The rare bits of air up there at the top must be real, real thin – intellectual inbreeding at its finest – Citigroup and other Bailout Info – US Economic / Global Crisis

Wall Street banks in $70bn staff payout

Pay and bonus deals equivalent to 10% of US government bail-out package
guardian.co.uk, Friday 17 October 2008 20.08 BST
Simon Bowers

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/oct/17/executivesalaries-banking

The sums that continue to be spent by Wall Street firms on payroll, payoffs and, most controversially, bonuses appear to bear no relation to the losses incurred by investors in the banks. Shares in Citigroup and Goldman Sachs have declined by more than 45% since the start of the year. Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley have fallen by more than 60%. JP MorganChase fell 6.4% and Lehman Brothers has collapsed.

At one point last week the Morgan Stanley $10.7bn pay pot for the year to date was greater than the entire stock market value of the business. In effect, staff, on receiving their remuneration, could club together and buy the bank.

In the first nine months of the year Citigroup, which employs thousands of staff in the UK, accrued $25.9bn for salaries and bonuses, an increase on the previous year of 4%. Earlier this week the bank accepted a $25bn investment by the US government as part of its bail-out plan.

At Goldman Sachs the figure was $11.4bn, Morgan Stanley $10.73bn, JP Morgan $6.53bn and Merrill Lynch $11.7bn. At Merrill, which was on the point of going bust last month before being taken over by Bank of America, the total accrued in the last quarter grew 76% to $3.49bn. At Morgan Stanley, the amount put aside for staff compensation also grew in the last quarter to the end of August by 3% to $3.7bn.

Days before it collapsed into bankruptcy protection a month ago Lehman Brothers revealed $6.12bn of staff pay plans in its corporate filings. These payouts, the bank insisted, were justified despite net revenue collapsing from $14.9bn to a net outgoing of $64m.

Financial workers at Wall Street’s top banks are to receive pay deals worth more than $70bn (£40bn), a substantial proportion of which is expected to be paid in discretionary bonuses, for their work so far this year – despite plunging the global financial system into its worst crisis since the 1929 stock market crash, the Guardian has learned.

Staff at six banks including Goldman Sachs and Citigroup are in line to pick up the payouts despite being the beneficiaries of a $700bn bail-out from the US government that has already prompted criticism. The government’s cash has been poured in on the condition that excessive executive pay would be curbed.

Many critics of investment banks have questioned why firms continue to siphon off billions of dollars of bank earnings into bonus pools rather than using the funds to shore up the capital position of the crisis-stricken institutions. One source said:  That’s a fair question – and it may well be that by the end of the year the banks start review the situation.

Much of the anger about investment banking bonuses has focused on boardroom executives such as former Lehman boss Dick Fuld, who was paid $485m in salary, bonuses and options between 2000 and 2007.

Last year Merrill Lynch’s chairman Stan O’Neal retired after announcing losses of $8bn, taking a final pay deal worth $161m. Citigroup boss Chuck Prince left last year with a $38m in bonuses, shares and options after multibillion-dollar write-downs. In Britain, Bob Diamond, Barclays president, is one of the few investment bankers whose pay is public. Last year he received a salary of £250,000, but his total pay, including bonuses, reached £36m.

***

Stocks end at 12-year lows
Dow and S&P 500 continue their descent after Citigroup-U.S. deal and GDP plunge.

By Alexandra Twin, CNNMoney.com senior writer
Last Updated: February 27, 2009: 5:58 PM ET

http://money.cnn.com/2009/02/27/markets/markets_newyork/index.htm

The deal gives the bank more capital, which ideally would lead to more lending. The government already gave Citigroup $45 billion in exchange for preferred shares. Shares of Dow stock Citigroup have plunged around 90% over the last year as the company has struggled to stay solvent amid the housing collapse and the credit market crisis. (Full story)

However, the deal inspired no confidence and Citi (C, Fortune 500) shares slumped 39% with investors worrying that the company will ultimately have to be taken over by the government overall, a move that would completely wipe out shareholders.

Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) lost 26%. Wells Fargo (WFC, Fortune 500) lost 16% and Morgan Stanley (MS, Fortune 500) lost 8.4%. The KBW Bank (BKX) sector index lost 8.7%.

GDP: Fourth-quarter gross domestic product growth (GDP) shrank at the sharpest pace in 26 years, the government said Friday. GDP, which measures the output of goods and services made in the U.S., fell at a 6.2% annual rate, the biggest fall in GDP since the first quarter of 1982.

In other news, the New York Stock Exchange said it is temporarily waving its minimum price for listed stocks, due to the unprecedented stock market environment. There are 50 stocks that have traded for less than a $100 for at least 30 days, the NYSE said. Typically, those stocks would be put under review, which could eventually lead to a delisting.

Last month, the NYSE changed its market capitalization for listed companies to $15 million from $25 million. Both changes are in effect through the end of June.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Stocks tumbled Friday on worries about the government taking a bigger chunk of Citigroup and a bleak reading on the economy, again touching 12-year lows.

The Dow Jones industrial average (INDU) lost 119 points, or 1.7%. It was the lowest close since May 1, 1997.

The S&P 500 (SPX) index lost 18 points, or 2.4%, closing at its lowest point since Dec. 18, 1996.

The Nasdaq composite (COMP) lost 13.5 points, or 1%. The tech-fueled Nasdaq has held up better than the other major averages this year and remains above its lows from Nov. 21, 2008.

The economy shrank at the sharpest pace in 26 years in the fourth quarter of last year, confirming other earlier reports that suggested the economy took a hit in the last three months of last year.

General Electric (GE, Fortune 500) said Friday that it will cut its quarterly dividend by 68% to 10 cents per share from 31 cents per share, a move the company says will save it about $9 billion a year. GE shares lost 6.5%.

Market breadth was negative. On the New York Stock Exchange, losers beat winners two to one on volume of 1.43 billion shares. On the Nasdaq, decliners topped advancers five to four on volume of 1.8 billion shares.

Bonds: Treasury prices slipped, raising the yield on the benchmark 10-year note to 3.01% from 2.99% Thursday. Treasury prices and yields move in opposite directions.

***

Smith Barney is a division of Citigroup Global Capital Markets Inc., a global, full-service financial firm, that provides brokerage, investment banking and asset management services to corporations, governments and individuals around the world. In 800 offices, Financial Advisors service 9.6 million domestic client accounts representing $1.562 trillion in client assets worldwide.[1] Clients range from individual investors to small- and mid-sized businesses, as well as large corporations, non-profit organizations and family foundations.

Origins

Smith Barney & Co. was formed in 1938 through the merger of Charles D. Barney & Co., founded in 1873, and Edward B. Smith & Co., founded in 1892. In the late 1980s the retail brokerage firm Smith Barney was owned by Primerica Financial Services. Commercial Credit purchased Primerica in 1988, for $1.5 billion. In 1992, they paid $722 million to buy a 27 percent share of Travelers Insurance. By the end of 1993, the merged company was known as Travelers Group Inc. In September 1997, Travelers acquired Salomon Inc. (parent company of Salomon Brothers Inc.), for over $9 billion in stock, and merged it with its own investment arm to create Salomon Smith Barney.

In April 1998 Travelers Group announced an agreement to undertake a $76 billion merger between Travelers and Citicorp, creating the largest single financial services company in the world. It now has over one trillion U.S. dollars in assets.

On January 13, 2009, Morgan Stanley and Citigroup announced the merger of Smith Barney with Morgan Stanley’s Global Wealth Management Group, with Morgan Stanley paying US$2.7 billion cash upfront to Citigroup for a 51 percent stake in the joint venture. The joint venture will operate under the name Morgan Stanley Smith Barney.[2]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_Barney

***

The Travelers Companies (NYSE: TRV) is the largest American insurance company by market value.[2] It is also the second largest writer of commercial property casualty and personal insurance in the United States. The company is headquartered in St. Paul, Minnesota and has major operations in Hartford, Connecticut.

The company has field offices in every U.S. state, plus operations in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Singapore, Shanghai and Canada. In 2008, the company reported revenues of US $24 billion and total assets of US $110 billion.

Travelers, through its subsidiaries and approximately 14,000 independent agents and brokers, provides commercial and personal property and casualty insurance products and services to businesses, government units, associations, and individuals. The company offers insurance through three segments:

* Personal Insurance, which includes home, auto and other insurance products for individuals
* Business Insurance, which includes a broad array of property and casualty insurance and insurance-related services in the United States
* Financial, Professional & International Insurance, which includes surety, crime, and financial liability businesses which primarily use credit-based underwriting processes, as well as property and casualty products that are predominantly marketed on an international basis

Saint Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. was founded March 5, 1853, in St. Paul, Minnesota, serving local customers who were having a difficult time getting claim payments in a timely manner from insurance companies on the east coast of the United States. It barely survived the Panic of 1857 by dramatically paring down its operations and later reorganizing itself into a stock company (as opposed to a mutual company). It soon spread its operations across the country. In 1998 it acquired USF&G, known formerly as United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, an insurance company based in Baltimore, Maryland, but was forced to downsize by almost half due to a competitive marketplace.[3]

Travelers was founded in 1864 in Hartford. Along the way it had many industry firsts, including the first automobile policy, the first commercial airline policy, and the first policy for space travel.[4]

In the 1990s, it went through a series of mergers and acquisitions. It was bought by Primerica in 1993[5], but the resulting company retained the Travelers name. In 1995 it became The Travelers Group[4]. It bought Aetna’s property and casualty business in 1996.[6]

In 1998, the Travelers Group merged with Citicorp to form Citigroup.[5] However, the synergies between the banking and insurance arms of the company did not work as well as planned, so Citigroup spun off Travelers Property and Casualty into a subsidiary company in 2002[7], although it kept the red umbrella logo. Three years later, Citigroup sold Travelers Life & Annuity to MetLife.[8] In 2003, Travelers bought renewal rights for Zenith’s Commercial businesses.[9]
St. Paul Travelers logo used until February 2007

In 2004, the St. Paul and Travelers Companies merged and renamed itself St. Paul Travelers, with the headquarters set in St. Paul, Minnesota. This corporate name lasted until 2007, when the company repurchased the rights to the famous red umbrella logo from Citigroup and readopted it as its main corporate symbol, while also changing the corporate name to The Travelers Companies.[10][11]

Travelers is currently 93 on the Fortune 500 list of largest U.S. companies.

Alleged anticompetitive practices

In January 2007, Travelers agreed to pay US$ 77 million to six states to settle a class action suit and end investigations into its insurance practices.[13] The charges involved paying the insurance broker Marsh & McLennan Companies contingent commissions to win business without the knowledge of clients, thus creating a conflict of interest.[14] Additionally, the investigation examined whether Travelers had created the illusion of competition by submitting fake bids,[15] thus misleading clients into believing they were receiving competitive commercial premiums.[16]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Travelers_Companies

***

IndyMac Regulator Failed to Catch ‘Unsound’ Lending, Audit Says

By Linda Shen

Feb. 26 (Bloomberg) — IndyMac Bancorp Inc.’s collapse last year cost the U.S. government about $10.7 billion and occurred because the company’s primary regulator didn’t track the lender’s “unsafe and unsound” practices, an audit concluded.

While the Office of Thrift Supervision had blamed Senator Charles Schumer for sparking a run on the bank by releasing a letter critical of IndyMac, today’s audit said the company was already headed for probable failure. The OTS, which regulates the Pasadena, California-based lender, “failed to prevent a material loss” to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the Treasury Department said in the report.

“The thrift’s high-risk business strategy warranted more careful and much earlier attention” from regulators, according to the report distributed by the Treasury’s Office of the Inspector General.

IndyMac’s “nontraditional” loans and “insufficient underwriting” helped lead to its seizure by regulators in July, according to the audit. The FDIC estimated last month that IndyMac’s failure would cost the insurance fund $8.5 billion to $9.4 billion, up from its prediction in July of $4 billion to $8 billion.

Leader in Mortgages

IndyMac was once the second-biggest independent mortgage lender behind Countrywide Financial Corp., which almost failed before being bought by Bank of America Corp. It was also the second-largest lender to collapse last year, behind Washington Mutual Inc., as a deepening national recession sent home foreclosures rising.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aG_FyLTipBVc&refer=home

***

U.S. Thrifts Post Record $13.4 Billion Loss in 2008 (Update2)

By Margaret Chadbourn and Alison Vekshin

Feb. 26 (Bloomberg) — U.S. savings and loans reported a record $13.4 billion loss last year as they set aside more funds for loan losses amid the recession and worsening financial crisis, the industry’s regulator said today.

