Shade Tree Wisdom of Politics – Cricket Diane C “Sparky” Phillips – 2008

The Shade Tree Wisdom of Politics -
by Cricket Diane C “Sparky” Phillips, 2008

* A good politician is somebody that can make you believe what you didn’t wanna hear in the first place.

* The best place to stay in politics is out of it but the next best place is out of the firing zone.

* A difference of opinion is like that old pair of boots you use to put the manure out in the garden. No point ruining your good ones just to have ‘em stink from stepping in it.

* There may be tons of good ideas in politics but leave it to the politicians to only get the worst ones done, if any at all.

* The treasury is a place where politicians use the “can’t eat just one” rule. In Latin, that’s “eat-amus maximus.”

* Its not a disorder to be a politician but you can’t tell that by listening to them.

* How could you trust the judgment of a politician? It’s a contradiction of terms.

* If you can see the difference between the candidates offered by both parties – you have been listening to them too long.

* Is it possible to tell the difference between a donkey’s ass, an elephant’s ass, as horse’s ass and a jackass? Have you been up in Congress lately?

* A bad marriage is like getting a bad politician but easier to get shed of.

* When two politicians are in the same room, they will always have three ideas between them – none of which will do what they say they will do.

* In order to have politics, it takes a special meeting of several ingredients including the ability to be disagreeable without letting on that you think the other person’s an ass.

* Politicians without money are like you and me – not in politics.

* It takes more than most people would give to be a politician and more than most people would steal to stay one.

* Political compromise is a fancy way of saying that nobody gets what they want but they’re going to spend more than enough money for everybody to have had what they wanted.

* Good in terms of politics is a matter of reference. It depends on who is talking and whether they’re in earshot of anybody.

In answer to what I heard on CNN Headline News Cable Show, “The Glenn Beck Show” during this week.)

To those who believe the poor are at fault for destroying America -

You reckon that poor women like me that have no job, no income and have a bunch of children I can’t afford is what messes up our country?

Wow, I don’t have as much to live on in an entire year as Washington pays to buy one chair in one office of any Senator and you figure that I’m the one causing America to fail?

It sickens me to see executive after executive that has driven their companies into the ground who are allowed to walk off with tens of millions of dollars for not doing the job they were hired to do. The billions of dollars being paid to these people while their companies are failing isn’t being listed as the cause of the problem – no, you figure it is the poor people causing it.

The US government took all of one day to bail out Bear Stearns whose idea of accounting wouldn’t have been tolerated in any smaller business and whose risky decision-making, shoddy maneuvering and poor use of their resources cost their own demise.

But, listen to the reasons given for not bailing out individual homeowners and apply these to Bear Stearns and other big financial institutions engaged in high powered gambling and illegal accounting practices. Why is it acceptable to bail out billionaires, millionaires and big corporate entities whose profits should be providing their safety net?

And every few days, I watch the Feds “float” hundreds of millions of dollars to these large corporations and financial institutions to buy them time to adjust their accounts for the mess they created by pretending the losses they had didn’t exist and that the values of what assets they had were greater than reality could support.

These corporate and financial entities engaged in risky and criminally negligent business practices in order to conceal the truth from investors, government regulators and the general public. The use of these fraudulent accounting practices has today and in the future removed opportunities for everyone and is costing each of us. It is our money that is bailing them out.

All the while, these companies’ executives are personally walking away with hundreds of millions of dollars for themselves and their friends. They have intentionally manipulated their investment positions, monopolized their markets, heavily lobbied legislators and regulators to turn a blind eye to their actions and driven their formerly profitable companies into the ground costing hundreds of thousands of jobs and opportunities to be lost.

For some reason, you and others are not placing blame on these individuals directly responsible to the world for creating this mess but instead cussing the audacity of poor people for creating it. And, for some reason, these upper class decision-makers are being given the protection and status of royalty within a democratic society founded upon equality while taking none of the responsibility for their actions.

If the government had to put back the money they’ve stolen and re-routed from the social security system and stop hijacking its funds to pay for other things that don’t belong to it – the system would be solvent for many generations to come. It was not the people of the United States that decided to steal from the social security system funds – it has been legislators, government officers, accountants and administrative decision-makers who have done it. They’ve hijacked the funds to pay for other things and should be required to put those funds back where they belong.

If the small business administration supported small businesses once again, rather than loans to support financial institutions and giving out grant monies to city, county and state governments, it would do the job it was created to do. The changes that have been made in policy and practice over the last fifteen – twenty years, has caused the small business administration to be no more than a clearing house of funding for large institutions and government operations at various levels.

