community Development Legacy Fund, Inc.     Madison, WI     Statewide     WI     $120,000,000     Business
http://www.cdfifund.gov/docs/2007/nmtc/NMTCProgramAwardlist2007.pdf

I’ve been listening to reporter and expert after reporter and Republicans and business people and bankers say, “We just don’t know what is going to happen with the US government getting involved.”

Are they kidding? Look at this – The US Treasury has been wholesale giving away our money to banks, credit companies and mortgage companies all along. And, so have the states and local governments. There are the socialist underpinnings – welfare systems that use taxpayer moneys to underwrite usury banking businesses. And, they’ve been doing that all along with Republicans running the entire thing.

- cricketdiane, 02-18-09

This evidence suggests that if you have a good enough excuse to maybe loan a dollar – the US Treasury has already been giving you a million here and a million there to get yourself some computers and stuff and maybe loan some money –

MY NOTE -

(Something’s wrong with this picture – )

U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (CDFI)

http://bingaman.senate.gov/news/20080826-01.cfm?renderforprint=1

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Jeff Bingaman today announced that four New Mexico community-based lending organizations have been awarded federal funds from the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (CDFI).

“The funding awarded today will help these New Mexico organizations continue to serve their customers,” Bingaman said.

$1.07 million – ACCION New Mexico
ACCION will use $1 million to increase its lending capacity and $72,236 to cover a portion of staff salary, a portion of technology upgrades and postage for marketing materials.

$1.05 million – Homewise, Inc. in Santa Fe
Homewise provides home mortgage loans, counseling, and training to an eight-county target market in Northern New Mexico and will use $1 million as lending capital for its employer-assisted mortgage product and $52,275 to improve outreach capabilities by hiring a part-time outreach coordinator and updating its customer tracking software.

$224,596 – New Mexico Community Capital (NMCC) in Bernalillo
EFCU provides a variety of services including savings and checking accounts, car loans, and a new payday loan product to three small, rural communities in eastern New Mexico and is a NCUA Low-Income Designated credit union. Funding will be used to upgrade its member processing system, which will improve efficiency and provide members with access to more products and services. The upgrade includes the purchase of new workstations and computers and 13 days of onsite installation and staff training.

U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (CDFI)

http://www.cdfifund.gov/

About the CDFI Fund

Vision

The vision of the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (the CDFI Fund) is an America in which all people have access to affordable credit, capital and financial services.

Mission

The CDFI Fund’s mission is to expand the capacity of financial institutions to provide credit, capital, and financial services to underserved populations and communities in the United States.

Overview

The CDFI Fund was created for the purpose of promoting economic revitalization and community development through investment in and assistance to community development financial institutions (CDFIs). The CDFI Fund was established by the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994, as a bipartisan initiative.

The CDFI Fund achieves its purpose by promoting access to capital and local economic growth in the following ways:

1.

through its CDFI Program by directly investing in, supporting and training CDFIs that provide loans, investments, financial services and technical assistance to underserved populations and communities;
2.

through its New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) Program by providing an allocation of tax credits to community development entities (CDEs) which enable them to attract investment from the private-sector and reinvest these amounts in low-income communities;
3.

through its Bank Enterprise Award (BEA) Program by providing an incentive to banks to invest in their communities and in other CDFIs; and
4.

through its Native Initiatives, by taking action to provide financial assistance, technical assistance, and training to Native CDFIs and other Native entities proposing to become or create Native CDFIs.

Since its creation, the CDFI Fund has awarded $864 million to community development organizations and financial institutions; it has awarded allocations of New Markets Tax Credits which will attract private-sector investments totaling $16 billion, including $1 billion of special allocation authority to be used for the recovery and redevelopment of the Gulf Opportunity Zone.

Search CDFI Fund Award Database

Last updated/reviewed: 5/2/2007

http://www.cdfifund.gov/who_we_are/about_us.asp

***

My Note -

This evidence suggests that if you have a good enough excuse to maybe loan a dollar – the US Treasury has already been giving you a million here and a million there to get yourself some computers and stuff and maybe loan some money -

Apparently welfare systems for backing mortgage lenders has been being wholesale given to banks, investment banks, mortgage lenders, credit card companies and other “loan” systems. So, we’ve paid for the loans to be made, given them the money to make loans and paid for their equipment, salaries and papergoods to market them, computers to track them and training for their employees. Then, we paid interest on the loans and then they foreclosed on us and wouldn’t work it out for us to stay in our homes. and, they made us pay an insurance premium every month so that if we happened to not be able to pay the mortgage or loan then they would be covered by the lenders’ insurance we paid.

And, they had tax cuts when we didn’t and tax subsidies other people didn’t have and from 1994 – 2008 the US Treasury has been giving them our money to use to do it all with. Unbelievable.

I knew there was something wrong with this picture, as evidence by this being done outside the other public programs announced last year to solve the same problem and do the same thing with our tax money to make massive welfare payments to banks, mortgage companies, investment businesses, credit card companies, and other lenders.

This is only the tip of a tiny chunk of ice from a really, really big iceberg. I would bet this is only one office of one fund that is doing the same thing and giving our money to cover the business costs of these businesses. They couldn’t do that for a business any of the rest of America’s people might start, including me. Just unbelievable.

- cricketdiane, 02-18-09

***
$11 MILLION AWARDED TO ORGANIZATIONS
FOR WORK IN ECONOMICALLY DISTRESSED COMMUNITIES
Today the Department of the Treasury’s Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund announced that approximately $11 million has been awarded to 51 banks and thrifts across the country that provide critically needed financial products and services to economically disadvantaged people and communities. These awards are being made through the fiscal year 2007 round of the Bank Enterprise Award (BEA) Program.
The BEA Program was created to provide an incentive to FDIC-insured banks and thrifts to annually increase either (1) their level of financing and services in economically distressed communities, such as opening new savings accounts, providing home mortgage loans or investing in local small businesses; (2) their investment in certified community development financial institutions (CDFIs); (3) or both.
The CDFI Fund awards the bank or thrift for increasing the investment they make in community
development activities. The investment made by the bank or thrift significantly leverages the CDFI Fund’s dollars and puts more capital to work in Distressed Communities throughout the nation. The $11 million awarded this round represents $226 million in investments made by the applicants to benefit low-income communities.

http://www.cdfifund.gov/docs/2007/bea/CDFIProgramBEAAwardList2007.pdf

Organization Name Location Award
1st Independence Bank Louisville, KY $6,000
Albina Community Bank Portland, OR $500,000
AMCORE Bank Rockford, IL $15,000
American Metro Bank Chicago, IL $500,000
Bank of America, N.A. Sarasota, FL $500,000
Bank of Ohio County, Inc. Beaver Dam, KY $6,000
Carver State Bank Savannah, GA $188,127
Central Bank of Kansas City Kansas City, MO $489,169
Citizens Bank New Liberty, KY $6,000
Citizens Bank and Trust Chicago, IL $290,146
City National Bank of New Jersey Newark, NJ $500,000
Columbia Savings Bank Cincinnati, OH $12,000
Commonwealth Community Bank, Inc. Hartford, KY $6,000
Community Bank of Lawndale Chicago, IL $500,000
Community Bank of the Bay Oakland, CA $286,282
Delta Southern Bank Ruleville, MS $500,000
Eclipse Bank, Inc. Louisville, KY $6,000
First American International Bank Brooklyn, NY $500,000
First State Financial, Inc. Middlesboro, KY $6,000
Franklin National Bank Minneapolis, MN $500,000
Guaranty Bank Dallas, TX $30,000
Hart County Bank and Trust Company Munfordville, KY $6,000
Hyden Citizens Bank Hyden, KY $15,000
Independence Bank Owensboro, KY $15,000
Irwin Union Bank, FSB Columbus, IN $6,235
Kentucky Bank Paris, KY $6,000
Kentucky Trust Bank Beaver Dam, KY $36,000
King Southern Bank Chaplin, KY $18,000
Lawrenceburg National Bank Lawrenceburg, KY $6,000
Legacy Bancorp, Inc. Milwaukee, WI $491,521
Louisville Community Development Bank Louisville, KY $316,545
Mission Community Bank San Luis Obispo, CA $337,500
Mission Valley Bank Sun Valley, CA $500,000
Mutual Bank Naperville, IL $60,000
Neighborhood National Bank San Diego, CA $500,000
New Washington State Bank Charlestown, IN $9,008
North Milwaukee State Bank Milwaukee, WI $500,000
OneUnited Bank Boston, MA $500,000
Pacific Global Bank Chicago, IL $500,000
Pinnacle National Bank Nashville, TN $112,500
PNC Bank, NA Philadelphia, PA $60,000
Premier Bank Wilmette, IL $179,684
Seaway National Bank of Chicago Chicago, IL $500,000
South Carolina Community Bank Columbia, SC $443,255
Stock Yards Bank and Trust Company Louisville, KY $6,373
SunTrust Bank Atlanta, GA $172,072
The Casey County Bank, Inc. Liberty, KY $6,000
The Fountain Trust Company Covington, IN $6,000
United Citizens Bank and Trust Company Campbellsburg, KY $6,000
University National Bank St Paul, MN $500,000
Your Community Bank New Albany, IN $6,294

http://www.cdfifund.gov/docs/2007/bea/CDFIProgramBEAAwardList2007.pdf

***

Note – this is only one part of the Fund

When, not if – There are differences between facts and rhetoric – interact with those who need to know the difference

Chart Series: The Bush Economic Record

The JEC has compiled a series of charts examining various economic indicators, including job creation, health insurance coverage, unemployment, wages, debt held by public, etc. in an effort to paint a well-rounded picture of the Bush economy as compared to past administrations. The President says his policies are working to make the economy strong and that all Americans are benefiting, but the facts show an economic record that has left the vast majority of American families behind. A PDF of all Bush Economic Record Charts, along with the talking points are available on the right side of this page.

Page 1 of 5 (see below for charts on each page – Joint Economic Committee, Senate

Job Growth Among the Slowest of Any Administration in over 70 Years

Slowest Job Growth of Any Administration in Over 75 Years

Private Sector Job Growth Among the Worst in over 75 Years

Slow Job Growth Has Turned Into Job Losses

The Unemployment Rate Hits 7.2%, Highest Since 1993

http://jec.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ChartsData.Detail&ImageGallery_id=e704b95f-f4f7-9f3e-6430-f8f6f55dcf89

***

5.1 Million More Unemployed

Almost Four Times the Number of Unemployed Since Bush Took Office

Employee Compensation has Lagged Far Behind Productivity

Real Earnings Growth is Weak and Unequal Relative to 1990s

http://jec.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ChartsData.Detail&PageNum=2&ImageGallery_id=e704b95f-f4f7-9f3e-6430-f8f6f55dcf89

***

Large Projected Surpluses Turned into Large Deficits

$4.2 Trillion More Debt in FY 2008

Bush Tax Cuts for Millionaires Dwarf Tax Cuts for The Rest of America

Household Income Has Declined Under This Administration

http://jec.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ChartsData.Detail&PageNum=3&ImageGallery_id=e704b95f-f4f7-9f3e-6430-f8f6f55dcf89

***

Real Median Household Income Has Fallen

Real Household Income Has Declined for Virtually All Since 2000

The Poverty Rate Has Risen Under This Administration

5.7 Million More Americans in Poverty

http://jec.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ChartsData.Detail&PageNum=4&ImageGallery_id=e704b95f-f4f7-9f3e-6430-f8f6f55dcf89

***

7.2 Million More Americans Without Health Insurance

http://jec.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ChartsData.Detail&PageNum=5&ImageGallery_id=e704b95f-f4f7-9f3e-6430-f8f6f55dcf89

** NOTE -
also available on this page:

*
Subprime Housing Crisis Timeline
The JEC has compiled a timeline of events tracking the subprime crisis from December 2006 to the present. Although it does not include every event in the markets, in Congress, or in the Administration, it provides a fairly comprehensive background guide to the current housing crisis and the steps taken to avoid further deterioration of the subprime market.

http://jec.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ChartsData.Home

***

Chart Series: How Are High Food Prices Impacting American Families?

:: Nearly All Families Spend Over 10% of Income on Food

Milk and Egg Prices are Soaring Past Inflation

Fruit and Veggie Prices are Soaring Past Inflation

Grain and Bean Prices are Soaring Past Inflation

http://jec.senate.gov/index.cfm

***

United States House of Representatives

111th Congress, 1st Session
Washington, DC 20515 | (202) 224-3121 | TTY: (202) 225-1904

This Web site is speech enabled
Large-Print

Search All House Sites Search

Write Your
Representative
Committee Offices

Home
Offices

Resources

U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC 20515 | (202) 224-3121 | TTY: (202) 225-1904 | Site Map | Contact Webmaster

***

http://www.house.gov/house/CommitteeWWW.shtml

United States Senate
GO
United States Senate Senators Home Committees Home Legislation & Records Home Art & History Home Visitors Center Home Reference Home
United States Senate
Votes
Nominations
Calendars & Schedules
Congressional Records & Journals
Bills & Resolutions
Treaties
Appropriations
Lobbying Disclosure
Legislative Process
Active Legislation

Home > Legislation & Records Home

How to Find Legislation

Active Legislation is a list of current bills, arranged by subject, that have been receiving legislative or media attention.

The THOMAS legislative information system provides search options for finding bill texts and legislative histories from 1973 (93rd Congress) to the present.

For more hints on finding legislation, see How to find bill numbers and How to find copies of bills.

Congressional Record

The Congressional Record is published daily when either house of Congress meets. It is a published account of Congressional debates and activities, including votes, legislation, and committee meeting announcements. The Congressional Record research guide further explains use and distribution of the Record.

Recent Floor Activity

Use the following choices to view and track recent floor activity by date (choose from the last five days). If the Senate was not in session on the specified date, you will see a header with the date, but no items will appear.

Last Major Action – Obtain a list of all bills with Major Actions on the specified date.
Bills Introduced – Obtain a list of all bills introduced on the specified date.
Congressional Record – See the printed, and substantially verbatim account of proceedings in the Senate for the date specified.
Daily Digest – Read a summary of the day’s floor and committee actions, with page references to the Congressional Record. Also lists the measures scheduled for action during the next meeting.
Roll Call Votes – Go to a table of all Roll Call Votes this year. The most recent votes are listed at the top.

Learn about filing lobbying documents with the Office of Public Records.

This chart compares legislative statistics over a 20-year period. The chart is in PDF format.

There are several ways to read the text of bills, including Web and print resources. Use this guide to learn how to find copies of bills.

Find out about congressional voting with this How to guide.

The Senate document room provides copies of publications generated by the Senate; including bills, reports, and committee assignment lists.

* Senators
* Committees
* Legislation & Records
* Art & History
* Visitors
* Reference

* Contact
* Content Responsibility
* Usage Policy
* PDF Help
* Privacy Policy
* www.senate.gov

http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/g_three_sections_with_teasers/legislative_home.htm

***

http://www.senate.gov/general/committee_membership/committee_memberships_JSLC.htm
This page has a window with all Senate committees in a pull-down menu which when selected offers a listing of all members on the committee selected – very handy

***

United States Senate
GO
United States Senate Senators Home Committees Home Legislation & Records Home Art & History Home Visitors Center Home Reference Home
United States Senate
Committee and Subcommittee Membership
Committee Assignments for the 110th Congress
Committee Hearings & Meetings Scheduled

Home > Committees Home

Committees

Standing

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry
http://agriculture.senate.gov/

Appropriations
http://appropriations.senate.gov/

Armed Services
http://armed-services.senate.gov/

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
http://banking.senate.gov/public/

Budget
http://budget.senate.gov/

Commerce, Science, and Transportation
http://commerce.senate.gov/public/

Energy and Natural Resources
http://energy.senate.gov/public/

Environment and Public Works
http://epw.senate.gov/public/?CFID=6268185&CFTOKEN=57797321

Finance
http://finance.senate.gov/

Foreign Relations
http://foreign.senate.gov/

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
http://help.senate.gov/

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/

Judiciary
http://judiciary.senate.gov/

Rules and Administration
http://rules.senate.gov/public/
Small Business and Entrepreneurship
http://sbc.senate.gov/

Veterans’ Affairs
http://veterans.senate.gov/public/?CFID=6268353&CFTOKEN=73832594

Special, Select, and Other

Indian Affairs
http://indian.senate.gov/public/

Select Committee on Ethics
http://ethics.senate.gov/

Select Committee on Intelligence
http://intelligence.senate.gov/

Special Committee on Aging
http://aging.senate.gov/

Joint

Joint Committee on Printing
http://jcp.senate.gov/

Joint Committee on Taxation
http://www.house.gov/jct/

Joint Committee on the Library
http://www.senate.gov/general/committee_membership/committee_memberships_JSLC.htm

Joint Economic Committee
http://jec.senate.gov/

About the Senate Committee System

Due to the high volume and complexity of its work, the Senate divides its tasks among 20 committees, 68 subcommittees, and 4 joint committees. Although the Senate committee system is similar to that of the House of Representatives, it has its own guidelines, within which each committee adopts its own rules. This creates considerable variation among the panels.

Standing committees generally have legislative jurisdiction. Subcommittees handle specific areas of the committee’s work. Select and joint committees generally handle oversight or housekeeping responsibilities.

The chair of each committee and a majority of its members represent the majority party. The chair primarily controls a committee’s business. Each party assigns its own members to committees, and each committee distributes its members among its subcommittees. The Senate places limits on the number and types of panels any one senator may serve on and chair.

Committees receive varying levels of operating funds and employ varying numbers of aides. Each hires its own staff. The majority party controls most committee staff and resources, but a portion is shared with the minority.

Several thousand bills and resolutions are referred to committees during each 2-year Congress. Committees select a small percentage for consideration, and those not addressed often receive no further action. The bills that committees report help to set the Senate’s agenda.

http://www.senate.gov/general/common/generic/about_committees.htm

US Senate Caucuses

Informal congressional groups and organizations of Members with shared interests in specific issues or philosophies have been part of the American policymaking process since colonial times. Typically, these groups organize without official recognition by the chamber and are not funded through the appropriation process.

In the Senate there is one officially recognized caucus — the Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control established by law in 1985.

Read Senate Judiciary Committee hearing transcripts for Supreme Court nominees.

Supreme Court Nominations is a list of nominees to the Court since 1789.

Would you like to read about the history of a Senate committee? This list of published histories will get you started.

To find committee hearings, click here

Committee and subcommittee membership booklet is available from GPO Access.

* Senators
* Committees
* Legislation & Records
* Art & History
* Visitors
* Reference

* Contact
* Content Responsibility
* Usage Policy
* PDF Help
* Privacy Policy
* www.senate.gov

http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/committees/d_three_sections_with_teasers/committees_home.htm

***

http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/e_one_section_no_teasers/org_chart.htm

Nifty chart showing organization of Senate with “roll-over” which gives name of Senator for each position of leadership.

Senate Organization Chart for the 111th Congress
The Virtual Reference Desk provides resources about Senate leadership, committees, and officers.

***

http://finance.senate.gov/press/Bpress/2009press/prb021309b.pdf

A full summary of provisions written in the Finance and House Ways & Means Committees is available
on the Finance website here:
http://finance.senate.gov/press/Bpress/2009press/prb021209.pdf

The final recovery and reinvestment plan contained approximately $287 billion in tax cuts for families
and businesses, with a particular focus on creating jobs in the green energy, highway, and schoolbuilding
sectors. The tax cuts included a $400 ]per ]worker tax credit – known as Making Work Pay credit
– to put cash in the hands of America’s working families in the next few months. Additional Finance
Committee provisions included a $14.4 billion measure providing a one ]time, $250 billion payment to
seniors, veterans, and retirees, and approximately $177 billion more in investments to create jobs in
health information technology, to help out ]of ]work Americans keep their health care coverage and find
new employment, and to give aid to struggling state economies. The legislation also included a major
expansion of Trade Adjustment Assistance to help American firms avoid layoffs due to international
competition, and to help workers negatively affected by trade stay on their financial feet and retrain for
new, good ]paying jobs here at home.

http://finance.senate.gov/sitepages/baucus.htm
http://finance.senate.gov/sitepages/press.htm

***

Request for

Public Comment

Finance Staff Discussion Draft of Proposal to Modify Tax Treatment of Related Party Reinsurance Companies

Technical Explanation of Reinsurance Staff Discussion Draft

Bipartisan Staff Discussion Draft on President’s Proposal to Require
Information Reporting on Electronic Payment Mechanism Reimbursements

Technical Explanation of Bipartisan Staff Discussion Draft

Public Comments on Basis Reporting Requirements for Publicly-Traded Securities

Basis Reporting Requirements for Publicly-Traded Securities

Broker Reporting of Customer’s Basis in Securities Transactions

Public Comments on Tax Technical Correction Act of 2006 (S. 4026)

Public Comments on Tax Technical Correction Act of 2005 (S. 1447)

http://finance.senate.gov/sitepages/techcorrections.htm

http://finance.senate.gov/
Chairman Max Baucus,
Ranking Member Chuck Grassley,

***
02/10/2009 HARKIN, KOHL REINTRODUCE BILL TO GIVE CONSUMERS FULL INFORMATION ON EXORBITANT 401 (K) PLAN MANAGEMENT FEES

February 10, 2009

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) and Senator Herb Kohl (D-WI), Chairman of the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, introduced legislation today to protect American workers by ensuring they can access information on the cost of 401 (k) plans’ management fees. The Harkin/Kohl Defined Contribution Fee Disclosure Act of 2009 would require 401(k) plan providers to disclose all fees so that workers saving for retirement can make a fully informed decision about which plan is best for them.

Choosing a plan with a lower management fee can boost Americans’ retirement savings by thousands of dollars. In 2007, AARP found that if a 35-year-old invested $20,000 in a 401(k) plan over 30 years, earning a 6.5 percent return and paying 0.5 percent in fees, that individual would end up with $132,287 in savings. But if their fees increased to 1.5 percent, only $99, 679 would be left for their retirement – a 25 percent reduction in the account balance.

“I believe there is a basic right for consumers to clearly know how much products and services are costing them,” said Senator Kohl. “Disclosure is especially important in the case of 401(k)s, as the slightest difference in fees can translate into a staggering depletion in savings, greatly affecting one’s ability to build a secure retirement.”

http://aging.senate.gov/

http://aging.senate.gov/hearing_detail.cfm?id=308079&

***

Committee Members
111th Congress, 1st Session
Senate

House
Max Baucus, Chairman
Montana

John D. Rockefeller IV
West Va.

Kent Conrad
North Dakota

Chuck Grassley
Iowa
Orrin G. Hatch
Utah Charles B. Rangel, Vice Chairman
New York

Fortney Pete Stark
California

Sander M. Levin
Michigan

Wally Herger
California

The Joint Committee on Taxation
1015 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC. 20515
Front Office: (202) 225-3621
Privacy Policy

Edward D. Kleinbard
Chief of Staff

Bernard A. Schmitt
Deputy Chief of Staff

Emily S. McMahon
Deputy Chief of Staff

Thomas A. Barthold
Deputy Chief of Staff

http://www.house.gov/jct/

***

Joint Economic Committee
http://jec.senate.gov/

PLEASE SELECT A CHART SERIES:
The Bush Economic Record 17 Charts
At What Cost?: Egregious Price Increases in the Pharmaceutical Drug Industry 4 Charts
Flight Delays Cost Passengers, Airlines, and the U.S. Economy Billions 3 Charts
How Are High Food Prices Impacting American Families? 4 Charts
The Costs of the Iraq War and What The American People Could Get with Those Funds 7 Charts
Extending the Bush Tax Cuts is the Wrong Way to Stimulate the Economy 5 Charts
Economic Costs of the Iraq War Hearing 5 Charts
What Should the Federal Government do to Avoid a Recession Hearing 6 Charts
Sovereign Wealth Funds 3 Charts

*
Subprime Housing Crisis Timeline
The JEC has compiled a timeline of events tracking the subprime crisis from December 2006 to the present. Although it does not include every event in the markets, in Congress, or in the Administration, it provides a fairly comprehensive background guide to the current housing crisis and the steps taken to avoid further deterioration of the subprime market.

http://jec.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ChartsData.Home

***

Reference – Senate

Statistics & Lists

Capitol

Committees

Elections

Legislation & Procedure

Nominations & Treaties

Officers & Staff

Political Parties & Leadership

Senators

Sessions of Congress

Votes

Consult Bibliographies for lists of books on Congress and the government as well as for lists of special collections, such as books written by sitting Senators and novels about Capitol Hill.

http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/two_column_table/stats_and_lists.htm

***

Transcripts of hearings may be available on a committee Web site, from the Government Printing Office, or from a federal depository library. Learn how to find Committee Hearings.

http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/g_three_sections_with_teasers/reference_home.htm

***
This one is amazing – (it could be a viable practical solution to the toxic assets undermining companies’ value.)

MBIA Splits Off Municipal Bond Insurance Business (Update2)

By Shannon D. Harrington and Jody Shenn

Feb. 18 (Bloomberg) — MBIA Inc., the largest bond insurer, will split its municipal bond insurance business from the mortgage-related debt guarantees that led to the loss of its top credit ratings. The shares surged as much as 42 percent.

Armonk, New York-based MBIA transferred guarantees on about $537 billion of municipal bonds to MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois, which it plans to move to New York and rename as National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. It also paid the new entity $4.98 billion in premiums and dividends, MBIA said today in a statement.

MBIA is seeking to revive its core business after guarantees on complex mortgage-backed securities and other debt saddled it with potential losses as U.S. home foreclosures soared and the market for the securities froze. The loss of its AAA ratings last year crippled its ability to write new muni-bond insurance, creating an opportunity for rivals to take market share.

“It’s a positive but it’s a small positive,” said Robert Haines, an analyst at CreditSights Inc. in New York. “We’re going to need to see further steps and the further steps are much more challenging than the step they took today.”

MBIA also said today it has had discussions with the U.S. Treasury about additional capital, which it will need to win back its top ratings, suggesting the company may seek funds from the government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program.

Standard & Poor’s today lowered its financial-strength ratings on the MBIA Illinois unit, acquired in 1989, one level to AA- from AA, saying its capital so far is “marginally below our ‘AA’ standard.” S&P also said the unit was downgraded because of “uncertain business prospects.”

Reinvigorate Market

MBIA rose $1.11, or 32 percent, to $4.59 at 9:54 a.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading, after earlier climbing to $4.93. The shares had lost 72 percent in the past year before today.

Chief Executive Officer Jay Brown told MBIA shareholders in a letter today that the municipal bond insurance business “will not subsidize our structured business.”

The mortgage-debt and other guarantees that plunged in value amid the housing and credit-market crisis “remain in an entity with ample claims-paying resources to meet any expected claims,” Brown said.

“Municipalities and authorities have been searching for bond insurance in a marketplace where only one insurer is currently active,” New York Insurance Superintendent Eric Dinallo said in a statement. “With the return of a solidly capitalized insurer with more than 30 years of experience, we hope this will help reinvigorate the municipal bond market and help public entities get easier, less costly access to credit.”