Thrifts lost $3 billion in the fourth quarter, down from $4.4 billion in the preceding three months, the Office of Thrift Supervision, the regulator of savings and loans, said today in a report on the industry’s health.

[Etc. - a lot more good stuff in this article - etc., etc., etc. ]

The OTS, an agency of the Treasury, supervised 810 thrifts, including Hudson City Savings Bank and Sovereign Bank, that had a combined $1.2 trillion in assets at the end of the fourth quarter.

The government’s planned overhaul of U.S. financial regulation is putting the agency’s future in doubt amid suggestions it was a light-touch regulator. Former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson in March proposed eliminating the agency and merging its functions into the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the regulator of national banks.

Reich, a Republican who is serving a five-year term that would have ended in August 2010, told OTS employees on Feb. 12 that he will resign as director effective tomorrow. Scott Polakoff, the agency’s chief operating officer, will become acting director until Obama, a Democrat, names a permanent successor.

To contact the reporters on this story: Margaret Chadbourn in Washington at mchadbourn@bloomberg.net; Alison Vekshin in Washington at avekshin@bloomberg.net.
Last Updated: February 26, 2009 11:43 EST

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=a1DEmgK_DsZ0&refer=news

***

John M. Reich was sworn in August 9, 2005, as Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS). U.S. President George W. Bush nominated Mr. Reich to be OTS Director on June 7, 2005, and the Senate confirmed his nomination on July 29, 2005. In this capacity, Mr. Reich will continue to serve as a member of the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

Director Office of Thrift Supervision
Incumbent
Assumed office
August 9, 2005

Prior to joining OTS, Mr. Reich served as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of the FDIC since November 2002. He has been a member of the FDIC Board since January 2001. He also served as Acting Chairman of the FDIC from July to August 2001.

Mr. Reich also served 12 years on the staff of U.S. Senator Connie Mack (R-FL), before joining the FDIC. From 1998 through 2000, he was Senator Mack’s Chief of Staff, directing and overseeing all of the Senator’s offices and committee activities, including those at the Senate Banking Committee.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_M._Reich

***

http://www.forbes.com/lists/2006/12/RMSG.html

Nifty list of compensations for executives – look for previous and next links directly above the person’s name and check out the great chart that compares what they make to others in the same industry.

***

Board of Directors – Members

C. Michael Armstrong
Chairman – Board of Trustees, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Health System Corporation and Hospital
Alain J.P. Belda
Chairman, Alcoa Inc.
Sir Win Bischoff
Former Chairman, Citigroup
Kenneth T. Derr
Chairman, Retired, Chevron Corporation
John M. Deutch
Institute Professor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Roberto Hernández Ramírez
Chairman, Banco Nacional de Mexico
Andrew N. Liveris
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, The Dow Chemical Company
Anne Mulcahy
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Xerox Corporation
Vikram Pandit
Chief Executive Officer, Citi
Richard D. Parsons
Chairman, Citi
Lawrence R. Ricciardi
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Advisor to the Chairman, Retired, IBM Corporation
Judith Rodin
President, Rockefeller Foundation
Robert E. Rubin
Director and Former Senior Counselor, Citi
Robert L. Ryan
Chief Financial Officer, Retired, Medtronic Inc.
Franklin A. Thomas
Consultant, TFF Study Group

http://www.citigroup.com/citi/corporategovernance/bddir.htm

***
Federal bailout 2008

On 24 November 2008 the U.S. government announced a massive bailout of Citigroup, designed to rescue the company from bankruptcy while giving the government a major say in its operations. The Treasury will provide another $20 billion in TARP funds in addition to $25 billion given in October. The Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC will cover 90% of the losses on its $335-billion portfolio after Citigroup absorbs the first $29 billion in losses.[48] In return the bank will give Washington $27 billion of preferred shares and warrants to acquire stock. The government will obtain wide powers over banking operations. Citigroup has agreed to try to modify mortgages, using standards set up by the FDIC after the collapse of IndyMac Bank, with the goal of keeping as many homeowners as possible in their houses. Executive salaries will be capped.[49]

As a condition of the bailout, Citigroup’s dividend payment has been reduced to a mere 1 cent a share.

As the subprime mortgage crisis began to unfold, heavy exposure to toxic mortgages in the forms of Collateralized debt obligation (CDOs), compounded by poor risk management led the company into serious trouble. In early 2007 Citigroup began eliminating about 5 percent of its workforce, in a broad restructuring designed to cut costs and bolster its long underperforming stock.[20] By November 2008, the ongoing crisis hit Citigroup hard and despite federal TARP bailout money, the company announced further cuts.[22] Its stock market value dropped to $21 billion, down from $244 billion two years prior.[23] As a result, Citigroup and Federal regulators negotiated a plan to stabilize the company.[9] Its single largest shareholder is Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal of Saudi Arabia, who has a 4.9% stake.[50] Vikram Pandit is Citigroup’s current CEO, while Richard Parsons is the current chairman.[39]

Political donations

Citigroup is the 16th largest political campaign contributor, out of all organizations, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Members of the firm have donated over $23,033,490 from 1989-2006, 49% of which went to Democrats and 51% of which went to Republicans.[51] According to Matthew Vadum, a senior editor at the conservative Capital Research Center, Citigroup is also a heavy contributor to left of center political causes.[52]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citigroup

***

HRH Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud  (born 7 March 1955) is a member of the Saudi Royal Family, and an entrepreneur and international investor. He has amassed his fortune through investments in real estate and the stock market. As of December 2, 2008, his net worth is estimated at US$17.08 billion, down from $21 billion, according to the Arabian Business rich list published December 2, 2008.

Although his stake in Citibank once accounted for approximately half of his wealth, by January 2009 this holding had lost nearly all of its value. At the end of 1990 he bought 4.9% of Citicorp’s existing common shares for $207m ($12.46 per share)—the most that he could without being legally obliged to declare his interest. In February 1991, as American troops stationed in Saudi Arabia were preparing for war with Iraq, the prince spent $590m buying new preferred shares, convertible into common shares at $16 each. This amounted to a further 10% of Citicorp and took his stake to 14.9%.[2] In January 2008, the Prince participated — together with the Singapore government investment coporation and other investors — in a $12.5 Billion capital raise, in an unsucessful effort to shore up Citi’s capital position, but the value of these shares continued to plunge. http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/10/billionaires08_Prince-Alwaleed-Bin-Talal-Alsaud_0RD0.html.

Excerpt from -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Waleed_bin_Talal

**MY note – it looks like Citigroup would have been in bankruptcy a long time ago if it hadn’t been for this guardian angel underwriting their bad habits.

***

MORE from Wikipedia about CITIGROUP -
***
The Terra Securities scandal

In November 2007 it became public that the Citigroup is heavily involved in the Terra Securities scandal, which involved investments by eight municipalities of Norway in various hedge funds in the United States bond market.[45] The funds were sold by Terra Securities ASA to the municipalities, while the products were delivered by Citigroup. Terra Securities ASA filed for bankruptcy November 28, 2007, the day after they received a letter[46] from The Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway announcing withdrawal of permissions to operate. The same letter also stated, “The Supervisory Authority contends that Citigroup’s presentation, as well as the presentation from Terra Securities ASA, appears insufficient and misleading because central elements like information about potential extra payments and the size of these are omitted.”

Theft from customer accounts

On August 26, 2008 it was announced that Citigroup agreed to pay nearly $18 million in refunds and fines to settle accusations by California Attorney General Jerry Brown that it wrongly took funds from the accounts of credit card customers. Citigroup would pay $14 million of restitution to roughly 53,000 customers nationwide. A three-year investigation found that Citigroup from 1992 to 2003 used an improper computerized “sweep” feature to move positive balances from card accounts into the bank’s general fund, without telling cardholders.[47]

Brown said in a statement that Citigroup “knowingly stole from its customers, mostly poor people and the recently deceased, when it designed and implemented the sweeps…When a whistleblower uncovered the scam and brought it to his superiors, they buried the information and continued the illegal practice.”[47]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citigroup

***

http://djindexes.com/mdsidx/downloads/DJIA_Hist_Comp.pdf
Complete history of Dow Jones Indexes Components – through September 2008

***

***
Risks And Riches
(MONEY Magazine)
By Jason Zweig
April 1, 1999

(MONEY Magazine) – Over the full sweep of time, mutual funds have shown that they are probably the greatest contribution to financial democracy ever devised.

But like every democratic structure, they are far from perfect.

Failing to beat the market, as 90% of all funds have done for the past four years running, is a longstanding pattern (see the chart below).

1993: Complex “mortgage derivative” funds earn remarkably high returns at remarkably low risk.

1993: Emerging markets funds gain 72%, and investors pour in more than $1 billion.

1994: Mortgage derivative funds lose up to 28% when interest rates rise.

Emerging markets funds fall more than 10%.

1995: SEC proposes measuring risk mathematically. Only trouble is, no one (least of all the SEC) knows how to do it.

1997: The SEC proposes the “profile” prospectus, urging funds to write in plain English–instead of the languages they had long preferred, Doublethink and Middle Slobovian.

1998: Emerging markets funds lose 26.8%, and disgusted investors yank out more than $3 billion in assets.

FUNDS 7343

ASSETS 5.5 TRILLION

AS OF 12/31/98

Note: Number of funds treats multiple-class shares as one portfolio

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/moneymag_archive/1999/04/01/257688/index.htm

MY NOTE -

This is the most amazing timeline about mutual funds starting in the 20′s – simple to read – great overview. From 1999.

***

AIG: The bailout that won’t quit
The world’s largest insurer is expected to announce yet another bailout iteration Monday. But some say its options are limited.

By David Goldman and Tami Luhby, CNNMoney.com staff writers
Last Updated: February 27, 2009: 6:22 PM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Troubled insurer American International Group is looking for more help from the federal government as it struggles to sell off assets and keep its core businesses afloat.

The company, which is blowing through the $152.2 billion bailout it already received from the government, is keeping mum about possible revisions to the rescue package. But it’s likely the feds will take a bigger stake and wield more control over the world’s largest insurer, according to published reports.

[Etc.]

AIG’s troubles stem from its financial products unit, which sold credit default swaps – essentially insurance contracts – on collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs. The value of the CDOs plummeted in 2008, and AIG was forced to post more collateral to back up the swaps.

The company also took sizeable writedowns on its subprime mortgage-backed securities holdings, which fell in value as the housing crisis wore on.

AIG suffered a loss of more than $18 billion in the nine months prior to its Sept. 16 bailout, and shares of the company tanked, limiting its ability to raise cash. Credit raters then downgraded AIG, requiring it to post more collateral.

Government officials decided they had to act lest the insurance titan file bankruptcy. At the time, AIG had $1.1 trillion in assets and 74 million clients in 130 countries, so the company’s collapse would likely roil the global markets.

http://money.cnn.com/2009/02/27/news/companies/aig_bailout/index.htm

***

Citigroup Inc., doing business as Citi, is a major American financial services company based in New York, NY. Citigroup was formed from one of the world’s largest mergers in history by combining the banking giant Citicorp and financial conglomerate Travelers Group on April 7, 1998.[6] Citigroup Inc. has the world’s largest financial services network, spanning 107 countries with approximately 12,000 offices worldwide. The company employs approximately 300,000 staff around the world, and holds over 200 million customer accounts in more than 100 countries. It is the world’s largest bank by revenues as of 2008. It is a primary dealer in US Treasury securities[7] and its stock has been a component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average since March 17, 1997.[8] Citigroup suffered huge losses during the global financial crisis of 2008 and was rescued in November 2008 in a massive bailout by the U.S. government.[9] Its largest shareholders include funds from the Middle East and Singapore.[10] On February 27, 2009 Citigroup announced that the United States government would be taking a 36% equity stake in the company by converting $25 billion in emergency aid into common shares.[11]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citigroup

***

**MY note -

This is the most bizarre idea – but I bet this is where the “brilliant” financial investors are getting their virtually stupid investment information. Not because the info is stupid – but because it relies, as they do also – on last year or the year before to get guidance about now and tomorrow. That is a problem.