With the number of regulations required exclusively of small and start up businesses by the government in the United States, it is remarkable that anything gets done. But any time there are any regulations for the safety and well-being of the public required of larger companies, the government steps in and undermines the regulating agency, its funding, its authority or negates the legislation that founded it. How is that the fault of the poor people suffering America’s double standard?

How do you figure that any of these factors are not the culprits in America’s financial and economic instability? Why can a few hold tens of billions of dollars in futures positions without accountability for having manipulated commodities and oil / energy futures prices? Why is that accepted in practice along with leveraging against money that doesn’t exist to buy more of some future commodities than could possibly exist in reality? Why isn’t that system of gambling and unsecured risk taking illegal when it directly caused the Great Depression and Stock Market Crash of earlier days in America and other places?

Why is it okay for every House of Representatives member, Senator, agency, department head and government administrator to have a staff in excess of 30 individuals making over $50,000 a year each without successfully achieving anything worthwhile for the people of America? How can it possibly take over 22 million people to run our government and why continue paying them even when the infrastructure they’re paid to protect is crumbling and the job is not getting done?

And, you think I’m the reason America is failing, the economy is unstable, the government is past bankrupt and our position in the world is degrading rapidly? You figure that is caused by me and every other woman and her children like me living in a fourth class, third world America?

It wouldn’t be that the Democrats and Republicans both, failed to protect our freedoms and rights and opportunity while forcing us to endure their use of us to make money and insure their own paychecks? It may be that the greater culprits here are not on the bottom rungs of the ladder but isn’t it easier to blame those denied a voice and kept out of the game entirely?

Why would anyone turn to the poor and the “disenfranchised” and say, “you’re the ones to blame for all this?” I and others like me have been denied any voice in the matter at all. Who has been making the decisions and how much are they being paid?

Why do Senators deserve a parking deck at over $78 per square foot to build while any person in America is homeless? Why is that considered appropriate uses of our money along with very expensive decorations for their offices, paid “field trips” to vacation spot seminars and conventions, obscenely overstaffed offices and departments and exaggerated paychecks while any person in America is without opportunity or is going hungry?

Why should it cost $200,000 – $250,000 to create / or to start up a business in America simply to provide assured income for banks and government regulators in states and counties? How is it that you don’t think this is creating and contributing to many economic problems and eroding the foundations of our country?

Why is it that knowing these things and others you would turn to the poor and blame them? Do you not understand that our markets are not supported by the two percent at the top of our caste system in America, but rather by the participation and purchases by well over 98% of the rest of the population?

Is it not clear that our government and its big corporate friends they support have engaged intentionally in severe social stratification measures to take large segments of the population “out of the game,” thinking it would secure higher profits and limit competition for their own benefit?

Isn’t it possible that since there are no realized consequences to them personally for these tactics, little will be changed now or in the immediate future? Why aren’t all these and similar known-factors placed squarely to blame for the mess they’ve directly created and perpetrated to the detriment of us all?

They’ve created a prison system for profit that only does well if they continue to herd people in for even the smallest offense. They’ve manufactured a system of “justice” that is no justice at all and supports the careers of district attorneys, judges and politicians rather than what is right and just. They’ve created a health system that only secures its profits by making people sick and keeping them in ill health to keep pharmaceutical companies and medical industry companies healthy at the expense of everyone.

They’ve manufactured prison camps for the disabled and disenfranchised that profit only by heavy traffic and abusive use of pharmaceuticals in the name of behavior modification. These drugs wouldn’t even be used in tranquilizer guns against enemy combatants during war in the name of humane treatment of combatants and the Geneva Convention guidelines.

Police routinely round up women and disabled individuals to fill these locked behavior modification based mental health systems and deny even the most basic rights to them that are assured to every American. There is no due process, no recourse, and typically abusive policies are used throughout these agencies and their systems.

They’ve made a family and children services that profits by taking children using gestapo tactics and forcing those taken through profit-driven social services programs. Their funding is critically  supported by forced administration of pharmaceuticals whether they are needed, or beneficial, or appropriate, or not.

They’ve forced viable livelihoods and opportunities for livelihoods to be denied to many while securing opportunities for themselves exclusively. These despots in this, making decisions that destroy people’s lives aren’t sitting in Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia or Armenia – not from the old Soviet Union or Cuba or North Korea – but in America and somehow, since they are in America doing it, that makes it okay, especially if its profit-driven – no matter what the results to individuals suffering from it and being subjected to it.

They’ve managed to create hospitals that few can survive with any opportunities to a healthy life thereafter while using a billing prowess would make anyone’s head spin. These unconscionable places hurt more than they help on a regular basis but nothing is ever done to hold them accountable nor to correct the travesties they are commonly found to have caused.