Sliding Share

MBIA Insurance Corp.’s share of new insured municipal debt issues in the U.S. plummeted to 2.5 percent last year from 22 percent in 2007, according to data compiled by Thomson Reuters.

The portion of new municipal issues that were insured last month slid to 15 percent, according to Thomson. Assured Guaranty Corp., the bond insurer backed by billionaire Wilbur Ross, said it provided guarantees on $2.8 billion, or 81 percent.

Municipal borrowers used insurance on 18 percent of the bonds they sold in 2008, down from 47 percent in 2007 amid concern about the health of the guarantors, according to data compiled by Thomson Reuters. The unprecedented decline in private municipal bond insurance also led a blue-ribbon commission of local officials and industry professionals to call for studying the creation of a new mutually owned guarantor.

Raising Capital

The new insurer, which might not be able to win AAA ratings, may not need them, according to Steve Stelmach and Amy DeBone, analysts at Friedman, Billings, Ramsey Group Inc. in Arlington, Virginia.

“Should National be able to attain double-A ratings, we believe that a significant portion of public finance market that remains below double-A rated would benefit from a wrap,” they wrote in a report today. “However, market acceptance of the new bond insurer remains an open question.”

Brown said MBIA intends to raise capital for the new company “well in excess” of historical requirements for AAA ratings, which the insurer had until June, when both Moody’s Investors Service and S&P stripped the company of their top rankings.

MBIA Insurance Corp., the main insurance unit before the split-off now has a Baa1 rating from Moody’s and a BBB+ rating from S&P, both of which are just three levels above non- investment grade.

Treasury Talks

MBIA has had discussions with the U.S. Treasury about additional capital, Brown said in the shareholder letter.

“We will continue to explore whether this is an avenue that can provide capital to a healthy financial institution on terms that work for all of our constituencies,” Brown said. Proposed limits on compensation at companies that accept government funds, though, “create obvious challenges to attract, retain and motivate employees for organizations that accept TARP funds,” he said.

MBIA’s municipal insurance business includes the rights and obligations to Financial Guaranty Insurance Co.’s business, which the company reinsured last year, according to the statement.

To contact the reporters on this story: Shannon D. Harrington in New York at sharrington6@bloomberg.net; Jody Shenn in New York at jshenn@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: February 18, 2009 09:59 EST

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a0p9547U7sno&refer=home

***
Note – about above story – cnbc “Power Lunch” show today, 02-18-09 just before 12.12 p.m. (Noon) had Jay Brown, CEO of MBIA explaining that they divided the “structured investment vehicles” part of their business away from their municipal bond insurance by making it into a separate isolated company with around $8 billion in the new company. That left $10.34 Billion in the original company.

He said they are not going to be doing credit derivatives anymore, not selling credit insurance or derivatives. He also said that every bond is an individual story but overall agreed with the anchors that the bonds in many cases are at risk. Although both companies will still be under the same ticker symbol for the time being, and shares held for the original company will still hold both companies – the isolation of municipal bond insurance in a straight-forward insurance facility is (great news. – my comment.)

(My question – what are they planning to do with their existing credit derivatives and are they not going to be involved in credit derivatives, credit default swaps and what will they do with those that are still considered company assets of the original company? – what will it do to the pension funds and others that are invested with them?)

He said this is not the “good bank / bad bank” model as an anchor suggested. [And, he is right - this is something else and represents a structured appropriate solution that could work as soon as the other piece of the puzzle is resolved in the original company. My guess is that bankruptcy would be one choice of restructuring it but that is probably the costliest solution compared to some other possibilities. There must be a way to convert the old credit derivatives and structured investment vehicles based upon some very basic process. That needs to be defined. -my note.]

CNBC, Power Lunch, 02-18-09, before 12.12 p.m. (Noon)
Jay Brown interview, CEO of MBIA

http://www.cnbc.com/id/15838342

http://www.cnbc.com/

At 1.50 p.m. later on the same day, 02-18-09, the (MBI), MBIA Inc. Stock had risen 31.6% according to the chart on cnbc’s website.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/15837856/
All shows throughout the day are listed on the left side of this page in links to find them.

***

This one is stupid - (and undermines the process of solvency and merit) -

RBS Said to Boost Bonuses by Up to 600 Million Pounds (Update2)

By Jon Menon

Feb. 18 (Bloomberg) — Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc may give employees as much as 600 million pounds ($850 million) of bonds to supplement 2008 bonuses after the government-controlled lender said it cut the cash element of its incentive plan by more than 90 percent, a person familiar with the matter said.

The bank will give the bonds to employees as part of a deferred compensation plan, said the person, who wouldn’t be identified because the details haven’t been released. Edinburgh- based RBS will also give 165 million pounds to “lower paid” employees to replace a profit-share plan.

RBS said yesterday it would give workers 175 million pounds in cash payments, 90 percent less than 2.5 billion pounds paid for 2007. The lender last month reported a 28 billion-pound annual loss, the biggest by a British company. Governments across the world are putting pressure on financial services firms to limit pay after the industry racked up more than $1 trillion of losses in the credit crisis.

“All the additional bonuses that may be available are conditional on performance,” Prime Minister Gordon Brown told reporters at his monthly press briefing in London today. “There will be no rewards for failure.”

The deferred bonus payments will be made in RBS bonds created for the purpose over three years starting in 2010, said the person. The bonds can’t be sold for at least five years.

The government, which has been pressing banks to curb bonus payments, said last month it may increase its stake in RBS to 70 percent from 58 percent after injecting 20 billion pounds into the lender.

Future Clawback

Any deferred award is subject to a clawback “if future losses arise in relation to their 2008 activities,” and is dependent on how many employees remain, RBS said yesterday.

Restrictions on bonuses may harm RBS’s competitiveness, wrote Ian Gordon, an analyst at Exane BNP Paribas in a note to investors today.

“Whilst widely popular with the British public, the potential lack of flexibility to recruit and/or retain key revenue generators is a concern in terms of the future development and performance of RBS’s businesses,” wrote Gordon who cut his rating on the stock to “neutral” from “outperform”.

RBS spokesman Neil Moorhouse declined to provide details beyond the bank’s statement yesterday. A Treasury spokesman was unavailable to comment. The Financial Times reported the plan for the additional payments earlier today.

To contact the reporter on this story: Jon Menon in London at jmenon1@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: February 18, 2009 11:49 EST

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aJJZcuF602Uc&refer=home

***

President Obama’s plan to deal with the U.S. housing crisis aims to help as many as 9 million families avoid foreclosure.
02-18-09

***
Goldman Sachs Partners Borrow to Cover Margin Calls
Topics:Economy (U.S.) | Economy (Global) | Wall Street | Banking
Sectors:Financial Services | Banks
Companies:Goldman Sachs Group Inc
By: Charles Gasparino | 18 Feb 2009 | 01:25 PM ET

Charles Gasparino
On-Air Editor

Tough times on Wall Street are reaching all the way to the highest levels of the most storied former investment bank—Goldman Sachs—as partners there are being forced to borrow money to cover margin calls, according to sources within the firm.

Several Goldman Sachs partners have leveraged their Goldman Sachs stock to buy alternative investments such as hedge funds & private equity, and they have done so through their Goldman Sachs brokerage accounts.

But Goldman stock [GS 83.83 -1.88 (-2.19%) ] has declined in value by more than 50 percent since last spring, meaning that Goldman Sachs is in the awkward position of making margin calls on its own partners, who can’t meet those calls because their alternative investments are underwater and they don’t have enough cash on hand.

Now those partners are being forced to borrow money—millions of dollars—to meet Goldman Sachs’ own margin calls.

Sources at Goldman told CNBC that the borrowing is not a widespread phenomenon. It affects a “few” partners, sources say. But it is significant enough that the firm is arranging for its own financial advising firm to help facilitate borrowing for partners that need the money.

Buying stock on margin—basically on credit—is inherently risky. When markets turn down and stock values fall, the people who offer that credit call their clients, needing more cash to make up the lost value. These “margin calls” are a classic sign of bad times in the market all the way back to the depression, and now they’re back, big time.

* Get Real-Time Quotes for Goldman Sachs

RELATED LINKS

Current DateTime: 11:01:04 18 Feb 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29260357

* Goldman Pres. to Retire at End of March
* RIM Execs Settle SEC Charges
* Fed Taking Step Toward Inflation Target
* European Banks Braced for Tough 2009

Margin calls are fairly common on Wall Street and there are several high profile examples of top execs being squeezed by margin calls—Sumner Redstone of Viacom, Chairman/CEO Aubrey McClendon of Chesapeake Energy). And now it’s happening at the white shoe firms, Goldman Sachs.
© 2009 CNBC.com

Goldman Sachs Video Gallery
along right side of page – including 02-17-09 announcement that the Goldman president will be retiring on March 31.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/29260008

** My Note -

It was great to see President Clinton on Larry King Live last night on CNN – that was a very interesting and enlightening interview – the conference that is ongoing for the Clinton Global Initiative and micro-loans / innovative and mighty, directed solutions from citizens everywhere is very heartening.

“Muster Up” is probably not very well known anymore, but it is probably time to do that, both as individual citizens of the United States and as citizens of the World.

I, for one am making the call for citizens to participate in the solutions. It does involve us. It is our problem. It does affect us. We are part of the available solutions that could work. And, it will take our abilities to apply our knowledge, skills, talents and life experience to help structure and construct solutions that work. We can do that.

“MUSTER UP, citizens – It is time to tackle the difficulties at hand.”

- cricketdiane, 02-18-09

bonds and leverage and hedge funds and dodging reality based accounting and political persuasion and buying favoritism and, and, and, financial “thinking paths” ad nauseum

I said that when the stock market dropped to the 7500 mark on the Dow, that I would see what I could do. And, I still believe the real value of the Dow is about 6500 more or less, but before we get there -

The players in this charade of financial genius are going to have to fix the mess they have driven into the unpredictable chaos that is evolving before us each day. There is absolutely no willingness to do so.

Therefore, the solutions are limited by much talk and little real action.

So, in honor of reality – write these sources of this mess and explain it to them in terms they and their friends can understand -

RNCommunications@gop.com

cpac@conservative.org

feedback@brookings.edu

Chairman@gop.com

Office of Constituent Services – Republican National Committee
info@gop.com

***

The Hill welcomes letters to the editor.

* Letters should relate to an article that has appeared in The Hill and should be no longer than 500 words.
* Letters may be edited for content and space.
* For verification purposes, only letters that include the sender’s name, address and telephone number will be considered for publication.
* Authors cannot be notified in advance of a letter’s publication.

Letters can be sent to:
The Hill
1625 K Street NW
Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006

or, faxed to 202-628-8503
or, emailed to letters@thehill.com

- I figure this is the paper that is available in the bathrooms of the Capital to read up there in Washington. They definitely need to hear something new.

And,

Email the folks at the Hoover Institute that had a heavy hand in the economic policies that we are enduring and having to fix that were perpetrated by Republican Party cronies and other business leaders.

Then, when it gets to 6500 on the Dow – let me know.

Hopefully, there will be some change in the way bonds are being handled and bondholders are using their ill-gotten advantage to improperly crush the companies they were supposed to be “helping.”

Otherwise, we won’t have many companies of any appreciable size or quality left by the time they are done. How many valuable national assets and resources do we have to lose before those who can help fit the appropriate solutions to the task will have done so?

Nearly every corporation and company in America is a national asset and a valuable resource – or they wouldn’t have been in business this long. Now, what will we do to keep them vibrant and viable founded upon solid ground financially with healthy profitable potential available to them in a reasonable, ethical and prudent manner?

Somebody please explain to the Republican-oriented that they are not wasting our time at anything but their own expense for every moment they waste and want with it now. After barely surviving the duress that our economy and our people are enduring and have been enduring throughout their reign – I think they should have to help fix it and I don’t mean to re-install fantasy accounting and fantasy happy horse shit about how wonderful things are while they rob us blind.

- cricketdiane, 02-18-09

When the Dow got to 7500 – I figured it’d be about time to do something last minute to make things better – but I don’t have a clue about how to encourage real citizenship in corporate financial structures of bonds and leverage and hedge funds and dodging reality based accounting and political persuasion and buying favoritism and, and, and, – financial “thinking paths” ad nauseum.

Bondholders are acting like principles, bond values are volatile, defaults of a third of risky bonds are possible – who is regulating this stuff? Anybody?

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2009/NEW021409A.htm

G-7 meeting
IMF Gains New Funding, Puts Focus on Bank Clean Up

IMF Survey online

February 14, 2009

* IMF welcomes Japan loan, seeks to double Fund resources
* Says emerging markets may face big financing problems in 2009
* Clean up of banks critical for recovery from crisis

IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn, warning that the global economic crisis was set to bite emerging markets and low-income countries harder this year, said he aimed to double the Fund’s lendable resources to $500 billion and thanked Japan for leading the way by contributing $100 billion.

Speaking to reporters following a meeting on February 13-14 in Rome of the Group of Seven (G-7) major industrialized countries, Strauss-Kahn said that advanced economies were in a serious recession and the rest of the world was close to one.

Along with implementing planned economic stimulus measures, the next critical step in combating the global financial crisis is to restructure damaged banks and clean up the financial sector, he said.

In a communiqué, G-7 ministers said they were committed to acting jointly to support world growth and employment and strengthen the financial sector, while avoiding protectionism. The ministers met as the U.S. Senate voted in favor of a $787 billion economic stimulus plan—clearing the way for it to be signed into law by President Barack Obama.

Boosting IMF resources

The ministers backed a proposal to increase the resources available to the IMF to help support countries hurt by the crisis.  We agree that a reformed IMF, endowed with additional resources, is crucial to respond effectively and flexibly to the current crisis,  their statement said.

Strauss-Kahn (left) exchanges the signed loan agreement with Shoichi Nakagawa, Japan’s Minister of Finance, at the Rome ceremony (photo: IMF)

Japan signed an agreement in Rome to lend an extra $100 billion to the IMF and Strauss-Kahn said he aimed to double total IMF lendable resources to $500 billion [see related story on the Japan loan].

The biggest concrete result of this summit is the loan by the Japanese … I want to thank the Japanese for having led the way… Now I will continue with the objective of doubling the (IMF) resources,  he told reporters.  It is the largest loan ever made in the history of humanity.

Why the IMF needs more money

The IMF has so far committed around $50 billion in lending to a number of economies affected by the crisis, including Belarus, Hungary, Iceland, Latvia, Pakistan, Serbia, and Ukraine. It announced a precautionary loan for El Salvador last month and an IMF team has also been in negotiations with Turkey.

But with the global economy grinding to a virtual halt this year and both trade and capital flows plummeting, Strauss-Kahn foresaw mounting problems for developing countries in the year ahead.  There’s going to be a true, massive problem of financing for developing countries in 2009,  Strauss-Kahn said.

The IMF needed to be ready because of the fall off in private capital flows, he added.  The balance of payments surpluses emerging markets still had in 2008 will melt like snow in the sun,  he warned.

Concessional funds

The IMF Managing Director said low-income countries would face difficulties because of fallout from the global crisis.

I do not want to talk about financing and forget the poorest countries,  he said.  I also want to double concessional resources.

The IMF and the World Bank provide lending to low-income countries at concessional rates to help finance their development.

Cleaning up the banks

Before the meeting Strauss-Kahn welcomed economic stimulus measures announced by several major and emerging market economies and said it was now critical to start applying them.

In Rome, Strauss-Kahn told reporters that the next critical step was to take action to clean up the banking sector.  Today the problem is not really stimulus any more. It’s really the problem of the banking sector and the restructuring of the banking sector.

He said that credit markets were still not functioning well,  …so the restructuring of the financial sector is absolutely essential.

What we must do is to test viability bank by bank. The banks that are viable you must help them with public money. The ones that aren’t you must help them to be taken over by another.

Politically difficult

He recognized that spending additional public money was politically difficult when people legitimately felt that the banking sector had created the crisis. But it was important to do so, otherwise the economy would not recover. The IMF had studied 122 banking crises around the world and the lesson was that banks’ balance sheets must be cleaned up for real recovery to begin.

The banking sector can start distributing credit only once it has shrunk and it’s been cleaned up,  he said.

Comments on this article should be sent to imfsurvey@imf.org

***

http://www.g7finance.tesoro.it/opencms/opencms/handle404?exporturi=/export/sites/G8/it/2009ItalianPresidency/Meetings/February/Communiques/Documents/Comunicato.pdf&%5D

Omnibus Communique – (mentioned above)

The G7 Finance Ministers have asked their Deputies to prepare, in consultation with other partners, a progress report in four months on developing an agreed set of common principles and standards on propriety, integrity and transparency of international economic and financial activity.

The financial measures taken by each of us are helping to stabilize extremely volatile financial markets. These actions aimed at restoring normal credit flows to the economy follow three approaches as needed: i) enhance liquidity and funding through traditional and newly-created instruments and facilities; ii) strengthen the capital base according to the competent authority’s assessment of individual financial institutions; iii) facilitate the orderly resolution of impaired assets. The G7 commit to take any further action that may prove necessary to reestablish full confidence in the global financial system. We will continue to work together and to cooperate to avoid undesirable spillovers and distortions.

The G7 is committed to continue working with partners in international fora to accelerate reforms of the regulatory framework, including limiting procyclicality, the scope of regulation, compensation practices, market integrity and risk management.

Statement of G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors
Rome, Italy, February 14, 2009

***
February 20, 2009
Title: Seminar: The State of Public Finances: Outlook and Medium-Term Policies After the 2008 Crisis (IMF seminar)
Calendar page
http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/bc/eng/index.asp#top

***
World Economic Outlook Update  2009
Global Economic Slump Challenges Policies

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2009/update/01/index.htm

***
http://www.imf.org/external/index.htm
HOME

***
IMFSurvey Magazine: Interview
Subscribe
Focus Now on Applying Stimulus, IMF Says Ahead of G-7

Factory in Illinois, United States: global downturn is stalling growth, eroding jobs in advanced economies (photo: Chuck Berman/Chicago Tribune/MCT)
Related Links

* Video: watch interview
* IMF calls for action on banks
* IMF’s world growth forecast
* IMF urges G-20 action
* World faces deepening crisis
* IMF on fiscal stimulus

GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS
Focus Now on Applying Stimulus, IMF Says Ahead of G-7

By Camilla Andersen
IMF Survey online

February 12, 2009

* Governments must now carry out their stimulus plans, IMF says
* IMF head warns of protectionism  through the back door
* Solutions to crisis must not be at expense of other economies

IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn said that advanced countries must now focus on getting their economies moving again by implementing the stimulus packages they have announced, as well as cleaning up their financial sectors.

U.S. Congressional leaders have agreed a stimulus package worth $789 billion, and countries in Europe and Asia have also taken steps to counter the global slowdown.

Speaking ahead of a trip to Rome to join a conference of the world’s advanced economies, known as the Group of Seven (G-7), Strauss-Kahn said:  So the question is no more to convince the governments to move today, but for them to implement the policies they need to manage.

He warned of the dangers of protectionist solutions to the crisis, which started in mid-2007.  You may have protectionism coming through the back door, especially in the financial sector,  he said.

He also outlined how IMF programs for crisis-hit countries differed from the past, and pointed to greater focus on assisting vulnerable groups through the development of social safety nets. Here is an edited transcript of his interview.

IMF Survey online: The financial crisis seems to be intensifying. Are we in the eye of the hurricane right now or is worse to come?

Strauss-Kahn: The problem is that the effect on the real economy, for the most part, is still to come. 2009 will certainly be a rather bad year for growth, not only for the advanced economies, but also for the emerging economies.

But there [are] signals, some signs of hope. Large stimulus packages have been implemented, especially in the United States-you will have seen the latest developments here in Washington and on Capitol Hill. The same is true, even if it’s not on the same level, in most European countries, where some room was available for stimulus packages. Also, most governments have realized that they have to work on the financial sector-to restructure the financial sector and clean up bank balance sheets.

IMF Survey online: With dramatic job losses around the world, how serious is the risk of protectionist politics?

Strauss-Kahn: It’s big. It’s really big. Not traditional protectionism-increasing tariffs and things like that. Most governments have understood from lessons from the past that this did not work, and it even made things worse.

But you may have protectionism coming through the back door, especially in the financial sector. To give you an example, when governments provide some new resources or recapitalization of banks, they may add some comment saying that the money should stay at home. Or you may have in different stimulus packages some comment or amendment saying that this money also should be used to buy national products, and these kinds of things. So this kind of protectionism may come back.

So the risk of a  beggar your neighbor  policy is still high, and I think it is part of our job to explain that in no way in a global crisis [should there] be a domestic or national solution: we have to find a global response.

IMF Survey online: The IMF says that governments have done a lot already but that they haven’t achieved a decisive breakthrough yet. What more should governments do to prevent a further downward spiral in the global economy?

Strauss-Kahn: A big change, especially the big change during the fall, was that most governments, including the United States, Japan, the European countries, but also others, did not realize that what the IMF had been claiming for months-that we needed a stimulus package at the global level, and at the same time that there was no solution but comprehensive action on the financial sector. They did not realize that it was true and that they had to act. Probably the G-20 meeting on November 15 here in Washington was the point when heads of states and governments became more explicit about it.

Now, it takes a lot of time in different countries, depending on the national democratic processes and other reasons, to implement this. It is true for the stimulus packages, and even more so for restructuring of the financial, and especially the banking sector. So the question is no more to convince the governments to move today, but for them to implement the policies they need to manage.

I have just come from a tour in Europe and Asia, and I am flying to the G-7 meeting in Rome, and the message from the Fund is twofold: First, what you prepared is OK, in most cases, so just do it

Second, the crisis has now hit hard in the emerging countries, and the financing we have [provided] for the emerging countries is very important. It may come to us if it goes badly in those countries because of the global economy-because we are in a global crisis-so you have to take care not only of what is happening in your own economy, or in the regional economy, but you, the leaders, need to take care of the global economy. So these two messages are very important today.

IMF Survey online: Some critics are already saying, as in the Asian crisis, that the IMF is making things worse by suggesting that governments raise interest rates and cut spending. Are IMF programs different from before?

Strauss-Kahn: I’m not sure I agree with the premise of your question. Yes, the IMF made mistakes, sometimes even big mistakes. But please remember that we were trying to help economies that were in trouble. That’s what we are here for  If countries never ran into problems, there would be no need for the IMF.

But when no one wants your currency, then you have no choice but to raise interest rates to make it more attractive. And when you are running a large current account deficit, you must take steps to reduce it. You need to find additional resources-including by borrowing from the Fund-and to balance it with cuts to the budget.

So when the IMF is called in it is because a country has problems, and it a bit naïve to believe that those problems can be resolved without pain. In fact, without the help of the IMF, the solution in the country will be even more painful for the people.

That said, the world has changed, and this crisis differs from previous crises, so we have had to adapt our policies. What the IMF has tried to do is to focus the conditionality of our loans on the core problems we need to fix. In the past there were many conditions which were certainly good for the country but not directly linked to the most pressing problems at hand.

Strauss-Kahn:  What the IMF has tried to do is to focus the conditionality of our loans on the core problems we need to fix  (IMF photo)

When you look at the number of conditions in the IMF’s most recent programs, they have dropped by 30-40 percent, and are mainly focused on the financial sector or the fiscal deficit.

Let me add one more point. In this crisis, everyone in the country may be hit, but some will be hit harder than others. I believe the Fund has to take care of the most vulnerable in society. And that is why developing safety nets, even in a crisis, is very important.

Let’s take the example of Pakistan. We have a program with Pakistan, where the Fund has agreed to a dedicated amount to be spent on programs that will be implemented-with the help of the World Bank-to help the most vulnerable people.

What is true for Pakistan is also true for other countries, where we have to take into account that part of the population may be very hard hit by the crisis. We are doing this not only because we want to help people, but also because such policies will help ensure ownership of the program. Ownership is vital to the success of any IMF-supported program, and to have ownership we need to show that the program takes care of the needs of the entire population, including those who are most vulnerable.

Comments on this article should be sent to imfsurvey@imf.org

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2009/INT021209B.htm

***

Elderly New Yorkers angry as crisis hits poorest
Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:52am EST

By Claudia Parsons

NEW YORK (Reuters) – From housebound grandmothers who relay on charity meal deliveries, to ailing retirees who cannot pay rising costs for medications, older Americans feeling the pinch of the financial crisis are getting angry and forming groups with names like  Senior Outrage.

In New York, with city and state tax revenues tumbling, benefits and services to the elderly are being cut, and many older residents are furiously drawing comparisons to the billions of dollars spent to bail out banks — and pay Wall Street bonuses.

Dolores Green, 68, retired as a home help worker and lives on a government Social Security check of $740 a month. She pays $719 a month in rent, leaving just $21 for everything else.

To eat, she relies on the federal food stamp assistance program, and worries that her cost for some medication she needs for her diabetes has gone up to $8 from $3.

To get by, she said:  I run errands for seniors. They may hand me $2 or $3 or something.

Green says she sees more people seeking government assistance, such as her daughter, who lost her job after 25 years.

She’s just applied for food stamps, she’s got two kids,  Green told Reuters at a community center where some 25 elderly New Yorkers were eating a lunch of sandwiches, a gelatin dessert, milk and tomato juice.  That’s why she can’t help me, because she’s got to help her children.

Maybe I’ll move in with you,  she jokes to her friend Alice Jordan, 80, a retired teacher who suffers from osteoporosis and high blood pressure.

Jordan said her food stamp allocation had gradually eroded to $54 a month from $180.

When she reads about the well-heeled victims of financier Bernard Madoff’s suspected $50 billion Ponzi scheme, she says she wishes they would spare a thought for those who never had such wealth.

Just like this guy Madoff ripped them off, how did they feel when they lost their money and had to change their style of living? Think of us. … How do you think we feel?  she asked.

BIG BUDGET GAPS

New York City’s Department for the Aging, which runs more than 300 community centers for aging residents and provides services such as food delivery to the homebound, affordable housing and heating subsidies, has cut its 2009 budget by $4 million to $285 million and faces another proposed cut, of $9.5 million, in 2010.

The cuts are part of Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s bid to close a $4 billion city budget gap caused by the collapse of corporate tax revenues, especially from Wall Street, which normally pumps a fortune into local coffers.

New York state, which typically gets 20 percent of its revenues from Wall Street taxes, also is proposing cuts in health care and services for the elderly as part of a drive to close a $13 billion 2009 budget gap.
Among the proposals is a cut in the state contribution to the Federal Supplemental Security Income, or SSI, for elderly, blind or disabled people with little or no other income.

Parvati Devi, 62, says that would cut her SSI check by $24.  I can’t afford to have anything cut,  she said.  We collect cans on the street, we do anything to survive.

A couple of hundred retirees attended a forum with New York city and state officials this month to express their anger at cuts they say are hitting the most vulnerable people hardest.