Value Line, Inc.(NASDAQ: VALU), is a New York corporation founded in 1931 by Arnold Bernhard, best known for publishing the The Value Line Investment Survey , a stock analysis newsletter that’s updated weekly and kept by subscribers in a large black or green binder. The survey itself is broken into three parts; Ratings & Reports, Table of Summary & Index Contents, and Selection & Opinion.

Company background

Value Line, in its current form, was incorporated in 1982 and is the successor to substantially all of the operations of Arnold Bernhard & Co., Inc. In June 2005, AB & Co. owned approximately 86.5% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock.

The Company’s periodical investment publications are produced through its wholly owned subsidiary, Value Line Publishing, Inc. The publications provide investment advisory services to mutual funds, institutions, and individuals. VLP publishes in both print and electronic formats

* The Value Line Investment Survey
* The Value Line Investment Survey – Small and Mid-Cap Edition,
* The Value Line 600,
* Value Line Select (more in-depth coverage of one stock per month)
* The Value Line Mutual Fund Survey
* The Value Line No-Load Fund Advisor
* The Value Line Special Situations Service (for speculators)
* The Value Line Options Survey and The Value Line Convertibles Survey

VLP also provides current and historical financial databases DataFile, Estimates & Projections, Convertibles, Mutual Funds and other services (in standard computer formats) and markets investment analysis software:

* The Value Line Investment Analyzer
* Value Line ETF Survey
* Mutual Fund Survey for Windows
* Value Line Daily Options Survey
* Value Line Electronic Convertibles
* Value Line Research Center

The Company is the investment adviser for the Value Line Family of Mutual Funds, which on April 30, 2005, include 14 open-end investment companies with various investment objectives. In addition, the Company manages investments for private and institutional clients. The Company is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

In addition to VLP, the Company’s other wholly owned subsidiaries include a registered broker-dealer, Value Line Securities, Inc., and an advertising agency, Vanderbilt Advertising Agency, Inc. These subsidiaries primarily provide services used by the Company in its investment management and publishing businesses. Compupower Corporation, another subsidiary, serves the subscription fulfillment needs of the Company’s publishing operations. Value Line Distribution Center, Inc. handles all of the mailings of the publications to the Company’s subscribers. Additionally, VLDC provides office space for Compupower

In 1965, Value Line introduced a mathematical formula, called the Timeliness Ranking System, that serves as the basis for its survey picks. The company also manages a series of mutual funds, again based on the firm’s Timeliness Ranking System, and produces several other publications, both print and electronic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_Line

***

** My Note -

I also don’t get how the ratings, value analysis sorts of companies can also own investment businesses which brokers the products they are valuing. – Just a thought, it seems that it wouldn’t really make sense from a fair and unbiased kind of standpoint. – cricketdiane, 02-28-09

(But then I noticed it is also true that every member on the board of directors at Citigroup and other corporations is on other boards or is an acting chairman or CEO or CFO or COO of some other mega conglomerate – how does that make sense, is it a private club or something?)

***

Many critics of investment banks have questioned why firms continue to siphon off billions of dollars of bank earnings into bonus pools rather than using the funds to shore up the capital position of the crisis-stricken institutions. One source said:  That’s a fair question – and it may well be that by the end of the year the banks start review the situation.

Much of the anger about investment banking bonuses has focused on boardroom executives such as former Lehman boss Dick Fuld, who was paid $485m in salary, bonuses and options between 2000 and 2007.

Last year Merrill Lynch’s chairman Stan O’Neal retired after announcing losses of $8bn, taking a final pay deal worth $161m. Citigroup boss Chuck Prince left last year with a $38m in bonuses, shares and options after multibillion-dollar write-downs. In Britain, Bob Diamond, Barclays president, is one of the few investment bankers whose pay is public. Last year he received a salary of £250,000, but his total pay, including bonuses, reached £36m.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/oct/17/executivesalaries-banking

***
Gary L. Crittenden (born 1953) is an American financial manager currently employed as the Chief Financial Officer of Citigroup, and serving on the boards of Staples Inc., Ryerson, Inc., TJX Companies, and Utah Capital Investment Corp.

He was the CFO of Sears Roebuck and Company from 1997 and 1998. Later, he served as the CFO of Monsanto from 1998 to 2000. Prior to joining Citigroup, Crittenden was Executive Vice President and CFO of American Express, as well as the head of the company’s Global Network Services division.[2] At American Express, he is credited with an ambitious re-engineering effort as well as a Corporate Portfolio Management effort which aimed to optimize the enterprise’s resource allocation

It was reported that for 2007 Crittenden earned a salary of $403,410, and a total compensation of $19.4 million.[5] He also serves on the boards of Staples Inc., Ryerson, Inc., TJX Companies, and Utah Capital Investment Corp.[2]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Crittenden

***

American Express

Payment products
Credit cards • Charge cards • Traveler’s cheques • Centurion Card • Red Card • ExpressPay • Plum Card
Magazines
Travel + Leisure • Food & Wine • Departures Magazine • Executive Travel • Black Ink
Spun-off companies
Ameriprise Financial • First Data Corp. • Lehman Brothers • American Railway Express Agency • Merchants Despatch
Notable current and former executives
Henry Wells • William Fargo • J.C. Fargo • Ralph Reed • James D. Robinson III • Lou Gerstner • Sandy Weill • Harvey Golub • Ken Chenault
Corporate directors
Ken Chenault (Chairman) • Daniel Akerson • Charlene Barshefsky • Ursula Burns • Peter Chernin • Vernon Jordan, Jr. • Jan Leschly • Rick Levin • Richard McGinn • Edward Miller • Frank Popoff • Robert Walter • Ron Williams
Other
Amex Bank of Canada • The Adventures of Seinfeld & Superman • World Monuments Watch • Salad Oil Scandal
Annual revenue: $24.27 billion USD (? 10% FY 2005) A Employees: 65,800 A Stock symbol: NYSE: AXP A Website: www.americanexpress.com

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Crittenden

Peter Chernin (Russian: ???? ??????, or Pyotr Chernin, born May 29, 1951 in Harrison, New York, of Jewish roots) is President and Chief Operating Officer of News Corporation, and Chairman and CEO of Fox Entertainment Group, a position he will hold until June 2009 (see below for note). In addition to the Fox duties, he is also a Corporate Director for American Express.

Chernin earned a B.A. in English literature from UC Berkeley.

According to The New York Times he is a major fund raiser for Senator Hillary Clinton.[1]

Widely considered one of the most powerful media executives in the world, Chernin has been credited in particular with the success of Fox’s cable operations. Prior to joining Fox, Chernin was president and COO of Lorimar Film Entertainment. His other executive roles include positions at Showtime/The Movie Channel, Warner Books and St. Martin’s Press.

It was rumored in the media that he will leave his current position at News Corp. by June 2009, when his contract expires, and will be replaced in his current position by James Murdoch, the media executive youngest son of Rupert Murdoch. On February 24, 2009, the Wall Street Journal reported that Peter Chernin would leave News Corporation, effective June 30. [2][3] [4]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Chernin

***

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_News_Corporation

News Corporation
Corporate directors
Rupert Murdoch A José María Aznar A Natalie Bancroft A Peter Chernin A David DeVoe A Arthur Siskind A Rod Eddington A Andrew Knight A James Murdoch A Lachlan Murdoch A Rod Paige A Thomas Perkins A Viet Dinh A John L. Thornton

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Chernin

Annual revenue: $23.9 billion USD (?17% FY 2005) A Employees: 44,000 A Stock symbol: NYSE: NWS, NYSE: NWSa, ASX: NWS, LSE: NCRA
See List of assets owned by News Corporation.

***

Citigroup has an interesting concept of what constitutes necessary spending and covering losses

http://www.usnews.com/articles/business/real-estate/2009/02/27/uncle-sam-to-take-up-to-36-stake-in-citigroup-5-things-to-know.html

Here are five things you need to know about the development:

1. Tangible Common Equity: Citigroup’s share price has been hammered of late amid concern that the company doesn’t have enough capital to absorb its massive losses.

2. Is that Enough?

3. More cash: The government did not inject more cash into Citigroup as part of the plan.

4. Bank of America:

5. Management and directors: Today’s announcements included no plans for Citigroup CEO Pandit to step down. However, the board of directors is expected to get a makeover, with a fresh crop of independent directors coming on board “as soon as feasible,” according to the Treasury Department.

Uncle Sam To Take Up to 36% Stake in Citigroup: 5 Things to Know
By Luke Mullins
Posted February 27, 2009

Uncle Sam announced plans Friday to toss yet another lifeline to Citigroup by converting its preferred shares to common stock, a move that allows the struggling financial behemoth to boost a key capital ratio and hopefully reassure skittish investors. Under the plan, the Treasury Department would swap up to $25 billion of preferred stock as long as other big Citigroup investors do the same.

***

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/24/business/24citigroup.html?ref=business

Shares of Citigroup rallied on Monday in the hope that the government’s plan would stabilize the company. Shares rose 19 cents, to $2.14. The stock was still down 68 percent for the year.

In many ways, Mr. Pandit is already grappling with the same problems that the government would face if it took control.

He was forced to split off Citigroup’s prized Smith Barney brokerage unit, for instance, to raise capital. He is also scaling back the company’s mortgage and proprietary trading operations. He has created a “bad bank” structure to hold Citi’s money-losing businesses, like private label credit cards and Primerica insurance, and tens of billions of dollars’ worth of toxic assets.

Citigroup, with operations in more than 100 countries, encapsulates many of the ills plaguing the global banking industry. In the future, the company will almost certainly be smaller and less profitable than it was in the past, analysts say.

The entire banking industry, after all, remains under acute stress. JPMorgan Chase, widely regarded as one of the healthier big banks, announced on Monday that it would sharply reduce its dividend to stockholders to conserve cash in case the economy deteriorates further.

The administration’s strategy seems to point in the direction of stopping short of outright nationalization — where the government takes control — and stepping up regulatory scrutiny.

The government has ordered Citigroup to sell businesses, shake up its board, cut its dividend and reduce risky trading. It has also moved to curb bonuses and perks like corporate jets. Moreover, Citigroup already relies on the government to finance its operations and insure hundreds of billions of risky assets.

Published: February 23, 2009

3rd Rescue Would Give U.S. 40% of Citigroup

***

In August, Weill volunteered to give up retirement perks in exchange for early termination of a consulting contract he got when he retired as chairman in 2006.

That agreement, which was supposed to run 10 years and now will end in April, gave Weill millions of dollars in perks, including an office, car and driver, and use of company aircraft. On Feb. 1, he agreed to stop using the aircraft after the New York Post reported he used a jet in December to take a family vacation to Mexico.

His perks cost Citigroup $2.87 million in 2006, $2.31 million in 2005, $1.6 million in 2004, $1.59 million in 2003, $1.04 million in 2002 and $33,826 for three months in 2001, according to regulatory filings. He waived the annual cash retainer of $75,000 and $150,000 deferred stock award given to other non-employee directors, according to the March 2008 filing.

NEW YORK — Citigroup Inc., the U.S. bank that got a US$52 billion government bailout, said director Roberto Hernandez Ramirez will keep free use of company aircraft and an office after he steps down from the board in April. Hernandez, 66, will keep the perks because he remains non-executive chairman of Citigroup subsidiary Banco Nacional de Mexico, Mike Hanretta, a spokesman for the New York-based bank, said in an interview.

The bank said in the March regulatory filing that it “provided certain security services to Roberto Hernandez and members of his immediate family as well as office, secretarial and related services, and airplane and helicopter usage.”

Hanretta said Hernandez travels on his own plane and gets reimbursed for business trips taken in his capacity as Banamex chairman. Like other Citigroup directors, he is reimbursed at a commercial rate when he travels for board business. He doesn’t get reimbursed for personal travel, Hanretta said.

The benefits, also including helicopter use and security for Hernandez and his family, cost US$2.61 million in 2007, according to a March 2008 regulatory filing.