The women that are not paid enough to support themselves and their children nor allowed to create a business to support themselves are such a huge portion of the US population that it is surprising that they are dismissed so easily. But then, haven’t businesses, states and US Congressional members done everything possible to disenfranchise these women and deny them resources to participate in the free market economy on equal footing?

The police and armies of law enforcement personnel engage in brutality against people in every state, county and city in the United States as a common practice. This is true across America whether a person has committed an egregious crime or simply made a minor offense or none at all and is being hauled off for feeling agitated. There is a huge status given for beating a suspect down, among the opinions in the police agencies and among fellow officers. In the United States, flagrant cruelty, brutality and viciousness by police against citizens is glamorized, accepted and encouraged.

No other country in the world could get away with that kind of police force abuses of power and brutality without the United States and the United Nations holding the country’s leadership accountable for it. But, when the police in America are driving a woman’s face into the ground while digging their knee into her liver, or when videotape surfaces of another brutal beating by police of a handcuffed suspect, it makes no difference to anybody.

In statistics that are reported and those not reported, the most likely cause of death for a woman and her children comes not from strangers, thieves, disease or car accidents but rather from her family members, spouses, male friends she is dating or the father of her children. The real chance of any woman being safe in any of these relationships in America is extremely slim based on the overwhelming evidence and even the most conservative statistics.

The chance of a woman or female child being critically injured or permanently disabled from rape, domestic violence and abuse in America has surpassed every other nation except Saudi Arabia and Taliban controlled factions.

But, these American women are supposed to get up and in some way compete for opportunities to take care of herself and her children. That it is commonplace for those opportunities to be slighted to her, denied to her and that the government and business systems that seek to profit from her difficulties will further abuse and victimize her are facts. Then to turn and place blame on these women for all the troubles and difficulties of America? You’ve got to be either blind or engaging in pathetic jest at the expense of reality.

What is the problem with placing the blame squarely where it belongs? Are you and those who agree with you afraid something would have to change knowing there’s a problem these institutions, programs, businesses and government administrators can be held accountable to solve? Would that be bad?

If those who created the problems were to have to fix them and change what they’ve made into something that will work better, how is that so undesirable? Do you think everything would unravel unless the poor are treated as the scapegoats?

The criminal and unjustifiable practices that have been in use by businesses, lobbyists, government officials, churches, political parties, financial institutions, wealthy executives, hedge fund managers, brokers, “experts”, large investors, corporate decision-makers, industries and state sovereignties have done their damage already. They are guilty of directly and indirectly undermining our economic foundations, of creating a caste system in America and dissolving the tenets of freedom, human rights and equality guaranteed in our Constitution. Why shouldn’t they be held accountable and be required to fix it?

We have global warming because our businesses didn’t want to put a $2,000 filter on their smokestacks or stop dumping industrial sludge into streams, rivers and oceans. We have glaciers melting because they didn’t want to produce any vehicles that would run on something else besides petroleum products.

And, we’ve done little to change it in the last forty years when it was known to be creating severe impacts because all the resources were poured into propaganda to discredit the facts about any of it. Where did they think they would be able to live with clean air after polluting it around the world with nuclear fallout, industrial waste and vehicle emissions?

Do they really not know the consequences that were and are inevitable from what they’ve done in the manner and the cost to society of the way they’ve done it? Have they not studied history at all?

At what point do you think they will recognize their part in creating these problems and do anything to change it? Never? As long as their comfort is assured and the blame does not rest with them, why should anything be any different until the game unravels and everyone knows what has happened?

Do you genuinely believe that I, as a poor and a disenfranchised fourth class “untouchable” living in third world America on $6,000 a year from the government, have managed to bring down our entire economy? After I’ve been beaten in my own home by husbands, roommates and “boyfriends” and nearly killed by them, had my children taken off by family services to homes where they were abused as I watched helplessly and after being forced to endure chemical lobotomy that left me unable to function or to walk in the sun or to accomplish anything, you are placing me to blame for America’s troubles?

After I’ve endured “experts” that weren’t qualified to know what reality is like in America for any woman, diagnose my real-life experiences as a delusional reality without ever attempting to verify the truth of it, and suffered the fruitlessness of working to get my children back and support them, and after being subjected to abject poverty, lack of opportunity and miserable circumstances, you say to the world that I am causing our government to bankrupt?

And then, because only the knowledge, skills, talents, experiences, opinions, ideas and inventions of those who are successfully making money are considered valid, my skills and abilities are kept out of the marketplace, which means that in thirty years, I haven’t been allowed to make a living with what I know how to do. And try as I might, there will apparently never come a day in which I can make a living from it in the United States, either.

But, somehow I am to blame for the economic disaster taking place in my nation. Is that what your intelligent use of resources has figured out? And, what? – you figure that if I weren’t here that somehow it would all be just fine?