We are outraged that the government, which has spent hundreds of billions of dollars to bail out financial institutions — and they in turn have given $18 billion as bonuses to their top executives — has no funds to support vital services for their senior citizens,  said Muriel Beach, New York City head of the State Wide Senior Action Council.

State Wide and other groups formed the  Senior Outrage Coalition  this month to mobilize protest among the city’s 1.3 million citizens aged 65 and over.

We are of a generation that fought in the sixties,  she said.  We’re out there doing it again.

City figures show that in 2006, one-fifth of New Yorkers age 65 and older lived in poverty, twice the national average. Advocacy groups say by now it is closer to one-third, and New York is second only to Detroit among major U.S. cities in its rate of poverty among the elderly.

Moreover, the federal poverty guidelines for 2008, $10,400 for a single person and $14,000 for a couple, are so low that many who are in need do not qualify for most public benefits.

Minorities tend to fare worst, with 30 percent of Hispanic, 29 percent of Asian and 20 percent of elderly blacks in poverty compared with 13 percent of elderly whites in New York City.

A formidable crowd despite walkers, canes and wheelchairs, many at the forum vented rage at lavish bonuses being paid on Wall Street.

Richard Gottfried, a state assemblyman, said while they might have been pleased to hear that six top executives at investment bank Goldman Sachs gave up their bonuses last year, the tax on their bonuses alone put $12 million into the state budget in 2007.

I, like many of you, could do a lot with $12 million,  Gottfried said.

(Editing by Patricia Zengerle)

http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE51G0X820090217

***
http://www.census.gov/econ/www/

Business and Industry
Census Bureau Economic Programs
See what Economic Census data can do for you  business.census.gov
Latest Economic Indicator     Previous     Current

IMG
Manufacturing and Trade Inventories and Sales

U.S. total business sales for December were $1,016.6 billion, down 3.2% from last month. Month-end inventories were $1,460.5 billion, down 1.3% from last month.
-5.1
November 2008
% Change in sales     -3.2
December 2008
% Change in sales

Economic Briefing Room A Indicator Release Schedule A Historical Time Series
Get help with your form
Economic Census * MA-10000 * NC-99001 * RD1 * QSS * QFR * M3     Index of Forms Programs Overview
E-commerce Data     Industry Statistics Sampler
Links to all data for an industry
Current Quarter     Multisector
Economic Statistics by Geography, Sector, and Frequency
Click on year to go to latest data.
Programs with national and subnational data
U.S.     States     Metro
areas     Coun-
ties     Cities     ZIP
codes
Economic Census     2002     2002     2002     2002     2002     2002
Survey of Business Owners   (incl. minorities, women)     2002     2002     2002     2002     2002
Statistics of U.S. Businesses  (firms by size)     2006     2006     2006
Statistics of U.S. Businesses  (estab. births, deaths)     2005     2005     2005     2005
County Business Patterns     2006     2006     2006     2006           2006
Nonemployer Statistics       2006     2006     2006     2006
Business Dynamics Statistics  (firm size and age)     2005     2005
Local Employment Dynamics Qtrly Workforce Indicators           2007     2007     2007
Commodity Flow Survey     2002     2002
Annual Survey of Manufactures     2006     2006
Building Permits     2008     2008     2008     2008     2008
Governments     2007     2007         2007     2007
Foreign Trade: State Exports     2007     2007

Other national data
Multi-sector data:
Annual Capital Expenditures Survey (ACES)     2007
Information & Communication Technology (ICT) Survey     2006
Quarterly Financial Report     2008
E-Commerce Statistics     2005
Business Expenses Survey     2002

Sector-specific data:
Construction, Mining,
Manufacturing,
Retail, Wholesale Trade
Service sectors

Data more frequent than annual
Monthly:
Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and Orders (M3)
Current Industrial Reports (selected)
Advance Monthly Sales for Retail and Food Services
Monthly Retail Sales and Inventories
Monthly Wholesale Trade Survey
Manufacturing and Trade Inventories and Sales (MTIS)
Housing Units Authorized by Building Permits

Quarterly:
Quarterly Financial Report
Quarterly Services Survey
Retail E-Commerce Sales
Current Industrial Reports (selected)
Local Employment Dynamics: QWI

All other data sets linked
above are annual, except
for the Economic Census
and Survey of Business Owners

See also the discussion of assembling time series data before and after 1997.

Economic data
by sector
Construction
Governments
Manufacturing
Mining
Retail trade
Services
Wholesale trade
International trade
Special topics
Programs overview
Business expenses
Capital expenditures
Companies
Concentration
E-Commerce
Economic studies
Historic data
Minorities/women
NAICS
NAPCS
Small business
Economic data
on people and households
Income
Poverty
Labor force
Households
Economic data from other agencies
BEA (GDP)
BLS (prices, jobs)
White House Briefing Room
Other Agencies
FedStats

http://www.census.gov/econ/www/

***
http://www.eui.eu/LIB/Guides/Economics/Statistics/Descriptions/ce.shtml

search

EUI Logo     European University Institute
Library
About the EUI     Admissions     Departments     Robert Schuman Centre     Max Weber Programme     Library
Home > Library >Guides to subject areas >Economics > ce

Statistics
Data Portal
Macro data
Micro data

ECO Journals

ECO Books

ECO Working Papers

VSP Services

Software Manuals

Economics Internet

Economics Profile

Library Catalogue

Nereus Network

Micro data

Consumer Expenditure Survey (USA)

o Data description
o Time period
o External link
o How to access data
o Catalogue record

Data description
The Consumer Expenditure Survey is issued by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor.

Supporting Documentation for the Consumer Expenditure Survey is available at 005.369 CEx in the Badia Library.
The latest volume (2006) includes: a Multiple Imputation Manual; the 2004 Consumer Expenditure Diary Survey (issued in 2006); and the 2004 Consumer Expenditure Interview Survey documentation (2006).

A reprint of Ch. 16, ‘Consumer expenditures and incomes’ from the Handbook of Methods (BLS) is available in the 2003 CEx manual (also at 055.369 CEx) and online.
Comprehensive information is provided on the CEx home page: http://www.bls.gov/cex.

Special Note: In June 2007, the Bureau of Labor Statistics issued a letter outlining some problems in the CE 2005Q3 Interview ‘MTAB’ file. Full details are available on this BLS page: http://www.bls.gov/cex/csxdatanote.htm.

The CEx survey consists of two separate parts, each with a different data collection technique and sample. In the Interview Survey, each consumer unit (CU) in the sample is interviewed every 3 months over five calendar quarters. The sample for each quarter is divided into three panels, with CU’s being interviewed every 3 months in the same panel of every quarter.

The Interview Survey collects detailed data on an estimated 60 to 70% of total family expenditures. In addition, global estimates, accounting for an additional 20 to 25% of total expenditures, are obtained for food and other selected items. In general, expenses reported in the Interview Survey are either relatively large, such as property, automobiles, or major appliances – or are expenses occuring on a fairly regular basis; such as rent, utility bills or insurance premiums.

A Diary (or daily record keeping) Survey is completed at home by the respondent family for two consecutive 1-week periods. In the Diary Survey, detailed data are collected on small, frequently-purchased items which are normally difficult to recall. These items include detailed expenditures for food and beverages, housekeeping supplies and services, non-prescription drugs and personal care products and services.

Time period
Waves available: 1984-2006.
Data updated on server: April 2008.

Waves 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999 and are available on the K:\ drive (see below for access procedure).

Waves 1984-1998 are available via ICPSR (see below for access procedure).

Special note: The November 2006 data release (wave 2004) is the corrected data set – following the discovery of data errors by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in the January 2006 (wave 2004) release.

External link
Comprehensive information is provided on the CEx home page: http://www.bls.gov/cex

The Bureau of Labor statistics has provided the Library with three Excel-format ‘parsing files’ for 1996-1998 (for those using CE data from ICPSR). Please contact econlibrary@eui.eu to request the files.

How to access data

(i) CEx waves 1999-2004 on the K:\ drive

Access to this data is restricted to current EUI members who have completed the registration procedure, as follows:

1. Complete the online EUI Data Registration Form (selecting ‘Consumer Expenditure Survey’ in the dropdown menu)
2. Sign the EUI ‘Conditions of Use’ agreement and the ‘Confidentiality Declaration’ at the Badia Library (Economics Office, 085).

Registered current EUI members can then access the data directly from drive K:\

Consumer Expenditure Survey data is mainly composed of ASCII files that can be used with Stata. Consult the online Tutorial on Loading and Using Data on WINDOWS.
Stata 9 manuals are located at 005.369 in both the VSP Reference Library and the Badia Library.
The Stata Bulletin is at SER 51 in the Badia Library.

(ii) CEx waves 1984-1998

1. Find the required data Study Number(s) in the ICPSR data holdings catalogue.
2. Send the Study Number(s) by e-mail to econlibrary@eui.eu, indicating the format in which the data should be delivered (Stata, SPSS, SAS &c)
3. Moderate-sized sets will be sent directly via e-mail. Larger sets will be placed on an FTP server and the link will be sent by e-mail. Very large sets will be copied to disk for collection at the Economics Library Office.

Users should consult ICPSR’s file decompressing instructions. The Computing Service also has instructions on using ZIP files to compress and decompress data.

Users should carefully read the University of Michigan ICPSR Responsible Use statement.

The Bureau of Labor statistics has provided the Library with four Excel-format ‘parsing’ files:
The parsing files are for 1996-1998 (for those using CE data from ICPSR); and
for 2005 (for those using CE data from the EUI K:\ drive).
Please contact econlibrary@eui.eu to request the parsing files.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE RESOURCES IN ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS

Contact: Thomas Bourke at econlibrary@eui.eu

Page updated: 12/04/08
Contact us
Vacancies
How to reach us
News
Organisation
Academic service
Computing service
Language centre
Logistics service
EUI Intranet
EUI WebMail
About the website
Directory
Getting to Florence
EUI Buildings
Postgraduate
Postdoctoral
Practical information
About the Academic Service
Why apply
Admission conditions
Language requirementes
How to apply
Information for referees
Grant information
Selection
FAQ
The EUI doctorate
Max Weber
Jean Monnet Fellowships
Fernand Braudel Senior Fellowships
Externally Funded Fellowships
Senior Fellowships
Living in Florence
Housing
Children
Student services
Staff
Economics
History & Civilization
Law
Political & Social Sciences
Academy of European Law
People
Alumni
Research activities
Postgraduate Programme
Theses Defended
Job Market
European Doctoral Programme
Publications
Economics Library
Contacts
ECO Intranet
Finance & Consumption Programme
People
Research and teaching
Online projects
Publications
Other resources
Contacts
HEC Intranet
Academy of European History
People
Research and teaching
Guide to the Law Dept.
Working Groups
Publications
Contacts
European Private Law Forum
Law Intranet
Academy of European Law
People
Research and teaching
Doctoral programme
EUI Working Papers
Visitors in the department
Links
SPS Intranet
About the Academy
Summer courses
Information for participants
Publications
Projects
Contacts
About
Research
Events
Publications
People
Applying to the RSCAS
RSCAS Intranet
Contacts
Director’s Welcome
Governance
Research Tools
Research & Training schools
Browse A..Z
RSCAS Publishing Policy
Catalogue
About the Library
Services
Electronic Resources
Collections
New acquisitions
Guides to subject areas
European Union Information
Library A-Z index
Library sitemap
People
Programme Activities
Publications
MWP Observatory
Apply to the MWP
Fellows on the Job Market
Contacts

http://www.eui.eu/LIB/Guides/Economics/Statistics/Descriptions/ce.shtml

***

Bureau of Labor Statistics
The Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE) program consists of two surveys, the quarterly Interview Survey and the Diary Survey, that provide information on the buying habits of American consumers, including data on their expenditures, income, and consumer unit (families and single consumers) characteristics. The survey data are collected for the Bureau of Labor Statistics by the U.S. Census Bureau.

The most recent data tables are for 2007, and were made available on November 26, 2008. See Featured CE Tables and Economic News Releases sections on the CE home page for current data tables and news release.

DOL Banner
www.bls.gov
Search: for:
U.S. Bureau of Labor StatisticsBureau of Labor Statistics
Newsroom | Tutorials | Release Calendar Release Calendar

* Home
* Subject Areas
* Databases & Tables
* Publications
* Economic Releases

A – Z Index | About BLS

* INFLATION
o Consumer Price Index
o Producer Price Indexes
o Import/Export Price Indexes
o Employment Cost Index
o Contract Escalation
o International Consumer Price Indexes
o Price Index Research
o INFLATION & PRICES OVERVIEW
* SPENDING
o Consumer Expenditures
o How Americans Spend Time
o Consumer Spending Overview
* UNEMPLOYMENT
o National Unemployment Rate
o State and Local Unemployment Rates
o International Unemployment Rates
o Mass Layoffs
o Unemployment Research
o UNEMPLOYMENT OVERVIEW
* EMPLOYMENT
o National Employment
o State and Local Employment
o State and County Employment
o Worker Characteristics
o Employment Projections
o Job Openings and Labor Turnover
o Employment by Occupation
o Work Experience Over Time
o Business Employment Dynamics
o International Employment Comparisons
o Employment Research
o EMPLOYMENT OVERVIEW
* PAY & BENEFITS
o Employment Costs
o National Compensation Data
o Wages by Area and Occupation
o Earnings by Demographics
o Earnings by Industry
o County Wages
o Benefits
o International Compensation Costs
o Compensation Research
o Strikes and Lockouts
o Pay & Benefits Overview
* PRODUCTIVITY
o Productivity and Costs
o Multifactor Productivity
o International Productivity
o PRODUCTIVITY OVERVIEW
* INJURIES

Consumer Expenditure Survey

CE CE Program Links
Consumer Expenditure Survey

* CE Homepage
* CE Overview
* CE FAQs
* Contact CE

* BROWSE CE
* CE HOME
* CE OVERVIEW
o About CE Tables
o Glossary of Terms
* CE NEWS RELEASES
* CE DATABASES
* CE TABLES
* CE PRODUCTS
* CE SURVEY FORMS
o INTERVIEW
o DIARY
* CE PUBLICATIONS
* CE FAQs
* CONTACT CE

SEARCH CE

* CE TOPICS
* MOST RECENT CE DATA TABLES
* REPORTS
o ANNUAL
o BIENNIAL
o ANTHOLOGY
o OTHER
* GEOGRAPHY
o NATIONAL
o REGION AND AREA
o STATE
o METROPOLITAN AREA
* PUBLIC USE MICRODATA
o DESCRIPTION AND ORDER FORM
o DOCUMENTATION

The Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE) program consists of two surveys, the quarterly Interview Survey and the Diary Survey, that provide information on the buying habits of American consumers, including data on their expenditures, income, and consumer unit (families and single consumers) characteristics. The survey data are collected for the Bureau of Labor Statistics by the U.S. Census Bureau.

The most recent data tables are for 2007, and were made available on November 26, 2008. See Featured CE Tables and Economic News Releases sections on the CE home page for current data tables and news release.
Announcement

Spending on Cell Phone Services Has Exceeded Spending on Residential Phone Services
On This Page

* CE News Releases & Reports
* CE Databases
* CE Tables
* CE Products
* CE Survey Forms

* CE Publications
* CE Special Notices
* CE FAQs
* CE Related Links
* Contact CE

CE News Releases
Consumer Expenditures

November 25, 2008
Average annual expenditures per consumer unit rose 2.6 percent in 2007 following an increase of 4.3 percent in 2006. Moderate increases in spending on housing (3.4 percent), transportation (2.9 percent), and food (0.4 percent), contributed to the small increase in 2007.

* News Release
* NEW CE News Releases Issued by BLS Regional Offices

Reports

* Spending on Cell Phone Services Has Exceeded Spending on Residential Phone Services
* Consumer Expenditures Reports
o Consumer Expenditures Annual Reports
+ Consumer Expenditures in 2006 (annual report) (PDF 114K)

CE Databases
CE Database
Database Name     Special
Notice     Top
Picks     One
Screen     Multi-
Screen     Tables     Text Files
Tutorials:
For help, try these tutorials           Most Requested Statistics Tutorial     Create Customized Tables (one screen) Tutorial     Create Customized Tables (multi screen) Tutorial
Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE)
One Screen Data Search     Multi Screen Data Search     Tables     Text Files

More Tools

* Series Report–Already know the series identifier for the statistic you want? Use this shortcut to retrieve your data.
* Text files (FTP)–For those who want it all. Download a flat file of the entire database or large subset of the database.
Featured CE Tables
Tables (1984 through 2007)
One Year Tables
CURRENT EXPENDITURE TABLES

* Age of reference person (TXT) (PDF 21K)
* Composition of consumer unit (TXT) (PDF 22K)
* Education of reference person (TXT) (PDF 22K)
* Higher income before taxes (TXT) (PDF 20K)
* Hispanic or Latino origin of reference person (TXT) (PDF 17K)
* Housing tenure and type of area (TXT) (PDF 20K)
* Income before taxes (TXT) (PDF 22K)
* Number of earners in consumer unit (TXT) (PDF 20K)
* Occupation of reference person (TXT) (PDF 23K)
* Population size of area of residence (TXT) (PDF 20K)
* Quintiles of income before taxes (TXT) (PDF 19K)
* Race of reference person (TXT) (PDF 19K)
* Region of residence (TXT) (PDF 18K)
* Size of consumer unit (TXT) (PDF 19K)
* Selected age of reference person (TXT) (PDF 20K)

Previous Years »

CURRENT EXPENDITURE SHARES TABLES

* Age of reference person (TXT) (PDF 16K)
* Composition of consumer unit (TXT) (PDF 17K)
* Education of reference person (TXT) (PDF 18K)
* Higher income before taxes (TXT) (PDF 16K)
* Hispanic or Latino origin of reference person (TXT) (PDF 14K)
* Housing tenure and type of area (TXT) (PDF 16K)
* Income before taxes (TXT) (PDF 17K)
* Number of earners in consumer unit (TXT) (PDF 17K)
* Occupation of reference person (TXT) (PDF 18K)
* Quintiles of income before taxes (TXT) (PDF 14K)
* Race of reference person (TXT) (PDF 15K)
* Region of residence (TXT) (PDF 14K)
* Size of consumer unit (TXT)(PDF 16K)

Previous Years »
CURRENT AGGREGATE EXPENDITURE SHARES TABLES

* Age of reference person (TXT) (PDF 19K)
* Composition of consumer unit (TXT) (PDF 20K)
* Education of reference person (TXT) (PDF 20K)
* Higher income before taxes (TXT) (PDF 19K)
* Hispanic or Latino origin of reference person (TXT) (PDF 17K)
* Housing tenure and type of area (TXT) (PDF 20K)
* Income before taxes (TXT) (PDF 20K)
* Number of earners in consumer unit (TXT) (PDF 18K)
* Occupation of reference person (TXT) (PDF 20K)
* Quintiles of income before taxes (TXT) (PDF 18K)
* Race of reference person (TXT) (PDF 18K)
* Region of residence (TXT) (PDF 17K)
* Size of consumer unit (TXT) (PDF 18K)

Previous Years »

Additional CE Data Tables »
CE Products

* Public Use Microdata
* NEW Public Use Microdata Documentation
o 2007 Public Use Interview Survey Microdata Documentation (PDF 515K)
o 2007 Public Use Interview Survey Data Dictionary (PDF 1,026K)
o 2007 Public Use Diary Survey Microdata Documentation (PDF 213K)
o 2007 Public Use Diary Survey Data Dictionary (PDF 200K)
o Archives

CE Survey Forms
Current Survey Forms

* NEW Computer Assisted Personal Interview (CAPI) Survey 2008 — includes economic stimulus questions starting in June 2008
* NEW Interview Survey Information Booklet 2007-08 (PDF 309K)
* Diary Survey Form 2005-09 (PDF 363K)
* NEW Computer Assisted Diary Household Characteristics Questionnaire 2009
* Diary Survey Information Booklet 2009 (PDF 285K)

All CE Survey Forms »
CE Publications

* UPDATED BLS Handbook of Methods, Chapter 16, Consumer Expenditures and Income (HTML) (PDF)
* NEW Consumer Expenditure Survey Anthology, 2008 (PDF 1.8 MB)
* Consumer Expenditure Survey Anthology, 2005 (PDF 1.2 MB)
* Consumer Expenditure Survey Anthology, 2003 (PDF 2.7 MB)
* Monthly Labor Review Articles by CE staff
* Issues in Labor Statistics
* Economic Working Papers by CE staff
* 100 Years of U.S. Consumer Spending: Data for the Nation, New York City, and Boston

CE Frequently Asked Questions
People Are Asking…

1. Does BLS have information about household spending on cell phone services?
2. What is the most recent Consumer Expenditure Survey Annual Report?
3. How do I contact the CE group?
4. Are CE standard error tables available?
5. How do you use the standard errors in the CE?
6. How does income imputation affect CE publications?

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the Consumer Expenditure Survey?
2. How is the Consumer Expenditure Survey used?
3. What is a consumer unit?
4. Who is the reference person?
5. What types of data are available and in what form?
6. What geographic areas are covered?
7. Is income information available from other sources?
8. Does the Consumer Expenditure Survey include information on assets and liabilities?
9. Are historical data from the Consumer Expenditure Survey available?
10. How are the Consumer Expenditure Survey data collected?

All CE FAQs »
CE Special Notices

* NEW CE Note to 1980 through 2006 CE Public Use Microdata users
* CE Note to 2005 CE Public Use Microdata users
* CE Note to 1999-2005 CE Public Use Microdata users
* Income Imputation Introduced with 2004 Data
* User’s Guide to Income Imputation in the CE (PDF 263K)

CE Related Links
Other BLS Programs

* Consumer Price Indexes –monthly data on changes in the prices paid by urban consumers for a representative basket of goods and services.

Other Useful Links

* Bureau of Economic Analysis
* Census Bureau’s Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP)
* Census Bureau’s Household and Housing Statistics –Income and Poverty Data
* Census Bureau’s Population Division

Contact Us
Methods of Contact

The economists and administrative personnel of the Consumer Expenditure Survey staff are available Monday through Friday to respond to inquires. Please use any of the methods below to contact the CE National Office. Inquires should include your name, and phone number, fax number, mailing address, or e-mail address, along with a brief message.

Due to unanticipated budget constraints, the CE mailing list is no longer being maintained, and printed copies of future publications will not be available until further notice. Individual copies of existing printed materials can still be mailed upon request.

Telephone
(202) 691-6900

Due to the high volume of information requests received each day, incoming calls may be connected to the office’s voice mail or transferred to an economist’s voice mail.

FAX
(202) 691-7006

Mail
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Consumer Expenditure Surveys — Branch of Information and Analysis
Postal Square Building, Room 3985
2 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E.
Washington, DC 20212-0001

E Mail
Contact us

Quick Links
Tools

* At a Glance Tables
* Economic News Releases
* Databases & Tables
* Maps

Calculators

* Inflation
* Location Quotient
* Injury And Illness

Help

* Help & Tutorials
* A to Z Index
* FAQs
* Glossary
* About BLS
* Contact Us

Info

* What’s New
* Careers @ BLS
* Find It  DOL
* Join our Mailing Lists
* Privacy & Security
* Linking & Copyright Information

Bureau of Labor Statistics
Sorry for the interruption.

Please help us improve our website by participating in the survey that begins below

Our Pledge of Privacy
The answers you provide on this survey will be used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to improve the website. Please note:

* Your participation is completely voluntary and anonymous.
* We estimate that it will take an average of two minutes to complete this survey.
* Privacy Act Statement

Click on the yes button below to take the survey after you have finished visiting our website. The survey will be available in the taskbar at the bottom of your screen when you are ready to take it.

Freedom of Information Act | Customer Survey | Do you have a technical Web site question?
bls.gov Home

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Branch of Information and Analysis Suite 3985, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20212-0001

www.bls.gov/cex | Telephone: (202) 691-6900 | Fax: (202) 691-7006 Do you have a CE data question?

http://www.bls.gov/cex/

***
http://www.eui.eu/LIB/Guides/Economics/Statistics/Descriptions/ce.shtml

European University Institute

***

IMFSurvey Magazine: Policy
Subscribe
IMF Advice Helps Fight Financial Fraud as Schemes Multiply

Based on numbers alone, the United States has probably experienced more Ponzi and pyramid schemes than anywhere (photo: Stan Honda/AFP)
Related Links

* F&D on Albania’s pyramids
* IMF fights illicit activity
* IMF technical assistance
* Technical assistance key issues
* Technical assistance in Africa
* IMF warns of fraud e-mails

PYRAMID, PONZI SCHEMES
IMF Advice Helps Fight Financial Fraud as Schemes Multiply

By Wipada Soonthornsima
IMF African Department, and
Philip Bartholomew and Mary Zephirin
IMF Monetary and Capital Markets Department

February 12, 2009

* IMF learns of rising financial fraud, especially in shallow financial systems
* Financial fraud schemes emerge by skillfully operating in regulatory gaps
* Controlling, closing down financial fraud schemes can be politically difficult

Better communications, more financial complexity, and multinational business operations have made it a lot easier to commit financial fraud.

Thwarting fraudulent financial schemes and dealing with unlicensed financial institutions are rising priorities, and the IMF is advising member governments on policies to deal with this growing problem.

For the past several years, the IMF has been informed of a rising number of financial frauds, especially in—but not limited to—countries with shallow financial systems. IMF technical assistance has helped Jamaica, Lesotho, and Swaziland to address cases of financial fraud. In addition, Kenya, Namibia, Nigeria, and Seychelles are among other countries that have relayed instances of fraud to the IMF.

Simple fraud—entering into a contract with no intention of honoring the contract’s terms—is made more difficult to identify when some financial trappings are added to make the deal or scheme appear more sophisticated and legitimate. Typically, such frauds are considered only a nuisance to the economy and not a systemic threat, but when such schemes get very big, as in Albania in 1996 or Lesotho in 2007, they can cause or threaten major damage.

Pyramids and Ponzis

Common forms of financial fraud include pyramid schemes (see Box 1)—typically referred to by scheme organizers as multilevel marketing schemes—and Ponzi schemes (see Box 2), which are usually promoted as investment schemes. Except in the case of Lesotho, where the liability of a major Ponzi scheme was estimated to have grown to about 8 percent of GDP before it was shut down, small pyramids have been the most prevalent fraud schemes.
Box 1
Pay Here to Enter

A typical pyramid scheme involves members who pay a subscription price to join. Each member is promised a reward (in cash or kind, and typically large relative to subscription) for recruiting more members. For example, each member may be required to recruit five others who each recruit five more, and so on to get the reward. While the promised large reward draws in members, the number of recruits required to be ultimately rewarded grows exponentially, and quickly exceeds the target population, leaving most members empty handed. While unfortunate for the defrauded investors, it is fortunate that individual schemes collapse very quickly and usually do not grow to systemically threaten the financial system or the economy.