Updated Friday, February 20, 2009 11:30 am TWN, Bloomberg

Citigroup director to keep plane, helicopter, office

http://www.chinapost.com.tw/business/company-focus/2009/02/20/196936/Citigroup-director.htm

***


Critical US Government Information Sources and Facts –

***

Home | About GAO | Contact GAO | Site Map | E-mail Updates | Help
Keyword or Report #
Try our improved search
GAO.GOV

* Reports & Testimonies
* Legal Decisions
* Comptroller General
* Topic Collections
* Careers
* FraudNet/Reporting Fraud

GAO.GOV
Budget Issues: Franchise Fund Pilot Review
GAO-03-1069 August 22, 2003
Highlights Page (PDF)   Full Report (PDF, 57 pages)   Accessible Text

Summary

Congress is considering the reauthorization of the six franchise fund pilots authorized by the Government Reform Act of 1994. These self-supporting business-like entities were established to provide common administrative services on a fully reimbursable basis.

The authorization for most of the pilots will expire at the end of fiscal year 2003. In addition to the suggestion of giving the pilots permanent authorization, there has been some discussion in recent years of expanding the franchise fund concept so that all departments and independent agencies can set up a franchise fund.

To provide the context to evaluate franchise fund pilots and fully understand reauthorization issues, GAO agreed to identify the many funds, called intragovernmental revolving funds, that operate with purposes similar to that of franchise funds and to analyze their legal authorities to determine if franchise funds were somehow unique.

In addition, we examined the operations and managerial cost accounting processes of the franchise fund pilots at the Departments of the Interior and Commerce.

We determined if they had taken into account the criteria suggested by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), including: (1) adhering to OMB/Chief Financial Officers (CFO) Council’s 12 business operating principles, (2) accounting for full cost, and (3) conducting audits of financial statements at the fund level.

The six franchise fund pilots are part of a group of 34 intragovernmental revolving (IR) funds that were created to provide the common support services required by many federal agencies. In general, the legal authorities for these 34 funds are very similar.

Twelve of the 34 funds–including 5 of the franchise fund pilots–have explicit authority to charge for an operating reserve and/or to retain a reserve for acquisition of capital equipment and financial management improvements.

The franchise fund pilots at the Departments of Interior and Commerce have both (1) taken into account many of the 12 business operating principles, (2) designed their cost accounting processes to set fees to recover the full cost of operations, and (3) progressed toward implementing the main cost accounting standards.

The Interior Franchise Fund’s (IFF) major business line, GovWorks, provides acquisition services and has seen dramatic growth in revenue and workload since fiscal year 1997. GovWorks expects continuing growth through fiscal year 2007. The IFF has been subject to an audit of its financial statements at the franchise fund level through fiscal year 2002.

The Commerce Franchise Fund’s (CFF) only business line, Office of Computer Services (OCS), provides information technology infrastructure support services and has had a declining revenue and customer base. However, OCS expects its revenues to remain stable through fiscal year 2005. The CFF was subject to financial audits at the franchise fund level for fiscal years 1997 and 1998, and at the department level for fiscal years 2001 and 2002. No audits were conducted for fiscal years 1999 or 2000.

Longer-term reauthorization (more than 1 or 2 years) would be helpful to the operation of franchise fund pilots, but neither their legal authority nor their operation makes franchise funds unique compared to other IR funds.

A primary attraction to the franchise fund label is the explicit ability to retain reserves, and Congress could, and has, given this authority to other IR funds. The explicit authority provisions granted to franchise fund pilots (and a few other IR funds) could be considered case-by-case for individual IR funds.

In deciding whether to provide these authorities to any individual fund, Congress could use the same criteria suggested by OMB for franchise fund pilots, including: (1) examining operations against OMB/CFO’s 12 business operating principles, (2) determining if managerial cost accounting processes are in place to account for the full unit costs of outputs produced, and (3) considering if annual or periodic independent audits are being conducted at the fund level to ensure the reliability of the fund’s financial information.

Individual case-by-case authority would also permit Congress to consider and evaluate the agency’s commitment and the strength of the IR fund’s leadership, which are additional factors that can influence the success of the fund.

Related Searches
Related terms:
Accounting standards
Authorizing legislation
Budget obligations
Cost accounting
DOI GovWorks
Intragovernmental revolving funds
Permanent budget authority

* Home
* About GAO
* Contact GAO
* Privacy & Other Site Policies
* FOIA
* Site Map
* E-mail Updates
* Help

Accountability   Integrity   Reliability

http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-03-1069

***

FMS Web site  – About FMS

http://fms.treas.gov/search.html

FMS Overview
http://fms.treas.gov/aboutfms/index.html

All About FMS
http://fms.treas.gov/aboutfms/welcometofms.html

Navigating the FMS Web Site
http://fms.treas.gov/aboutfms/firstvisit.html

Organizational Charts
http://fms.treas.gov/aboutfms/org_charts.html

Fact Sheets
http://fms.treas.gov/news/factsheets/index.html

Strategic Plan
http://fms.treas.gov/strategicplan/index.html

Legislative & Public Affairs
http://fms.treas.gov/news/index.html

Locations & Directions
http://fms.treas.gov/aboutfms/locations.html

Doing Business with FMS
http://fms.treas.gov/aboutfms/business.html

Working at FMS

Overview
http://fms.treas.gov/hrd/index.html

EEO Policy Statement (PDF)
http://fms.treas.gov/aboutfms/eeo_policy_statement.pdf

EEO Complaint Process (PDF)
http://fms.treas.gov/aboutfms/eeo_complaint_process.pdf

Reasonable Accommodations
http://fms.treas.gov/aboutfms/reasonable_accommodations_procedures.pdf

Procedures (PDF)
http://fms.treas.gov/aboutfms/reasonable_accommodations_procedures.pdf

Glossary
http://fms.treas.gov/acronyms.html

Contacts
http://fms.treas.gov/aboutfms/contacts.html

about RSS/XML on the FMS Web site RSS

About the Financial Management Service
All About FMS

Our Background and History

In 1940, the United States Department of the Treasury established the Fiscal Service, which consisted of the Bureau of Accounts, the Bureau of the Public Debt, and the Office of the Treasurer. A 1974 reorganization of the Fiscal Service created the Bureau of Government Financial Operations, which was formed from a merger of the Bureau of Accounts and most functions of the Office of the Treasurer. In 1984, the Bureau of Government Financial Operations was renamed the Financial Management Service (FMS); the new name reflected Treasury’s renewed emphasis on achieving greater efficiency and economy in government financial management.

For more detailed information on FMS’ background and history, click here.

Our Mission

The mission of FMS is to provide central payment services to federal program agencies, operate the federal government’s collections and deposit systems, provide governmentwide accounting and reporting services, and manage the collection of delinquent debt. No longer just the government’s “bookkeeper,” the FMS of the new millennium is an organization that is on the technology forefront in its use of automated systems. The bureau also supports federal agencies’ financial management improvement efforts in the areas of education, consulting, and accounting operations through a franchise fund business. FMS’ express and explicit mission strategically supports the overarching Treasury goal of managing the government’s finances effectively, as well as two of the governmentwide initiatives under the President’s Management Agenda – Improved Financial Performance and Expanded Electronic Government.

Our Services

Disbursing Federal Payments: FMS is the primary disburser of payments to individuals and businesses on behalf of federal agencies (e.g., benefit payments paid by the Social Security Administration or the Department of Veterans Affairs; federal income tax refund payments; payments to businesses for goods and services provided to the federal government). The majority of the payments are disbursed through electronic funds transfers; the remaining are check payments. Annually, FMS disburses nearly a billion payments, with an associated dollar value of more than $1.6 trillion. In keeping with the FMS strategic goal of moving toward an all-electronic Treasury, FMS continually invests in state-of-the-art technology systems that are integral to processing payments accurately, efficiently, and securely.

Collecting Federal Revenue: FMS administers the world’s largest government funds collections systems through a network of more than 10,000 financial institutions. Each year, the bureau collects more than $2.45 trillion in federal revenues, such as individual and corporate income tax deposits, customs duties, fees for government services, fines, and loan repayments. Using cutting-edge technology, FMS has taken a leadership role in providing federal agencies, individuals, businesses, tax practitioners, and financial institutions with a wide variety of electronic collection alternatives. The options are designed and developed with some major goals in mind: to offer a service that is easy to use, convenient and secure; to streamline the collection process; to make full use of web technologies; to manage the depositary services provided to Treasury by financial institutions, and to monitor the cash position of the federal government.

Issuing Governmentwide Financial Reports: FMS has the critical responsibility of maintaining the federal government’s set of accounts and serving as the repository of information About the Financial position of the United States government. The bureau closely monitors the government’s monetary assets and liabilities at all times through its oversight of central accounting and reporting systems. FMS’ oversight responsibilities include assisting federal agencies with adopting uniform accounting and reporting standards and systems and assuring the continuous exchange of financial information among federal agencies, the Executive Branch’s Office of Management and Budget, and financial institutions. The bureau also gathers and publishes governmentwide financial information for use in establishing fiscal and debt management policies. The public and private sectors are able to monitor the government’s financial status using this financial data. FMS publications include the Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances of the United States Government (the official publication of receipts and outlays), the Monthly Treasury Statement (a report of the government receipts and outlays and the budget surplus or deficit that is based on agency reporting), the Daily Treasury Statement (a report summarizing data on the cash and debt operations of the Treasury, which is based on reporting of the Treasury account balances of the Federal Reserve Banks), and the Financial Report of the United States Government (the consolidated audited financial statements for the preceding fiscal year that cover the Executive Branch, as well as parts of the Legislative and Judicial Branches.

Collecting Delinquent Debt: FMS, using a centralized process, collects delinquent debts (e.g. federal student, mortgage, or small business loans, federal salary or benefit overpayments, fines or penalties assessed by federal agencies) owed to the United States government, as well as income tax debts owed to states and overdue child support payments owed to custodial parents. Two major tools are used to collect delinquent debts; first, under the Treasury Offset Program, the names and taxpayer identifying numbers of debtors included in an FMS database are matched against the names and taxpayer identifying numbers of recipients of federal payments. If there are matches, the amounts of the payments are reduced (“offset”) to satisfy the delinquent debts; second, through a program known as “cross-servicing”, delinquent debts that are referred to FMS by federal agencies are collected using a variety of means. They include offsetting federal payments, sending demand letters to debtors, entering into repayment arrangements, withholding wages administratively, referring debts to the Department of Justice for action, reporting to credit bureaus, and contracting for the services of private collection agencies. By allowing federal agencies with lending authority to access information from the FMS delinquent debtor database, FMS works to ensure that federal government loans are not made to previously identified delinquent debtors. Since Congress placed debt collection under a single, central authority, FMS collects more than $3.7 billion each year in delinquent debt.

Supporting Federal Agencies’ Financial Improvement Efforts: FMS, by taking an entrepreneurial approach, supports the financial improvement efforts of federal agencies. Over the last five years, through course offerings, conferences, and workshops, FMS has trained thousands of federal agency representatives in a myriad of financial management areas (e.g., financial reporting assistance, review and closeout activities). In addition, FMS offers professional consulting services to federal agencies seeking assistance with activities such as reconciliations of funds balances with Treasury, Standard General Ledger compliance reviews, internal controls reviews, financial reporting compliance reviews, cost accounting assistance, and financial systems services.

Our Partnerships

Federal Agencies: Because of the very unique governmentwide mission of FMS, the bureau interacts and forges partnerships with virtually every Executive Branch agency. Through FMS’ state-of-the-art information technology systems, for example, agencies are able to submit certified requests for payment disbursements, determine the status of disbursements, initiate claims, verify deposits and funds transfers, and report and view financial information for accounting purposes. On a regular basis, FMS also conducts workshops and conferences for agency representatives to assist them with all aspects of government financial management, including cash management, governmentwide accounting and reporting and debt management.

Financial Institutions: Financial institutions are key partners of Treasury and FMS. They provide various critical services in their capacity as depositaries and financial agents of the United States as designated by the Secretary of the Treasury. Accepting and processing public monies and services related to the disbursement of and accounting for those monies are prominent among the responsibilities relegated to financial institutions.

Federal Reserve Banks: Under federal statute, Federal Reserve Banks act as fiscal agents and depositories as directed by the Secretary of the Treasury. For example, the banks maintain the Treasury’s account, accept deposits of federal taxes and other federal agency receipts, and process checks and electronic payments drawn on Treasury’s account.