Where were you when I was doing the jobs you wouldn’t do despite my poverty, personal despair and hardships? Were you helping anybody or busying yourself with self-flattery for identifying those like me as the crux of all our nation’s problems?

Unlike you, there is no reason for anyone to pay me for the work I do or that I can do – I’m a woman and certified by “professionals” to be delusional. Well, it isn’t a delusion that tells me how the therapy available doesn’t fix poverty nor heal the wounds of having the man married to me beating me within a breath of dying. And there is no delusion nor illusion in the grief and pain that will always be with me because my children and my home and my freedom was taken away from me when we didn’t deserve to have that happen to us.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that the “system” only exists to serve its own survival at the expense of those being subjected to it. And, the fact is, there is not one single thing I can do to change any of the choices being made by the people running the show for their own profit.

The lies of our government leaders are so commonplace it is expected. The lies of the “expert analysts” of any arena are obvious, yet supported as if a good argument simply means rhetoric and a valid opinion position. And yet, major decisions with far-reaching impacts are being made based on these lies. No one I know would get away with that, but it is such a common practice in business, in government, in economic and statistical analysis and other arenas like American law, that when true facts become evident, there is no place for them.

Then, once those facts no longer can be denied or “reframed” by experts and decision-makers, there are new lies created to sidestep any responsibility and to prevent being required to make any changes in the “business as usual” status quo.

There is only one crime in America that is considered no crime at all and that is the ones committed against a woman. The only employee that is required to do three times the work to get less than one half the pay or no pay at all is the employee that is a woman. The only value a woman has to American business and particularly to business men (of a non-sexual nature) is as the decision-maker of which toilet paper to buy. The chances of any American woman getting beaten to death in her own home by a significant and trusted male she knows is greater than one in four every moment of every day across America.

There is over $60,000 a year on paperwork alone being spent on each homeless, poor, disabled, disenfranchised, and elderly to be tracked, identified and analyzed. With that much money outright given to them, not one of them would be living in poverty or homeless, now would they?

Grants, subsidized research, tax breaks and outright subsidies of billions of dollars are being paid  by taxpayers for every large industry in America, while these companies’ profits which should be used for these things in order to sustain their growth and opportunities are being used like free money to enrich their own lifestyles. But no one looks at them and says they are stealing from America and causing government budget deficits.

Why should the American people be paying them to do business while they refuse to reinvest a portion of their profits into research and development or future sustainability? Why are corporations being allowed to gouge the public on monopolized fuel and other necessary resources to keep their profits at 300% when the raw products have been solely owned and subsidized by the American people?

How is it that you don’t think artificially propping up profits and refusing to honestly value assets, profits and real losses would be responsible for undermining the economy and stability of the US, (and in turn, negatively impacting the global economy)?

What kind of thinking supports the ideas you are espousing that if the poor would stop being poor then all this would straighten itself out and our government, our businesses and our nation would be strong, stable and comfortable for everyone? How does that make sense to you and to your listeners?

Written by Cricket Diane C “Sparky” Phillips, 08-24-08
(In answer to what I heard on CNN Headline News Cable Show, “The Glenn Beck Show” during this week.)

Who are the “they” in this writing – well, if you are making over $6,000 a year, work for the government or think poor people are causing the problem – go look in the mirror, because you have helped create this problem and are among the “they” it describes. And you can fix this.

The truth about Georgia from 2004 report – Cricket Diane C “Sparky” Phillips – 2008

http://www.unomig.org/data/file/101/040420.pdf

There is a lot of good and reliable info found on this report about Georgia and Russia.

It is listed on Google results – in this way:

PDF]

S Security Council

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – View as HTML
to address the Security Council. During the first visit of President Saakashvili to. Moscow on 10 and 11 February 2004, he and the President of the Russian
www.unomig.org/data/file/101/040420.pdf – Similar pagesNote this
by U NationsAll 789 versions

The obama / mccain question –

Who would you choose for President if both Obama and McCain were white or if both of them were black? Then, which one would you want for President? Because, if the color of skin doesn’t matter, then it is the same determining factors to use in making the choice. Do you want a lawyer or a soldier as President?

Or would a better choice be found outside the two parties solely responsible for having mucked it up this bad? If either party had been willing or able to make things better, they certainly could have done it by now . . .

Written by Cricket Diane C “Sparky” Phillips, 08-20-08

Critical Questions for America – Cricket Diane C Phillips – 2008 –

What would help America right now?
leads to the question – “in what respect?”
And then to these questions?

–> What would stabilize the markets right now?

–> What could inspire people to work together?

–> What is valid when everyone disagrees?