A major reason such schemes constantly emerge is that they skillfully operate in regulatory gaps. It is difficult for regulators to stop unlicensed financial institutions, as they must prove that the scheme or enterprise is engaging in deposit-taking, insurance, or other regulated activities. They must prove that an enterprise is doing something illegal or that requires a license—and information can be scarce or obscure on institutions not applying for licenses or charters.

Action to obtain information can be legally complicated, and many regulators prefer not to take the risk of legal proceedings. Too often, statutes do not define and prohibit Ponzi or pyramid schemes, and it is not yet legally clear how such statutes are enforced.

It is puzzling that authorities have problems dealing with pyramid and Ponzi schemes, and that they occur continually. Moreover, as recently demonstrated with what appears to be a multibillion dollar Ponzi operating on Wall Street in the United States, it is a myth to believe that Ponzis, pyramids, and other fraudulent schemes are limited to unsophisticated victims or are most prevalent in shallow financial systems. Indeed, based on numbers alone, the United States has probably experienced more Ponzi and pyramid schemes than anywhere.

Pyramid and Ponzi schemes typically go through the following stages:

• Initiation, when the first subscriptions or investments are handed over
• Validation, when large and easy rewards earned by initial members generate strong word-of-mouth publicity
• Expansion, when a large number of people join or massive investments are received, and
• Collapse, when defaults occur and promoters seek to abscond with invested money.
Box 2
Too Good to be True

Ponzi schemes are different from, and potentially more dangerous than, pyramid schemes. Ponzis promise to pay relatively high rates of returns for fixed-term investments. Rather than investing collected funds, they initially make promised payouts from subsequent subscribers. Scheme payouts to initial investors build credibility for the schemes to attract more investors. While simple arithmetic shows that the schemes will eventually collapse, successful Ponzi operators use selected payouts to build credibility and get investors to reinvest rather than take payouts. This rollover of funds can let schemes operate for many years before cash flow leads to collapse. Accumulation of liabilities to investors—both principal and promised interest or yields—can grow large enough to be systemic.

Both pyramids and Ponzis typically have no true business activity or investments to generate the promised high returns, although some business, product, or service may be used as a front. In addition, fraudulent operators may use separate schemes, incorporating Ponzi and pyramid characteristics, to prolong operations.

Pillars of the community

Interestingly, many Ponzi operators have managed to extend their operations by ostentatious charitable contributions, significant political contributions, and pretentious demonstrations of their or their scheme’s wealth. Prior to collapse, Ponzi operators may be regarded as pillars of their communities. This makes it even more difficult for government authorities to intervene.

Controlling and closing down pyramids, and particularly Ponzi schemes, can be politically difficult—especially if politicians or other important people are subscribers to the scheme. Once they grow, the authorities may be increasingly reluctant to trigger their collapse.

While Ponzis are fundamentally unsustainable, only if a Ponzi scheme collapses by itself will subscribers blame the scheme’s operators. If government authorities close or suspend a Ponzi—curtailing the Ponzi’s ability to meet its cash flow obligations—faithful subscribers could blame such intervention for their losses rather than the inherent flaws of the financial scheme.

? The IMF will supply technical support for a Workshop on Dealing with Ponzis, Pyramid Schemes, and other Financial Frauds to be held in Mbabane, Swaziland, in March 2009. The workshop is organized by the Central Bank of Swaziland and will include participants from sub-Saharan African countries.

? In 2006 the IMF issued a statement to warn the public about fraudulent e-mail messages and financial scams misusing the name of the IMF.

Comments on this article should be sent to imfsurvey@imf.org

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2009/pol021209a.htm

***

Trump Entertainment, Facing Payment Due, May Seek Bankruptcy

By Beth Jinks

Feb. 17 (Bloomberg) — Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc., facing a deadline to make a $53 million interest payment on its bonds, may file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection as soon as today, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The company may file early this week if it can’t reach agreement with bondholders, the person said on Feb. 14. Bondholders also may force the Atlantic City, New Jersey-based casino operator into bankruptcy, said the person, who declined to be named because the discussions were ongoing.

This would be the third trip to bankruptcy court for Trump Entertainment’s three casinos. Trump quit the company’s board on Feb. 13, saying he disagreed with bondholders’ decisions. He said bondholders turned down an offer he made to purchase the company.

“Unless we’re going to be responsible for management it’s just not something that’s worthwhile,” Trump, said in a Feb. 13 interview.

Trump Entertainment’s board met late yesterday to decide whether to file for bankruptcy, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Tom Hickey, a spokesman for Trump Entertainment, Chief Executive Officer Mark Juliano and Chief Financial Officer John Burke didn’t return phone messages.

Trump’s departure from the board won’t affect Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc.’s $270 million sale of the Trump Marina Hotel Casino, the buyer, Richard T. Fields’ Coastal Marina LLC said yesterday.

“The contract is still in place,” Charlie Leonard, a spokesman for Fields, said in a phone interview. “We are proceeding with closing of the purchase in the first quarter.”

Marina Sale

Leonard declined to comment on bankruptcy questions. Analysts including Fitch Ratings’ Michael Paladino and Gimme Credit LLC’s Kimberly Noland have questioned the likelihood of the sale closing since the deal was first disclosed in May.

The casino’s price includes settlement of a lawsuit Trump filed against Fields as chairman of debt-laden Trump Entertainment. Trump also was a witness in the suit before resigning last week over disagreements with bondholders.

Trump Marina is a 27-story hotel with a casino, theater, nightclub, and spa on 14 acres in Atlantic City, New Jersey.

Fields agreed to pay $316 million, then negotiated the lower price in October as property values in Atlantic City declined amid a drop-off in gambling. Fields has plans to refurbish the property into a Margaritaville casino resort.

A deadline to make the $53 million payment, originally due Dec. 1, has been extended four times since an initial grace period ended on Dec. 31.

Bondholder Pressure

Trump Entertainment emerged from bankruptcy 3 1/2 years ago. Its predecessor, Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Inc., sought court protection in November 2004. It had lost money for nine years because of high interest payments that Trump claimed prevented the company from refurbishing and expanding its casinos.

The three casino resorts also went through bankruptcy in the 1990s.

Trump Entertainment’s market value has tumbled to $7.3 million from its peak at $842 million in August 2005. The company’s 8.5 percent notes due June 2015 traded at 14 cents on the dollar Feb. 13, according to Trace, the bond-pricing system of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

Trump controls about 28 percent of Trump Entertainment’s stock, according to a March 21 regulatory filing. His daughter, Ivanka Trump, also quit the board last week.

“I strongly disagree with the bondholders’ decisions and actions,” Trump, 62, said on Feb. 14.

Holders of most of company’s $1.25 billion in notes and Beal Bank Nevada, which is owed $490 million, have agreed not to exercise default rights for interest or principal payments until 9 a.m. New York time today.

Lawsuit on Hold

The lawsuit with Fields was placed on hold pending closure of the sale in May, and will be dropped with prejudice should the deal be completed as disclosed, regulatory filings show.

Trump Entertainment alleged that Fields had done improper deals with the Seminole Tribe of Florida to develop two Hard Rock casinos. Donald Trump had earlier hired Fields to help the company win development deals with the American Indian tribe.

Atlantic City gambling revenue fell a record 7.6 percent in 2008, the second straight annual decline as the recession deterred some gamblers, and slot-machine competition from nearby states wooed others. The decline continued in January, with revenue down 9.4 percent.

To contact the reporter on this story: Beth Jinks in New York at bjinks1@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: February 17, 2009 00:00 EST

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aXx3Qw4nGQfo

***

Probabilistic Parsing
Determinant and Dependency Parsers

*  minor bug fix    2007-04-04
* Important update: v0.4.3   2007-03-23
* CoNLL dependency parsing shared task   2007-01-18
* View all news …

Related Articles

* The State of Game AI
* Using AI To Train Firefighters
* AI Researchers Say ‘Rascals’ Might Pass Turing Test
* Cutting-Edge AI Projects?
* Whatever Happened To AI?

Details:
*   Project Admins : jasonbaldridge, ryanmcd
* Developers : 2
* Development Status : 3 – Alpha
* Intended Audience : Developers, Information Technology, Science/Research
* License : Common Public License 1.0
* Operating System : OS Independent (Written in an interpreted language)
* Programming Language : Java, Python
* Topic : Artificial Intelligence, Human Machine Interfaces
* User Interface : Command-line
* Project UNIX name : mstparser
* Registered : 2006-09-28 16:10
* Activity Percentile (last week) : 94.00
* View project activity statistics
* View list of RSS feeds available for this project

http://sourceforge.net/projects/mstparser

MSTParser is a non-projective dependency parser that searches for maximum spanning trees over directed graphs. Models of dependency structure are based on large-margin discriminative training methods. Projective parsing is also supported.

***

***
FINRA TRACE Corporate Bond Market Activity
Market Breadth
All Issues     Investment Grade     High Yield     Convertibles
Total Issues Traded     4,363     3,232     877     254
Advances     1,974     1,538     310     126
Declines     1,915     1,348     454     113
Unchanged     156     84     61     11
52 Week High     123     112     7     4
52 Week Low     168     119     43     6
Dollar Volume *     16,275     9,973     4,510     1,792
* Par value in millions

View All
FINRA-Bloomberg Active US Corporate Bond Indices
Total Return
12:00 AM 2/12/2009

View All

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/Default.aspx

***

FINRA TRACE Data: Contains trade details as reported to FINRA’s Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (TRACE).
FINRA TRACE Corporate Bond Data

Last Updated: 2/17/2009

***

FINRA-Bloomberg Active US Corporate Bond Indices

View Charts By: Time Frame:
Total Return (NBBI)

Total Return (NBBH)

Select date for indices: Calendar

Index Value    Change
Total Return    131.19    -0.11
Price    93.02    -0.09
Yield    6.43    0.02
Volume*    2467    -357.00
* Par value in millions

Index Value    Change
Total Return    149.77    -0.30
Price    91.61    -0.22
Yield    17.35    0.22
Volume*    454    4.00
* Par value in millions

Investment Grade Top 10 Most Active Bonds

Symbol     Rank
CSCO.GB     1
WFC.GBX     2
XRX.HK     3
GNW.GC     4
UNH.GP     5
GS.JR     6
CIT.SZ     7
ABT.GO     8
GS.SF     9
VIA.HD     10

High Yield Top 10 Most Active Bonds

Symbol     Rank
GM.HA     1
GM.HB     2
F.GT     3
SFD.GB     4
SIRI.GG     5
GM.HC     6
UIS.GL     7
HCA.HT     8
MGG.GM     9
WM.HE     10

Investment Grade Leading Movers

Symbol     Bond Price     Change
LTR.GF     104.27     12.16
MOT.GE     46.18     5.72
RBOS.GQ     90.96     5.25
AIG.GOP     77.55     4.09
TXT.HH     94.95     4.07
TXT.II     65.17     3.97
VIA.GR     100.40     3.96
HBC.QT     93.54     3.92
AIG.WG     61.69     3.72
MCD.HD     106.82     3.72

High Yield Leading Movers

Symbol     Bond Price     Change
CHTR.GL     67.04     13.15
CHCG.GN     74.91     7.24
RMIX.GB     54.35     7.11
SIRI.GG     40.78     5.25
CHTR.HM     16.38     4.12
LEH.GZJ     14.66     3.90
LEH.XS     14.55     3.62
RAD.GA     26.59     3.29
GMA.IYC     66.49     3.29
LEH.HF     14.44     2.97

Investment Grade Lagging Movers

Symbol     Bond Price     Change
BAC.HMZ     75.95            -8.49
VZ.LP       83.50               -7.67
AIG.GMF     74.86                 -7.41
NWS.HR     82.56                 -6.32
DE.IO               112.78                 -5.95
OJA.GY     98.77                 -5.94
DUK.GN     103.79     -5.32
CAT.GVB     91.59                 -5.27
WMT.GP     119.80     -5.01
HIG.GN     74.59                 -4.93
View Investment Grade Index Membership List

High Yield Lagging Movers

Symbol     Bond Price     Change
MGG.GR     51.13     -6.32
MBI.GF     32.05     -5.46
CWEI.GB     60.99     -5.14
GMA.HH     60.85     -4.75
CTBV.GA     48.42     -4.55
ABK.GA     77.00     -4.16
AMKR.GJ     58.00     -3.83
S.GJ     56.47     -2.93
WM.IT     78.23     -2.60
MGG.HA     50.25     -2.59
View High Yield Index Membership List

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/ActiveUSCorpBond.aspx

***

Last Updated: 2/17/2009
Bond Detail

Lookup CUSIP or Symbol:
ABS.GD / CUSIP: 013104AF1     Search for Bond Trade Activity   Add to Watchlist
Last: $75.000    Yield: 10.428%
Security Category:     Corporate
Price |  Yield
Price      2/11/2009
5 day 3 mo 6 mo 1 year
Issue Description:     SR DEB
Issuer Name:     ALBERTSONS INC
Coupon Rate:     7.450%
Coupon Type:     Fixed
Maturity Date:     08/01/2029

Item Description

Bond Type:     US Corporate Debentures             Industry:     Industrial

Last Price:     $75.000     Industry Sub-Sector     Retail

Yield:     10.42800%     Tax Status:     -

Callable:     Yes     Insurance     -

Moody’s Rating (Assignment Date):     Ba3 (01/08/2009)     Redemption Type:     -

S&P Rating (Assignment Date):     B+ (03/19/2008)     Pre-refund:     No

Fitch Rating (Assignment Date):     BB- (09/18/2008)

Pay Frequency:     Semi-Annual

First Coupon Date:     02/01/2000

Original Issue Information

Offer Price:     $99.760             Offer Size*     $650,000.00

Yield to Maturity:     7.470%     Amount Outstanding*     $650,000.00

Offer Date:     07/22/1999

Settlement Date:     07/27/1999     * dollar amount in thousands

Call Schedule Information     Put Schedule Information

Next Call Date     –             Next Put Date     -

Call Price     –     Put Price     -

Call Frequency     Continuously     Put Frequency     -

Composite Trade Information

Last Sale                   Daily Trade Summary

Date     02/13/2009     High Price / Equivalent Yield     $75.000 / 10.42800%

Price     $75.000     Low Price / Equivalent Yield     $73.000 / 10.73400%

Yield     10.428%     Net Change (Price)     ($5.500)

Search for Bond Trade Activity

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/BondDetail.aspx?ID=MDEzMTA0QUYx

***

Last Updated: 2/17/2009
High Yield (NBBH) Membership Info

High Yield Membership

Symbol    Bond Price    Change    Bond Yield    Change    % Weight In Index
ABS.GD     98.000    0.580     7.640    -0.060     0.00328
ABY.GH     102.630    -0.020     7.640    0.010     0.00209
ABY.GI     89.500    -2.970     10.020    0.350     0.00207
ABY.GK     86.390    1.200     8.890    -0.280     0.00156
ABY.GP     96.420    -0.330     9.010    0.060     0.00223
AES.HW     107.370    0.390     6.190    -0.070     0.00221
AKS.GC     99.610    -0.460     8.100    1.230     0.00231
AKS.GF     101.990    -0.070     7.040    0.020     0.00289
AMD.GE     102.160    -0.740     7.060    0.230     0.00205
AMKR.GJ     97.360    -0.170     8.310    0.040     0.00213
AMKR.GL     98.470    0.890     7.580    -0.270     0.00127
AMKR.GN     103.500    0.000     8.580    0.000     0.00213
ANWL.GG     72.680    -3.020     14.640    0.980     0.00103
ARM.GC     103.800    -1.340     7.800    0.320     0.00214
ARM.GG     100.290    0.000     8.080    0.000     0.00130
AW.GC     104.000    0.000     5.970    0.000     0.00402
AW.GZ     101.750    0.000     6.810    0.000     0.00314
BBI.GB     101.640    -0.050     8.440    0.020     0.00157
BFT.GB     82.900    0.020     49.280    0.160     0.00126
BKST.GB     102.090    -2.910     11.390    0.810     0.00096
BLL.GD     101.640    0.140     6.370    -0.040     0.00288
BONT.GA     107.420    -0.010     8.390    0.000     0.00282
BOW.GA     98.060    -0.940     8.460    0.250     0.00303
BOW.GJ     94.500    3.080     7.630    -0.670     0.00195
BTU.GC     102.070    0.820     6.280    -0.240     0.00342

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/NBBHMembershipInfo.aspx

***
Last Updated: 2/17/2009
High Yield (NBBH) Membership Info

High Yield Membership

Symbol    Bond Price    Change    Bond Yield    Change    % Weight In Index
CBB.GN     102.350    0.240     7.780    -0.060     0.00337
CCU.GB     94.920    4.790     7.750    -0.510     0.00147
CCU.GE     95.290    -0.010     7.500    0.000     0.00086
CCU.GP     94.720    -0.960     6.870    0.210     0.00244
CCU.GV     88.920    0.660     7.460    -0.130     0.00343
CCU.GY     100.240    0.070     6.180    -0.020     0.00387
CHCG.GB     100.000    0.500     8.680    -28.130     0.00096
CHK.GT     101.250    0.000     6.560    0.000     0.00350
CHK.HE     99.150    -0.390     6.610    0.050     0.00562
CHK.HH     99.880    0.130     6.890    -0.010     0.00257
CHTR.GL     106.100    0.350     7.490    -0.160     0.00947
CHTR.HM     104.130    -0.380     10.120    0.080     0.01890
CPN.GD     112.500    -0.750     -148.150    -148.150     0.00113
CPN.GE     109.520    -0.150     -1.530    -1.530     0.00128
CPN.GH     107.770    0.500     5.060    -0.150     0.00276
CPN.GJ     108.150    0.910     5.240    -0.250     0.00367
CPN.GO     110.160    0.810     -1.420    -1.420     0.00898
CQB.GC     90.570    0.370     9.250    -0.070     0.00117
CQB.GK     95.570    -1.930     9.640    0.340     0.00111
CSOR.GB     103.630    -0.890     6.700    0.130     0.00160
CTB.GD     98.230    0.050     8.230    -0.010     0.00077
CTB.GH     85.490    1.010     11.230    -0.220     0.00154
CVC.GP     103.750    1.980     7.100    -0.470     0.00534
CWEI.GB     96.260    -0.280     8.520    0.060     0.00112
CXW.GC     103.050    -0.190     5.920    0.100     0.00226

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/NBBHMembershipInfo.aspx

***
Investors > Market Data > Bonds > High Yield Membership Information
Market Data

* Company Information
* Equities and Options
* Bonds
* Mutual Funds
* Watchlist
* Feedback

Tutorial
View tutorial to learn more about the functionality and content of this site

Last Updated: 2/17/2009
High Yield (NBBH) Membership Info

High Yield Membership

Symbol    Bond Price    Change    Bond Yield    Change    % Weight In Index
CZN.GJ     91.000    -1.660     8.280    0.160     0.00059
CZN.GK     94.220    -2.110     7.580    0.220     0.00067
CZN.GQ     111.630    1.460     7.920    -0.130     0.00543
CZN.GS     99.880    -0.020     6.270    0.000     0.00360
DAL.GA     53.710    -1.380     19.950    0.520     0.00041
DAL.GD     53.500    0.940     19.130    -0.320     0.00029
DAL.GF     53.480    0.000     17.260    0.000     0.00055
DAL.GI     56.030    0.300     32.700    -0.210     0.00144
DAL.GJ     56.300    -0.130     14.760    0.040     0.00268
DCEL.GF     103.250    -0.020     8.000    0.010     0.00223
DCN.GC     73.000    -2.000     22.990    1.640     0.00132
DCN.GP     73.020    0.980     10.730    -0.220     0.00169
DIRTV.GB     105.510    0.000     6.650    0.000     0.00495
DIRTV.GD     98.000    2.570     6.690    -0.420     0.00505
DISH.GK     100.250    0.000     5.570    0.000     0.00507
DISH.GL     100.870    0.250     6.150    -0.070     0.00516
DISH.GQ     100.910    0.000     6.470    0.000     0.00519
DISH.GT     103.490    0.000     6.600    0.000     0.00799
DJTE.GA     101.540    0.040     8.170    -0.010     0.00654
DLX.GA     91.050    -1.450     6.920    0.330     0.00141
DLX.GF     86.920    0.060     7.430    -0.010     0.00123
DOL.GB     97.900    0.510     9.190    -0.110     0.00078
DOL.GD     99.970    -0.260     8.630    0.140     0.00180
DOL.GG     99.540    0.420     9.010    -0.130     0.00103
DOL.GH     96.190    -0.170     8.630    0.070     0.00198

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/NBBHMembershipInfo.aspx

***
Last Updated: 2/17/2009
High Yield (NBBH) Membership Info

High Yield Membership

Symbol    Bond Price    Change    Bond Yield    Change    % Weight In Index
DPHIQ.GB     111.630    -0.600     0.610    0.270     0.00287
DPHIQ.GC     113.480    0.260     5.970    -0.020     0.00292
DPHIQ.GE     107.550    0.090     4.680    -0.010     0.00277
DPHIQ.GG     121.260    -0.100     -5.120    -5.120     0.00156
DRD.GF     95.960    0.010     10.940    0.000     0.00096
DRRA.GB     25.740    -0.480     49.820    0.750     0.00053
DUOC.GB     5.010    0.080     287.500    -1.710     0.00011
DVA.GI     101.380    0.070     6.960    -0.020     0.00444
EK.JK     96.830    0.580     6.580    -0.550     0.00125
EK.JM     100.890    -0.830     7.080    0.160     0.00260
ELN.GI     98.100    -0.460     8.250    0.120     0.00423
F.GAA     94.700    -0.100     8.060    0.020     0.01463
F.GAB     97.970    -0.680     7.070    0.490     0.00505
F.GB     99.690    -0.270     9.610    0.100     0.00257
F.GC     90.230    -2.770     10.790    0.420     0.00062
F.GD     89.250    0.000     10.550    0.000     0.00168
F.GH     99.970    -1.170     9.510    0.330     0.00086
F.GJ     88.590    -1.340     10.400    0.190     0.00090
F.GL     73.690    -2.470     10.610    0.340     0.00076
F.GLY     96.950    1.090     6.910    -0.450     0.00499
F.GM     73.300    -0.320     10.390    0.050     0.00113
F.GMP     98.700    0.190     6.640    -0.250     0.00408
F.GN     76.780    -1.500     10.290    0.220     0.00099
F.GO     100.150    0.040     7.140    -0.030     0.00258
F.GP     73.150    0.580     10.190    -0.080     0.00188

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/NBBHMembershipInfo.aspx

***

Last Updated: 2/17/2009
High Yield (NBBH) Membership Info

High Yield Membership

Symbol    Bond Price    Change    Bond Yield    Change    % Weight In Index
F.GPH     100.090    0.030     6.530    -0.030     0.00576
F.GR     71.670    -2.080     9.850    0.300     0.00111
F.GRN     102.750    -0.480     7.730    0.150     0.00265
F.GS     92.430    0.890     10.230    -0.130     0.00087
F.GSD     105.750    -0.770     8.270    0.210     0.00817
F.GSG     97.430    -0.160     8.390    0.020     0.00753
F.GT     88.680    0.440     10.150    -0.050     0.00181
F.GU     90.250    -2.450     11.070    0.300     0.00134
F.GV     78.850    -0.930     9.600    0.160     0.00203
F.GW     73.810    -0.350     9.510    0.050     0.00343
F.GX     72.550    -0.890     9.340    0.120     0.00349
F.GY     79.320    -0.380     9.670    0.050     0.01511
F.HG     99.300    -0.760     7.280    0.590     0.00153
F.HH     98.950    0.060     7.070    -0.040     0.00153
F.HP     99.660    -0.140     8.680    0.670     0.00476
F.IB     97.600    -0.140     7.250    0.090     0.01407
F.IF     99.600    -0.130     7.550    0.060     0.02565
F.IK     100.920    0.780     7.540    -0.280     0.01299
F.IO     98.650    -0.150     7.790    0.050     0.01524
F.IT     97.700    -0.260     7.860    0.070     0.01761
F.JL     99.100    0.020     7.340    -0.010     0.00026
F.JS     88.700    -0.010     9.020    0.000     0.00023
F.LO     93.380    -3.000     9.470    0.910     0.00024
F.MH     94.280    -0.680     8.890    0.190     0.00024
F.MS     91.980    -0.480     9.120    0.130     0.00024

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/NBBHMembershipInfo.aspx

***
Last Updated: 2/17/2009
High Yield (NBBH) Membership Info

High Yield Membership

Symbol    Bond Price    Change    Bond Yield    Change    % Weight In Index
F.NA     93.670    1.710     8.920    -0.460     0.00024
F.OC     94.460    -1.860     8.690    0.460     0.00029
F.OX     91.430    0.210     9.020    -0.050     0.00028
F.PO     100.000    -0.340     7.560    0.920     0.00064
F.PQ     99.470    0.000     7.560    0.000     0.00062
F.QW     100.290    -0.560     7.550    0.130     0.00091
FFIG.GD     92.880    -1.010     10.170    0.270     0.00096
FFRX.GB     100.110    0.000     8.290    0.000     0.00050
FFRX.GC     100.040    0.560     8.240    -0.090     0.00052
FFRX.GF     95.170    -2.080     8.040    0.290     0.00090
FFRX.GK     99.260    -0.590     7.930    0.140     0.00238
FRN.GC     96.040    -4.690     9.350    1.240     0.00087
GM.GA     96.440    -0.320     9.260    0.040     0.00298
GM.GC     101.100    2.850     9.260    -0.370     0.00156
GM.GE     83.160    -0.330     9.330    0.040     0.00214
GM.GH     94.110    0.090     8.650    -0.020     0.00242
GM.GI     89.670    -1.820     9.310    0.230     0.00185
GM.GK     98.910    -0.720     7.430    0.700     0.00255
GM.GL     80.520    0.070     8.800    -0.010     0.00249
GM.GM     95.600    -0.750     8.580    0.240     0.00739
GM.GN     98.910    -0.530     7.610    0.370     0.00382
GM.GZ     81.980    1.790     9.050    -0.200     0.00179
GM.HA     94.040    0.180     8.360    -0.040     0.00484
GM.HB     91.690    -0.110     9.220    0.010     0.01417
GM.HC     91.490    -0.760     9.270    0.100     0.00589