* What We Do

* Background and History of the Financial Management Service

Last Updated:  Wednesday March 26, 2008

Contact FMS
http://fms.treas.gov/aboutfms/contacts.html

Treasury E-Government
http://www.treas.gov/offices/cio/egov/

Web Site Inventory / Publication Schedule
http://fms.treas.gov/news/web_inventory.html

Accessibility / 508 Statement
http://fms.treas.gov/access.html

Freedom of Information Act / Information Quality
http://fms.treas.gov/foia/index.html

Information Quality
http://fms.treas.gov/foia/section515.html

Treasury Department Web Site
http://www.treasury.gov/

Treasury No Fear Act Page
http://www.treasury.gov/nofearact/

Regulations.gov
http://www.regulations.gov

USA.gov
http://www.usagov.gov

from:

http://fms.treas.gov/aboutfms/welcometofms.html

***

FMS Web site

**

Get answers to questions about

Change of Mailing Address
for Benefit Checks

Checks & Payments

Child Support Enforcement

Debt Collection

Direct Deposit

FMS Project Summary

Grants & Loans

Missing Federal Checks

Tax Refund Offset

Unclaimed Assets

Withholdings & Offsets

Index to Questions & Answers

Browse by topic
A to Z Index

Direct Deposit

Fact Sheets

Forms

Glossary of Acronyms
& Abbreviations

News & Press Releases

Programs

Publications

Rates & Sureties

Regulations & Guidance

Training & Events

**

Most requested pages on the FMS Web site

Direct Deposit

Electronic Federal Tax
Payment System (EFTPS)

Surety Bonds:
Certified Companies
Reinsurer Companies

Check Claims

Rates of Exchange

Monthly Treasury Statement

Treasury Bulletin

US Standard General Ledger

Governmentwide Debt Collection

Treasury Financial Manual

Prompt Payment

Green Book

Unclaimed Assets: Q&A

**
Welcome to FMS

THE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE, a bureau of the United States Department of the Treasury, provides central payment services to Federal Program Agencies, operates the federal government’s collections and deposit systems, provides government-wide accounting and reporting services, and manages the collection of delinquent debt owed to the government. FMS also supports federal agencies’ financial management improvement efforts in the areas of education, consulting, and accounting operations.

If this is your first visit to the FMS Web site and you would like some tips on navigating the site, please take a minute to visit our Help for First-Time Visitors page.

For more information about FMS’ mission, history, and the services we provide, please visit All About FMS.

Publications: statements, reports, reference & guidance
Statements
Daily Treasury Statement
Monthly Treasury Statement
Combined Statement (annual)

Reports
Financial Report of the U.S. Government
# Summary of the 2008 Financial Report
Status Report of U.S. Treasury-Owned Gold
Term Investment Option (TIO)
Treasury Bulletin (quarterly)
Treasury Tax & Loan/TIO/Repo Actions

Reference & Guidance
Automated Clearing House
Federal Account Symbols & Titles (FAST Book)
Financial Data Registry
Green Book
Surety Bonds
Treasury Financial Manual (TFM)
U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL)

More Publications

Programs: payments, collections, debt collection, agency reporting, training & consulting
Payments
ASAP | Check Claims | EFT
Electronic Transfer Accounts | ITS.gov
PAID (now Internet Payment Platform)
Internet Payment Platform (IPP)Exit FMS Web site to ipp.gov
PAM | Prompt Payment

Collections
CA$HLINK | EFTPS | FEDTAX II
IPAC | Pay.gov | TGAnet

Debt Collection
Governmentwide Debt Collection
Treasury Offset Program (TOP)

**

Agency Reporting

FACTS II | GFRS/FACTS I/IFCS | GOALS II

Governmentwide Accounting (GWA)

Governmentwide TAS ATB System (GTAS)

Shared Accounting Module (SAM)

Transaction Reporting System (TRS)

Treasury Report on Receivables (TROR)

**

Training & Consulting
Federal Agency Assistance
Treasury Agency Services

More Programs & Services

**

FMS highlights Updated February 26, 2009

* American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
FMS Information Related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009New

* Recovery.gov – Exit FMS Web site

* Federal Tax Refund Status
Exit to Internal Revenue Service Web Site – Exit FMS Web site

* Go to previous updates

* FMS Press Releases

* Treasury Press RoomExit – FMS Web site

Click here to find out more about the Direct Express Card.
A low-cost alternative for federal beneficiaries without bank accounts.

Click here to sign up online for Direct Express. This link will take you out of the FMS Web site.

Go Direct with Direct Deposit: The safest, fastest and easiest way to get your money. Click here for more information. This campaign is sponsored by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Banks. This link will take you out of the FMS Web site.

Start receiving your social security, SSI or other federal benefit payments through direct deposit.

Click here to sign up online for Go Direct. This campaign is sponsored by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Banks. This link will take you out of the FMS Web site.

Direct Deposit Sign-Up Forms

E-Mail Notification

* Subscribe to Free Program & Publication Updates

* Manage Your Subscription

Contact FMS
Treasury E-Government     Privacy Policy
Web Site Inventory/
Publication Schedule     Accessibility/
508 Statement     Freedom of Information Act/
Information Quality
Treasury Department Web Site     Treasury No Fear Act Page     Regulations.gov     USA.gov

http://fms.treas.gov/index.html

Why are we, the American people responsible for covering the losses of banks and bank holding companies – we didn’t make up that junk they were buying -

Last night on bloomberg’s financial shows, there was a rolling clip played every so often of Bank of America’s Ken Lewis and his adjusted mathematics lesson.

And, maybe I’m not as sophisticated as those great financial geeks of Wall Street and in the corporate boardrooms of America, but even I know that you don’t use the numbers and facts from a time that was profitable to express the situation that currently isn’t.

It seems that “normalized numbers” is an expression to indicate using numbers from an earlier period (say, 2005) when the assets were performing and profits were evident to explain that a business is currently profit-making and performing well today.

And, then using those numbers from an earlier time, adding them or dividing them or otherwise manipulating them as if they happened this week, this quarter or in these last six months, to explain current profitability and to project future earnings, expectations, costs and profits.

Watching Ken Lewis in action, it is easy to see what the problem is. They think we are all stupid. And – maybe we are. We let this go on this way.

Yesterday, I created another glossary of terms, so I could keep up with them. Now, I’m going to have to add a whole other category to cover the bullshitus maximus of “adjusted mathematics” being used by Ken Lewis and other bankers, CEOs, CFOs, and public finance folks.

Glossary of specific terms, 02-25-09


Federal Reserve – access portal for free money from the government to use for covering bad bets.

stress test (for financial institutions) – figuring out how much money banks and credit card companies need and giving it to them.

legacy assets – worthless and nearly worthless toxic assets being purchased for above market rates in order to make it sound better and to make publicly traded profit-driven companies’ balance sheets look better.

stock markets – an elaborate poker game used to price things that are created in and based upon the imaginations and machinations of American financial engineers.

bond markets – a place to gamble on someone else’s bad debts – quite a thrill to get the oneupmanship of picking the one out of ten thousand that makes good on it.

financial news coverage – an entertainment akin to fantasy football based primarily on innuendo, rumor, gossip and “feel-good” reporting. Previously it was intended to do whatever it takes to make things look good in the stock market and in the corporate community such that people will stay in the “con game” of stocks, bonds, consumer credit and money market funds.

Securities and Exchange Commission – plum job with good pay and benefits provided you suit up, show up and don’t bother looking at anything in the stock market, bond markets or having to do with money or assets. A nice place to work for quick, free money, a pretty work environment and cheesecake benefits package plus perks working with old stock market and Harvard business school buddies.

Office of Thrift Supervision – something the Feds use to bully bankers with concepts about mathematics being used for other applications besides betting on the football pool or Las Vegas gambling. This includes using mathematics for accounting and adhering to other stupid regulations, (that bankers claim shouldn’t apply to them because regulators don’t understand “the necessities of business” in their opinion.)

From the lessons of watching “how its done” by bankers, investment bankers and other financial institutions – when the office of thrift supervision or other regulators of a similar authority are expected – leave town for a conference when they come by taking any file passwords with you and put all materials from them in file 86.

Explanation of a balance sheet -

> item

> 001   -   (well that’s losing money, so don’t put it on this balance sheet.)

002   -   (carry forward the numbers from 2005 when it was profitable)

003   -   (that really doesn’t count here because private jets are advertising)

004   -   (if we put that here, it would look like we are losing money.)

005   -   (that increases shareholder value, so it isn’t really paid out against anything that comes in the door. We don’t count that.)

- cricketdiane, 02-26-09

this is why it is a Depression that we are experiencing and continues to unfold before us –

Here is why I say we are in a Depression – because sooner or later, everything will have to be re-valued based on real values rather than supposed values.

Let’s say we have corporation A. This corporation owns an office building which is 90% unoccupied. But on the books of corporation A, this office building is priced u as if it is fully rented. What asset value does that office building then represent? What happens when the market value of those office spaces devolves into a sub-value of what was expected and projected for its capacity? What happens to that asset value when the building and property itself cannot be sold in the marketplace or could only be sold for a value much lower than that paid for it? That is the situation now.

Further, let’s say that corporation A leveraged the asset value of the office building that they own at some time before today. That leverage occurred at an assumption of full or nearly complete occupancy, not at 90% empty. It also occurred at a property value based on expected returns in a marketplace at least 30% higher than it is now. But, the leverage was created based on the old values which no longer apply. Now, what is that asset worth? What value is it given when the leverage based upon it is greater than the value that could be brought from it based in reality?

On the balance sheet of corporation A, what occurs? Where is the actual values of properties owned and assets available against the borrowing and debt obligations that must be made on higher values than reality will bear?

To me, this means that sooner or later adjustments will have to be made in a downward direction. There is no doubt that other credit structures and derivatives were sold based upon the credit extended to corporation A and its assets and properties. Those also will falter in value. It isn’t possible for this system to represent real value nor to flex in accommodation of it, except for situations in which that value continues to increase. It has no flexibility going in the other direction – in a negative valuation event.

For that reason, above and beyond all others, I say that we are in a Depression economic situation and that is what is unfolding before us. The trade deficits that have been maintained over a period of years, the number of bankruptcies registered and administered over the last five years, the true unemployment figures from the US and around the world, and the basic insolvency of the credit based system that has been in use without restraint – all spell out a speculative environment of high-risk, highly leveraged institutions that are failing in light of reality.

I believe that the housing foreclosures are a symptom of the problem, not the cause – but are an indication of the very real fractures occurring in the system. It was never viable to use loans as assets to be traded, sold and used as leverage against asset purchases and obligations as if they were real money. They aren’t. These uses of credit, leverage and loans as a currency has falsified the actual values of everything they have touched and undermined the real values throughout the corporations and government systems that have used them.

The solutions that will work for this situation include putting the precise and appropriate regulations in place before valuing any more of the asset classes involved, placing standard accounting practices into use across the board (regardless of the type of fund, accounts or institution involved), and exchanging credit based assets back to real ones in the marketplace. It will also be a part of any viable solution to take apart the CDOs into their component parts and re-establishing their real values in light of the realities in the marketplace.

Currency and asset values must be re-asserted based upon relative comparisons from the real world and no longer based on credit, loans, leverage, guarantees, future earnings, future taxes, and pretend economics / make-believe accounting practices. When that happens, opportunity can open and be constructed that is available to all with potential for growth, strength and a foundation that is concrete and real to support it.

These and other similar measures must be done or we have nothing and everything that is touched by these eroding values will be worth nothing.

- cricketdiane, 02-25-09

A year ago, Secretary Paulson and Fed Chairman Bernanke sat in Congress and said everything was fine and we might see a small “contraction” in the economic horizon – that is the brightest group we’ve got working on it?

You don’t put water in a bucket with a hole in it.

The off-balance sheet accounting is still occurring everywhere from the banks to the pension funds. Mark to make believe is still in use and hasn’t been corrected in a number of significant places.

A credit-based economy is not a strong macro-economic model but our authorities are continuing to try shoring up the very structural deficiencies that are inherent to it.

Not to be the one left out of saying it, we’re screwed.

Now, our government is going to buy or guarantee “legacy assets” which are the toxic assets of little, questionable or no value. That is not of interest to anyone with a wit of good sense in the marketplace, so we are going to buy them or back them.

Our Federal Reserve charter does not serve the interest of the American people but rather the banking industry and in particular, serves the interest of these mega conglomerate bank holding companies for lack of a better plan.