–> How does our country regain international standing?

–> How do we balance the needs of people and the needs of business?

–> What could be done to balance the federal budget and state’s finances? For cities? And for counties?

–> How do we make our schools better to teach each student effectively at all ages?

–> What needs to happen for our communities to deal with their problems more effectively?

–> Why do our “experts” not have the tools, knowledge and understanding to effectively convey the accurate analysis of many current situations? What do they need to do it better, more accurately?

–>  How do we restore conscient and conscious awareness in our decision-makers and leaders?

–> What has to happen for understanding far-reaching implications in real world decisions and their immediate impacts to living populations?

–> How do we better manage our resources and the man-hours that support them?

–> How do we reduce administrative costs for services, especially in our government?

–> What can we do that we are not doing now?

–> Is there a way we can achieve energy independence? quickly?

–> Why is it that more is being spent on administrative costs than on the services being provided?

–> How do we get the citizens of America invested in America and in her succeeding? And in succeeding internationally?

–> What do we need to do to raise the standard of living in every city and territory of America? And – how do we raise the standard of living and opportunities for all individuals in America?

–> What can we do to promote small business and help it stabilize and grow / expand? How do we support growth and stability both individually and across the board for all small and medium-sized businesses?

–> How do we know the difference between what should be allowed to fail and what must be rescued?

–> How do we help without nationalizing or socializing huge systems like health care and energy / fuels / electricity, etc.?

–> What could it be like if we were to do things differently and how do we project that to find out? What tools do we use for it?

–> What options do we have that we are not using in the U.S.? How do we bring those into place and activate them?

–> What cost to benefit ratios do we need to understand choices better?

–> What will restore the homeowners of America to stable home ownership, financing and to the greater opportunities for home ownership?

–> What does the word, “meritocracy” mean in application to business and government systems and how can it be measured accurately?

–> How do we play out the situation with Russia and other world players to America’s advantage now and in the future?

–> What can be done to know what will work and what results will come from it? from different choices available?

–> How do we fix the social security system in such a way that it will continue to finance itself and be solvent financially now and in the future?

–> How do we get an overview that accurately describes and explains what is happening and makes it easy to understand with accuracy along with options available?

–> What describes the thinking processes needed that are different than those being used now and how do we incorporate these into the way we are doing it?

–> How do we overcome legacy thinking which is driving so many of the choices being made?

–> What does it take to quickly “think on your feet” and understand what is really going on in any given situation such that we can use that ability effectively and learn to use it?

–> How does disordinant information fit together into a seamless accurate depiction of events and how do we know how it fits together?

–> What could be done to restore the oceans, the rivers, the land and air from its pollutants?

–> How would we finance changes and policies / services locally and to the Federal levels?

Written by Cricket Diane C Phillips, 08-19-08
Cricket House Studios, 2008, USA1
“Creating the Tangible from the Impossible.”

A matter of opinion – how to find out why in international affairs – Cricket Diane C Phillips – 2008

What would the world be if the world is the way Russia would have it?
What would the world be if the world is the way Iran would have it?
What would the world be if the world is the way Great Britain would have it?
What would the world be if the world is the way the United States would have it?

The real question is “what is at contest”?
Is it domination?
Or to be on equal footing? – and to have equal advantage? Or, greater advantage?
Is it to be the best, the greatest, the biggest or to have the most power in the contest?
Is it to control power, population, resources, viewpoints or beliefs?
What in the consensus of their population drives their position of power?

These are not qualified by superimposing our values and pathways of thought on theirs. These must be found by following their thinking constructs from the legacy of their society and history.

If there is a table with five seats that will determine the world’s future and three seats are filled by Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Iran, who will have the other two seats? How will it be determined?

What contest would occur for standing and using which tools of political power and persuasion?

The world is a big place. But is it a very small place to those who hold power? Is it never more than a day and a night away from having no power at all?

The most noticeable thing that I could see in my research about Russia since 2001, is that most “experts” are superimposing values, interpretations of methods, and meanings in general from their own backgrounds onto the current situations.

The past in the Soviet mindset may influence in some ways to overcome those days and in other ways to bring some parts of what worked at the time into today’s social structures. However, the days of the Soviet Union are not today and are only appropriately applied in limited ways to explain struggles of power and international maneuvering. Between there and here, a degree of difficulties have been experienced across the Russian landscape and new applications of science and engineering have catapulted the old world into a new one. The once dominant intellectual resources of the Soviet Union are a basis of pride and nationalism at its very core which are likely desirable for them to be restored now and in the future. How these are being used to restore position in the world arena and to garner agreement for social policies and politics within the Federation would be interesting to know. The hands that wield the power cannot do so with the great assuredness it once had when Moscow held easily manipulated populations.