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/NBBHMembershipInfo.aspx

***

Last Updated: 2/17/2009
High Yield (NBBH) Membership Info

High Yield Membership

Symbol    Bond Price    Change    Bond Yield    Change    % Weight In Index
GMA.GB     96.920    0.080     6.890    -0.020     0.00200
GMA.GP     100.170    0.180     5.890    -0.230     0.00387
GMA.GRI     99.550    0.000     164.030    0.000     0.00073
GMA.GT     98.810    -0.070     6.560    0.040     0.00509
GMA.GV     99.960    -0.040     8.360    2.390     0.00566
GMA.GWA     100.000    0.000     0.000    0.000     0.00038
GMA.GY     103.090    0.300     6.520    -0.120     0.01327
GMA.HC     101.530    -0.620     6.800    0.180     0.01046
GMA.HE     100.600    -0.070     6.720    0.020     0.02824
GMA.HF     109.350    -0.800     7.180    0.060     0.02253
GMA.HH     100.440    0.720     6.890    -0.180     0.00517
GMA.HJU     99.970    0.180     6.170    -0.440     0.00772
GMA.HJV     100.400    -0.270     6.780    0.060     0.01034
GMA.HSF     98.700    -0.060     6.350    0.060     0.00508
GMA.HZM     98.310    -0.470     6.920    0.710     0.00253
GMA.IFU     98.050    0.040     6.620    -0.020     0.00758
GMA.IMW     99.250    -0.380     6.880    0.070     0.00895
GP.GR     102.780    -0.110     7.240    0.020     0.00132
GP.GT     95.100    0.000     7.720    0.000     0.00147
GPS.GB     100.150    -0.120     6.560    0.270     0.00168
GSPP.GE     105.500    0.630     6.570    -0.160     0.00353
GT.GB     95.450    2.210     7.430    -0.220     0.00074
GT.GF     103.750    0.700     6.850    -0.180     0.00347
GT.GL     110.000    0.620     6.780    -0.200     0.00227
HAWK.GB     106.630    0.000     7.580    0.000     0.00426

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/NBBHMembershipInfo.aspx

***

Last Updated: 2/17/2009
High Yield (NBBH) Membership Info

High Yield Membership

Symbol    Bond Price    Change    Bond Yield    Change    % Weight In Index
HCA.GZ     102.070    0.000     7.240    0.000     0.00263
HCA.HG     96.500    -0.030     7.790    0.010     0.00249
HCA.HP     85.550    0.120     8.890    -0.020     0.00441
HET.GF     89.570    -0.170     7.370    0.030     0.00231
HET.GL     86.920    1.160     7.820    -0.210     0.00448
HET.GN     83.640    -1.360     8.090    0.220     0.00323
HET.GO     89.390    -0.110     8.160    0.020     0.00345
HLIO.GB     105.790    -0.140     7.290    0.520     0.00089
HLT.GD     102.690    -0.330     6.100    0.130     0.00106
HLT.GE     104.130    2.880     6.950    -0.380     0.00107
HMT.GE     103.000    0.540     6.360    -0.140     0.00385
HOVV.GI     96.190    -1.040     8.560    0.230     0.00074
HOVV.GU     100.540    -1.710     8.540    0.260     0.00129
IHSC.GF     30.000    0.530     50.030    -0.720     0.00030
IMAX.GD     96.020    -1.980     10.960    0.680     0.00079
INTEL.GE     88.590    -0.530     8.820    0.120     0.00319
INTEL.GF     96.390    -0.830     8.520    0.210     0.00298
ISLE.GE     98.000    -0.130     7.370    0.020     0.00252
JCOU.GB     105.420    -0.310     7.250    0.070     0.00461
JRCC.GA     90.130    0.250     11.980    -0.070     0.00070
KMI.GT     94.420    -1.120     6.550    0.170     0.00413
KMI.GV     91.220    1.390     7.120    -0.120     0.00258
L.GH     102.170    0.010     8.040    0.000     0.00525
L.GQ     94.330    -1.530     6.850    0.320     0.00486
LLL.GM     103.560    -0.010     6.380    0.000     0.00400

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/NBBHMembershipInfo.aspx

***
Last Updated: 2/17/2009
High Yield (NBBH) Membership Info

High Yield Membership

Symbol    Bond Price    Change    Bond Yield    Change    % Weight In Index
LLL.GQ     99.750    0.130     6.410    -0.020     0.00514
LNDLK.GC     103.170    0.000     7.400    0.000     0.00106
LNY.GB     98.240    0.150     7.810    -0.030     0.00202
LU.GE     89.940    -0.690     7.380    0.070     0.00630
LUK.GH     101.050    0.030     6.790    -0.010     0.00130
LVLT.GV.WI     108.500    0.000     6.800    0.000     0.00386
LVLT.GX     117.130    -0.130     7.570    0.040     0.00332
LYO.GV     107.090    -0.160     6.440    0.030     0.00483
LYO.GW     107.660    0.030     6.920    -0.010     0.00499
LYWH.GA     98.170    -2.990     11.180    0.790     0.00126
LYWH.GC     89.200    -1.470     9.680    0.320     0.00069
LYWH.GE     90.500    2.130     9.830    -0.530     0.00068
MCSC.GF     62.160    0.980     16.970    -0.320     0.00080
MEE.GJ     95.140    0.270     7.820    -0.050     0.00372
MERC.GB     100.220    -0.550     9.180    0.170     0.00160
MGG.GG     107.540    -0.550     6.050    0.170     0.00471
MGG.GM     100.330    0.240     5.860    -0.110     0.00542
MGG.GN     93.930    0.430     7.000    -0.080     0.00254
MGG.GP     106.260    -0.490     6.500    0.140     0.00219
MGG.GR     99.840    -1.840     6.780    0.410     0.00282
MGG.GV     96.210    -1.650     7.240    0.270     0.00432
MGG.GY     98.500    0.960     7.100    -0.150     0.00124
MGG.HA     101.550    -0.310     7.400    0.050     0.00392
MHO.GB     93.010    -0.960     8.620    0.250     0.00096
MOVI.GB     92.540    -0.070     13.050    0.020     0.00155

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/NBBHMembershipInfo.aspx

***
Last Updated: 2/17/2009
High Yield (NBBH) Membership Info

High Yield Membership

Symbol    Bond Price    Change    Bond Yield    Change    % Weight In Index
MSX.GE     93.980    -0.720     12.600    0.200     0.00121
MUHD.GC     93.380    -1.900     7.140    0.340     0.00154
NCX.GH     96.360    0.000     7.410    0.000     0.00199
NMGA.GH     111.730    0.000     7.820    0.000     0.00288
NRG.GT     103.280    0.380     6.770    -0.070     0.01277
NRG.GU     103.130    0.630     6.850    -0.100     0.00584
NWAC.HJ     86.290    -1.150     16.910    0.840     0.00133
NWAC.HO     83.750    -3.030     23.780    4.160     0.00086
PBR.GI     119.420    0.000     6.040    0.000     0.00355
PBR.GJ     111.790    0.380     5.780    -0.060     0.00229
PGMI.GD     88.950    -0.400     12.060    0.120     0.00165
PKOH.GD     98.980    -0.140     8.560    0.030     0.00106
POL.GL     100.190    -2.340     8.820    0.570     0.00103
PRTL.GD     88.650    -0.320     18.530    0.180     0.00033
PXD.GB     99.250    1.860     7.270    -0.180     0.00128
Q.HK     100.520    1.270     7.390    -0.190     0.00251
Q.HL     96.060    -0.280     7.210    0.030     0.00495
RACI.GC     97.310    0.510     11.380    -0.170     0.00100
RAD.GA     89.070    -0.220     9.170    0.050     0.00092
RAD.GE     85.470    1.310     9.320    -0.170     0.00132
RAD.GX     99.740    -0.040     9.300    0.010     0.00077
REI.HK     105.870    0.000     5.530    0.000     0.00409
REV.GE     95.000    -1.200     11.080    0.390     0.00191
RG.HB     102.900    0.360     5.860    -0.060     0.00397
RHD.GN     106.900    0.000     7.560    0.000     0.00666

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/NBBHMembershipInfo.aspx

***

Last Updated: 2/17/2009
High Yield (NBBH) Membership Info

High Yield Membership

Symbol    Bond Price    Change    Bond Yield    Change    % Weight In Index
RMIX.GB     101.500    0.000     8.010    0.000     0.00149
RMY.GA     84.200    -1.230     35.540    2.500     0.00063
RMY.GC     28.210    1.050     96.890    -3.080     0.00024
ROV.GC     93.580    2.070     9.860    -0.460     0.00169
RT.GH     100.630    0.570     8.050    -0.180     0.00078
RVSU.GF     98.290    -0.780     10.790    1.010     0.00085
S.JX     101.210    1.460     5.620    -0.750     0.00137
S.JY     103.600    1.110     5.930    -0.320     0.00160
SCR.GE     81.000    0.650     30.520    -0.950     0.00062
SDS.GG     107.630    0.630     7.070    -0.160     0.00887
SDS.GJ     109.330    -0.080     8.320    0.020     0.00563
SEM.GE     90.250    0.000     9.410    0.000     0.00307
SFD.GG     101.820    0.840     6.510    -0.230     0.00315
SIRI.GG     100.840    -0.130     9.420    0.030     0.00260
SIX.GJ     99.630    -1.140     9.020    0.610     0.00154
SIX.GL     96.520    -0.160     10.540    0.040     0.00193
SIX.GN     96.090    1.000     10.410    -0.210     0.00249
SOLO.GB     86.050    -0.070     11.480    0.020     0.00144
SPC.GF     78.370    1.520     11.650    -0.360     0.00283
SPF.GG     97.150    -0.510     8.370    0.110     0.00063
SPF.GJ     99.850    0.000     6.920    0.000     0.00090
SPF.GM     97.730    0.000     7.270    0.000     0.00088
SPF.GN     90.830    -2.090     8.550    0.370     0.00082
SRI.GA     105.070    0.240     9.560    -0.090     0.00108
SSCC.GD     101.750    -1.130     7.750    0.390     0.00210

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/NBBHMembershipInfo.aspx

***
Last Updated: 2/17/2009
High Yield (NBBH) Membership Info

High Yield Membership

Symbol    Bond Price    Change    Bond Yield    Change    % Weight In Index
SSCC.GG     101.370    -0.380     7.800    0.120     0.00365
STBR.GF     101.550    -1.780     7.570    0.620     0.00275
STCS.GB     99.500    -0.730     11.140    0.230     0.00079
STN.GK     92.480    0.230     8.070    -0.040     0.00333
STN.GL     98.380    1.000     6.380    -0.240     0.00228
STN.GM     92.700    0.040     7.900    -0.010     0.00215
STZ.GC     101.210    -0.160     7.070    0.020     0.00365
TBC.GB     72.250    0.470     25.540    -0.330     0.00130
TBC.GC     64.780    0.140     22.710    -0.060     0.00167
TBC.GF     63.780    1.110     19.450    -0.480     0.00115
TE.GB     105.940    1.570     5.550    -0.420     0.00327
TE.GS     99.880    0.000     7.310    0.000     0.00154
TEN.GK     105.000    1.380     7.520    -0.300     0.00270
THC.GS     93.730    0.730     8.010    -0.200     0.00483
THC.GU     78.850    0.420     9.030    -0.050     0.00182
THC.GV     92.250    -1.250     8.370    0.320     0.00285
THC.GX     93.630    -1.360     8.790    0.310     0.00482
THC.HC     101.670    0.100     9.550    -0.020     0.00524
TOA.GC     92.130    -0.930     11.980    0.370     0.00095
TOA.GD     69.510    -4.400     19.990    1.700     0.00054
TOA.GK     63.220    -5.570     15.890    1.630     0.00065
TOY.GC     95.740    0.390     8.820    -0.110     0.00246
TOY.GE     91.560    -1.290     9.760    0.300     0.00189
TOY.GF     86.250    0.380     9.350    -0.060     0.00178
TSG.GA     98.960    -0.760     7.630    0.210     0.00204

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/NBBHMembershipInfo.aspx

***
Last Updated: 2/17/2009
High Yield (NBBH) Membership Info

High Yield Membership

Symbol    Bond Price    Change    Bond Yield    Change    % Weight In Index
UIS.GL     100.360    0.570     6.740    -0.220     0.00155
UIS.GM     102.210    0.660     7.500    -0.150     0.00211
UIS.GN     101.480    -0.220     8.200    0.040     0.00078
URI.GS     103.130    0.540     6.950    -0.140     0.00279
URI.GT     99.570    -0.240     6.600    0.060     0.00513
URI.GU     100.000    -0.710     7.000    0.170     0.00193
USU.GB     99.190    0.140     7.230    -0.080     0.00077
VC.GB     101.850    -0.090     7.610    0.030     0.00289
VC.GC     87.880    0.040     9.410    -0.010     0.00199
VTO.GF     110.920    -0.040     7.840    0.010     0.00128
WCI.GE     98.500    0.000     8.180    0.000     0.00063
WCI.GI     99.560    -0.420     9.230    0.100     0.00103
WEN.GB     98.570    1.850     7.140    -0.190     0.00051
WLV.GB     101.090    1.700     9.330    -1.510     0.00062
WYNN.GE     99.270    -0.170     6.750    0.030     0.00664
XMRD.GL     100.870    -0.790     9.530    0.200     0.00312

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/NBBHMembershipInfo.aspx

***
http://www.upi.com/Business_News/2009/02/17/Sirius_XM_creditors_draw_line_in_sand/UPI-28441234900923/

Sirius XM creditors draw line in sand
Published: Feb. 17, 2009 at 3:02 PM

NEW YORK, Feb. 17 (UPI) — Sirius XM Radio creditors said they preferred the U.S. satellite radio company make a deal to avoid bankruptcy, in spite of the company’s $175 million debt.

“From our perspective, there are restructuring alternatives that are preferable to bankruptcy,” said Edward Weisfelner at bankruptcy firm Brown Rudnick.

Weisfelner said creditors would move to replace executives, including Sirius XM Chief Executive Officer Mel Karmazin, or appoint their own trustees if the company filed for Chapter 11 protection, The Washington Post (NYSE:WPO) reported Tuesday.

The Post reported that Liberty Media was close to a deal that would enable Sirius to avoid bankruptcy. Dish Network CEO Charles Ergen is also keeping an eye on developments, the Post said.

Sirius merged with XM in July but the company has never made a profit. Its share values fell to 10 cents a share Friday, down from $3 a share last year.

Its financial burdens include lucrative salaries for big-name personalities, like Howard Stern, who earns $100 million a year. In addition, it pays large fees to automobile makers for installing satellite radio equipment into new cars.

Bankruptcy would allow the company to renegotiate these deals, the Post said.

***

Fear Of Global Economic Slump Sends Markets Tumbling – 02/17/09
A sharp drop in the global markets sparked fears of a protracted economic slump to send the U. S. markets tumbling with the Dow skidding 298 points to 7553. Nasdaq collapsed 64 points to 1471.

http://www.upi.com/finance/?Page=MajorIndices

NYSE Composite      4939.11      -267.65      (-5.14%)
Quote | Chart | Historical
Nasdaq Composite     1470.66     -63.70     (-4.15%)
Quote | Chart | Historical
Standard & Poors 500     789.17     -37.67     (-4.56%)
Quote | Chart | Historical
RUSSELL 2000     428.90     -19.46     (-4.34%)
Quote | Chart | Historical

http://www.upi.com/finance/?Page=MajorIndices

Shares of Bank of America Corp. (BAC) dropped 67 cents to close at $4.90, Citigroup Inc. (C) 43 cents to close at $3.06, and Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) plummeted 38 cents to close at $1.31 over fears that the economic stimulus package is not enough to stem the tide do defaults.

http://www.upi.com/finance/?GUID=8014105&Page=MediaViewer

**
Modine Manufacturing Co. (NYSE: MOD) warned of losses for the third quarter and is in discussions with its lenders to obtain a covenant waiver.  The stock price collapsed 84 cents to close at 93 cents.  …

http://www.upi.com/finance/?GUID=7961717&Page=MediaViewer&ChannelID=3273

***

http://www3.modine.com/v2portal/modine.portal

A HISTORY OF INNOVATION
Since 1916, Modine Manufacturing Company has applied innovative thermal technology to meet customer’s needs. Founder A.B.Modine made innovation a company value and built a thriving business. Modine breakthroughs in customized heating and cooling solutions have yielded state-of-the-art components, modules and systems that have given the world’s vehicle makers and commercial equipment manufacturers a competitive edge in the markets they serve.

What is Modine?
Wherever thermal management is needed, Modine is there. Click a video link below to learn more about us.
Real (2.7 MB), WMP (3.5 MB), Quick (4.3 MB)

Climatic Wind Tunnel in Bonlanden, Germany
Click here to learn more about our state of the art test facility and services.
To take a virtual tour of Modine’s Wind Tunnel in Bonlanden, Germany, click here .

Corporate News
February 18, 2009
2/17/2009 9:22:00 AM
Modine Suspends Quarterly Cash Dividend

RACINE, Wis.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Feb. 17, 2009– Modine Manufacturing Company (NYSE: MOD), a diversified global leader in thermal management technology and solutions, today announced that it has suspended its quarterly cash dividend on its common stock.

About Modine

Modine, with fiscal 2008 adjusted revenues of $1.9 billion, specializes in thermal management systems and components, bringing highly engineered heating and cooling technology and solutions to diversified global markets. Modine products are used in light, medium and heavy-duty vehicles, heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment, off-highway and industrial equipment, refrigeration systems, and fuel cells. The company employs approximately 7,900 people at 33 facilities worldwide in 15 countries. For more information about Modine, visit www.modine.com.

Source: Modine Manufacturing Company

Modine Manufacturing Company
Susan Fisher, 262-636-8434
s.h.fisher@na.modine.com

2/17/2009 9:20:00 AM
Modine Secures Amendments to Financing Agreements

RACINE, Wis.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Feb. 17, 2009– Modine Manufacturing Company (NYSE: MOD), a diversified global leader in thermal management technology and solutions, today announced that it has reached agreement with its primary lenders and note holders on a waiver of defaults that existed at December 31, 2008 and amendments to its revolving credit and note purchase agreements.

“As we focus on preserving cash and liquidity, we are pleased we were able to complete this amendment process,” said Bradley C. Richardson, Executive Vice President – Corporate Strategy and Chief Financial Officer. “We believe these amended agreements, which are structured based on our assumptions about operating in a recessionary environment, will provide the company sufficient liquidity to execute our plans and consistently maintain our day-to-day business activities.”

The terms and conditions of these waivers and amendments will be discussed in the company’s third quarter fiscal 2009 earnings conference call on February 17, 2009. In addition, the amended agreements will be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on an upcoming Form 8-K.

About Modine

Modine, with fiscal 2008 adjusted revenues of $1.9 billion, specializes in thermal management systems and components, bringing highly engineered heating and cooling technology and solutions to diversified global markets. Modine products are used in light, medium and heavy-duty vehicles, heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment, off-highway and industrial equipment, refrigeration systems, and fuel cells. The company employs approximately 7,900 people at 33 facilities worldwide in 15 countries. For more information about Modine, visit www.modine.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains statements, including information about future financial performance, accompanied by phrases such as “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “intends,” and other similar “forward-looking” statements, as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Modine’s actual results, performance or achievements may differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements, because of certain risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A. in Part II. in this report. Other risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following: the impact the current global economic uncertainty and credit market turmoil is having on Modine, its customers and its suppliers and any worsening of such economic conditions; the secondary effects on Modine’s future cash flows and liquidity that may result from Modine’s customers and lenders dealing with the economic crisis and its consequences; Modine’s ability to limit capital spending and/or consummate planned divestitures; Modine’s ability to recover the book value of the South Korean business, if divested; Modine’s ability to successfully implement restructuring plans and drive cost reductions as a result; Modine’s ability to maintain adequate liquidity to carry out restructuring plans while investing for future growth; Modine’s ability to satisfactorily service its customers during the implementation and execution of any restructuring plans and/or new product launches; Modine’s ability to avoid or limit inefficiencies in the transitioning of products from production facilities to be closed to other existing or new production facilities; Modine’s ability to successfully execute its four-point recovery plan; Modine’s ability to further cut costs to increase its gross margin and to maintain and grow its business; impairment of assets resulting from business downturns; Modine’s ability to realize future tax benefits; customers’ actual production demand for new products and technologies, including market acceptance of a particular vehicle model or engine; Modine’s ability to increase its gross margin, including its ability to produce products in low cost countries; Modine’s ability to maintain customer relationships while rationalizing its business; Modine’s ability to maintain current programs and compete effectively for new business, including its ability to offset or otherwise address increasing pricing pressures from its competitors and cost-downs from its customers; Modine’s ability to obtain profitable business at its new facilities in China, Hungary, Mexico, India and Austria and to produce quality products at these facilities from business obtained; the effect of the weather on the Commercial Products business, which directly impacts sales; unanticipated problems with suppliers meeting Modine’s time and price demands; the impact of environmental laws and regulations on Modine’s business and the business of Modine’s customers, including Modine’s ability to take advantage of opportunities to supply alternative new technologies to meet environmental emissions standards; economic, social and political conditions, changes and challenges in the markets where Modine operates and competes (including currency exchange rate fluctuations, tariffs, inflation, changes in interest rates, recession, and restrictions associated with importing and exporting and foreign ownership); changes in the anticipated sales mix; Modine’s association with a particular industry, such as the automobile industry, which could have an adverse effect on Modine’s stock price; the nature of the vehicular industry, including the dramatic decline in customer build rates; work stoppages or interference at Modine or Modine’s major customers; unanticipated product or manufacturing difficulties, including unanticipated warranty claims; unanticipated delays or modifications initiated by major customers with respect to product applications or requirements; costs and other effects of unanticipated litigation or claims, and the increasing pressures associated with rising health care and insurance costs; and other risks and uncertainties identified by the Company in public filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company does not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

Source: Modine Manufacturing Company

Modine Manufacturing Company
Susan Fisher, 262-636-8434
s.h.fisher@na.modine.com

2/17/2009 9:20:00 AM
Modine Reports Third Quarter Fiscal 2009 Results; Takes Aggressive Action to Address Business Performance; Supported by Newly Amended Credit Agreements

RACINE, Wis.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Feb. 17, 2009– Modine Manufacturing Company (NYSE: MOD), a diversified global leader in thermal management technology and solutions, today reported its financial results for the third quarter of fiscal 2009, as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2008, as follows:
($ in millions except per share data)           2009

2008(a)
Change

Net Sales       $     365.2                 $     480.6                 $     (115.4     )
Gross Profit     $     41.9                 $     69.6                 $     (27.7     )
% of Sales           11.5     %                 14.5     %

(300 bp)

Pre-Tax Loss from Continuing Operations     $ (63.6     )       $     (23.9     )           $     (39.7     )
Net Loss       $     (56.1     )           $     (54.8     )           $     (1.3     )
Diluted Loss Per Share $     (1.75     )    $     (1.71     )           $     (0.04     )

Nine Month to Date Cash Flow from Operations     $     80.3                 $     60.5                 $     19.8
Net Debt(b)     $     187.7                 $     193.0                 $     (5.3     )

(a) Third quarter fiscal 2008 amounts have been adjusted to reflect the removal of the one month
lag in the reporting of results for the company’s international operations

(b) As of December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008, respectively

Commenting on the results, Modine President and Chief Executive Officer Thomas A. Burke said, “Obviously these results are disappointing. The weakening global economy and severe downturn in the vehicular markets have contributed to significant sales volume declines and margin compression, particularly in Europe. Despite these unprecedented conditions, we generated strong cash flow during the first nine months of fiscal 2009 with net debt declining since March 31, 2008. We continue to take aggressive actions to address our business performance and lower our underlying cost structure in light of the near-term economic outlook. We have secured a waiver of defaults and amendments to our company’s debt agreements that provide us the liquidity needed to execute on our plans. At the same time, we are encouraged by recent new program opportunities in our thermal management product segments and, with the assistance of outside advisors, are actively refocusing our product portfolio to ensure we have the right products, processes and technologies for the future. With renewed support from our creditors, actions we are taking to align our cost structure to the market demands, and a more focused technology portfolio, we are confident Modine is solidly positioned to weather this recession.”

Third Quarter Overview

* Sales volumes, excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rates, declined 15 percent as a result of the weakening economy, instability in the global financial markets, and a corresponding downturn in the company’s vehicular markets;
* Gross margin declined 300 basis points reflecting the decline in sales volumes, the underabsorption of fixed costs in the company’s manufacturing facilities as the result of declining sales volumes, and a shift in product mix toward lower margin business;
* Impairment charges totaled $27.3 million and restructuring and repositioning charges totaled $27.2 million;
* Tax valuation allowance charges of $7.0 million were recorded against certain net deferred tax assets;
* A total of $8.7 million in revenue was recognized from the licensing of Modine-specific fuel cell technology to Bloom Energy and performance of transition services;
* Operating cash flows increased $19.8 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2009 compared to the prior year as a result of strong working capital management;
* Net debt has decreased by $5.3 million since March 31, 2008; and
* In light of the current volatility in the global economy and the impact in the markets, Modine is withdrawing its fiscal 2009 earnings guidance.

Continuing Aggressive Action to Address Business Performance

“In response to the near-term adverse conditions facing the company and our recent business performance, we continue to execute aggressively on the strategies of our four-point plan, which includes manufacturing realignment, portfolio rationalization, selling, general and administrative expense reduction, and capital allocation discipline,” said Bradley C. Richardson, Executive Vice President – Corporate Strategy and Chief Financial Officer. “We have introduced a short-term emphasis on maximizing cash flow and are proceeding with a number of decisive measures to position the company to attain a more competitive cost base, improve our longer term competitiveness and more effectively capitalize on growth opportunities in our core thermal management markets. In addition to the previously announced closure of manufacturing facilities, the elimination of U.S. post-retirement benefits for Medicare eligible participants, the intended divestiture of our South Korean-based vehicular HVAC business, and the ramp-up of production at new facilities in lower cost countries, we have implemented or are implementing the following:

* A 30 percent reduction in global senior leadership;
* A 25 percent workforce reduction, as previously announced, in our Racine, Wisconsin, headquarters with a comparable reduction planned in our European headquarters;
* A targeted reduction of our direct costs proportional to the volume declines within our manufacturing facilities globally;
* Implementation of a 20 percent reduction in manufacturing overhead in North America with a similar reduction planned in Europe;
* A capital spending limit of $65 million in fiscal 2010, significantly below the company’s recent historical levels;
* Rigorous working capital discipline through the active, customer-supported management of accounts receivable, as well as inventory management; and
* The suspension of the company’s quarterly cash dividend as part of its near-term focus on preserving cash and liquidity.”

Credit Amendment

“As we focus on preserving cash and liquidity, we are pleased that we have been able to amend our credit agreements,” Richardson continued. “These amendments were structured based on our assumptions about operating in a recessionary environment and we believe the amended agreements will provide the company sufficient liquidity to execute our restructuring plans and maintain our day-to-day business.”

On February 17, 2009, Modine entered into an amendment with its primary lenders and note holders and obtained a waiver of defaults that existed at December 31, 2008. Under the amended agreements, the existing quarterly leverage and interest expense coverage ratio covenants are temporarily replaced by a minimum adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) level for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and each quarter during fiscal 2010, with the leverage and interest expense coverage ratio becoming effective for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.