There is an open line of funding from the Federal Reserve and our Treasury using taxpayer money by the hundreds of billions of dollars and in some cases, totaling in the trillions of dollars being given wholesale to the corporate giants of banking, investment banking, insurance and others.

And, again I say – “You don’t put money in a bucket with a hole in it.”

The necessary conforming standards and regulations of good sense and prudence have not been put in place where it concerns these massive institutions.

One department of their organization does not know what the other is doing. Credit products are being mis-priced as assets in one place and priced as something else in another.

Credit rates are being jacked up to those already under contract for that credit, not only in the US but around the world. Ratings for credit are being created and adjusted, not based on reality but based on the abusive power of the ratings agencies. They are not objective independent free-standing organizations without conflicts of interest, no matter what they say.

Those products which rely on credit for purchases to be made are arbitrarily priced higher than the market value of those products, from houses to cars to college educations to washers and dryers. The supply and demand in the marketplace cannot reflect the capacity in pricing because of the unnatural use of credit to underwrite those prices higher than the market value.

Many cities, counties, states and agencies of the Federal government are using credit and leverage against future taxes and existing assets to boost the available budget moneys for projects, services and administrative costs that consequently have skyrocketed.

Where there is a greater pool of money to access, costs are found to accommodate those higher financial quantities, even though it is acquired through leverage. It isn’t because projects actually would have cost that much to administer or to complete – it is based on a synthetically created larger pool of money to access.

Then, the same government budgets have used “mark to make believe” and “off-balance sheet’ accounting to manipulate reality for bond investors, the public and their oversight / regulatory committees. It is a fallacy based system that is not only out of touch with reality – it is unsustainable and has been simply a disaster waiting to happen. And, it still is because it is being allowed to continue in the same form using the same deficient processes.

As admirable as President Obama’s speech was last night, the Republicans were staunch in their determination to undermine whatever efforts are being made in order to “win” what they perceive as their own standing in all this.

It is a direct result of their governance and of many other members in both parties making choices that were not overviewed in light of macro-economics, but rather somewhere close to the end of their noses where immediate profits and opportunities to have quick, easy money available undermined the use of any good sense.

Even today, as changes must be made in order for our country to survive, there are efforts being made by Republican party owned governors, legislators and agency heads throughout the system who are bound and determined to undo whatever is done, to destroy any changes made and to have their way regardless of the cost to us all. That is a sham and a shame.

Last night, my Dad was very amused by my assertion that we are in a Depression – not a Recession, not a deep Recession, not a small “contraction” in our economy. I thought about it quite awhile last night after getting off the phone with him and decided it wasn’t worth telling him why I believe it is so.

Let him remember it how it was, when America was strong and filled with promise and hope and opportunity for all. Let him think it is all fine and will correct itself real soon with all these bright people up in Washington working on it. Reality doesn’t really matter all that much, does it?

- cricketdiane, 02-25-09

** Besides which, there is no one that is going to change it, no matter what they do. That is the macro-economic fractures in the foundation of an economy when credit is its basis. It has just been a matter of time – complexity upon complexity, default upon default, distrust upon distrust, a closing of opportunity to all at the hands of a few. It was a disaster in motion.

***

Investment advisors and bankers have found virtual loopholes to operate as they see fit – Our tax money is their free pool of money to have, to use and to spend anytime they want it.

-CITE-
15 USC Sec. 80b-18a                                         01/03/2007

-EXPCITE-
TITLE 15 – COMMERCE AND TRADE
CHAPTER 2D – INVESTMENT COMPANIES AND ADVISERS
SUBCHAPTER II – INVESTMENT ADVISERS

-HEAD-
Sec. 80b-18a. State regulation of investment advisers

-STATUTE-
(a) Jurisdiction of State regulators
Nothing in this subchapter shall affect the jurisdiction of the
securities commissioner (or any agency or officer performing like
functions) of any State over any security or any person insofar as
it does not conflict with the provisions of this subchapter or the
rules and regulations thereunder.
(b) Dual compliance purposes
No State may enforce any law or regulation that would require an
investment adviser to maintain any books or records in addition to
those required under the laws of the State in which it maintains
its principal place of business, if the investment adviser -
(1) is registered or licensed as such in the State in which it
maintains its principal place of business; and
(2) is in compliance with the applicable books and records
requirements of the State in which it maintains its principal
place of business.
(c) Limitation on capital and bond requirements
No State may enforce any law or regulation that would require an
investment adviser to maintain a higher minimum net capital or to
post any bond in addition to any that is required under the laws of
the State in which it maintains its principal place of business, if
the investment adviser -
(1) is registered or licensed as such in the State in which it
maintains its principal place of business; and
(2) is in compliance with the applicable net capital or bonding
requirements of the State in which it maintains its principal
place of business.
(d) National de minimis standard
No law of any State or political subdivision thereof requiring
the registration, licensing, or qualification as an investment
adviser shall require an investment adviser to register with the
securities commissioner of the State (or any agency or officer
performing like functions) or to comply with such law (other than
any provision thereof prohibiting fraudulent conduct) if the
investment adviser -
(1) does not have a place of business located within the State;
and
(2) during the preceding 12-month period, has had fewer than 6
clients who are residents of that State.

http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/15C2D.txt

** My note -

Bernanke noted that “bank holding companies” which actually own our bank conglomerates where hundreds of billions of dollars have been freely given to underwrite their risky choices – are not going to be forced out of the marketplace by any of our regulators. It sounded like he announced that our regulators do not have the authority to determine that they must be allowed to fail. That isn’t even on the menu.

When I was reading the regulations above, I realized that over a period of time, many of our authorities have had their powers undermined for purposes of regulating with any measure by maneuvers within the financial and investment industries and by the inadequately written laws governing their activities.

It is possible that since these $100 billion dollar plus valued bank corporations are owned by holding companies, the regulations and authorities do not apply to them. But, the FED does guarantee their risky ventures, backs their riskier loan and asset products, underwrites their activities using taxpayer moneys and generally, sees to every measure of success for them.

When did the Federal Reserve receive the authority to open, unlimited access to every dime in the Treasury, both now and in all future revenues, to give out as they desire to underwrite whatever banks, investments, hedge funds, money market funds, corporations, credit derivatives, “holding companies,” Wall Street banking firms, credit companies, and other profit-driven institutions?

Since someone thought that the American people who own this nation and who own those tax revenues had agreed to this pathway and process, what concept of capitalism and “free market economy” were they using when they decided to do it?

When was it that we agreed to it? Did the American people have any say in it at all, in fact? Which US citizens were they which agreed to it and were they individual taxpayers or corporate players which would benefit from it without limit?

Why do investment advisors and bankers get to decide for all of us, how our tax moneys will be spent? Who gave them that decision-making power which we are funding and then underwriting, back-stopping, guaranteeing and funding again?

What right did they have to keep profits, when we have underwritten their entire business enterprise and now guarantee every dime and dollar of expenses and risks involved in their enterprise? Who are these people that own our Federal Reserve and unlimited check-writing facility of our Treasury?

Whether it is by the Stress Test measure of the current program or the TARP funds, discount window, purchase of mortgage-backed securities and CDOs, purchase and provision of commercial paper or by the use of FDIC, SEC, Office of Thrift Supervision, US Treasury and Federal Reserve systems to their benefit – there are huge pools of free money being given to businesses that are “profit-driven”. Therefore, we the taxpayers are nobody in our government’s estimation of it and have no rights to a say in it at all.

This is not anything like a capitalist model nor has it been for at least the last twenty – thirty years. Certainly there is nothing capitalist nor “free market economy” about doing it the way that our government and its regulatory authorities have been doing it for that time.

It isn’t a free market economy when taxpayers have been underwriting the risks of certain profit-driven companies to the exclusion of others who are by virtue of reality, competing with them. And to guarantee the poor choices of corporations to no consequence or accountability for their actions while others fail as a result. That is not capitalism. It is not a free market at all. It isn’t even an open market, for that matter.

Through the inhumane, nearly un-human greed and avarice of a few in positions of power, prestige and wealth, we are now feeding them, their businesses, and their lifestyles with every dollar in the US Treasury, every tax dollar, every fee, every revenue source and every dollar of taxes that will be available for our Treasury in the future with absolutely no reserve and no restraint.

That is the unlimited availability of access to any and all funds that Ben Bernanke and Timothy Geithner and others before them,  have given to these “players” in the marketplace from Citigroup to AIG to Bank of America to Goldman Sachs, to JP Morgan Chase to whatever other institutions they choose to save “for us”.

And that is what they are doing and are going to continue to do – see the last hour of questions from the Senate banking committee today to Ben Bernanke, especially that moment the Tennessee member finally cut through the bull to demand the truth.

Apparently there is nothing anyone can do to stop them – why should I give the best of my efforts to save something like that? Why would anyone? For what reason would any American citizen want to give their money to serve this ball of corruption, greed and corporate welfare? Our tax money is their free pool of money to have, to use and to spend anytime they want it.

Believe this, no dollar that any of us makes is our own – it now belongs to Citigroup, AIG, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Wachovia, Goldman Sachs, Merril Lynch, JP Morgan Chase, and every other banking / investment / financial firm in operation that the Federal Reserve serves. They have killed our opportunity to live free, to pursue our happiness, to have quality of life and any measure of opportunities available to us. This isn’t America – this is something else that they have wrought under our feet.

- cricketdiane, 02-24-09

Federal Reserve / US Treasury Stress Test will decide how much money mega banks need in a worst case scenario and then give it to them from taxpayers’ money – Bernanke admits

In testimony today – Federal Reserve guy Bernanke admitted in the last hour of questions, that the Stress Test is being used to determine whether the 19 – 20 mega banks are properly capitalized. Then, the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury will give them the money they need to be properly capitalized so they can survive.

Therefore, the American people have not only prevented these insolvent corporate structures from failing when TARP money and other funds were put into them, we are going to do so on a continuing basis in the immediate future.

When did the American people decide that they wanted to subsidize the people who caused the problem? Is this blackmail, where they keep coming back for more money, more money?

Does the Federal Reserve serve any other purpose beyond a slush fund for these banks and corporations at taxpayers’ expense? What kind of regulation is that?

Why are they permitted to regulate themselves and bypass the laws of the US and every sensible, prudent financial manner of doing business? How can they possibly be adequate regulating an industry they are only designed to serve?

The Federal Reserve and US Treasury are supposed to be the wisdom of the financial world, but what is wise about this? They are using their position and unlimited, synthetically-derived power (abusing their power), to snooker the American people and legislators to rob us blind, (abusing their power).

What happened to their corporate profits when they had them – weren’t they supposed to use a portion of the banks’, investment bankings’, bank holding companies’, and profits to capitalize for solvency specifically because of this kind of situation?

- cricketdiane, 02-24-09

It is all wrong – there is nothing worth a durn whatsoever – why didn’t we just let those sorry unethical business executives at Citigroup, Bank of America, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs and AIG – just slam into bankruptcy and sorted it out from there? Not one of them is worth keeping.

http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/business/2009/02/23/yoon.hkong.citi.bad.image.cnn?iref=24hours

Citi’s bad image in Hong Kong 2:15

Citibank in Hong Kong is reportedly charging around 45 percent interest to some borrowers. CNN’s Eunice Yoon reports.

Source: CNN
Added On February 23, 2009

***

And, Citigroup aside from overcharging obscene interest rates in Hong Kong and probably everywhere else they can get away with it, they are busy shopping arm-in-arm with other companies that we’ve given bailouts,  because  apparently they want to be the ones in control of the credit default swaps clearing facility rather than have regulators do it. – That’s probably why they are asking us for money again  – note this article  from cnn about it.

- cricketdiane, 02-24-09

SPECIAL REPORT  Issue #1: America’s Money Crisis
Citi in talks over bigger U.S. stake – report
Bank and regulators said to discuss plan for government to convert preferred shares to common stock.

By CNNMoney.com staff
Last Updated: February 23, 2009: 1:09 PM ET

Government officials are reportedly weighing converting preferred shares in Citigroup into common stock, which ultimately bolster the embattled bank’s capital structure.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Citigroup Inc. is in discussions with regulators about a plan for the federal government to take a larger ownership stake in the bank, according to published reports.

The Wall Street Journal, citing sources familiar with the matter, reported that the government would convert a large portion of its preferred Citigroup shares to common shares.

The government received the preferred shares in return for investing $45 billion in Citi as part of the $700 billion bailout of the financial system.