It is power at its core that manages to harness those who would use it to insure their continued success and security. That is true regardless of the nation or its leaders in whom power has been entrusted. To understand their goals, empathic understanding of this vision of power must exist from the viewpoint being used by those who can accomplish it.

Written by Cricket Diane C Phillips, USA, 08-17-08

Georgia conflict with Russia – my opinion from researching info – Cricketdiane – 2008

My opinions about Russia / Georgia conflict – 2008 -
Cricket Diane C Phillips, 08-13-08

From what I could understand, the Russians are securing mining interests that exist in those mountains and along the port side of the area. N & S Ossetia wanted to join into its own nation. However, there are mining companies that may be instigating much of that push to serve their own interests.

Apparently, during the Soviet years of the USSR, the minerals and elements found in these mountains were deemed valuable only if they fell into very limited categories. Now, since so much is known of values involved with a greater number of the ores, minerals, elements and chemicals available to be mined there, it changes the asset value of the area. New techniques in geophysics, geology and mining as well as new uses of these elements around the world, have made this area critical to provision and re-valued this asset area.

The French have a mining concern in N Ossetia – the Sadon mine and other Mediterranean consortiums are in the area who desire autonomy for Ossetia to benefit the processes and profits of removal for their own opportunities to prosper. There are now as always, certain ethnic divisions that are being played to get what they want both by the population’s leadership and by these businesses.

The West thinks it is all about oil and that everything revolves around oil and the oil pipeline. Oil is nothing compared to what is in those mountains, it touches every industry we have today and for the future.

While the uranium mine there is one listed as tapped out, at the time it was closed little was known about the value of other geologically occurring specimens that go along with uranium naturally being available in the same place. I happened upon a rock hounding site with samples that were taken from these areas and it is possible and indeed probable, that Europeans and others with business interests there know what these mean to profitability.

It is also clear that a local business man had attempted sale of enriched uranium along this border and that Georgia had accused Russia of sending spies into their country thereafter which is likely true. It looks as though Russia had good reason to be concerned since a certain amount of recovery involved with enriched uranium, nuclear contaminants, radioactive raw ores, industrial chemicals and specific equipment for rendering plutonium had been thwarted when nuclear assets were decommissioned in the area, (in Georgia and Ossetia). These apparently have been turning up from time to time in the black market and along the trail to certain places as evidenced by scattered news stories at different recent times.

Unfortunately, the separatists of Georgia were impassioned probably by old feuds and incited by business interests of the mining companies but uncontrollable. It looks like it became fairly unmanageable about two weeks ago real time and the Georgian government and the Russians decided to do something to secure the area.

That’s just what it looks like to me from my internet research and info searches about specifics and unless either of these nations show indications about the true threats and influences that were being made in the separatist camp about their intentions – we’ll never know. I’m sure they (the separatists) did not take the opportunity to seize territory without some tools to hold it. It is most likely that Russia knew of the threat ahead of time and were able to know fairly soon that Georgia had moved her military assets to place and that they had fired off the first shots. Russia intel had to be in place and their assets ready to intervene or they would never have gotten there in time – not this week or next.

The fact that the Georgian president is crying foul and insisting that the Russian move concerns putting down their democracy is no more than a ploy for sympathy to influence the people of Georgia and the West, in particular. If there had been the intention of doing that, Russian troops would’ve been sitting throughout Georgia within a week by simply rolling over the territory from one end to the other. They didn’t and each thrust has secured only the specific areas in question along with the resource assets that Georgia could use to mount an assault and put more lives in danger. It could be about Georgia’s freedom and sovereignty, but I don’t see it. They must keep the assets and resources within their country’s responsibility secured or someone else vested in it must do it. The Georgian president refused to negotiate with the separatists and did nothing to insure conflict resolution without violence, along with allowing critical assets, resources and ______ to be unsecured, unprotected and available to any who would do something with them as they would see fit.

The Russians would’ve been the ones accountable and certainly the ones blamed for not securing these assets to the detriment of the world community. They would’ve also lost assets upon which they are relying that are in the region along the border with Georgia, in Ossetia and within the Northern Caucasus mountains. There is also tourism in the area of the ski resort variety which would be impacted and makes available quick access to the world for any enriched uranium products being sold by the separatists to finance their cause.