The minimum adjusted EBITDA level requirements, beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, are as follows:

(in Millions)

For the quarter ended March 31, 2009                     $     (25.00     )

For the two consecutive quarters ended June 30, 2009                 (22.00     )

For the three consecutive quarters ended September 30, 2009             (14.00     )

For the four consecutive quarters ended December 31, 2009             1.75

For the four consecutive quarters ended March 31, 2010                 35.00

In contemplation of the uncertainty that exists around the severity and duration of the global recession, the minimum adjusted EBITDA level requirements were established with a range of approximately $10 million to $20 million of cushion at each quarter end to allow for variability in our projected results. We believe that this cushion is sufficient and that we will be able to maintain compliance with the minimum adjusted EBITDA levels through the end of fiscal 2010.

Under the amended agreements, the company has securitized certain assets, accepted other restrictive covenants, and will have to pay higher interest costs as described in the credit amendments.

Conference Call and Webcast

Modine will conduct a conference call and live webcast, with a slide presentation, on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. Central Time (11:00 a.m. Eastern Time) to discuss the fiscal 2009 third quarter. The webcast and accompanying slides will be available on the investor section of the Modine website at www.modine.com. The dial-in phone number for the audio portion of the call is 800-599-9795; passcode: 68513851. The international call-in number is 617-786-2905; passcode: 68513851. Participants are encouraged to log on to the webcast and conference call about 10 minutes prior to the start of the event. A replay of the audio and the slides will be available on the investor relations section of the Modine website at www.modine.com about two hours after the live call concludes. A call-in replay will be available through February 23, 2009, at 888-286-8010; passcode: 13234155 or, for international callers, at 617-801-6888; passcode: 13234155. A transcript of the call will be posted to the company’s website on or about February 19, 2009.

About Modine

Modine, with fiscal 2008 adjusted revenues of $1.9 billion, specializes in thermal management systems and components, bringing highly engineered heating and cooling technology and solutions to diversified global markets. Modine products are used in light, medium and heavy-duty vehicles, heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment, off-highway and industrial equipment, refrigeration systems, and fuel cells. The company employs approximately 7,900 people at 33 facilities worldwide in 15 countries. For more information about Modine, visit www.modine.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains statements, including information about future financial performance, accompanied by phrases such as “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “intends,” and other similar “forward-looking” statements, as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Modine’s actual results, performance or achievements may differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements, because of certain risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A. in Part II. in this report. Other risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following: the Company’s ability to remain in compliance going forward with its debt agreements; fund its liquidity requirements and meet its long-term commitments given the continued decline and disruption in the credit markets due to the world-wide credit crisis; the impact the current global economic uncertainty and credit market turmoil is having on Modine, its customers and its suppliers and any worsening of such economic conditions; the secondary effects on Modine’s future cash flows and liquidity that may result from Modine’s customers and lenders dealing with the economic crisis and its consequences; Modine’s ability to limit capital spending and/or consummate planned divestitures; Modine’s ability to recover the book value of the South Korean business, if divested; Modine’s ability to successfully implement restructuring plans and drive cost reductions as a result; Modine’s ability to maintain adequate liquidity to carry out restructuring plans while investing for future growth; Modine’s ability to satisfactorily service its customers during the implementation and execution of any restructuring plans and/or new product launches; Modine’s ability to avoid or limit inefficiencies in the transitioning of products from production facilities to be closed to other existing or new production facilities; Modine’s ability to successfully execute its four-point recovery plan; Modine’s ability to further cut costs to increase its gross margin and to maintain and grow its business; impairment of assets resulting from business downturns; Modine’s ability to realize future tax benefits; customers’ actual production demand for new products and technologies, including market acceptance of a particular vehicle model or engine; Modine’s ability to increase its gross margin, including its ability to produce products in low cost countries; Modine’s ability to maintain customer relationships while rationalizing its business; Modine’s ability to maintain current programs and compete effectively for new business, including its ability to offset or otherwise address increasing pricing pressures from its competitors and cost-downs from its customers; Modine’s ability to obtain profitable business at its new facilities in China, Hungary, Mexico, India and Austria and to produce quality products at these facilities from business obtained; the effect of the weather on the Commercial Products business, which directly impacts sales; unanticipated problems with suppliers meeting Modine’s time and price demands; the impact of environmental laws and regulations on Modine’s business and the business of Modine’s customers, including Modine’s ability to take advantage of opportunities to supply alternative new technologies to meet environmental emissions standards; economic, social and political conditions, changes and challenges in the markets where Modine operates and competes (including currency exchange rate fluctuations, tariffs, inflation, changes in interest rates, recession, and restrictions associated with importing and exporting and foreign ownership); changes in the anticipated sales mix; Modine’s association with a particular industry, such as the automobile industry, which could have an adverse effect on Modine’s stock price; the nature of the vehicular industry, including the dramatic decline in customer build rates; work stoppages or interference at Modine or Modine’s major customers; unanticipated product or manufacturing difficulties, including unanticipated warranty claims; unanticipated delays or modifications initiated by major customers with respect to product applications or requirements; costs and other effects of unanticipated litigation or claims, and the increasing pressures associated with rising health care and insurance costs; and other risks and uncertainties identified by the Company in public filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company does not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

Non-GAAP Financial Disclosures

Financial information excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes in this press release are not measures that are defined in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). These items are measures that management believes are important to adjust for in order to have a meaningful comparison to prior and future periods and to provide a basis for future projections and for estimating our earnings growth prospects. Non-GAAP measures are used by management as a performance measure to judge profitability of our business absent the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes. Management analyzes the company’s business performance and trends excluding these amounts. These measures, as well as adjusted EBITDA and Net Debt (which are defined below), provide a more consistent view of performance than the closest GAAP equivalent for management and investors. Management compensates for this by using these measures in combination with the GAAP measures. However, these measures are not, and should not be, viewed as substitutes for the GAAP measures. The presentations of the non-GAAP measures in this press release are made alongside the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

Definition – Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)

The sum of, net (loss) earnings and adding back provision for income taxes, interest expense, discontinued operations, depreciation and amortization, adjusted to exclude unusual, non-recurring or extraordinary non-cash charges and cash restructuring and repositioning charges, as defined in the applicable debt agreements; this is a financial measure of the profit generated excluding the above mentioned items.

Definition – Net Debt

The sum of short- and long-term debt, less cash on hand; this is an indicator of the company’s debt position after considering on hand cash balances.

– Financial tables follow –

Modine Manufacturing Company
Consolidated statements of earnings (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per-share amounts)

Three months ended December 31,             Nine months ended December 31,
2008           2007 *         2008           2007 *
Net sales     $     365,201    $    480,579       $ 1,298,183               $        1,353,472
Cost of sales               323,288                       410,941                         1,123,031                       1,151,695
Gross profit         41,913                 69,638                     175,152                 201,777
Selling, general and administrative expenses         47,032                 61,365                     171,455                 172,334
Restructuring expense (income)         25,311                 (3     )                 28,130                 (322     )
Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets           27,342                       31,455                         30,507                       31,455
Loss from operations         (57,772     )             (23,179     )                 (54,940     )             (1,690     )
Interest expense             4,216                 3,475                     10,452                 9,180
Other expense (income) – net           1,656                       (2,778     )                   494                       (7,327     )
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes         (63,644     )             (23,876     )                 (65,886     )             (3,543     )
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes           (7,166     )                 31,083                         (2,107     )                 30,443
Loss from continuing operations         (56,478     )             (54,959     )                 (63,779     )             (33,986     )
Earnings from discontinued operations (net of income taxes)         52                 149                     217                 535
Gain on sale of discontinued operations (net of income taxes)           369                       –                         2,066                       -
Net loss         $     (56,057     )           $     (54,810     )             $     (61,496     )           $     (33,451     )

Loss per share of common stock – basic:
Continuing operations     $     (1.76     )         $     (1.72     )             $     (1.99     )         $     (1.06     )
Earnings from discontinued operations         –                 –                     0.01                 0.02
Gain on sale of discontinued operations           0.01                       0.01                         0.06                       -
Net loss – basic         $     (1.75     )           $     (1.71     )             $     (1.92     )           $     (1.04     )

Loss per share of common stock – diluted:
Continuing operations     $     (1.76     )         $     (1.72     )             $     (1.99     )         $     (1.06     )
Earnings from discontinued operations         –                 –                     0.01                 0.02
Gain on sale of discontinued operations           0.01                       0.01                         0.06                       -
Net loss – diluted     $     (1.75     )           $     (1.71     )             $     (1.92     )           $     (1.04     )

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic                 32,093                 31,936                     32,066                 32,049
Diluted             32,093                 31,936                     32,066                 32,049

Dividends paid per share     $     0.100             $     0.175                 $     0.300             $     0.525

Comprehensive (loss) earnings, which represents net loss adjusted by the post-tax change in foreign-currency translation, the effective portion of cash flow hedges and change in SFAS No. 158 benefit plan adjustment recorded in shareholders’ equity, for the three month period ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, were $(79,918) and $(36,273), respectively, and for the nine month period ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, were $(128,673) and $27,641, respectively.

Condensed consolidated balance sheets (unaudited)
(In thousands)
December 31, 2008           March 31, 2008 *

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents     $     72,854         $     38,595
Short term investments         1,666             2,909
Trade receivables – net         170,827             294,935
Inventories                 118,682             125,499
Assets held for sale         –             6,871
Other current assets           74,040               64,482
Total current assets           438,069               533,291
Property, plant and equipment – net         484,309             540,536
Assets held for sale             –             5,522
Other noncurrent assets           66,848               88,934
Total assets     $     989,226         $     1,168,283

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity

Debt due within one year     $     6,981         $     4,600
Accounts payable             147,325             193,228
Liabilities of business held for sale         –             3,093
Other current liabilities           149,017               137,993
Total current liabilities           303,323               338,914
Long-term debt             253,598             227,013
Deferred income taxes         15,587             23,634
Liabilities of business held for sale         –             166
Other noncurrent liabilities           69,062               95,438
Total liabilities           641,570               685,165
Shareholders’ equity           347,656               483,118
Total liabilities & shareholders’ equity     $     989,226         $     1,168,283

* The prior year amounts have been adjusted to account for the removal of the one-month
reporting lag for foreign operations.

Modine Manufacturing Company
Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows (unaudited)
(In thousands)
Nine months ended December 31,           2008     2007 *

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss                     $     (61,496     )     $     (33,451     )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss with net cash provided
by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization             55,875             59,030
Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets             30,507             31,455
Other – net                     (15,465     )         10,432
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities               70,843                 (6,965     )
Net cash provided by operating activities               80,264                 60,501

Cash flows from investing activities:
Expenditures for plant, property and equipment             (79,538     )         (58,984     )
Proceeds from dispositions of assets             15,174             8,734
Settlement of derivative contracts             (263     )         (1,286     )
Other – net                       3,225                 63
Net cash used for investing activities               (61,402     )           (51,473     )

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in debt                 30,919             51,996
Cash proceeds from exercise of stock options             18             686
Repurchase of common stock, treasury and retirement             (560     )         (7,396     )
Cash dividends paid                 (9,678     )         (16,972     )
Other – net                       (856     )           (5,283     )
Net cash provided by financing activities               19,843                 23,031

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash               (4,446     )           3,318

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents             34,259             35,377

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period             38,595             26,207

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period         $     72,854           $     61,584

Condensed segment operating results (unaudited)
(In thousands)

Three months ended December 31,             Nine months ended December 31,
2008         2007 *             2008         2007 *
Sales:
Original Equipment – Asia     $     42,271             $     74,339                 $     153,056             $     204,597
Original Equipment – Europe         112,934                 189,770                     499,920                 535,944
Original Equipment – North America         126,232                 133,248                     385,358                 381,142
South America             28,669                 33,920                     114,787                 97,632
Commercial Products         48,795                 55,933                     150,865                 150,360
Fuel Cell               11,469                       923                         14,282                       2,230
Segment sales               370,370                       488,133                         1,318,268                       1,371,905
Corporate and administrative         897                 321                     2,631                 2,461
Eliminations               (6,066     )                 (7,875     )                   (22,716     )                 (20,894     )
Total net sales     $     365,201                 $     480,579                   $     1,298,183                 $     1,353,472

Operating income (loss):
Original Equipment – Asia     $     (1,928     )         $     380                 $     (6,746     )         $     (403     )
Original Equipment – Europe         (43,351     )             20,971                     (6,865     )             60,764
Original Equipment – North America         (12,727     )             (31,070     )                 (25,662     )             (34,224     )
South America             1,041                 2,523                     11,648                 8,828
Commercial Products         5,178                 4,846                     13,886                 10,665
Fuel Cell               9,057                       (395     )                   7,764                       (1,247     )
Segment (loss) income from operations           (42,730     )                 (2,745     )                   (5,975     )                 44,383
Corporate and administrative         (14,900     )             (20,440     )                 (48,832     )             (46,134     )
Eliminations               (142     )                 6                         (133     )                 61
Loss from operations     $     (57,772     )           $     (23,179     )             $     (54,940     )           $     (1,690     )

* The prior year amounts have been adjusted to account for the removal of the one-month reporting lag for foreign operations.

Source: Modine Manufacturing Company

Modine Manufacturing Company
Susan Fisher, 262-636-8434
s.h.fisher@na.modine.com

2/10/2009 5:43:00 PM
Modine Files Form 12b-25 with Securities and Exchange Commission

RACINE, Wis.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Feb. 10, 2009– Modine Manufacturing Company (NYSE: MOD), a diversified global leader in thermal management technology and solutions, announced today that it has filed a Form 12b-25 “Notification of Late Filing” with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission delaying the filing of its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 to on or before February 17, 2009. A copy of the Form 12b-25 is available through the SEC filings section on the investor relations portal of the Company’s website at http://www.modine.com. The Company will release its third quarter fiscal 2009 earnings on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 and conduct a conference call and webcast for investors on that same date at 10:00 a.m. Central Time (11:00 a.m. Eastern Time).

The Company included the following text in its Form 12b-25 filing:

“The weakening global economy and sales volume declines have created a significant downturn in Modine Manufacturing Company’s (the “Company”) vehicular markets, particularly within Europe. These factors triggered an impairment review of the Company’s long-lived assets within its Original Equipment – Europe segment during the third quarter ended December 31, 2008. As of February 9, 2009, the Company has yet to complete this impairment analysis in time to timely file the Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008 without unreasonable effort or expense.

Loss from continuing operations: For the three months ended December 31, 2008, the Company anticipates reporting a loss from continuing operations in a range of $55 million to $58 million, subject to finalization of the long-lived asset impairment analysis for the Company’s Original Equipment – Europe segment. This compares to the reported loss from continuing operations for the three months ended December 31, 2007 of $55 million. The current year loss is the result of the following factors:

* Sales volumes declined significantly as a result of the weakening global economy. The instability in the global financial markets has created a significant downturn in the Company’s vehicular markets, particularly within Europe. Net sales were $365 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008, as compared to net sales of $481 million for the three months ended December 31, 2007;
* The decline in sales volumes, the underabsorption of fixed costs in the Company’s manufacturing facilities as the result of declining sales volumes, as well as a shift in product mix toward lower margin business contributed to a decline in gross profit. Gross profit was $42 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008, as compared to gross profit of $70 million for the three months ended December 31, 2007;
* The results for the three months ended December 31, 2008 are anticipated to include impairment charges in a range of $25 million to $28 million, subject to the finalization of the long-lived asset impairment analysis for the Original Equipment – Europe segment. This is comprised of a $9 million goodwill impairment charge in the Company’s Original Equipment – Europe segment, an estimated $8 million to $11 million long-lived asset impairment charge in the Company’s Original Equipment – Europe segment, and an $8 million long-lived asset impairment charge in the Company’s Original Equipment – North America segment;
* Restructuring and repositioning charges totaling $27 million were recorded during the three months ended December 31, 2008 related to a workforce reduction in the Company’s Racine, Wisconsin headquarters and a planned workforce reduction throughout the Company’s European facilities, including the European headquarters in Bonlanden, Germany; and
* Tax valuation allowance charges of $7 million were recorded against the net deferred tax assets in the U.S. and South Korea as the Company continues to assess that it is more likely than not that these assets will not be realized in the future.

For the nine months ended December 31, 2008, the Company anticipates reporting a loss from continuing operations in a range of $61 million to $64 million. This compares to the reported loss from continuing operations for the nine months ended December 31, 2007 of $34 million. The weakened global economy is expected to continue to adversely affect the Company’s results over the remainder of fiscal 2009. Based on this trend and the current quarter impairment and restructuring charges which were not contemplated in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company anticipates that its full year results will fall significantly below its fiscal 2009 loss from continuing operations before income taxes guidance range of $5 million to $25 million which was previously reported in conjunction with the Company’s second quarter fiscal 2009 earnings release on October 30, 2008.

Liquidity: The Company’s debt agreements require it to maintain specified financial ratios. The most restrictive limitations are quarter-end debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) of not more than a 3.0 to 1.0 ratio (leverage ratio) and earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) to interest expense of not less than a 1.75 to 1.0 ratio for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 (interest expense coverage ratio), as such terms are used in the debt agreements. As indicated in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, recent adverse trends have put additional pressure on the Company’s ability to remain in compliance with the interest expense coverage ratio. As a result of the significant downturn in the Company’s vehicular markets and resulting loss to be reported for the three months ended December 31, 2008, the Company was not in compliance with the interest expense coverage ratio at December 31, 2008, which constituted a default under the debt agreements.

The Company has reached an agreement in principle with its primary lenders and holders of notes on a waiver of the default which existed at December 31, 2008, and an amendment of its debt agreements. The Company has received written confirmation from the lenders and note holders, and anticipates closing on the waiver and amendments prior to filing its Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008. The waiver and amendments will not become effective until the closing. The Company will file a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission that will describe the material terms of the obligations when the waiver and amendments become effective. In the very unlikely event that the Company is unable to close on the waiver and amendments prior to the filing of its Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008, the Company would be required to classify its outstanding long-term indebtedness totaling $254 million as a current liability. Presently, the Company is not able to borrow on its existing revolving credit facility and will not be able to do so until closing on the waiver and amendments. However, at December 31, 2008, the Company had cash of $73 million that it believes will be sufficient to fund operations without accessing the revolving credit facility while the Company closes on the waiver and amendment or pursues other financing options, if needed. While the Company is confident that it will be able to close on the waiver and amendment with its primary lenders and holders of notes, and in fact is in the final stages of doing so, if it is unable to do so and also unable to obtain alternative financing arrangements, there would be substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Forward-Looking Statements

This document contains statements, including information about future financial performance, accompanied by phrases such as “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “will,” “intends,” and other similar “forward-looking” statements, as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company’s actual results, performance or achievements may differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements, because of certain risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A. in Part II. of the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008. Other risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:

* The Company’s ability to obtain a waiver of and amendment to its debt agreements to regain compliance with financial covenants and remain in compliance going forward;
* The impact the current global economic uncertainty and credit market turmoil is having on the Company, its customers and its suppliers and any worsening of such economic conditions;
* The secondary effects on the Company’s future cash flows and liquidity that may result from the Company’s customers and lenders dealing with the economic crisis and its consequences;
* The Company’s ability to limit capital spending and/or consummate planned divestitures;
* The Company’s ability to recover the book value of the South Korean business, if divested;
* The Company’s ability to successfully implement restructuring plans and drive cost reductions as a result;
* The Company’s ability to maintain adequate liquidity to carry out restructuring plans while investing for future growth;
* The Company’s ability to satisfactorily service its customers during the implementation and execution of any restructuring plans and/or new product launches;
* The Company’s ability to avoid or limit inefficiencies in the transitioning of products from production facilities to be closed to other existing or new production facilities;
* The Company’s ability to successfully execute its four-point recovery plan;
* The Company’s ability to further cut costs to increase its gross margin and to maintain and grow its business;
* Impairment of assets resulting from business downturns;
* The Company’s ability to realize future tax benefits;
* Customers’ actual production demand for new products and technologies, including market acceptance of a particular vehicle model or engine;
* The Company’s ability to increase its gross margin, including its ability to produce products in low cost countries;
* The Company’s ability to maintain customer relationships while rationalizing business;
* The Company’s ability to maintain current programs and compete effectively for new business, including its ability to offset or otherwise address increasing pricing pressures from its competitors and cost-downs from its customers;
* The Company’s ability to obtain profitable business at its new facilities in China, Hungary, Mexico, India and Austria and to produce quality products at these facilities from business obtained;
* The effect of the weather on the Commercial Products business, which directly impacts sales;
* Unanticipated problems with suppliers meeting the Company’s time and price demands;
* The impact of environmental laws and regulations on the Company’s business and the business of the Company’s customers, including the Company’s ability to take advantage of opportunities to supply alternative new technologies to meet environmental emissions standards;
* Economic, social and political conditions, changes and challenges in the markets where the Company operates and competes (including currency exchange rate fluctuations, tariffs, inflation, changes in interest rates, recession, and restrictions associated with importing and exporting and foreign ownership);
* Changes in the anticipated sales mix;
* The Company’s association with a particular industry, such as the automobile industry, which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s stock price;
* The nature of the vehicular industry, including the dramatic decline in customer build rates;
* Work stoppages or interference at the Company or the Company’s major customers;
* Unanticipated product or manufacturing difficulties, including unanticipated warranty claims;
* Unanticipated delays or modifications initiated by major customers with respect to product applications or requirements;
* Costs and other effects of unanticipated litigation or claims, and the increasing pressures associated with rising health care and insurance costs; and
* Other risks and uncertainties identified by the Company in public filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Company does not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.”

Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call Dial In Information

To access the February 17th live earnings webcast, including presentation slides, please log on through the investor relations section of Modine’s website at http://www.modine.com at least 10 minutes prior to the start of the event. If you choose to participate on the conference call, please dial 800.599.9795 (international dial in 617.786.2905) and enter passcode 68513851. A replay of the slides and the audio will be available approximately two hours after the call concludes through the investor relations section of Modine’s website at http://www.modine.com. An audio only replay will be available through midnight on February 23, 2009 by dialing 888.286.8010 (international replay 617.801.6888) and entering passcode 13234155. A transcript of the call will be posted to the Company’s website on or about February 19, 2009.

About Modine

With restated fiscal 2008 revenues of $1.9 billion, Modine specializes in thermal management systems and components, bringing highly engineered heating and cooling technology and solutions to diversified global markets. Modine products are used in light, medium and heavy-duty vehicles, heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment, off-highway and industrial equipment, refrigeration systems, and fuel cells. The company employs approximately 7,900 people at 33 facilities worldwide in 15 countries. For more information about Modine, visit www.modine.com.

Source: Modine Manufacturing Company

Modine Manufacturing Company
Susan Fisher, 262-636-8434
s.h.fisher@na.modine.com

2/9/2009 1:21:00 PM
Modine to File Form 12b-25 with Securities and Exchange Commission; Plans to Release Third Quarter Fiscal 2009 Earnings on February 17, 2009

RACINE, Wis.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Feb. 9, 2009– Modine Manufacturing Company (NYSE: MOD), a diversified global leader in thermal management technology and solutions, announced today that it intends to file on February 10, 2009, a Form 12b-25 “Notification of Late Filing” with the Securities and Exchange Commission stating that the filing of the company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 will be delayed and indicating that the Form 10-Q will be filed on or before February 17, 2009, the fifth calendar day following the prescribed due date. A copy of the Form 12b-25 will be made available through the SEC filings section on the investor relations portal of the company’s website at http://www.modine.com and will include details regarding the reasons for the delay.

The company will release its third quarter fiscal 2009 earnings on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 and conduct a conference call and webcast for investors on that same date at 10:00 a.m. Central Time (11:00 a.m. Eastern Time).

To access the live earnings webcast, including presentation slides, please log on through the investor relations section of Modine’s website at http://www.modine.com at least 10 minutes prior to the start of the event. If you choose to participate on the conference call, please dial 800.599.9795 (international dial in 617.786.2905) and enter passcode 68513851. A replay of the slides and the audio will be available approximately two hours after the call concludes through the investor relations section of Modine’s website at http://www.modine.com. An audio only replay will be available through midnight on February 23, 2009 by dialing 888.286.8010 (international replay 617.801.6888) and entering passcode 13234155. A transcript of the call will be posted to the company’s website on or about February 19, 2009.

About Modine

With restated fiscal 2008 revenues of $1.9 billion, Modine specializes in thermal management systems and components, bringing highly engineered heating and cooling technology and solutions to diversified global markets. Modine products are used in light, medium and heavy-duty vehicles, heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment, off-highway and industrial equipment, refrigeration systems, and fuel cells. The company employs approximately 7,900 people at 33 facilities worldwide in 15 countries. For more information about Modine, visit www.modine.com.

Source: Modine Manufacturing Company

Modine Manufacturing Company
Susan Fisher
262-636-8434
s.h.fisher@na.modine.com

- More News

Markets We Serve
Automotive
Off-Highway
Truck
Engines
Building HVAC
Fuel Cells
Cooling Coils

http://www3.modine.com/v2portal/modine.portal

Are the bondholders forcing bankruptcies of our corporations in order to get equity in the companies through bankruptcy restructuring and what do the FINRA bond charts express about the economic crisis we are about to face?

Trump Entertainment’s market value has tumbled to $7.3 million from its peak at $842 million in August 2005. The company’s 8.5 percent notes due June 2015 traded at 14 cents on the dollar Feb. 13, according to Trace, the bond-pricing system of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

Trump controls about 28 percent of Trump Entertainment’s stock, according to a March 21 regulatory filing. His daughter, Ivanka Trump, also quit the board last week.

“I strongly disagree with the bondholders’ decisions and actions,” Trump, 62, said on Feb. 14.

Holders of most of company’s $1.25 billion in notes and Beal Bank Nevada, which is owed $490 million, have agreed not to exercise default rights for interest or principal payments until 9 a.m. New York time today.

A deadline to make the $53 million payment, originally due Dec. 1, has been extended four times since an initial grace period ended on Dec. 31.

Bondholder Pressure

Trump Entertainment emerged from bankruptcy 3 1/2 years ago. Its predecessor, Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Inc., sought court protection in November 2004. It had lost money for nine years because of high interest payments that Trump claimed prevented the company from refurbishing and expanding its casinos.

Trump Entertainment’s board met late yesterday to decide whether to file for bankruptcy, the Wall Street Journal reported.

This would be the third trip to bankruptcy court for Trump Entertainment’s three casinos. Trump quit the company’s board on Feb. 13, saying he disagreed with bondholders’ decisions. He said bondholders turned down an offer he made to purchase the company.

By Beth Jinks

Feb. 17 (Bloomberg) — Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc., facing a deadline to make a $53 million interest payment on its bonds, may file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection as soon as today, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The company may file early this week if it can’t reach agreement with bondholders, the person said on Feb. 14. Bondholders also may force the Atlantic City, New Jersey-based casino operator into bankruptcy, said the person, who declined to be named because the discussions were ongoing.