The Treasury Department, which has spearheaded recovery efforts for the financial system, declined to comment on the report, noting it has a policy of not discussing conversations with specific banks.

Yet the department noted that it was open to allowing financial institutions to covert government’s existing preferred shares into new convertible preferred stock – a move that would ultimately allow Citigroup to strengthen its capital levels.

In many ways, that is exactly what government officials are reportedly considering, according to the Journal.

[ . . . ]

-CNN’s Alona Rivord contributed to this report. To top of page
First Published: February 22, 2009: 9:43 PM ET

http://money.cnn.com/2009/02/22/news/companies/citigroup_government/index.htm?cnn=yes

MY NOTE – “like I said in my earlier post, this one is CNN’s repeat of the WSJ report which used sources which were near someone who actually might have known something that might have happened and that could happen maybe.” Why does that happen with business stuff? Would someone please get them to remove their heads from the present location and give themselves some sunshine for a change – it is obviously needed in a bad way. It will never be possible to see reality from the position of ass first, eyes closed – it just doesn’t work.

- cricketdiane, 02-24-09

****

From Times Online
February 2, 2009
Icap consortium mulls £800m LCH.Clearnet bid
Miles Costello

Icap, the world’s largest interdealer broker, has joined forces with about a dozen investment banks and other rivals to consider a bid of about £800 million for LCH.Clearnet, the London-based clearer of share and derivatives trades.

A successful deal, which could be two or three months away, would mean that the Icap consortium wrestling LCH.Clearnet out of talks with The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, the US clearer.

It would also pave the way for LCH.Clearnet to expand into the over-the-counter derivatives market, an independently negotiated and highly profitable market for structured trades.

Icap is run by Michael Spencer, who is the treasurer to the Conservative Party. Interdealer brokers stand between counterparties in bond and derivatives trades.
Related Links

* Charity begins on dealing floor for Icap boss

* Icap boosts profits by 8% in turbulent markets

* Icap seeks to reassure its investors

In a statement to the stock market this morning, Icap confirmed that it was an equal member of the consortium.

“Discussions are at a very preliminary stage, and there can be no certainty that such an offer will be made,” the broker said.

Other members of the consortium are thought to include Société Générale and Morgan Stanley. Most of its members, which are big uses of LCH.Clearnet, are existing shareholders in the UK clearer.

According to sources, the banks and brokers are worried that a sale to DTCC, which began talks with LCH.Clearnet in October, would create a monopoly clearer and hit competition in the sector.

DTCC is a not-for-profit organisation and envisages turning LCH.Clearnet into a similar operator within three years. It has yet to table a firm bid but has signalled that shareholders would receive about €10 a share, which would value the company at about €739 million (£650 million).

The Icap consortium has not discussed firm terms yet but is understood to be comfortable paying a premium for LCH.Clearnet. It is understood that an offer of about £800 million is being mooted.

Icap has profited from the volatility in credit markets during the past 18 months of financial turbulence. However, it is also keen to diversify its revenue sources. Mr Spencer is a substantial shareholder in Icap and also runs his own private investment vehicle.

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/banking_and_finance/article5639247.ece

****

***
JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank Join ICAP in LCH.Clearnet Bid (Update1)

By Matthew Leising

Feb. 23 (Bloomberg) — JPMorgan Chase & Co., Deutsche Bank AG and six more banks are backing ICAP Plc’s potential bid for LCH.Clearnet Ltd., the firm that guarantees about half Wall Street’s interest-rate swap trades, said people familiar with the situation.

Some of the banks also have stakes in New York-based Depository Trust & Clearing Corp., which offered 739 million euros ($945 million) for London-based LCH.Clearnet, and wants to become a clearinghouse for trades involving credit-default swaps, or contracts used to hedge against losses and speculate on a company’s ability to repay its debt.

The banks are lining up to keep control of $458 trillion of outstanding interest-rate swaps in the world’s largest over-the- counter derivatives market. At the same time, U.S. and European regulators are pushing for more transparency in credit-default swaps, which were blamed for accelerating the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and American International Group Inc. in September.

“If there’s going to be clearing they want to control it,” Craig Pirrong, a finance professor at the University of Houston, said of the banks. “The banks are basically positioning themselves to have the most influence possible about how a legislatively mandated clearing system evolves.”

London-based ICAP, the world’s largest broker between banks, said Feb. 2 it was part of a group of financial companies that may bid for London-based LCH.Clearnet, without naming the banks. LCH.Clearnet said Feb. 13 it would offer clearing services for credit-default swaps, a $28 trillion market, by December.

ICAP Group

Citigroup Inc. and UBS AG are also part of the ICAP group, with BNP Paribas SA, HSBC Holdings Plc, Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc and Societe General SA, according to the people familiar with the plan, who asked not to be identified because the details are private. Spokespeople at the banks declined to comment.

“This is a group of major market participants who came together to explore the possibility of an offer,” said ICAP spokesman Neil Bennett, declining to name the banks.

London Stock Exchange Group Plc said last week it was interested in backing the bid, without committing itself to join the offer.

ICAP shares fell 0.25 pence to 211 pence as of 11:25 a.m. New York time in London trading.

Depository Trust is owned by banks and brokers including Goldman Sachs Group Inc., UBS, JPMorgan, Citigroup and Barclays Capital. Clearinghouses are capitalized by their members, and pool traders’ collateral to share the risk of default and give regulators access to prices and positions. Lack of central clearing left banks with losses after Lehman’s Sept. 15 bankruptcy.

Regulation

U.S., U.K. and European regulators are in talks to regulate credit-default swaps, the Federal Reserve said last week.

Regulators including the Fed, the U.K.’s Financial Services Authority, the German Federal Financial Services Authority and the European Central Bank met Feb. 19 to discuss a possible information sharing agreement, according to a Fed statement on its Web site. The goal would be to apply consistent standards to the market and provide support across multiple jurisdictions, the Fed said.

Credit-default swaps rise as investor confidence deteriorates. They pay the buyer face value if a company defaults in exchange for the underlying securities or the cash equivalent.

Derivatives are financial instruments derived from stocks, bonds, loans, currencies and commodities, or linked to specific events like changes in interest rates or weather.

To contact the reporter on this story: Matthew Leising in New York at mleising@bloomberg.net.
Last Updated: February 23, 2009 11:34 EST

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=abR5qTlf3z68&refer=us

***
Top banks agree central clearing for EU credit-default swaps
London/Brussels – Some of the world’s top banks have pledged to deal through central clearing houses when trading credit default swaps (CDS) in the European Union, EU officials said Thursday. But bankers and EU staff alike sidestepped a reported Fren…

Posted : Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:35:58 GMT
Author : DPA
Category : Business

Business News | Home
London/Brussels – Some of the world’s top banks have pledged to deal through central clearing houses when trading credit default swaps (CDS) in the European Union, EU officials said Thursday. But bankers and EU staff alike sidestepped a reported French call for the countries which use the euro to set up a clearing house in Paris to counter the weight of London and New York, saying that they did not care where the business was carried out.

The Brussels-based European Banking Federation (EBF) “has no preference as to the location of the (one or more) central counterparties, but above all it wishes for (them) to be safe, sound, efficient and reliable,” the group wrote.

The members of the EBF and the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) pledged to use central clearing services in simultaneous letters sent to the EU’s executive, the European Commission, on Wednesday, commission spokesman Oliver Drewes said.

The two organizations later on Thursday confirmed his comments on their respective websites.

Drewes said that the Brussels-based body welcomed the move, which comes as world governments are looking to crack down on off-exchange financial deals in the wake of the global banking meltdown.

He refused to comment on a report published in Thursday’s Financial Times that France’s national bank had called for the 16 states which use the euro to set up a clearing house in Paris in a bid to wrest control of the 28-trillion-dollar market from London.

“Who will do it? That’s up to them,” he said.

The banks signing the letters include Barclays Capital, Citigroup Global Markets, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, J P Morgan, Morgan Stanley and UBS.

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/256527,top-banks-agree-central-clearing-for-eu-credit-default-swaps.html

***

* Reuters, Thursday February 19 2009

* EU says top dealers agree to clear credit default swaps
* Says more measures may be needed to supervise sector
* Central clearing to be used by end of July
* ICE says ready to launch in Q1 2009 in Europe
* Eurex Clearing says its service ready in Q1 (Adds ICE announcement, Eurex comment)
By Huw Jones
BRUSSELS, Feb 19 (Reuters) – Brokers and banks that trade credit default swaps (CDS) off an exchange have agreed to clear their contracts centrally by the end of July to make the market less risky, the EU’s top market regulator said on Thursday.
The financial crisis and credit crunch has spurred policymakers to improve transparency across several markets.
Regulators on both sides of the Atlantic say the global $27 trillion credit derivatives sector — most of which is in the form of CDS — is too opaque, making it hard to quickly assess the extent of risk when things go wrong.
EU Internal Market Commissioner Charlie McCreevy said the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) and the European Banking Federation had committed to using a central counterparty for eligible EU contracts.
“Given the size of the derivatives markets I am looking (at) whether other measures might be necessary to make sure they are adequately supervised and do not pose unnecessary risks to financial markets,” McCreevy said in a statement.
A clearing house ensures trades are completed and backed by collateral even if one side of the deal later defaults.
McCreevy had asked the industry to commit by the end of 2008 to central clearing of CDS but a tentative deal collapsed and he then said legislation would be needed to make clearing compulsory.
ISDA said nine leading dealer firms have committed to using a central counterparty clearing for CDS in the EU.
“This commitment provides the basis for constructive dialogue with the European Commission, both on arrangements for central clearing and on related regulatory matters,” said Eraj Shirvani, ISDA chairman and head of fixed-income in Europe for Credit Suisse.
ISDA said the dealers who have signed up are Barclays Capital, Citigroup Global Markets, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank , Goldman Sachs, HSBC, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley and UBS .
McCreevy will meet with industry every three to four weeks to ensure the commitments are carried out but no particular operator is favoured, his spokesman said.
Legislation is still an option if there is no progress.
“Who is going to do this, who wants to offer this service? That is a decision for those who want to offer this kind of service,” McCreevy’s spokesman told a news briefing.
POWER BATTLES
The push for clearing has highlighted divides across the Atlantic, between Britain and the euro zone and between banks and exchanges.
The global market is roughly divided into dollar and euro denominated credit derivatives which are contracts bilaterally agreed among banks and dealers.
Some banks would like to clear all their global trades in one place but the EU fears this will be a U.S.-based operator.
France called on the European Central Bank (ECB) to lend its weight to McCreevy’s efforts to ensure an EU-based clearer is set up and the ECB is holding regular meetings with industry.
The British Bankers Association warned in a letter to McCreevy on Thursday that forcing industry to clear on a euro zone platform “could be both construed as anti-competitive and drive business away from the EU. It would also impact on firms’ ability to manage their global risk book.”
Deutsche Boerse’s Eurex Clearing and Anglo-French clearing house LCH.Clearnet have both announced they will launch a CDS clearing service. Eurex said it will be technically ready this quarter.
The IntercontinentalExchange, which is setting up a CDS clearer in the United States, announced on Thursday it would offer the same service in Europe during the first quarter.
Some banks are reportedly backing a bid by broker-dealer ICAP to acquire LCH.Clearnet so they can keep fees low and avoid using an exchange-owned clearer.
ISDA said it was working on the introduction of a standard coupon or interest payment for CDS and “hard wiring” of the auction settlement process in order to clear trades. (Reporting by Huw Jones; Editing by Sharon Lindores and Erica Billingham)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/feedarticle/8365358

***

My note -

“Take this mess out the hands of the same old, same old banking system inanities and put it under the rigors of actual accrual purview by the anti-trust division – and things will get different. Then, real solutions can make a difference that include sensible and prudent conversions from what we have now to what we need for the future of a stable and prosperous national future.” – cricketdiane, 02-23-09

***

[ ON A Different Note - ]

*** These jackasses are getting ready for a field war with the real people that are the citizens of their nation – and probably so are ours.

This is really a sad testament to the inability of our governments and police to utilize the public resources in a positive and productive way.

A bit it looks like, getting to use all their toys and tactics on a public crowd in order to consummate their authority is the sum total of their ability to perceive of positive and productive public good.