It is a delicate balance for Georgia to keep the peace in its own area which they had assured the world community they could and would do. But they didn’t nor did they have the resources to do so. Nor did they consider it to be as important as the rest of the world community knows it to be. They sit on the border with Turkey and old trade routes die hard. There is a pathway that exists from Turkey through Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria and Northern Egypt that has existed since before the Middle Ages and still exists today. It exists in the same family relationships that have handed it down through generations. The Georgian people do not sit off in an isolation to themselves. They never have and they certainly don’t today. The reasons that the Russians responded as they did and as quickly as they did is not because it doesn’t matter. It is because it does and they have generally more reasons than one for doing a thing before they are willing to act. They do not do it lightly or for some single intention of expansionism in the old sense of territory and accomplishment. There have to be significant and multiple reasons to justify the expense, the effort and the response including an impending jeopardy, among others.

And, in the world economy there is greater 3-dimensional expansion of assets and value than to take over land to occupy and have to manage. The resources of the Caucasus mountains are worth having, most of the rest of Georgia would be a difficult land grab to manage over time and to what critical advantage? The “Soviets” are not required to use any of the pipelines in the area in order to profit from delivery of their oil. Their options are broad for moving what they produce to international markets.

I also noticed that in my quick research about Georgia, there are regional differences of faith, belief systems, heritage and culture. These have existed for thousands of years however, they have been able to work along side one another, live near one another and conduct themselves side by side for centuries. The call of “ethnic cleansing” by both Georgia and Russia is unlikely to be the truth although having the choice, either side would’ve not minded who was in harms’ way and considered it a bonus if it included certain ethnic concentrations. There is a play for the world court’s sympathy and exoneration of their actions being promulgated here by both sides using this quantifier. It didn’t matter to them who was getting shot when Georgia decided to move on these areas. Nor did it make much difference to the Russians except that whoever stood in the way of securing the area and any of Georgia’s troops and military assets. If an army houses their troops in a children’s camp instead of their children, then gets targeted – it no longer is a human rights violation against children. It is a skirmish between armies, and that always gets women, children and others hurt in the process no matter where it happens.

Written by Cricket Diane C “Sparky” Phillips, 08-13-08, USA

A little more about Georgia and there are mining concerns there too –

Disagreements about real or perceived environmental threats, such as those related to the environmental conditions of the ‘frozen conflict’ zones, Metzamor nuclear power plant or the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan trans-regional pipeline further complicate the picture. On the positive side there are quite a few opportunities to foster cooperation between the countries in the environmental field. The ENVSEC assessment of environment and security linkages in the Southern Caucasus was completed and presented at the Ministerial meeting of EECCA countries in Tbilisi on October 22, 2004. ENVSEC has identified the frozen conflict zones in South Ossetia, Nagorno-Karabakh, and Abkhazia as areas where . . .

From:

http://www.envsec.org/southcauc/index.php

Some interesting mining info in Georgia – (Caucasus Mountains)

http://www.emed-mining.com/site/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=144&Itemid=44

Georgia used to possess one of the world’s richest manganese deposits in the Tchiatura and Sachkhere regions: present-day resources are estimated at about 200 million metric tons.

manganese, copper, zinc, copper, molybdenum, tungsten, coal, gold, chromium, nickel, and antimony (used in electronics, etc. as a by-product of gold mining) are mining interests in the area – Georgia / Russia throughout the Caucasus chain (- my note.)

–also uranium mining had been done there at one point – obviously there’s

Metzamor nuclear power plant

Georgia Conflict with Russia isn’t over a pipeline –

David Rockefeller Studies Program Contacts

For more information on the David Rockefeller Studies Program, contact:

Gary Samore
Vice President, Director of Studies, and Maurice R. Greenberg Chair
+1-212-434-9627
gsamore@cfr.org

Sebastian Mallaby
Director of the Maurice R. Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies, Deputy Director of Studies, and Paul A. Volcker Senior Fellow for International Economics
smallaby@cfr.org

Janine Hill
Deputy Director of Studies Administration
+1-212-434-9753
jhill@cfr.org
The Think Tank
The David Rockefeller Studies Program

The David Rockefeller Studies Program is the Council’s “think tank.” Its work is integral to achieving the Council’s goal of contributing to the foreign policy debate. Fellows in the Studies Program do this by researching, writing, and commenting on the most important challenges facing the United States and the world.

* Experts
* Projects

http://www.cfr.org/thinktank/

The Center for Preventive Action (CPA) was established by the Council on Foreign Relations in 1994 to help prevent, defuse, or resolve deadly conflicts around the world and to expand the body of knowledge on conflict prevention.

http://www.cfr.org/thinktank/cpa/index.html

Center for Preventive Action

For more information on the CPA, contact:

Paul Stares
General John W. Vessey Senior Fellow for Conflict Prevention
and Director, Center for Preventive Action
+1-202-518-3461
pstares@cfr.org