Excerpted from Bloomberg article – Feb. 17, by Beth Jinks -
Trump Entertainment, Facing Payment Due, May Seek Bankruptcy

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aXx3Qw4nGQfo

***
The casino operator had assets of about $2.1 billion and total debts of about $1.74 billion on December 31, 2008, it said in its filing with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey.

Nine affiliates of the casino operator including Trump Plaza Associates, Trump Plaza Associates, Trump Marina Associates and Trump Taj Mahal Associates simultaneously sought protection, according to the filing.

The company missed a $53.1 million bond interest payment due on December 1 as a sharp downturn in consumer spending hit casino revenues.

Donald Trump said on Friday that he had decided to resign from the board of the company due to disagreements with bondholders who wanted the casino group to file for bankruptcy.

(Reporting by Ajay Kamalakaran in Bangalore; editing by Simon Jessop)
Excerpted from Reuters article – Feb. 17, 09
“Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc, Donald Trump’s casino group, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Tuesday, court documents show”

http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-general/20090217/NEWS-US-TRUMP/

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE51G05X20090217
***

Last Updated: 2/17/2009

FINRA-Bloomberg Active US Corporate Bond Indices

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/ActiveUSCorpBond.aspx?TimeFrame=1y&ChartType=TotalReturn

Investment Grade Lagging Movers – 02/17/09

High Yield Lagging Movers – 02/17/09

View High Yield Index Membership List

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/NBBHMembershipInfo.aspx

***
FINRA TRACE Corporate Bond Market Activity
(on opening page – halfway down in a table)

Market Breadth
All Issues     Investment Grade     High Yield     Convertibles
Total Issues Traded     4,363              3,232                    877                   254
Advances                         1,974              1,538                     310                   126
Declines                            1,915              1,348                      454                   113
Unchanged                         156                     84                         61                      11
52 Week High                    123                   112                           7                        4
52 Week Low                     168                   119                         43                        6
Dollar Volume *         16,275              9,973                   4,510               1,792
* Par value in millions

http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/Default.aspx

***

** my note -
What I noticed because I had a question about the Trump story – is that the declines and advances in the chart are very, very close compared to the other times and that when I went to the pages of high-yield bonds, the charts on them are extremely volatile with drastic dips in value.

The question I had originally was why would the bondholders in the Trump casino group bonds find it more advantageous to pressure the corporation into bankruptcy rather than to allow either the purchase by Mr. Trump or a continued profitable relationship with the group. In trying to understand what their advantage would be, I found the FINRA Trace site mentioned in the Bloomberg article.

So, my questions now are -

1. Is there oversight of the manner in which these bondholders are doing business activities (surely it is not in the hands of FINRA)?

2.  How many bonds are currently in default that are currently engaged in trading such as these charts express? How are these defaults being handled by bondholders? Are they contributing to the defaults, liquidity difficulties and bankruptcies of our corporations?

3.  How are they regulated? And, are they part of Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) that are putting pressure on the bondholders to resolve other liquidity issues?

- cricketdiane, 02-17-09

***

It is my opinion only that these bonds are at the crux of our financial crisis and if even a third of them demand bankruptcy of their corporate facilities indebted to them, then we have a serious problem that has not been addressed.

Time is not on our side, but I believe there are solutions we can access to help resolve what is happening in this part of our financial industry and the impacts it is having on our businesses’ sustainability.

- “Cricket” Diane C. Phillips, 02-17-09

Are the bondholders forcing bankruptcies of our corporations in order to get equity in the companies through bankruptcy restructuring and what do the FINRA bond charts express about the economic crisis we are about to face?

***
The Oversight Committee is currently conducting an investigation into the financial crisis and is interested in any information that may help further the investigation.
http://oversight.house.gov/contact/tiplines/financial.asp
http://oversight.house.gov/

***

My Note -

Bondholders are not supposed to be able to maneuver a hostile takeover by use of the lines of influence which their bonds provide them. That would exceed their legal and appropriate use of extending credit through bonds to any company.

The use of their position as bondholders and using these bonds to force corporate governance, corporate choices about solvency or bankruptcy, strategic maneuvers to acquire equity and/or power in the corporate structure are wrong and if it isn’t illegal, it certainly should be because it allows these manipulations outside the sphere of regulated activities.

Bondholders are not shareholders. They are not part of the governing body of the corporate structure. They are not entitled a vote in decision-making and their influence in corporate bankruptcies as a choice for solvency should not be tolerated.

Their vested interest is operating outside the jurisdiction of and appropriate jurisprudence that governs all other financial / corporate filings and actions, including that of mergers, acquisitions and the like, when it is used to manipulate or maneuver for control, equity, and acquisition that is unfavorable to the corporate survival.

Doesn’t that amount to a hostile takeover for pennies on the dollar?

- cricketdiane, 02-17-09

***

SEC Divisions Homepages
Corporation Finance Enforcement

Investment Management Trading and Markets

SEC Offices Homepages

Office of Administrative Law Judges

Office of Administrative Services
Office of the Chief Accountant
Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations
Office of Economic Analysis
Office of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)
Office of the Executive Director
Office of Financial Management
Office of the General Counsel
Office of Human Resources
Office of Information Technology
Office of Inspector General
Office of Interactive Disclosure
Office of International Affairs
Office of Investor Education and Advocacy
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
Office of Public Affairs
Office of Risk Assessment
Office of the Secretary

SEC Task Force Homepages
21st Century Disclosure Initiative

SEC Organization Chart (text version also available)

For detailed descriptions of SEC offices and divisions, please read The Investor’s Advocate.

http://www.sec.gov/divisions.shtml

Contact | Employment | Links | FOIA | Forms | Privacy Policy
Modified: 12/17/2008

http://www.sec.gov/divisions.shtml

Why would bondholders to major corporations such as Trump’s casino group, prefer to push them into bankruptcy?

What would cause these bondholders to prefer bankruptcy for the Trump group rather than a continued profitable relationship with them? Does that make any sense?

- my note, Cricketdiane, 02-17-09

Trump Entertainment files for Chapter 11
news-general-20090217-NEWS-US-TRUMP

Donald Trump speaks during a news conference at an Aberdeenshire Council inq…
24 minutes ago

(Reuters) – Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc, Donald Trump’s casino group, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Tuesday, court documents show.

The casino operator had assets of about $2.1 billion and total debts of about $1.74 billion on December 31, 2008, it said in its filing with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey.

Nine affiliates of the casino operator including Trump Plaza Associates, Trump Plaza Associates, Trump Marina Associates and Trump Taj Mahal Associates simultaneously sought protection, according to the filing.

The company missed a $53.1 million bond interest payment due on December 1 as a sharp downturn in consumer spending hit casino revenues.

Donald Trump said on Friday that he had decided to resign from the board of the company due to disagreements with bondholders who wanted the casino group to file for bankruptcy.

(Reporting by Ajay Kamalakaran in Bangalore; editing by Simon Jessop)
http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-general/20090217/NEWS-US-TRUMP/

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE51G05X20090217

Did the experts add any of the stimulus effects inherent in building these “deferred maintenance” projects – surely those people will go to McDonald’s for lunch and Walmart on the way home -

In the amount of time that has spent on every news channel and every news show parading people through to tell us what is entirely bad wrong about the stimulus plan and experts to project for us what it will or will not do maybe, we could have been told every last item and cost in the bill.

The number of people who voted for it without reading it may be large but surely they were paying attention when they were nit-picking and fighting over every last word, dot, dash and quantity in it. And then, the same Senators and Representatives that were pitching hell about not being given time to read it were the same ones telling us at every opportunity on the news, what was bad wrong that was in it.

Well, did they know what was in it or not? I have a feeling that either they did know when they voted for it or their Party told them what to do and what was in the bill that they agreed or disagreed with. Now, isn’t that about how these Congressional members have been doing it on just about everything they vote for or against? I bet it is.

I was finally so tired of hearing the same three comments about the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act repeated by a vast parade of “experts” and politically oriented opinions online, on cable and on prime time tv, that I decided I would find the durn thing and read it myself.

The only way I found the thing was through the White House website with a search using its name in the search box halfway down the page. Not real convenient and maybe somewhere it is located where it is easier to find, but don’t go over to the Congress website or US Senate website or the Thomas legislative information site to find it.

In the process of searching for an official online copy of the stimulus bill, I found the following good stuff (and a couple other things that were interesting) -

accidently found – Anti-Trust listing
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?i110:@FIELD(TITLE+@3(Antitrust+Policy)+):

***
Congressional Record Index – 110th Congress
http://thomas.loc.gov/i110/i110SNOW.html

***

FDsys – GPO Access
Search Government Publications
Browse Government Publications
About Government Publications
Search on GPO Access

http://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action

GPO’s Federal Digital System (FDsys) provides public access to government information submitted by Congress and Federal agencies and preserved as technology changes.

***
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:HR00001:@@@S

Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009 – (stimulus bill)

http://www.conferencereport.gpoaccess.gov/SearchCongressionalRecord.aspx?CongressionalRecordId=xN/m0fuchas=
House conference reports on H.R. 1 – 2009, from GPO

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c111:7:./temp/~c111e0XnId::
Public Print of:

H.R.1
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Print)

***

H.R.1
Title: Making supplemental appropriations for job preservation and creation, infrastructure investment, energy efficiency and science, assistance to the unemployed, and State and local fiscal stabilization, for fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes.

Sponsor: Rep Obey, David R. [WI-7] (introduced 1/26/2009)      Cosponsors (9)

Related Bills: H.RES.88, H.RES.92, H.RES.168, H.R.290, H.R.291, H.R.598, H.R.629, H.R.679, S.336, S.350

Latest Major Action: 2/13/2009 Conference report agreed to in Senate. Status: Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 60 – 38. Record Vote Number: 64.

Latest Conference Report: 111-16 (in Congressional Record H1307-1516)
Note: The House Rules Committee has posted the conference report. See also the GPO word-searchable version (more info).

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:HR00001:@@@S
ALL ACTIONS: ( and info directly above)

***

*
*

The Library of Congress > THOMAS Home > Bills, Resolutions > Search Results

THIS SEARCH     THIS DOCUMENT     GO TO
Next Hit        Forward           New Bills Search
Prev Hit        Back              HomePage
Hit List        Best Sections     Help
Contents Display

Bill 7 of 7
There are 6 other versions of this bill.
GPO’s PDF Display    References to this bill in the Congressional Record    Link to the Bill Summary & Status file.    Printer Friendly Display
H.R.1
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Print)
Beginning
February 10, 2009

***
Friday, February 13th, 2009 at 2:05 pm
ARRA for comment
Yesterday, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 passed through conference and is now on its way back to the House and Senate for full votes.
Take a look at the legislation and send us your thoughts, comments, and ideas.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/09/02/13/ARRA-for-comment/

***
On Friday, Feburary 13, 2009, the House of Representatives and Senate approved the conference report for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

The U.S. Government Printing Office has now published the final text of the legislation. Read it by clicking on the links below — then use the form on the right to leave your comments, thoughts, and ideas.
Conference Report on H.R. 1 (1 of 5): PDF, ASCII
Conference Report on H.R. 1 (2 of 5): PDF, ASCII
Conference Report on H.R. 1 (3 of 5): PDF, ASCII
Conference Report on H.R. 1 (4 of 5): PDF, ASCII
Conference Report on H.R. 1 (5 of 5): PDF, ASCII

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/arra_public_review/

***
http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/EIB41/EIB41b.pdf

Rising Food Prices Take a Bite Out of Food Stamp Benefits / EIB-41
Economic Research Service/USDA
During FY 1997-2008, given the existing method of adjusting the maximum
benefit, the cost of the TFP exceeded the nominal value of the food stamp
benefit in all but 3 months in FY 2003 (fi g. 2). Over the 144-month span,
the cumulative shortfall is estimated by subtracting the prevailing maximum
benefit from the cost of the TFP in each month and summing over the entire
period. This yields an estimated cumulative shortfall of $1,909, which averages to $13.26 a month in nominal (unadjusted for inflation) terms.

5See the June 2007 Thrifty Food Plan
cost for the reference family of four with
children ages 6-8 and 9-11 prepared by
USDA, Center for Nutrition Policy and
Promotion (www.cnpp.usda.gov/USDAFoodCost-
Home.htm
) and the fiscal year
2008 Food Stamp Program maximum
allotment for a family of four prepared
by USDA, Food and Nutrition Service
(www.fns.usda.gov/snap/government/
cola.htm
). The maximum benefits for
other family sizes are derived from the
maximum benefit for a family of four
using adjustment factors for economies
of scale in household food expenditures.
6Food prices for a monthly Consumer
Price Index are collected throughout
the month and a weighted average
is taken. So, on average, there is a
3.5-month lag from mid-June to the
start of October and a 4-month lag to
mid-October.

Throughout FY 2008, the difference between the cost of the TFP and the
maximum benefit for the reference family has grown due to rising food prices (fig. 3).

The FY 2008 Food Stamp Program maximum benefit for the reference family [of four with two adults and two elementary school children was set in October 2007 at $542, the cost of the Thrifty Food Plan [which used price data from 2001-2002 for its basis,] in the prior June.

But by October 2007, the cost of the Thrifty Food Plan had already risen to $554, resulting in a shortfall of $12. (my note – where are they shopping?)

The shortfall increased steadily over the year, reaching $56 in July and $64 in September 2008. The FY 2009 maximum benefit has been set at $588 for the reference family, given the June 2008 cost of the TFP.

The cost of the Thrifty Food Plan for October 2008 is $606, which is 3.1 percent greater than the maximum benefit in the first month of FY 2009.

***

http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/USDAFoodCost-Home.htm
Food Cost Chart used by food stamp decision-makers

***

http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/USDAFoodCost-Home.htm
Food Cost Chart used by food stamp decision-makers

20.70 per week for a one year old child
89.70 per month for a one year old child

36.60 per week for a male 51 – 70 years old
158.80 per month for a male 51 – 70 years old

35.20 per week for a female 51 – 70 years old
152.70 per month for a female 51 – 70 years old

153.80 per month for a female 19-50 years old

Families
Family of 2:4
19-50 years          83.00 per week
359.80 per month

Family of 4:
Couple, 19-50 years
and children.
2-3 and 4-5 years         120.60 per week
522.50 per month

Official USDA Food Plans:  Cost of Food at Home at Four Levels,
U.S. Average, December 20081
[All four Food Plans are based on 2001-02 data and updated to current dollars by
using the Consumer Price Index for specific food items.]

For specific foods and quantities of foods in the Food Plans, see Thrifty Food Plan, 2006 (2007) and The Low-Cost, Moderate-Cost, and Liberal Food Plans, 2007 (2007). All four Food Plans are based on 2001-02 data and updated to current dollars by using the Consumer Price Index for specific food items.

http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/Publications/FoodPlans/2008/CostofFoodDec08.pdf


***

Using this database, CNPP
calculated the weighted average nutrient content of each of the 58 food categories per 100 grams. For example, the “poultry, low-discretionary solid fat and low-cost group” consists of foods such as roasted chicken drumstick without skin, boiled chicken leg, and canned chicken soup.

** ( my note – how is it possible that this weighted average nutrient content would make it appear that the same quality of protein and nutrient value is in these three items? Do they really believe canned chicken soup at $1.23 a can for two servings has the same nutrient value as a chicken drumstick?)

[and]

Each of the 4,152 foods in the Food Price Database was assigned to one of the 58 food categories. The weighted average price per 100 grams of each of these food categories was then determined based on the average consumption by all people in the age-gender group. (my note – and then they used the price data from 2001-2002 to determine how much it would cost.)

http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/Publications/FoodPlans/MiscPubs/TFP2006Report.pdf

***

http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/Publications/FoodPlans/MiscPubs/TFP2006Report.pdf
Thrifty Food Plan 2006 (April 2007)

Andrea Carlson, PhD
Mark Lino, PhD
WenYen Juan, PhD
Kenneth Hanson, PhD1
P. Peter Basiotis, PhD
Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion
U.S. Department of Agriculture

April 2007
CNPP-19
1Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Carlson, A., Lino, M., Juan, W-Y., Hanson, K., & Basiotis, P.P. (2007). Thrifty Food
Plan, 2006. (CNPP-19). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy
and Promotion.

The Thrifty Food Plan (TFP), a fundamental part of the U.S. food guidance system and the
basis for maximum food stamp allotments, has been revised by USDA’s Center for Nutrition
Policy and Promotion (CNPP), with assistance from USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), Economic Research Service (ERS), and Agricultural Research Service (ARS). The
TFP provides a representative healthful and minimal cost meal plan that shows how a
nutritious diet may be achieved with limited resources. The Plan assumes that all purchased
food is consumed at home. The TFP was last revised in 1999. The newly revised (2006) TFP
differs from, and improves upon, the previous TFP in a number of ways. The 2006 TFP:

• Is based on the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans as well as the 2005 MyPyramid
Food Guidance System.
• Uses the prices low-income people paid for many foods.
• Uses the latest data on food consumption, nutrient content, and food prices: the 2001-
2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and 2001-2002 Food Price
Database.
• Offers a more realistic reflection of the time available for food preparation, especially
with increased expectations for work in assistance programs. Hence, it allows more
prepared foods and requires somewhat fewer preparations from scratch.
Although different from the previous TFP, the revised TFP is similar in one important
respect: It is set at the same inflation-adjusted cost as the previous TFP. CNPP determined it
was possible, for the 2001-2002 period, to obtain a healthful diet meeting current nutritional
standards at a cost equal to the previous TFP’s cost

***

The Thrifty Food Plan (TFP) has been revised to reflect current dietary recommendations,
food consumption patterns, food composition data, and food prices while maintaining the
cost level of the previous (1999)1 baskets. This revision was undertaken by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion (CNPP),
with assistance from USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), Economic Research
Service (ERS), and Agricultural Research Service (ARS).

***
CNPP used two main data sets in revising the TFP market baskets: the Federal Government’s
2001-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the
2001-2002 Food Price Database.

***
http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/g_three_sections_with_teasers/legislative_home.htm

How to Find Legislation

Active Legislation is a list of current bills, arranged by subject, that have been receiving legislative or media attention.

The THOMAS legislative information system provides search options for finding bill texts and legislative histories from 1973 (93rd Congress) to the present.

For more hints on finding legislation, see How to find bill numbers and How to find copies of bills.

Congressional Record

The Congressional Record is published daily when either house of Congress meets. It is a published account of Congressional debates and activities, including votes, legislation, and committee meeting announcements. The Congressional Record research guide further explains use and distribution of the Record.

Recent Floor Activity

Use the following choices to view and track recent floor activity by date (choose from the last five days). If the Senate was not in session on the specified date, you will see a header with the date, but no items will appear.

Last Major Action – Obtain a list of all bills with Major Actions on the specified date.
Bills Introduced – Obtain a list of all bills introduced on the specified date.
Congressional Record – See the printed, and substantially verbatim account of proceedings in the Senate for the date specified.
Daily Digest – Read a summary of the day’s floor and committee actions, with page references to the Congressional Record. Also lists the measures scheduled for action during the next meeting.
Roll Call Votes – Go to a table of all Roll Call Votes this year. The most recent votes are listed at the top.

***

then – back to here -

Friday, February 13th, 2009 at 2:05 pm
ARRA for comment
Yesterday, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 passed through conference and is now on its way back to the House and Senate for full votes.
Take a look at the legislation and send us your thoughts, comments, and ideas.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/09/02/13/ARRA-for-comment/

***
On Friday, Feburary 13, 2009, the House of Representatives and Senate approved the conference report for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

The U.S. Government Printing Office has now published the final text of the legislation. Read it by clicking on the links below — then use the form on the right to leave your comments, thoughts, and ideas.
Conference Report on H.R. 1 (1 of 5): PDF, ASCII
Conference Report on H.R. 1 (2 of 5): PDF, ASCII
Conference Report on H.R. 1 (3 of 5): PDF, ASCII
Conference Report on H.R. 1 (4 of 5): PDF, ASCII
Conference Report on H.R. 1 (5 of 5): PDF, ASCII

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/arra_public_review/

***

My note -

So, I was going to do this where I could see what it really has in it –

(and started what is seen below for about eight categories which makes it a lot easier for me to understand.) -

CONFERENCE REPORT ON H.R. 1, AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF
2009

[Congressional Record: February 12, 2009 (House)]
[Page H1307-H1357]
From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:cr12fe09-146]

** http://frwebgate3.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2009_record&docid=cr12fe09-146
TITLE I–AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION,
AND RELATED AGENCIES

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agriculture Buildings and Facilities and Rental Payments

$24,000,000                     for necessary construction, repair, and                                                                                   improvement activities.

office of inspector general

$22,500,000                       for oversight and audit of programs, grants,

and activities funded by this Act and

administered by the Department of Agriculture.

******

my note –

And, I was going along doing that which made it a bit farther than just these two listings, when I realized that of all the news shows and news items I’ve watched and checked online about the stimulus / reinvestment act – why didn’t they simply do that throughout their opportunities to tell us about it and call it “reporting the news.”

Why didn’t those in the Congressional offices with staff members and interns and secretaries and accountants and legal staff and lobbyists out the wazoo and Party resources out the wazoo also -  provide all of us with something like this formatted where we could all read it and understand it including those voting on it? Or did they and somewhere this bill looks more like a simple shopping list with the amounts for each thing out to one side?

You know, that is what comes of having voted these folks into office based on popularity rather than on other things that might be far more important.

I still don’t understand why elected and non-elected politically oriented people rely on their respective Party (in either case) to tell them what they think about the stimulus bill or whatever else. And, rely on their party as to why they think that. And, depend on their party leadership to express for them, how that means “what they believe in” based on their  “principles.”

Who defined that for them and what does it even mean at a point when their decisions have outcomes which do not reflect those “principles” or ascribed beliefs?

And, how does anyone get that “recording” which is stuck on stupid to stop and think about what they are saying, thinking and doing for themselves – especially in a crisis, critical emergency or changing situation?

The tricky thing about principles is that when applied at the wrong time, in the wrong measure or in choosing to apply the wrong combination of principles that are appropriate and the most successful for a situation, even the best, well-founded principles aren’t going to be worth a damn.

That is why we elect human people instead of machines to run our government – I thought we hired them for their ability to use their brains  when our safety and survival depends on their decision-making.

Since I started on the “shopping list” approach to see what is in this “stimulus” bill, here is the list given of what is in it – now all I need to do is retrieve the figures being given to each (when I have absolutely nothing better to do) -

(end of my note here)
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS.

SEC. 3. REFERENCES.

DIVISION A–APPROPRIATIONS PROVISIONS
TITLE I–AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES
Cooperative State Research, Education and Economic Service
research and education activities
Farm Service Agency
agricultural credit insurance fund program account
Natural Resources Conservation Service
watershed and flood prevention operations
watershed rehabilitation program
rural development salaries and expenses
Rural Housing Service
rural housing insurance program account
rural community facilities program account
Rural Business–cooperative Service
rural business program account
biorefinery assistance
rural energy for america program
Rural Utilities Service
rural water and waste disposal program account
distance learning, telemedicine, and broadband program account
Food and Nutrition Service
child nutrition programs
special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children (wic)
commodity assistance program
TITLE II–COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE, AND RELATED AGENCIES
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
operations and administration
Economic Development Administration
economic development assistance programs
Bureau of the Census
periodic censuses and programs
National Telecommunications and Information Administration
broadband technology opportunities program
digital-to-analog converter box program
National Institute of Standards and Technology
scientific and technical research and services
construction of research facilities
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
operations, research, and facilities
procurement, acquisition and construction
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
General Administration
tactical law enforcement wireless communications
Detention Trustee
United States Marshals Service
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Federal Prison System
State and Local Law Enforcement Activities
Office on Violence Against Women
violence against women prevention and prosecution programs
Office of Justice Programs
state and local law enforcement assistance
Community Oriented Policing Services
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
aeronautics
exploration
cross agency support
National Science Foundation
research and related activities
major research equipment and facilities construction
education and human resources
TITLE III–DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Operation and Maintenance, Army
Operation and Maintenance, Navy
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard
Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard
PROCUREMENT
Defense Production Act Purchases
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide
OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS
Defense Health Program
TITLE IV–ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT
Department of the Army
Corps of Engineers–Civil
investigations
mississippi river and tributaries
operation and maintenance
regulatory program
formerly utilized sites remedial action program
flood control and coastal emergencies
Bureau of Reclamation
water and related resources
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Energy Programs
energy efficiency and renewable energy
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability
Fossil Energy Research and Development
Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup
Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund
Science
Title 17–Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program
ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
National Nuclear Security Administration
weapons activities
Environmental and Other Defense Activities
defense environmental cleanup
Construction, Rehabilitation, Operation, and Maintenance, Western Area Power Administration
`TITLE III–BORROWING AUTHORITY

`SEC. 301. WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION BORROWING AUTHORITY.

`SEC. 1705. TEMPORARY PROGRAM FOR RAPID DEPLOYMENT OF RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION PROJECTS.

TITLE V–FINANCIAL SERVICES AND GENERAL GOVERNMENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Community Development Financial Institutions Fund Program Account
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Federal Payments
federal payment to the district of columbia water and sewer authority
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Real Property Activities
federal buildings fund
limitations on availability of revenue
Energy-Efficient Federal Motor Vehicle Fleet Procurement
RECOVERY ACT ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY BOARD
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Surety Bond Guarantees Revolving Fund
Business Loans Program Account
Administrative Provisions–Small Business Administration

SEC. 505. SURETY BONDS.

TITLE VI–DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Under Secretary for Management
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
border security fencing, infrastructure, and technology
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
automation modernization
Transportation Security Administration
aviation security
Coast Guard
acquisition, construction, and improvements
alteration of bridges
Federal Emergency Management Agency
management and administration
state and local programs
firefighter assistance grants
disaster assistance direct loan program account
emergency food and shelter
Federal Law Enforcement Training Center
acquisition, construction, improvements, and related expenses
TITLE VII–INTERIOR, ENVIRONMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
management of lands and resources
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
resource management
National Park Service
operation of the national park system
United States Geological Survey
surveys, investigations, and research
Bureau of Indian Affairs
operation of indian programs
indian guaranteed loan program account
DEPARTMENTAL OFFICES
Insular Affairs
assistance to territories
Department-Wide Programs
central hazardous materials fund
ENVIROMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Hazardous Substance Superfund
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund Program
State and Tribal Assistance Grants
(including transfers of funds)
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
capital improvement and maintenance
wildland fire management
Indian Health Service
indian health services
indian health facilities
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
Facilities Capital
TITLE VIII–DEPARTMENTS OF LABOR, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, AND EDUCATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
training and employment services
community service employment for older americans
state unemployment insurance and employment service operations
office of job corps
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services Administration
health resources and services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
disease control, research, and training
National Institutes of Health
national center for research resources
office of the director
buildings and facilities
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
healthcare research and quality
Administration for Children and Families
payments to states for the child care and development block grant
social services block grant
children and families services programs
Administration on Aging
aging services programs
office of the national coordinator for health information technology
Education for the Disadvantaged
School Improvement Programs
special education
Rehabilitation Services and Disability Research
Student Financial Assistance
Higher Education
Departmental Management
RELATED AGENCIES
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE
Operating Expenses
Office of the Inspector General
National Service Trust
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Limitation on Administrative Expenses

`SEC. 8104. REPORT ON THE IMPACT OF PAST AND FUTURE MINIMUM WAGE INCREASES.