Obviously – that is not good, not positive, not productive and in fact, is tragic. As if the citizens of the UK, the US and about everywhere else haven’t lost enough and been subjected to enough already –

now we’ve got the police and national guard and who all else, militarily getting themselves stirred up to shoot us, taze us, beat us, pepper spray us, arrest us, spray us with whatever nasty or hurtful whatever.

And, then all that public energy – on the part of police and on the part of the regular citizens will be completely wasted to absolutely no good, no solutions and no improvement of anyone’s lives whatsoever.

- cricketdiane, 02-24-09

**

Britain faces summer of rage – police

Middle-class anger at economic crisis could erupt into violence on streets

* Paul Lewis
* The Guardian, Monday 23 February 2009
* Article history

Protestors clash with mounted riot police outside the Israeli embassy in London

Protesters clash with police in London in January over Israel’s action in Gaza. Such scenes could become more common sights in the UK. Photograph: Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images

Police are preparing for a “summer of rage” as victims of the economic downturn take to the streets to demonstrate against financial institutions, the Guardian has learned.

Britain’s most senior police officer with responsibility for public order raised the spectre of a return of the riots of the 1980s, with people who have lost their jobs, homes or savings becoming “footsoldiers” in a wave of potentially violent mass protests.

Superintendent David Hartshorn, who heads the Metropolitan police’s public order branch, told the Guardian that middle-class individuals who would never have considered joining demonstrations may now seek to vent their anger through protests this year.

He said that banks, particularly those that still pay large bonuses despite receiving billions in taxpayer money, had become “viable targets”. So too had the headquarters of multinational companies and other financial institutions in the City which are being blamed for the financial crisis.

Hartshorn, who receives regular intelligence briefings on potential causes of civil unrest, said the mood at some demonstrations had changed recently, with activists increasingly “intent on coming on to the streets to create public disorder”.

The warning comes in the wake of often violent protests against the handling of the economy across Europe. In recent weeks Greek farmers have blocked roads over falling agricultural prices, a million workers in France joined demonstrations to demand greater protection for jobs and wages and Icelandic demonstrators have clashed with police in Reykjavik.

In the UK hundreds of oil refinery workers mounted wildcat strikes last month over the use of foreign workers.

Intelligence reports suggest that “known activists” are also returning to the streets, and police claim they will foment unrest. “Those people would be good at motivating people, but they haven’t had the ‘footsoldiers’ to actually carry out [protests],” Hartshorn said. “Obviously the downturn in the economy, unemployment, repossessions, changes that. Suddenly there is the opportunity for people to mass protest.

“It means that where we would possibly look at certain events and say, ‘yes there’ll be a lot of people there, there’ll be a lot of banner waving, but generally it will be peaceful’, [now] we have to make sure these elements don’t come out and hijack that event and turn that into disorder.”

Hartshorn identified April’s G20 meeting of the group of leading and developing nations in London as an event that could kick-start a challenging summer. “We’ve got G20 coming and I think that is being advertised on some of the sites as the highlight of what they see as a ‘summer of rage’,” he said.

His comments are likely to be met with disappointment by protest groups, who in recent weeks have complained that police are adopting a more confrontational approach at demonstrations. Officers have been accused of exaggerating the threat posed by activists to justify the use of resources spent on them.

Police were said to have been heavy-handed at Greek solidarity marches in London in December and, last month, at protests against Israel’s invasion of Gaza. In August 1,000 officers, helicopters and riot horses were drafted to Kent from 26 UK police forces to oversee the climate camp demonstration against the Kingsnorth power station. The massive operation to monitor the protesters cost £5.9m and resulted in 100 arrests. But in December the government was forced to apologise to parliament after the Guardian revealed that its claims that 70 officers had been hurt in violent clashes were wrong.

However, Hartshorn insisted: “Potentially there will be more industrial actions … History shows that some of those disputes – Wapping, the miners’ strike – have caused great tensions in the community and the police have had difficult times policing and maintaining law and order.”

Both “extreme rightwing and extreme leftwing” elements are looking to “use the fact that people are out of jobs” to galvanise support, he said.

A particularly worrying development was the re-emergence of individuals involved in the violent fascist organisation Combat 18, he said. “They are using the fact that there’s been lots of talk about eastern European people coming in and taking jobs on the Olympic sites,” he said. “They’re using those type of arguments to look at getting support.”

Hartshorn said he also expected large-scale demonstrations this year on environmental issues, with hardcore green activists “joining forces” with middle-class campaigners over issues such as airport expansion at Heathrow and Stansted. With the prospect of angry demonstrations against the economy, that could open the door to powerful coalitions.

“All you’ve got to do then is link in with the environmentalists, and look at the oil companies. They’re seen to be turning over billions of pounds profit in issues that are seen to be against the environment.”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/feb/23/police-civil-unrest-recession

***

Stop, armed police! Put down your MP3 player

* Rosalind Ryan
* guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 13 February 2008 16.20 GMT
* Article history

Armed police UK

Photograph: Dan Chung

Armed police arrested a man listening to his MP3 player and took a sample of his DNA after a fellow commuter mistook the music player for a gun.

Darren Nixon had been waiting at a bus stop in Stoke-on-Trent on his way home from work when a woman saw him reach into his pocket and take out a black Phillips MP3 player. The woman thought it was a pistol and called 999.

Police tracked 28-year-old Nixon using CCTV, sending three cars to follow him. When he got off the bus, armed officers surrounded him. He was driven to a police station, kept in a cell and had his fingerprints, photograph and DNA taken.

He was freed when Staffordshire police realised it was a false alarm – but will now have his DNA stored on a national database for life with a record that he was arrested on suspicion of a firearms offence.

“It was unreal,” he told the Metro newspaper. “I had a completely clean record before this, and have always been a law-abiding citizen.”

Nixon, a mechanic, said that as he got off the bus and started to walk home on January 26, he saw a policeman gesture but could not hear what he said.

“I turned the music off and they were telling me to put my hands up in the air,” he added.

“My heart was racing a mile a minute. One of them was hiding behind a car door, looking down his sights at me, and the other was shouting orders and pointing a gun at me.

“It was a pretty scary experience. I had no idea what was going on.”

Nixon has received an apology from Staffordshire police.

“‘We received a report from a member of the public who had seen a man appear to pull a hand gun from a jacket pocket, grip it with both hands and aim it,” a Staffordshire police spokesman said.

“An operation was put in place and a man matching the description was detained.”

He said the description was “extremely good”, enabling officers to act quickly.

The Liberal Democrats, who are campaigning to have the DNA records of innocent people destroyed, said the national DNA database now held more than 3m records kept for life, an estimated 125,000 of which belong to people who were neither cautioned or charged.

“There is no reason that [Nixon] is on the government’s database other than he was in the wrong place in the wrong time, and that could happen to all of us,” Lynne Featherstone, the party’s spokesperson for youth and equalities, said.

“The use of DNA is vital to modern policing, but not letting people remove their DNA when it is has been proved they have done absolutely nothing wrong would seem more at home in a fascist state than a free and fair society.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/feb/13/ukguns.police

***

Armed police in gang warning to five year olds

* Helen Carter
* The Guardian, Tuesday 6 March 2007
* Article history

Armed officers in full bullet-proof armour have been speaking to school children aged between five and seven in special assemblies to warn them against becoming involved in gangs and gun crime.

Officers in Merseyside have routinely gone into secondary schools, but now they fear that most gang members have already been recruited by their early to mid teens. By going into primary schools, backed by headteachers and the local education authority, they hope to prevent very young children from joining gangs.

PC Neil Thomas, of the force’s Matrix team which is running the sessions, said: “By the time children get to secondary school, we are probably a bit late to start teaching them about gangs and gun crime. So we decided to speak to five to seven-year-olds and teach them that picking up a gun or becoming involved in gangs is a slippery slope that could end them up being killed. We put on role play in the language they understand and get our message across.”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/mar/06/ukguns.helencarter

***

Who leaked the rumor that our banks would be nationalized and then who decided that those rumored comments constituted facts worthy of constant news coverage for the last four days?

“I have never seen so much time filled with so much sorrow for so many in the US and around the World.” – cricketdiane

I watched show after show over the past four days parade experts that they asked, “What will happen if they nationalize our banks? Will they nationalize our banks? There’s talks of them nationalizing our banks, how will that work? What do you think of them nationalizing the banks?”

News hour after news hour has been filled with it on every station, from every team of “reporters” and anchors, every cable news hour and asked of nearly every “expert” available to speak about anything.

Then last night, I really tried to listen for where this had started – but it was like, “a source near a person who heard it for certain,” kind of thing. And in the middle of the night, while markets around the world were making decisions about their investments, even bloomberg had a remark on the ticker that said, “Obama’s nationalization of the banks, whatever, whatever, whatever.”

From what I can tell without running all over the internet to find it, Chris Dodd had made a (one more stupid) comment late last week about the US having to nationalize the banks however undesirable that may be. And, the Obama administration had published a statement that banks would remain private – nationalization would not be considered an option, (which may or may not be true after all is said and done.)

Apparently, according to one news story played once across the last four days, the Wall Street Journal had pushed the story which was loosely based on something someone had said who was “close to the situation.” Then, early this morning, there was a story about Pandit of the Citigroup requesting the Fed convert their preferred shares bought as part of the TARP bailout, into common shares. And, in that story there was a quick explanation that Geithner was meeting with them to consider that action – (also maybe.)

What surprised me most of all has been the propensity of news producers and staff teams to report a story based on what is essentially “water-cooler” talk as if it is based on facts, the willingness of so many shows to carry it as if it is based on facts and the quick push to consume the airwaves with the “see what Obama and the Democrats are doing – they are going to nationalize the banks” opinion mongering.

There are several problems with this – the first of which is that I resent news organizations using the news broadcast opportunity to manipulate public sentiment on something that isn’t based on facts or reality. Second, it is inherently wrong to convey “news” stories that are not based on facts but rather on something someone said who might know something about it close to the source who might be making a decision on it sometime soon, maybe.

And, third  – more than anything else – how do they call themselves news organizations when the basic facts of the situation are being denied? The banks are the ones that put themselves at serious risk and they put ( not their money ), but ours at risk – both in our deposits and investments with them, and our hundreds of billions of tax dollars used to bailout their insolvency and lack of liquidity – lack of capital to back their leveraged obligations, their choices.

The Republicans and Democrats have certainly contributed to this mess over the years through the unwillingness of Congress to act on necessary regulations and to demand the enforcement of existing regulations.

Both parties have made their own significant contributions to allow these failed policies to exist that were feeding money to banks and investment banks for their continued operations through grants and other subsidies while allowing them to do any damn thing they wanted without hindrance nor concern for the public good.

Now, the facts are these – the nationalization of our banks (in particular, the large mega-conglomerates that are virtually insolvent) is a moot point. The actual “back-door nationalization” being discussed on news shows happened last fall when TARP moneys were used in the manner they were used. That isn’t news and isn’t today.

These banks haven’t been operating in a truly capitalist free market structure for most of the past thirty years, anyway. If they had not been given access to piles of free government money through grants and subsidies and other incentives over the course of that time, they wouldn’t have survived with a real bottom line profitability in a basic capitalist model.

These mega bank conglomerates aren’t profitable in a very basic sense because of the ways in which they have used their (our) assets to generate profits in what amounts to a shell game or Ponzi type scheme. Their leverage has been imprudent to a ratio of 40:1 and some investment / financial institutions have been leveraged up to 73:1. That is not banking – that is organized crime.

Those are the facts. What is also a fact is this – our government needs to submit these banking organizations to the process that determines anti-trust violations, oligopoly, monopoly and those rigors which are already in place and used commonly when organizations request to merge – will show the truth of the situation. They are qualified, the systems are already in place and they know what they are doing when analyzing assets and leverage / asset classes and the capital backup that should be in place for each.

Take this mess out the hands of the same old, same old banking system inanities and put it under the rigors of actual accrual purview by the anti-trust division – and things will get different. Then, real solutions can make a difference that include sensible and prudent conversions from what we have now to what we need for the future of a stable and prosperous national future.

The other thing I noticed that should have been covered by the news is that last week there were US assets being dropped into the market by China – they were selling them and then when Clinton asked about their continuing to buy our bonds, they said something about the decision being based on the liquidity of the assets they already have. This should have been given a big place on the news with an explanation of what these things mean. But now, here we are.

- cricketdiane. 02-23-09