Jamie Ekern
Assistant Director
+1-202-518-3463
jekern@cfr.org

Alex Noyes
Research Associate
+1-212-434-9744
anoyes@cfr.org

http://www.cfr.org/publication/14705/global_uranium_supply_and_demand.html

Author:
Toni Johnson, Staff Writer

November 2, 2007

Security Concerns

The U.S. Energy Department analyst notes that attempts to obtain yellow-cake uranium, which is mined but not yet enriched, is not in itself a cause for security concerns and in many cases is “perfectly legitimate.” What is concerning is any attempts to obtain highly-enriched uranium, he said. Recent stories about sales of weapons-grade material have sparked concern off and on since the end of the Cold War, including an instance in the former Soviet republic of Georgia in January 2006.

http://www.nationmaster.com/country/gg-georgia/mil-military

WMD > Nuclear
Georgia is home to three nuclear research institutes. The Andronikashvili Institute of Physics in Tbilisi houses a nonoperational IRT-M research reactor. All fresh and spent fuel was transferred from the reactor facility to Scotland in April 1998 under a multinational effort known as Operation Auburn Endeavor. The High Energy Physics Institute in Tbilisi is not known to house fissile material. The Sukhumi I. Vekua Institute of Physics & Technology (SIPT) was relocated from Sukhumi to Tbilisi due to the Abkhazian conflict. There are reports that SIPT once housed isotope production reactors and/or 2kg of 90% enriched uranium, though the whereabouts of the HEU is not known. Georgia is party to both the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. In addition, on 6 June 2003, Georgia ratified an Additional Protocol to the NPT.

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/mil_wmd_ove-military-wmd-overview

Georgia – USSR legacy
Independent for three years (1918-1921) following the Russian revolution, Georgia was forcibly incorporated into the USSR until the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991. As part of its Soviet legacy, Georgia possesses a decommissioned nuclear reactor and three nuclear research institutes, as well as a number of military bases contaminated with radioactive waste. Nonproliferation issues concerning Georgia stem primarily from the area of export controls. Georgia does not possess or produce nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons, but the country’s industrial and medical sectors use components that could also be used in WMD systems.

SOURCES: IISS (International Institute for Strategic Studies). 2001. The Military Balance 2001-2002. Oxford: Oxford University Press; Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva, Switzerland, 1997. Data collected from the nations concerned, unless otherwise indicated. Acronyms: Amnesty International (AI); European Council of Conscripts Organizations (ECCO); Friends World Committee for Consultation (FWCC); International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (IHFHR); National Interreligious Service Board for Conscientious Objectors (NISBCO); Service, Peace and Justice in Latin America (SERPAJ); War Resisters International (WRI); World Council of Churches (WCC); SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute). 2005. SIPRI Arms Transfers. Database. February. Stockholm.; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE): A Review and Update of Key Treaty Elements (US Department of State: Washington, DC, Jan. 2002). Joint Consultative Group (JCG), Group on Treaty Operation and Implementation, JCG document JCG.TOI/22/03, 23 June 2003; US Department of Defense. The Brookings Institution Iraq Index, April 24, 2006.; CIA World Factbook, December 2003; CIA World Factbook, 14 June, 2007 ; World Development Indicators database; Bonn International Center for Conversion (BICC); The Nuclear Threat Initiative

listed on this site – http://www.nationmaster.com/country/gg-georgia/mil-military

Shade Tree Wisdom 2 – Cricket Diane C “Sparky” Phillips – 2008

Shade Tree Wisdom 2 – 2008 -
2008 Cricket Diane C “Sparky” Phillips

* if you watch the news, you’re just asking to be bothered by something you cain’t do nothin’ about.

* you can’t trust any military that’s got toys – sooner or later, they’ll find a place to use them.

* a duck pond is pretty for the women relations to look at but don’t never tell ‘em where you go duck huntin’ for Christmas dinner.

* good curtains are somethin’ that covers the windows so you can see the ballgame without a glare on the screen.

* never share a remote control with a woman – any woman, even your mama – they’s some things that just ain’t right.

* if you know anybody that knows how to make music – don’t invite ‘em over to your mama’s house unless you like the music they play ‘cause she’ll have you sitting there to listen to it for hours.

* never let on that you don’t know how to do something and don’t never ask anybody how to do anything ‘cause sooner or later, everybody in town’ll know it.

* don’t ever loan a gun to anybody ‘cause they’ll shoot something you wouldn’t.

* an old tire makes a good swing but its not the kind your mama meant when she said to put a swing up.

* anything that’s sitting long enough to get stuck to the ground and get water standing in it makes a good planter.

* if the kitchen table was meant to get cleaned off – stuff wouldn’t get put there.

* any woman that don’t know motor oil goes under the kitchen sink don’t need to be a married woman.

Written by Cricket Diane C Phillips, 08-10-08, USA