(transfer of funds)
TITLE IX–LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
TITLE X–MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND VETERANS AFFAIRS, AND RELATED AGENCIES
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Military Construction, Army
Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps
Military Construction, Air Force
Military Construction, Defense-Wide
Military Construction, Army National Guard
Military Construction, Air National Guard
Family Housing Construction, Army
Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Army
Family Housing Construction, Air Force
Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Air Force
Homeowners Assistance Fund
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Veterans Health Administration
medical support and compliance
medical facilities
national cemetery administration
Departmental Administration
general operating expenses
information technology systems
construction, major projects
construction, minor projects
grants for construction of state extended care facilities
Administrative Provision
RELATED AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE–CIVIL
Cemeterial Expenses, Army
salary and expenses
TITLE XI–STATE, FOREIGN OPERATIONS, AND RELATED PROGRAMS
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Administration of Foreign Affairs
diplomatic and consular programs
INTERNATIONAL COMMISSIONS
International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico
construction
(including transfer of funds)
UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Funds Appropriated to the President
capital investment fund
Operating Expenses of the United States Agency for International Development Office of Inspector General
TITLE XII–TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
supplemental discretionary grants for a national surface transportation system
Federal Aviation Administration
supplemental funding for facilities and equipment
supplemental discretionary grants for airport investment
Federal Highway Administration
supplemental grants for highway investment
Federal Railroad Administration
supplemental grants to states for intercity passenger rail service
supplemental capital grants to the national railroad passenger corporation
high-speed rail corridor program
Federal Transit Administration
supplemental grants for public transit investment
Maritime Administration
supplemental grants for assistance to small shipyards
salaries and expenses
GENERAL PROVISION–DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Native American Housing Block Grants
Public Housing Capital Fund
Home Investment Partnerships Program
Homelessness Prevention Fund
Assisted Housing Stability and Energy and Green Retrofit Investments
Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control
Office of Inspector General
TITLE XIII–HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

SEC. 1301. SHORT TITLE.

Subtitle A–Promotion of Health Information Technology
PART I–IMPROVING HEALTH CARE QUALITY, SAFETY, AND EFFICIENCY

SEC. 13101. ONCHIT; STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT AND ADOPTION.

`TITLE XXX–HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND QUALITY

`SEC. 3000. DEFINITIONS.

`Subtitle A–Promotion of Health Information Technology

`SEC. 3001. OFFICE OF THE NATIONAL COORDINATOR FOR HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY.

`SEC. 3002. HIT POLICY COMMITTEE.

`SEC. 3003. HIT STANDARDS COMMITTEE.

`SEC. 3005. APPLICATION AND USE OF ADOPTED STANDARDS AND IMPLEMENTATION SPECIFICATIONS BY FEDERAL AGENCIES.

`SEC. 3006. VOLUNTARY APPLICATION AND USE OF ADOPTED STANDARDS AND IMPLEMENTATION SPECIFICATIONS BY PRIVATE ENTITIES.

`SEC. 3007. FEDERAL HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY.

SEC. 3008. TRANSITIONS.

`SEC. 3009. RELATION TO HIPAA PRIVACY AND SECURITY LAW.

SEC. 13102. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.

PART II–APPLICATION AND USE OF ADOPTED HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS; REPORTS

SEC. 13111. COORDINATION OF FEDERAL ACTIVITIES WITH ADOPTED STANDARDS AND IMPLEMENTATION SPECIFICATIONS.

SEC. 13112. APPLICATION TO PRIVATE ENTITIES.

SEC. 13113. STUDY AND REPORTS.

GENERAL PROVISIONS–HOPE FOR HOMEOWNERS AMENDMENTS
Subtitle B–Testing of Health Information Technology

SEC. 13201. NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY TESTING.

SEC. 13202. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS.

Subtitle C–Incentives for the Use of Health Information Technology
PART I–GRANTS AND LOANS FUNDING

SEC. 13301. GRANT, LOAN, AND DEMONSTRATION PROGRAMS.

`Subtitle B–Incentives for the Use of Health Information Technology

`SEC. 3011. IMMEDIATE FUNDING TO STRENGTHEN THE HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE.

`SEC. 3012. HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IMPLEMENTATION ASSISTANCE.

`SEC. 3013. STATE GRANTS TO PROMOTE HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY.

`SEC. 3015. DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM TO INTEGRATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTO CLINICAL EDUCATION.

`SEC. 3016. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONALS ON HEALTH CARE.

`SEC. 3017. GENERAL GRANT AND LOAN PROVISIONS.

`SEC. 3018. AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS.

Subtitle D–Privacy

SEC. 13400. DEFINITIONS.

PART I–IMPROVED PRIVACY PROVISIONS AND SECURITY PROVISIONS

SEC. 13402. NOTIFICATION IN THE CASE OF BREACH.

SEC. 13403. EDUCATION ON HEALTH INFORMATION PRIVACY.

SEC. 13404. APPLICATION OF PRIVACY PROVISIONS AND PENALTIES TO BUSINESS ASSOCIATES OF COVERED ENTITIES.

SEC. 13406. CONDITIONS ON CERTAIN CONTACTS AS PART OF HEALTH CARE OPERATIONS.

SEC. 13408. BUSINESS ASSOCIATE CONTRACTS REQUIRED FOR CERTAIN ENTITIES.

SEC. 13409. CLARIFICATION OF APPLICATION OF WRONGFUL DISCLOSURES CRIMINAL PENALTIES.

SEC. 13410. IMPROVED ENFORCEMENT.

SEC. 13411. AUDITS.

PART II–RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAWS; REGULATORY REFERENCES; EFFECTIVE DATE; REPORTS

SEC. 13421. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAWS.

SEC. 13422. REGULATORY REFERENCES.

SEC. 13423. EFFECTIVE DATE.

SEC. 13424. STUDIES, REPORTS, GUIDANCE.

TITLE XIV–STATE FISCAL STABILIZATION
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
State Fiscal Stabilization Fund
GENERAL PROVISIONS–THIS TITLE

SEC. 1401. ALLOCATIONS.

SEC. 1402. STATE USES OF FUNDS.

SEC. 1403. USES OF FUNDS BY LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES.

SEC. 1404. USES OF FUNDS BY INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION.

SEC. 1405. STATE APPLICATIONS.

SEC. 1406. STATE INCENTIVE GRANTS.

SEC. 1407. INNOVATION FUND.

SEC. 1408. STATE REPORTS.

SEC. 1409. EVALUATION.

SEC. 1410. SECRETARY’S REPORT TO CONGRESS.

SEC. 1411. PROHIBITION ON PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE.

SEC. 1412. DEFINITIONS.

SEC. 1413. REGULATORY RELIEF.

TITLE XV–RECOVERY ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY BOARD AND RECOVERY INDEPENDENT ADVISORY PANEL

SEC. 1501. DEFINITIONS.

Subtitle A–Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board

SEC. 1511. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE RECOVERY ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY BOARD.

SEC. 1512. COMPOSITION OF BOARD.

SEC. 1513. FUNCTIONS OF THE BOARD.

SEC. 1514. POWERS OF THE BOARD.

SEC. 1515. EMPLOYMENT, PERSONNEL, AND RELATED AUTHORITIES.

SEC. 1516. INDEPENDENCE OF INSPECTORS GENERAL.

SEC. 1517. COORDINATION WITH THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL AND STATE AUDITORS.

SEC. 1518. PROTECTING STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND CONTRACTOR WHISTLEBLOWERS.

SEC. 1519. BOARD WEBSITE.

SEC. 1520. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

SEC. 1521. TERMINATION OF THE BOARD.

Subtitle B–Recovery Independent Advisory Panel

SEC. 1531. ESTABLISHMENT OF RECOVERY INDEPENDENT ADVISORY PANEL.

SEC. 1532. DUTIES OF THE PANEL.

SEC. 1533. POWERS OF THE PANEL.

SEC. 1534. PANEL PERSONNEL MATTERS.

SEC. 1535. TERMINATION OF THE PANEL.

SEC. 1536. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

Subtitle C–Reports of the Council of Economic Advisers

SEC. 1541. REPORTS OF THE COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS.

Subtitle D–Reports on Use of Funds

SEC. 1551. REPORTS ON USE OF FUNDS.

TITLE XVI–GENERAL PROVISIONS–THIS ACT
emergency designation
availability
relationship to other appropriations
buy american
certification
economic stabilization contracting
PROHIBITION ON NO-BID CONTRACTS AND EARMARKS
DIVISION B–TAX, UNEMPLOYMENT, HEALTH, STATE FISCAL RELIEF, AND OTHER PROVISIONS

SEC. 1000. SHORT TITLE, ETC.

TITLE I–TAX PROVISIONS
Subtitle A–Tax Relief for Individuals and Families
PART I–GENERAL TAX RELIEF

SEC. 1001. MAKING WORK PAY CREDIT.

`SEC. 36A. MAKING WORK PAY CREDIT.

SEC. 1002. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN EARNED INCOME TAX CREDIT.

SEC. 1003. TEMPORARY INCREASE OF REFUNDABLE PORTION OF CHILD CREDIT.

SEC. 1004. AMERICAN OPPORTUNITY TAX CREDIT.

SEC. 1006. CREDIT FOR CERTAIN HOME PURCHASES.

`SEC. 25E. CREDIT FOR CERTAIN HOME PURCHASES.

SEC. 1007. SUSPENSION OF TAX ON PORTION OF UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION.

SEC. 1008. ABOVE-THE-LINE DEDUCTION FOR INTEREST ON INDEBTEDNESS WITH RESPECT TO THE PURCHASE OF CERTAIN MOTOR VEHICLES.

`SEC. 6050X. RETURNS RELATING TO QUALIFIED MOTOR VEHICLE INTEREST RECEIVED IN TRADE OR BUSINESS FROM INDIVIDUALS.

SEC. 1009. ABOVE-THE-LINE DEDUCTION FOR STATE SALES TAX AND EXCISE TAX ON THE PURCHASE OF CERTAIN MOTOR VEHICLES.

PART II–ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX RELIEF

SEC. 1011. EXTENSION OF ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX RELIEF FOR NONREFUNDABLE PERSONAL CREDITS.

SEC. 1012. EXTENSION OF INCREASED ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX EXEMPTION AMOUNT.

Subtitle B–Energy Incentives
PART I–RENEWABLE ENERGY INCENTIVES

SEC. 1101. EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR ELECTRICITY PRODUCED FROM CERTAIN RENEWABLE RESOURCES.

SEC. 1102. ELECTION OF INVESTMENT CREDIT IN LIEU OF PRODUCTION CREDIT.

SEC. 1103. REPEAL OF CERTAIN LIMITATIONS ON CREDIT FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY PROPERTY.

PART II–INCREASED ALLOCATIONS OF NEW CLEAN RENEWABLE ENERGY BONDS AND QUALIFIED ENERGY CONSERVATION BONDS

SEC. 1111. INCREASED LIMITATION ON ISSUANCE OF NEW CLEAN RENEWABLE ENERGY BONDS.

SEC. 1112. INCREASED LIMITATION ON ISSUANCE OF QUALIFIED ENERGY CONSERVATION BONDS.

PART III–ENERGY CONSERVATION INCENTIVES

SEC. 1121. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF CREDIT FOR NONBUSINESS ENERGY PROPERTY.

SEC. 1122. MODIFICATION OF CREDIT FOR RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENT PROPERTY.

SEC. 1123. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN CREDIT FOR ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLE REFUELING PROPERTY.

SEC. 1124. RECOVERY PERIOD FOR DEPRECIATION OF SMART METERS.

PART IV–ENERGY RESEARCH INCENTIVES

SEC. 1131. INCREASED RESEARCH CREDIT FOR ENERGY RESEARCH.

PART V–MODIFICATION OF CREDIT FOR CARBON DIOXIDE SEQUESTRATION

SEC. 1141. APPLICATION OF MONITORING REQUIREMENTS TO CARBON DIOXIDE USED AS A TERTIARY INJECTANT.

PART VI–PLUG-IN ELECTRIC DRIVE MOTOR VEHICLES

SEC. 1151. MODIFICATION OF CREDIT FOR QUALIFIED PLUG-IN ELECTRIC MOTOR VEHICLES.

SEC. 1152. CONVERSION KITS.

Subtitle C–Tax Incentives for Business
PART I–TEMPORARY INVESTMENT INCENTIVES

SEC. 1201. SPECIAL ALLOWANCE FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY ACQUIRED DURING 2009.

SEC. 1202. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN LIMITATIONS ON EXPENSING OF CERTAIN DEPRECIABLE BUSINESS ASSETS.

PART II–5-YEAR CARRYBACK OF OPERATING LOSSES

SEC. 1211. 5-YEAR CARRYBACK OF OPERATING LOSSES.

SEC. 1212. EXCEPTION FOR TARP RECIPIENTS.

PART III–INCENTIVES FOR NEW JOBS

SEC. 1221. INCENTIVES TO HIRE UNEMPLOYED VETERANS AND DISCONNECTED YOUTH.

PART IV–CANCELLATION OF INDEBTEDNESS

SEC. 1231. DEFERRAL AND RATABLE INCLUSION OF INCOME ARISING FROM INDEBTEDNESS DISCHARGED BY THE REPURCHASE OF A DEBT INSTRUMENT.

PART V–QUALIFIED SMALL BUSINESS STOCK

SEC. 1241. SPECIAL RULES APPLICABLE TO QUALIFIED SMALL BUSINESS STOCK FOR 2009 AND 2010.

PART VI–PARITY FOR TRANSPORTATION FRINGE BENEFITS

SEC. 1251. INCREASED EXCLUSION AMOUNT FOR COMMUTER TRANSIT BENEFITS AND TRANSIT PASSES.

PART VII–S CORPORATIONS

SEC. 1261. TEMPORARY REDUCTION IN RECOGNITION PERIOD FOR BUILT-IN GAINS TAX.

PART VIII–BROADBAND INCENTIVES

SEC. 1271. BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS TAX CREDIT.

`SEC. 48D. BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS CREDIT.

PART IX–CLARIFICATION OF REGULATIONS RELATED TO LIMITATIONS ON CERTAIN BUILT-IN LOSSES FOLLOWING AN OWNERSHIP CHANGE

SEC. 1281. CLARIFICATION OF REGULATIONS RELATED TO LIMITATIONS ON CERTAIN BUILT-IN LOSSES FOLLOWING AN OWNERSHIP CHANGE.

Subtitle D–Manufacturing Recovery Provisions

SEC. 1301. TEMPORARY EXPANSION OF AVAILABILITY OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BONDS TO FACILITIES MANUFACTURING INTANGIBLE PROPERTY.

SEC. 1302. CREDIT FOR INVESTMENT IN ADVANCED ENERGY FACILITIES.

`SEC. 48C. QUALIFYING ADVANCED ENERGY PROJECT CREDIT.

SEC. 1303. INCENTIVES FOR MANUFACTURING FACILITIES PRODUCING PLUG-IN ELECTRIC DRIVE MOTOR VEHICLES AND COMPONENTS.

`SEC. 179F. ELECTION TO EXPENSE MANUFACTURING FACILITIES PRODUCING PLUG-IN ELECTRIC DRIVE MOTOR VEHICLES AND COMPONENTS.

Subtitle E–Economic Recovery Tools

SEC. 1401. RECOVERY ZONE BONDS.

`PART III–RECOVERY ZONE BONDS

`SEC. 1400U-1. ALLOCATION OF RECOVERY ZONE BONDS.

`SEC. 1400U-2. RECOVERY ZONE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BONDS.

`SEC. 1400U-3. RECOVERY ZONE FACILITY BONDS.

`Part III. Recovery Zone Bonds.’.

SEC. 1402. TRIBAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BONDS.

SEC. 1403. MODIFICATIONS TO NEW MARKETS TAX CREDIT.

Subtitle F–Infrastructure Financing Tools
PART I–IMPROVED MARKETABILITY FOR TAX-EXEMPT BONDS

SEC. 1501. DE MINIMIS SAFE HARBOR EXCEPTION FOR TAX-EXEMPT INTEREST EXPENSE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.

SEC. 1502. MODIFICATION OF SMALL ISSUER EXCEPTION TO TAX-EXEMPT INTEREST EXPENSE ALLOCATION RULES FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.

SEC. 1503. TEMPORARY MODIFICATION OF ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX LIMITATIONS ON TAX-EXEMPT BONDS.

SEC. 1504. MODIFICATION TO HIGH SPEED INTERCITY RAIL FACILITY BONDS.

PART II–DELAY IN APPLICATION OF WITHHOLDING TAX ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS

SEC. 1511. DELAY IN APPLICATION OF WITHHOLDING TAX ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS.

PART III–TAX CREDIT BONDS FOR SCHOOLS

SEC. 1521. QUALIFIED SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BONDS.

`SEC. 54F. QUALIFIED SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BONDS.

SEC. 1522. EXTENSION AND EXPANSION OF QUALIFIED ZONE ACADEMY BONDS.

PART IV–BUILD AMERICA BONDS

SEC. 1531. BUILD AMERICA BONDS.

`Subpart J–Build America Bonds

`SEC. 54AA. BUILD AMERICA BONDS.

`SEC. 6431. CREDIT FOR QUALIFIED BONDS ALLOWED TO ISSUER.

Subtitle G–Economic Recovery Payments to Certain Individuals
Subtitle H–Trade Adjustment Assistance

SEC. 1701. TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

Subtitle I–Prohibition on Collection of Certain Payments Made Under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000

SEC. 1801. PROHIBITION ON COLLECTION OF CERTAIN PAYMENTS MADE UNDER THE CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000.

Subtitle J–Other Provisions

SEC. 1901. APPLICATION OF CERTAIN LABOR STANDARDS TO PROJECTS FINANCED WITH CERTAIN TAX-FAVORED BONDS.

SEC. 1902. INCREASE IN PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT.

SEC. 1903. ELECTION TO ACCELERATE THE LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT.

SEC. 2000. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

TITLE II–ASSISTANCE FOR UNEMPLOYED WORKERS AND STRUGGLING FAMILIES
Subtitle A–Unemployment Insurance

SEC. 2001. EXTENSION OF EMERGENCY UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION PROGRAM.

SEC. 2002. INCREASE IN UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BENEFITS.

SEC. 2003. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION MODERNIZATION.

`Special Transfers for Modernization
`Special Transfer in Fiscal Year 2009 for Administration

SEC. 2004. TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR STATES WITH ADVANCES.

Subtitle B–Assistance for Vulnerable Individuals

SEC. 2101. EMERGENCY FUND FOR TANF PROGRAM.

SEC. 2102. EXTENSION OF TANF SUPPLEMENTAL GRANTS.

SEC. 3000. TABLE OF CONTENTS OF TITLE.

TITLE III–HEALTH INSURANCE ASSISTANCE
Subtitle A–Premium Subsidies for COBRA Continuation Coverage for Unemployed Workers

SEC. 3001. PREMIUM ASSISTANCE FOR COBRA BENEFITS.

`SEC. 6432. COBRA PREMIUM ASSISTANCE.

`SEC. 6720C. PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO NOTIFY HEALTH PLAN OF CESSATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR COBRA PREMIUM ASSISTANCE.

`SEC. 139C. COBRA PREMIUM ASSISTANCE.

Subtitle B–Transitional Medical Assistance (TMA)

SEC. 3101. EXTENSION OF TRANSITIONAL MEDICAL ASSISTANCE (TMA).

Subtitle C–Extension of the Qualified Individual (QI) Program

SEC. 3201. EXTENSION OF THE QUALIFYING INDIVIDUAL (QI) PROGRAM.

Subtitle D–Other Provisions

SEC. 3304. APPLICATION OF PROMPT PAY REQUIREMENTS TO NURSING FACILITIES.

SEC. 3305. PERIOD OF APPLICATION; SUNSET.

SEC. 4001. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS OF TITLE.

TITLE IV–HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Subtitle A–Medicare Program

SEC. 4201. INCENTIVES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS.

SEC. 4202. INCENTIVES FOR HOSPITALS.

SEC. 4203. PREMIUM HOLD HARMLESS AND IMPLEMENTATION FUNDING.

SEC. 4204. NON-APPLICATION OF PHASED-OUT INDIRECT MEDICAL EDUCATION (IME) ADJUSTMENT FACTOR FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009.

SEC. 4205. STUDY ON APPLICATION OF EHR PAYMENT INCENTIVES FOR PROVIDERS NOT RECEIVING OTHER INCENTIVE PAYMENTS.

SEC. 4206. STUDY ON AVAILABILITY OF OPEN SOURCE HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS.

Subtitle B–Medicaid Funding

SEC. 4211. MEDICAID PROVIDER EHR ADOPTION AND OPERATION PAYMENTS; IMPLEMENTATION FUNDING.

SEC. 5000. PURPOSES; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

TITLE V–STATE FISCAL RELIEF

SEC. 5001. TEMPORARY INCREASE OF MEDICAID FMAP.

SEC. 5002. EXTENSION AND UPDATE OF SPECIAL RULE FOR INCREASE OF MEDICAID DSH ALLOTMENTS FOR LOW DSH STATES.

SEC. 5003. PAYMENT OF MEDICARE LIABILITY TO STATES AS A RESULT OF THE SPECIAL DISABILITY WORKLOAD PROJECT.

SEC. 5004. FUNDING FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL.

SEC. 5005. GAO STUDY AND REPORT REGARDING STATE NEEDS DURING PERIODS OF NATIONAL ECONOMIC DOWNTURN.

TITLE VI–EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Subtitle A–Oversight
TITLE VI–EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION OVERSIGHT

SEC. 6001. DEFINITIONS.

SEC. 6002. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

SEC. 6003. BOARD COMPENSATION COMMITTEE.

SEC. 6004. LIMITATION ON LUXURY EXPENDITURES.

SEC. 6005. SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

SEC. 6006. REVIEW OF PRIOR PAYMENTS TO EXECUTIVES.

Subtitle B–Limits on Executive Compensation

SEC. 6011. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 6012. LIMIT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

SEC. 6013. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY.

SEC. 6014. COMPENSATION.

Subtitle C–Excessive Bonuses

SEC. 6021. TREATMENT OF EXCESSIVE BONUSES BY TARP RECIPIENTS.

`SEC. 4999A. FAILURE TO REDEEM CERTAIN SECURITIES FROM UNITED STATES.

`Chapter 46-Taxes on Certain Excessive Remuneration
TITLE VII–FORECLOSURE PREVENTION

SEC. 7001. MANDATORY LOAN MODIFICATIONS.

TITLE VIII–FORECLOSURE MITIGATION

SEC. 8001. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 8002. DEFINITIONS.

SEC. 8003. PAYMENTS TO ELIGIBLE SERVICERS AUTHORIZED.

SEC. 8004. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

SEC. 8005. SUNSET OF AUTHORITY.

Don’t tell me you didn’t know what you were doing when you created the current economic crisis and imploding financial structures – this isn’t the “Kennedy years” –

Would somebody get a message up there to Washington that we are not living in the years of the “Kennedy era”. We are not experiencing the “Savings and Loan” crisis. This is not anything like the “tech bubble” of the 80′s and it certainly is not the same as other contractions, recessions or “bubbles.”

When these and other events occurred, the brilliant minds of those times constructed solutions, for better or worse, that met the necessities and parameters, strengths and weaknesses as well as the facts of those times and events. That is not today and not the situation we face now.

As the rampant speculation occurred before the Great Depression, it created some of the same weaknesses and fractures in the economy that we are experiencing now. But, never have we faced the strange development of unfounded asset classes and false “currencies, securities and credit products” that underlie this situation.

Never before this time, did financial and economic systems move at the speed that our new technologies have allowed. At no other time have the economic foundations of so many countries, businesses, individuals and markets been inexorably linked to the absurd creation of speculative products and constructed asset groups as they are now. And, at no other time has credit been the only currency of value throughout huge sectors of economies.

First of all, it was stupid to make credit as the standard dominant currency of value throughout the system because it only works under a specific and concrete set of prime conditions. Not given each and every one of those conditions, the system fails. It has no real flexibility to accommodate real conditions and changing economic environments.

Second, it was wrong to allow unregulated, unsecured and unmanageable false forms of assets to be created, traded, sold and used to prop up the economies of entire groups of financial systems. It was also wrong to sell and trade in credit based products where the potential for systemic damage could permeate the entire economy in the event of failure to meet prime conditional system requirements. That is to say, solutions that work only under prime and perfect conditions are not solutions at all, nor strengths, nor plausible foundations in the “real world”. They are destined to fail sooner or later.

Third, it was delusion and illusion, the reality of strong growth and prosperity was not founded in reality but in the degree to which leverage could be made against questionable assets. This is the most detrimental part of the illusion that was created because the real value of the currency system did not accommodate the total value of extensions of currency through credit products. It wasn’t innovative – it was criminal.

Fourth, it was failure in the making partly because it drove real innovation away and partly because it allowed third-rate players to participate with poor thinking skills and even poorer decision-making skills and ethics at the exclusion of genuine strengthening and innovation in every arena. Everywhere from business decisions within corporations to stock market level decisions to the research and development decisions to banking and investment decisions among others were manipulated by those who did not have the ability nor desire to understand the long-term implications of their decisions.

Fifth, it was restrictive and destructive to the opportunities of the great majority of the world’s population, especially in the United States, to benefit a few that were involved in “the game.” For the advantage of a very small proportion of the people alive today, this game was constructed to extremely advantage that elite population while the vast majority of the population found their real money buying less, their wages lower, their opportunities destroyed, their families and many  family members enduring poverty, and their quality of life undermined.

And, sixth, it was absurd and bizarre behavior, choices and decisions that yielded the economic crisis that we are experiencing across the world. At no time has more been required by so few in order to prop up their egos and lifestyles. Even the kings of Europe in the glory days of the sixteenth century knew to curb their vices and leave crumbs for their populations to eat. That has not been the case today. There was nothing to curb the vices and greed and perverse passions of this small elite population that has run the entire world economy and the greatness of the United States into the ground.

This day and time is unique in the underlying dynamics and facts of the current situation. It is also going to take unique and appropriate corrections to fix it. This will require the construction of these solutions using all that we know, all that has worked before and all that has not, and all the possibilities of what might work with the creative application of knowledge and understanding that we can muster. Then it will take the flexible application of workable solutions with real-time dynamic custom-fitting as we go. And, I believe we can do that.

- cricketdiane, 02-16-09